The Syndicate

Also perhaps lynched players move to the other thread? That would be a cool concept.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2018 10:17 am

sig wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2018 9:22 am And your reasoning for voting me was pingy so i adjusted my read

Tell me more

You went from thought me saying something was odd to bad, to it being okay, to it being odd again. And I disliked why you ended up placing a vote. It's almost like you decided it was better to try to lynch me because you panicked when people thought we were w/w.

And your reasoning for voting me was pingy so i adjusted my read

And your reasoning for voting me was pingy so i adjusted my read

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2018 3:32 am *haven't contributed to many sig mislynches in the past.

My very first successful lynch campaign on the Syndicate was against sig, Day 2 of Bullets Over Broadway. I have the case framed on my wall.

That was myfirst time on ts and first time as a scum so lets not talk about that dumpster fire. ;(

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 5:42 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 5:00 pm

sig wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:38 pm Also saying me not knowing slang is boom is reachy.

Slang was i assumed someone using slang

I never said that

I did. Sorta.

Yeah I was referring to jack, not you

Also saying me not knowing slang is boom is reachy.

Slang was i assumed someone using slang

I was civ reading him since he was pushing discussion and seemed to have a good town intent. His flipflop on me is pingy though.

I'm actually super good as mafia thank you very much, I'm also super good as civ. I'm just super good.

Also some of y'all seem to be taking my joking posts serious, which is amusing.

Sloonie vote for me is scummy.

You think we're teammates I'll prove we're not by voting for him!....... like what?

Scotty wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 3:01 pm

sig wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 2:41 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 2:33 pm I'm coming back to the idea of voting for sig. His attacks have been vague so far. I keep coming back to the use of his word "odd". He's been describing all of his suspicions in that manner. I'm wondering if that vague language is born out of an absence of authenticity.

You're flipflopping more than ummmm something that flipflops alot.

Though tbf I'm not the biggest fan of my role so I wouldn't mind being lynched, on the other hand I have no good reason to be lynched and if I'm NK'd then it's game over.You know I talked myself out of it I wouldn't vote for this Sig guy today.

What does that mean?

If im lynched today than nkd I'm dead. Would rather keep that one life buffer

Oh and Sloonie is still a civ read.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 2:33 pm I'm coming back to the idea of voting for sig. His attacks have been vague so far. I keep coming back to the use of his word "odd". He's been describing all of his suspicions in that manner. I'm wondering if that vague language is born out of an absence of authenticity.

You're flipflopping more than ummmm something that flipflops alot.

Though tbf I'm not the biggest fan of my role so I wouldn't mind being lynched, on the other hand I have no good reason to be lynched and if I'm NK'd then it's game over. You know I talked myself out of it I wouldn't vote for this Sig guy today.

Looking over Boomey's last post and a quick ISO, is making me think he's not mafia, I wouldn't want to vote for him today.

I believe Wilgy's last post and he's not posted as much, but I'm not scum reading him.

INH is confuzzled so I'm not voting there either.

Lorab is giving me third party feels right now.

I have class soon so I'll be back in a bit.

linki: I did that on purpose sloonie.

A really ballsy/crazy scum team would. So like wilgy, mac, marmot, but i don't think a more traditional team would

Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2018 10:25 pm

sig wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2018 9:43 pmi just ISO'd Kyle I'm not very impressed he hasn't posted much yet, but what he has posted seems blendy. He also voted for Ninja when we had two close wagons which I disliked.

I spent the latter half of day one curled up in a ball and purging the evils of food poisoning from my body. I hadn't read any of the relevant pages, so the only thing I had to base my vote off of was the case summaries people had provided, and none of them really blew my socks off. I voted to maintain the tie instead of breaking it bc I believed probability had as good of a chance at making a good decision than I did in that circumstance.

...and because i needed to stop looking at my phone and throw up again

And okay makes sense

LoRab wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2018 9:51 pm

sig wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2018 9:39 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2018 9:23 pm

sig wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2018 9:12 pmthe Slang?

Boomslang

Lorab why do you say that.

Aren't they a couple? I find couples rarely kill each other day 1--close friends, as well. I won't say it never happens, but I find it rare.

I knew there was another couple I just thought it was Rabbit and SVS.

I just ISO'd Kyle I'm not very impressed he hasn't posted much yet, but what he has posted seems blendy. He also voted for Ninja when we had two close wagons which I disliked.

MM's day 1 was all fluff so I'd like to see some content from him.

I am starting to gut read INH as bad, but when reading his posts they seem genuine so I'll need to take some time and give him a proper look over.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2018 9:23 pm

sig wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2018 9:12 pmthe Slang?

Boomslang

Ah, well his vote on me was weak and I disliked his reasoning for it, but I'm not convinced he's mafia. If I was present at EOD I'd have probably switched to him, but for day 2 I'm not so sure.

Lorab why do you say that.

the Slang?

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2018 7:01 pm [VOTE: Boomslang] aubergine

Any additional reason for this or is it just a continuation of D1?

NOooooooooooooooo Blooooober. ;(

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 6:55 pm

sig wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 6:54 pm And I was mainly messing around, I did write a haiku and knew I wouldn't be lynched so I figured i'd do some unconventional scum hunting and see how people reacted, I think we found out alot by the vote changes and last minute push onto Boom.

What did we find out?

What you said I agree with.

Lorab's vote for you was weird and I kind off disagree with it seemed like she wanted to avoid the main wagons.

Three votes for Jack is odd, I wouldn't be surprised if an anti-civ voted there.

I'd like to talk mechanics really quick. Everyone has two roles so does that mean mafia doesn't have chat? Or perhaps we don't have a traditional mafia. Otherwise I don't see how the former team members wouldn't out each other.

Boomslang wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 6:25 pm Running out of time. Sig hasn't changed his self-vote and hasn't explained that cryptic 70% comment. Although he hasn't shown up, Jack also isn't creating confusion in thread. So voting sig. [VOTE: Sig] aubergine

Creating confusion isn't a good reason to vote for someone, but I also don't want to throw out a NO U and say you must be mafia for voting me.

And I was mainly messing around, I did write a haiku and knew I wouldn't be lynched so I figured i'd do some unconventional scum hunting and see how people reacted, I think we found out alot by the vote changes and last minute push onto Boom.

Quin? Am I missing something here.

linki: Yeah I'd assume which ever group has the most votes for a player gets the lynch.

[VOTE: Sig] aubergine

I'm bored, lets tie it.

Plus I'm about 70% sure I submitted a haiku and it's very disappointing nobody followed up and answered when I asked if they did.

Scotty wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:44 pm

sig wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:02 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 1:54 pm

sig wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 1:52 pm I do like that Sloonie is posting and trying to get people talking, but as of right now I just don't think there's much to talk about. However, I'd put him down as a light civ read.

Got any non-civ reads?

Nope not yet.

I would fathom to say that I feel like @sig now looks more blendy and shruggy than INH.

Your case on me is odd.

I didn't think the INH thing has good backing it was odd, weird, strange bizarre, ect. Nothing else to really say on it. I do like that you're talking I just didn't like your case.

Marmot wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 4:46 pm

sig wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 1:52 pm I do like that Sloonie is posting and trying to get people talking, but as of right now I just don't think there's much to talk about. However, I'd put him down as a light civ read.

What do you think will get people talking?

Somebody could offer to like idk strip?

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:20 pm

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:12 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:08 pm Talk more about my case on INH.

Didn't you already basically admit that your case against me is an inherently-hollow trojan horse designed to stir up shit and get people talking?

That question was specifically for sig.

I feel like it was a hollow trojan horse case designed to stir up shit and get people talking.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 1:54 pm

sig wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 1:52 pm I do like that Sloonie is posting and trying to get people talking, but as of right now I just don't think there's much to talk about. However, I'd put him down as a light civ read.

Got any non-civ reads?

Nope not yet.

I do like that Sloonie is posting and trying to get people talking, but as of right now I just don't think there's much to talk about. However, I'd put him down as a light civ read.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 1:03 pm [VOTE: sig] aubergine

No bad sloonie bad boy no treats for you.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 12:36 pm Sig has 6 posts, but outside of an empty mudfling in my direction none of them have really contributed much.

It's day one, I don't have much to say.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 10:40 pm [VOTE: insertnamehere] aubergine

@sig what do you think of my vote?

I think it was odd, I don't see your case on INH and I'd rather not lynch him day 1. I also kind off agree most of the time day 1 is a shot in the dark.

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 12:27 am One thing that I'm worried about is the whole Haiku protection thing. Unfortunately, we don't know who did or did not send in a haiku, and people have an incentive to lie about doing so in order to protect themselves.

This could potentially lead to an even more lackadaisical and pointless Day 1 than usual, where not only does everyone not know who the hell is scum, but we also don't even know who we can actually lynch.

I don't think it would be info dumping to say who did a haiku? While people could lie about it I don't think many would so we could consider saying if we did.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2018 11:15 pm

sig wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2018 10:50 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2018 10:45 pm This tribe cannot win. We do not have JaggedJimmyJay, there's no use trying.

hmmmm a defeatist attitude you must be mafia.

Opportunistic reaching. Must be town.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2018 10:45 pm This tribe cannot win. We do not have JaggedJimmyJay, there's no use trying.

hmmmm a defeatist attitude you must be mafia.

Golden wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2018 7:46 pm

sig wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2018 7:46 pm We should totally press the button ASAP

and is Ninja a sock puppet?

Ninja is nijuukyugou

Dub sig, thanks.

We should totally press the button ASAP

and is Ninja a sock puppet?

Well this is interesting also second.