The Syndicate

MacDougall wrote:

sig wrote:I'm watching breaking bad, to bad I'm not a meth dealer in this game I could use the tips I learned from the show.

I'm working from home because my daughter is sick, but I'm actually watching WWE Fast Lane because yolo.

Enrique wrote:What? I said if Catwoman targeted the Joker they essentially became a team (winning by the same conditions). It's not my problem if you're not paying attention.

The town needs them dead. I guess 8 cops and 3 Superheroes should just go fuck themselves.

a2thezebra wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

sig wrote:Also I think we discussed inmates enough and it is crystal clear that they are equally bad and anyone who disagrees is mafia and should be voted for.

What about the inmates like Bane or Two Face or Catwoman that have the potential to share Civ/Wayne win conditions?

Exactly, and even more could share victories with the civilians. People act like they know the ins and outs of the entire setup and I don't like it.

a2thezebra wrote:So Enrique you really think that Epi designed a game where HALF of the players are anti-town. You really think that.

linki - It's hard to tell with you, sig. I could easily see you actually trying to convince people that you were pinged by that. People have suspected me just for saying that I don't think indys are inherently anti-town in other games as well so it wouldn't be the first time for such horse shit. If it was sarcasm then put it in orange font next time please.

linki - See now you ARE serious. Which is it?

a2thezebra wrote:

Enrique wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

Sorsha wrote:Isn't it a Syndicate Mafia tradition to lynch the new player first? Maybe that's why there was a no lynch yesterday

I had been thinking of giving Matt the botd in his lynch Nero/Enrique crusade anyway (and I don't think Matt is bad, I think he's Indy based on a couple of posts he's made today) so I'll be voting for Nero today's since he's come up with both Matt and Enrique.

I hope you guys are right!

What do you mean you hope "you guys" are right? Why are you unconcerned if you yourself are correct? Why pawn off the accountability?

So many shady votes recently.

Over half of the player roster is made of baddies from different factions. Isn't that crazy?

That's not true at all.

a2thezebra wrote:I am shocked that people are choosing to vote for Nerolunar - a player who none of us are very familiar with - over sig, who is clearly demonstrating his baddie meta moreso than his civ meta, and who has openly advocated what the host has said is not in our best interest, even voicing suspecion (and because of this, pressured) of those who didn't follow his lead. I don't see how anything Nerolunar has done tops this, especially since we are unfamiliar with his meta.

DFaraday wrote:Enrique, does your change of heart on Matt have anything to do with Nero or Sig? Has your suspicion of anyone else grown, or has just your suspicion of Matt decreased?

I'm feeling dumb that I haven't figured out what you're alluding to, so I'm trying to find something to work with here.

LoRab wrote:This post cricks my eyeball:

sig wrote:I don't understand the Breaking Bad hype? The characters are annoying though I'd like to play a mafia game based around it so I could help get rid of the annoying characters :P

So I skimmed over Wilgy's posts. One possibly role hint which I doubt and then his rainbow list.

DrWilgy wrote:Based soley on result of yesterdays lynch, I wouldn't try to lynch Scotty again btw. (Still 900 posts behind. Still think TH is a badewd.)

I suppose a "thoughts at this point rainbow" may be needed before EoN. I may not be here.
Scotty
Zebra
Mac
Everyone else
Dom
Bea
TH

So he might not have been a priority player to be lynched again today, but what are the chances he was killed for being on the right track? I'm not putting much stake in this at all and I wouldn't even use this as a reason to vote for someone but I think it is worth bringing up.
What I find really interesting is that he was almost lynched then NK'd. I think someone really wanted to get rid of Wilgy.

Which also adds to the idea he at some point mentioned a mafia member and that they are hoping that in killing him it will be forgotten.

It seems like too much speculation about the motivation that mafia might have had for the kill--and setting people up for a lynch, based on that speculation. Also, that it neglects to mention that mafia could have been trying to set someone up for a lynch, points to this idea.

I am voting shortly. I had said I was going to try to find the post that made me sig in the longer post I lost the other day. So, here it is.

Pondering between sig and nero. Still suspish of Bubbles, but this lynch is too close to put a statement vote on someone. And I do think Matt is civ, as I said yesterday, and don't want him voted out (however much he insists on taking a separate line for every piece of the knock knock joke, and his refusal to answer questions and address things when asked).

Matt wrote:Knock knock.

Who's there?

I

I who?

I have a theory that sig is Penguin, blackmailed Enrique into changing his tune (you notice sig pushing harder then ANYBODY on why Enrique changed), Enrique figured out siggy is Penguin as the only player who voted him yesterday and you notice he added sig as someone to lynch as well, game solved ya can all go home.

Enrique wrote:WIFOM is a shitty defense.

Here you are doing the exact same thing I just accused you of. Maybe I have a good reason for not disclosing what I saw to the thread? Trust me I'm not doing this for fun after I almost already got Matt lynched. Coming in his defense now is a HUGE risk for me to take when 20 people still haven't voted. I am confident that a Matt lynch is the worst possible thing that could come out of this day.

@Zebra: No I think I jumped the gun on him just like I did with Matt. Golden wouldn't be very far from the top on my rainbow list today. He's solid. ñ

I am not being blackmailed, I mean every single word I say and I have from the beginning. I fucked up.

Enrique wrote:

sabie12 wrote:

Black Rock wrote:

Enrique wrote:Matt,
I am the one who brought Nero into the conversation.
Twice.
I have no interest in lynching him today because I have a case against you and absolutely nothing on him. You insist he's not the Joker, but also, I'm sus for not wanting to lynch him without a motive. I don't know what his role is and look forward to finding out eventually.

Forever yours,
Enri.

I really don't understand how any of this is going on at this point. How do you go from this to naming him out of two names to lynch.

I agree I am also confused about the sudden change of heart. Is it possible he could have been forced by someone to change his vote?

This didn't happen. Like juliets said, it's taken a leap of faith for Matt. sig is my #1 suspect but I wouldn't oppose a Nero lynch. Just seriously please don't vote for Matt now.

MovingPictures07 wrote:sig, I also wanted to say I apologize if I got too heated when I voted for you yesterday; I was getting increasingly frustrated and knew I'd probably have little time before EoD, and I was very pinged by you in the moment, so I voted for you. I don't regret my vote, but I didn't really have any solid baddie read on anyone else.

MacDougall wrote:I think sig and nero are both reasonable candidates and wouldn't actually mind seeing either of them flip. But, I would like it to be based on something more than DharmaHelper blatantly inviting lurkers to drive by vote whoever he says to.

DharmaHelper wrote:Lets lynch Nero.

MovingPictures07 wrote:I see more discussion has occurred regarding the Wilgy as Robin and Scotty theory, but I'm not going to repeat myself until I'm blue in the sockface again (see, my avatar is blue now!). I still think my theory has merit, at least as a theory.

And Enrique, sorry, I'm not trying to call you out or anything. You're definitely not the only one, far from it, that I saw using crass language. I just was making a general statement, and I don't even mean to bring down the thread; rather, I just think this is a good call that, although this is a game of deception, we should try to be as respectful to each other as we can.

Enrique wrote: Epignosis/LC you are cruel cruel people.

Enrique wrote:I feel like a giant asshole right now
and this is gonna hurt me a lot but it's kinda important
I highly encourage a sig or nerolunar lynch today. NOT MATT.


ffffffff

Don't let his lead get wider. I was wrong.

i cant believe im doing this im so so sorry and would understand if this got me lynched, but i gotta at least try.

Epignosis/LC you are cruel cruel people.

Turnip Head wrote:This lynch is such bullshit.

Matt wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:Does anyone think Matt has had any difficulties at all articulating what he wishes to articulate given his current circumstances?

Knock knock.

Who's there?

Maybe

Maybe who?

Maybe once I'm no longer feeling like posting in knock knock form, I will be able to speak more clearly with several sentences instead of constant run on sentences as to keep my knock knock form pure, what say you?

Black Rock wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:My suspects thusfar, in no particular order:

SVS - I'm waiting for the shoe to drop on this one where I get accused of always doing this, or whatever, but I can't help legitimately finding the fact that she missed a vote after saying 10 minutes beforehand that she had to vote. Her explanations conflict with each other and don't make sense either. She got wrapped up in the Matt/Zebra conflict? OK ya sure. Except her "Better vote" post was her LAST POST before the 10 minute gap, her post following that was the one wherein she addressed her thoughts on Matt/Zebra. She had 10 minutes. Nobody'll follow me on this suspicion because I "always do this" or somethine lame but there you go. I probably won't vote for SVS today. I also intentionally put her at the top of this list after saying that it was in no particular order but that was only because I thought it was funny.

MP and Mac - For painting Scotty as confirmed civ and running with the Wilgy=Robin theory

Black Rock - TH's case covers this pretty well and it kind of bugs me she never followed through with a readthrough of me in particular because it's not like I'm buffing my post count or posting unnecessarily robust posts.

I got distracted. Maybe after the lynch but you haven't interested me much the past few days to worry about it. I still haven't read most of the thread and this particular time I am just trying to keep up with current events.

I see why Bea said she was highly criticized in the past by trying to get involved. Why is everyone worried about post count?

Glorfindel wrote:

TheFloyd73 wrote:Glorfindel, you appear to have overlooked Sig's speculation around your Day One vote, since you didn't refer to it at all. Do you have anything to say about it?

Hi, Floyd I'm sorry, I have no recollection of Sig's speculation about my Day 1 vote and frankly had I not answered his question about it, I don't doubt for a second that I'd have heard about it. In any case the rationale for my vote on Day 1 was quite clear. I stated very clearly that at the time I voted that I would be unable to return before the EoD due to work commitments and I had to place my vote using my best judgement at the time I made it. At that time despite the relatively small number of votes cast, Zebra was clearly in contention for lynching. I considered her a significant asset to our cause at that time (and still do) and placed my vote accordingly on (from memory) either on the only other (or one of a couple) competing wagons. I hope that satisfactorily explains my motivation Floyd.