The Syndicate

DharmaHelper wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Theoretically, Xander could say "Cliff and Clint, target this player tonight".

But if Cliff is nightkilled, nobody would know he was dead, so this strategy might not be ideal. Imo, Xander would be better off choosing players he thinks should be nightkilled.

Long Con wrote:

Scotty wrote:LC, I don't think you're thinking through these strategies, and honestly I don't think you are on Xander's team.

I'm not sure why you felt the need to let us all know how honest you are being when you said that. Maybe you thought that if you had said "I don't think you're on Xander's team", we might not think you were being honest about it. So, good thing you clarified that with a totally necessary adverb.

Long Con wrote: As for thinking through these strategies, the problem you are having is a lack of vision. This can be done, and it can be well-coordinated and executed by Xander. We can make him invincible. Unlynchable, unkillable.

I took Llama's rule to mean in-thread stuff. If he wants to limit what Xander can say in the secret message, so be it. The Xtacles will know soon enough.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Scotty wrote:

thellama73 wrote:RULES
1. No illegal BTSC with anyone, ever. Seriously.
2. No editing or deleting of posts.
3. No on topic talk from dead players. Please use Dead Red to post off topic.
4. No role outing. Infodumping should be handled with extreme caution.
5. No reproducing the host PMs in thread.
6. No jackassery. If you feel the need to be a jackass, send a message to the Mod on Duty istead of posting it in the thread. This is a big one.
7. Have fun!

I noticed this as well. I think extreme caution indicates that role outing should not be insinuated with an info dump. That is just a guess.

thellama73 wrote:RULES
1. No illegal BTSC with anyone, ever. Seriously.
2. No editing or deleting of posts.
3. No on topic talk from dead players. Please use Dead Red to post off topic.
4. No role outing. Infodumping should be handled with extreme caution.
5. No reproducing the host PMs in thread.
6. No jackassery. If you feel the need to be a jackass, send a message to the Mod on Duty istead of posting it in the thread. This is a big one.
7. Have fun!

Long Con wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

Long Con wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Long Con wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Who should I vote for today?

You should vote for Stan.

I'm sorry, but who's Stan?

Stan is a guy who's going to automatically start killing some relatively important Civs every day on Day 2.

thellama73 wrote:
Stan - Runs the Crews company when Xander is too lazy to do it, but has no real allegiance except to himself. Briefly masqueraded as Awesome-X. While he is alive, one of the Xtacles’ heads will explode every day.

timmer wrote:Sorry guys, I didn't realize that we had started!

I'm a little pinged by the fact that SVS apparently misread the roles, since her reply to Long Con about the Xtacles isn't accurate. But I suppose that's a ping that doesn't really indicate an alignment so I'm not sure where to go with it. I'll tune in more tomorrow night. Game on!

I dont really see how misunderstanding the roles could be indicative of her alignment. Are you thinking from an angle like baddies don't have to care as much as Civvies about understanding all the roles maybe?

I misunderstood Xanders messages, I was thinking any civs could get that info. Even understanding it, I am still leery of Xander sharing his identity. Although I think the risk is fairly minimal since the roles are not very vague as llama roles can sometimes be. I am sure Timmer has seen me make similar careless errors regardless of alignment, so Timmer. The last game we played together I went the whole game having misread my own role Lol.

I have read the Epi MP convo a few times. If I have learned anything it is that blurting out my opinion on either can be a mistake for me so I want to reserve judgment at this time.

My phone corrected Xander to Cancer yikes. And the color tags are really hard to read on the light theme, so I may have to switch to dark for this game.

Ok, no more colour tags.

And you're wrong, Xander should absolutely let the Xtacles know who he is. For starters, we won't be mislynching him then. And if he can get the Xtacles coordinated, they could actually protect him at night, every night! In addition to that, so long as enough live, they could coordinate a roleblock every night as well, which could end up finding baddies when kills fail.

Long Con wrote:Are we supposed to be weird and have a special thing we do in this game?

Epignosis wrote:Too late.

Made wrote:I really really really want to vote Val.

Long Con wrote:

Scotty wrote:I don't know, I would feel jipped if I were on Crews' team.

Are you implying you're not on Crews' team?

Elohcin wrote:Hey all! Ad a special welcome to all those I have yet to play with. It's good to have you on the syndicate. I am voting for Trent. I feel like the logical way to go about it is to go in order of who dies first in the show.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

thellama73 wrote:Also, someone tell Hamburgerboy this game has started. He never opened the PM I sent him when he first signed up.

I'm on it.