The Syndicate

Sig is selling his vote for day 3! Whichever bandwagon is bigger then his will receive his vote start a bandwagon know and you can get Sig's vote!






paid for by the lets not lynch a civ and be mean to Sig foundation






This is alllll sarc of course.

@Bulls your right I didn't say probably but this once again points to what I said right before the day ended, the amount of posts and the lengths of the posts plus the amount of time I spent defending myself, the fact I'm gonna need to do it again tomorrow and just RL tiredness, it will be easy to find a small thing to pick at which you just did.

Also it was what they were doing. I already said why I think you're bad I didn't call you bad day 1 did I when you originally voted for me? I said you were bad based on your posts and the reason for your lynch vote on me. You've literally made excuses to when I flip civ how it isn't your fault that is scummy.

a2thezebra wrote:In that case, I have no regrets about the pursuing of sig's lynch and if nothing changes my mind, I will vote for him as soon as Day 3 begins.

SO your going to from the beginning of the phase waste it once again by tunneling on me? Why not listen to other players if I still seem scummy later in the game kill me then, but honestly wasting another day phase the second in a row by having almost all the discussion focused on me based around a supposed scumslip wording difference and lynch nobody else. This is what the scum wants we've wasted a whole phase since I doubt anyone will lynch who I suggest which is one of the few ways we could get a scum.
You'd rather waste another day pursuing me with the chance I can flip and when that happens and I flip civ were will that leave you? THe mafia on my wagon have already made excuses why when I flip civ they can't be blamed, if anything you'll pursue those few who defended me and lynch more civs.

I'll make my big post about yesterday later but I've already said Bulls at least is mafia.

does Zebra tunnel so as a civ?

Black Rock wrote:

sig wrote:

MacDougall wrote:What is 10pm est?

United States East Coast timezone.

Or Canada

Canada psh been there for martial arts not impressed they are like the suburbs of the United States or our hat :P
Above is all in good fun of course not meant to insult.

BAM told you I wouldn't be lynched. Like mentioned it throughout the day phase about like at least three times.

Also welcome back Timmer kinda.

I like cats better so cats it is.

then*

Can't do worse the the Eagles current coach.

Am I dead yet? and EPi is smart

Yeah I did it for a reason. but before anyone asks I can't saywhy would still be fine lynching her as off right know at some point :P

linki: nope

@Floyd I see you're online what do you think about the two leading wagons me and nutelle?

llinki: No the us comment was to show how ridicules MY wagon was it is legit the same. Minor "scumslip" which makes no sense. Which i've said multiply time but your so busy tunneling you didn't bother to consider my points or see how stupid my lynch is based around my "scumslip".
Which started while more eloquent in the same manner.

I'm getting lynch for saying probably
I said we should lynch you for saying Us.
both "scumslips"
Both stupid
and I'm sure if you had multiply people harping on you about this you'd have responded and eventually made a messy post, overreacted, or etc which the scum would have then jumped on which they did to me.
Basically y'all decided I was scum and nothing will convince you otherwise. You're either scum or just tunneling way to hard.

linki changing vote to Elochin

Because I'm not trying to redirect a lynch to someone I don't think is mafia as a civ???

I wasn't really trying to get zebra lynched in the last few posts, it was two things I was trying to ever so stealthy say something but it kinda flew over her head and I was messing around it doesn't seem we will be lynching someone today so I'm joking around slightly more then usually but most of even these posts have points to them.

Or maybe she knows what I was trying to say and is really scum right know I'm leaning scum on her but we will see soon enough if my hunches are correct.

There is a very slim possibility she could get lynched with fewer votes but if I was trying to change the lynch I would push Mac/juilets they are more likely to get last minute lynched then

Linki: juliets this whole wagon was started based on a small word choice to when I posted why I thought Timmer was killed. I was accused of giving horriblhy defense etc but keep in mind I've been being pushed and forced to defend myself for an entire phase, with multiply people accusing me and jumping on my wagon very early. I've had few other people chime in for me and has had multiply people attack me rather aggressively those that havent have dropped votes and that was it. This is a scum wagon I don't think your post is genuine but if it is think about it from my perspective. I've made long posts defending myself pieces of those posts were then nitpicked at to find more "evidence" against me. People DEFENDING Bulls when he twisted and changed the words then said I said them. When I mentioned this and actually made posts not only defending myself but also looking at other peoples post to prove it was made by scum and prove when people mainly Bulls changed my wording and made it seem more sinister my points were ignored. If you can't see this is a scum created wagon then vote for me.
I have the feeling you already decided to vote for me though and am simply asking this to look better if I flip civ.

MacDougall wrote:

sig wrote:About?

The people you would hypothetically vote for. You also took way too long to answer because you mulled over what the best answers would be and to top it off your answers as to who you would vote for as scum with no vote on you indicates you know nutella is a mislynch.

Idk if nutella is mislynch but better her then me tbh, regardless of alignment expect maybe civ I would vote for her at this point. Also I have the thread up but I'm doing other things also

checking btsc for advise :P

@Nutelle who else would you like to lynch what about Elochin we can do it together?

About?

MacDougall wrote:Excuse me sigtown. Who would you vote for if you were scum, town or indy? Name three.

scum nutelle
town nutelle/Elohcin
indy nutelle

Or do you mean if I wasn't about to get lynched? If not it would be
scum BUGLABUSH/Luke
town Bulls/Elohcin
indy I'd go with a bandwagon and flow with it.

MacDougall wrote:

sig wrote:I'm not sure on Zebra but if we could get a few lynches on her that might reveal some information about her alignment.
Why Golden and Epi though?

lini: it ends at 10 est I think?
If ya really wanna cause trouble tie up the vote between me and nutelle

Sig. Fuck brah. How long to go.

I just feel like Epi and Golden are scum because I feel it would be great.

About one hour, it would be great for you to tie me and Nutelle by voting for nutelle.

@Turnip Thanks for answering


linki: Zebra it was a joke I'm channeling Mac.

MacDougall wrote:What is 10pm est?

United States East Coast timezone.

Long Con wrote:Ok, the thread is open. I deleted the placeholder poll, so there is no timer again. Sorry I fucked up. 10pm EST Sunday is the end.

Yup 10PM Est

I'm not sure on Zebra but if we could get a few lynches on her that might reveal some information about her alignment.
Why Golden and Epi though?

lini: it ends at 10 est I think?
If ya really wanna cause trouble tie up the vote between me and nutelle

a2thezebra wrote:

sig wrote:@Turnip what do you think about Zebra, and zebra what do you think about Turnip curious with how the day phase went what your views on each other are know opposed to last phase.

What exactly do you mean by this?

Well you two haven't had much interaction in the thread and I'm wondering what you both think of the other. Has your views on each other changed from the last phase into this one?

I thought the meaning of my question was quite clear.

@Turnip what do you think about Zebra, and zebra what do you think about Turnip curious with how the day phase went what your views on each other are know opposed to last phase.

Could you point it out?

MacDougall wrote:Stop making non juliets related posts. She didn't even argue when I called her scum. She is definitely scum. I can tell because I am the Mac Daddy.

Are you being serious?

HamburgerBoy wrote:

Golden wrote:HBoy - your defence of nutella sounds sincere. But it looks like it is either sig or nutella. Will you put your money where your mouth is and show you prefer a nutella lynch to a sig one?

@Sig - you better be as worth my effort to save as I think you are.

To be completely honest, I'm now having second thoughts. I hadn't given nutella's history much attention prior to the votes building on her, but I legitimately don't see a case against her. Your point about potential hypocrisy in latching onto the Bubbles case while not answering your own "Are you civ?" question is probably the closest to a tangible case, but even still it's so shady. If I was asked multiple questions, I could easily gloss over that part. Not to mention you could go WIFOM and ask whether a scum player would be more eager to answer it.

The way I see it, both the nutella and sig cases are fluff. However, nutella is at least answering the criticism against her more clearly. The defensive part of me wants to keep sig alive, but the pragmatic part is now asking "What's the use if people are just going to keep hounding him?" I think if nutella lasted another day, this stuff would die down. If sig lasts another day, it could just be another day (at some point in the future) of the same old crap. That's what happened on Talking Heads; almost lynched him day 1, things quieted down, then around day 9 or something people are suddenly like "Hey, let's hit the reset button and go sig all over again!"

If I was mafia I would say your backpedaling from a teammate but I'm not so your a light civ right know.
I could've been better in my defense but I think I found at least one scum this phase tomorrow I'll look over today and maybe see a few more.
I would look closely at those avoiding both wagons and voting elsewhere.
At least one player who made a post such as RIP timmer or why would they kill him? is mafia
I think Bulls is mafia potential others on my wagon but not all.
Maybe one on nutella's wagon not sure though.

Fair warning if I'm leading and there is no way it will switch I might change my vote from nutella and put it on another player I find more suspicious. Such as Bulls or one of my earlier reads like Elohcin.

I'll have a more detailed view of a few players based around the activities of today mainly the ones centering around me by the night phase or maybe the next day phase.

If I survive that is

I am
In regards to Epi's initial post not only was I not scum I was the only player who was correct and voted for the remaining scum.
Know I'll admit I can come across as scummy when I'm not but with zebras comment on scumtells. As scum I don't usually make these tells only as a civ do I do this. THis usually only happens within the first few phases when someone finds a reason to start a bandwagon and multiply people jump on it. Usually the people who push my wagon and start them are scum, such as Bull's. Quite possibly zebra as well, but I'm unsure on that.

I'm voting nutella

Did Splint say why she votedfor me or was it just a fly by?

linki: Nevermind Splint did you read my initial post and Bull's reasons for pursuing me? Do you find me saying the mafia is probably killing low posters to be suspicious?

Dom wrote:

TheFloyd73 wrote:Where's Mac been?

Yeah, it's really weird that he had so much time on his roadtrip to post BEFORE he got suspicion on him and now he doesn't!


I could vote for Mac or sig tbqh

He is currently on a roadtrip mentioned this in one of the games (Not sure which)
Dom why me?

You shouldn't vote for one of your groupies tis bad for your rep :P .

@Floyd don't go with the assumption we shouldn't lynch someone since they will be Mod killed. First off that might not happen, second off he won't flip so we will be inthe dark.
This could very well be a baddie's defense of another, without seeming like he is defending Mac.

Know I like the case against nutella enough to place my vote there, but I will hold my vote I would prefer not to waste a day phase with an attempt to lynch me.

linki: Zebra I already explained why I used that as an example it wasn't meant to try and derail or distract it wasn't an attempt to get you lynched. That wasn't even my main defense it was a point the first couple posts I made my defense many off the people voting me ignored it. My defense is based around the fact your all lynhcing me since I said probably. And this was a scum slip. I made several defenses I pointed out things about Bull's post that hints to him being scum and you've ignored it.

a2thezebra wrote:sig's defenses make no sense from a civvie perspective. Who else would I vote for, Golden?

Could you explain how my defense makes no sense? How should I have as a civ defended myself.

English is my first language but in regards to particular wording that gets picked at, well that always happen when people try to mislynch. Yes I purposely said mislynch since when I'm lynched as scum it is usually for bigger more obvious reasons, only as a civ/3P does little things like this lead to my lynch. It tends to happen more to me as a civ as I don't reread my posts as closely when I'm not scum.

linki: yeah HB is right, ya could never tell in RL I'm much more eloquent Which is why I'm going to be a politician or talk show host basically the same right?

@LoRab your right it was rude of me to call you inmature and I'm sorry for saying it. However I still stand by what I say while baddie/scum mean the same the word difference that Bulls used is I believe to be done on purpose in an attempt to make me look less clean. I dislike what you said and I believe you purposely missed my point. Because I will stand by what I said there is a difference between my word and his..

Once again sorry for my rash words I apologize for it

linki:

Bullzeye wrote:

sig wrote:Zebra I don't have much off an opinion on you right know I will ISO and have one tomorrow. I'm not sure about you, but today wouldn't be a good day to vote for you would it.

I still think Bulls is mafia, but I would like other peoples thoughts on matter both this and non related.
@Turnip head, Epi, and Matt what are your views on Zebra and Bulls?

I'd also like to point out I think Bulls has know placed a vote on me based around my previous post. I think I was completely right about his post and he is trying to make it seem like this isn't true by know placing a vote.

I voted you because I hadn't voted for you yet. I'd have voted you before going to bed anyway. You just asked for it (in a figurative sense, before you accuse me of twisting your words again) and sped the process up by like an hour.

sig wrote:linki: Zebra I don't thing you understand me pointing out the Us thing at all. Iim NOT trying to get you lynched by saying that I am showing how absurd it is. My point is that it is so stupid and makes no sense since it takes a simply word and twists it to mean something it doesn't which is the same thing bulls did do my post. Then any response given will be bad since he is lynching me with no case but based off of a little word. There is no way to properly defend yourself when there is no case and everything I've said in my defense has been shot down by people who want me lynched. Since I'm either reacting wrongly, or my tone is based or my defense is weak.

I think she is right that ridiculing the case against you is not a civ move. The reason your defenses are being shot down is that your defenses don't address the suspicion properly. Rather than acknowledge that the overall meaning of your post can be interpreted as if you had accidentally revealed baddie plans, you twist it around and make it about the meanings of individual words as well as accusing your accusers of being bad based purely on them suspecting you.
.

So I should have admitted that your case was right when it isn't? I'm notgoing to validate why you should lynch me I'm going to defend myself. What I'm interpenetrating from your post is no matter what I could have done you would have pursued my lynch. I've caught a few people in the past by doing this and I find the reason for your suspicion to be suspicious as well as your response. Your argument started based around individual wording, I've played mafia games with people who purposely change wording just enough or use small things to further their case. Look at my past game (TH) and you can see the reason I first mentioned LC was based around calling me the other guy, something thatwhen I said nobody took seriously but he ended up flipping mafia. It is the same with you changing my wording.

How should I address the suspicion on me? In my early posts I in fact did I said why I mentioned Timmer, gave the reasoning for mywording, and even answered the question people kept asking in the thread about Timmer. You ignored what I said and then said that was weak so you're wrong here I answered you just ignored it.

Zebra I don't have much off an opinion on you right know I will ISO and have one tomorrow. I'm not sure about you, but today wouldn't be a good day to vote for you would it.

I still think Bulls is mafia, but I would like other peoples thoughts on matter both this and non related.
@Turnip head, Epi, and Matt what are your views on Zebra and Bulls?

I'd also like to point out I think Bulls has know placed a vote on me based around my previous post. I think I was completely right about his post and he is trying to make it seem like this isn't true by know placing a vote.

linki: Zebra I don't thing you understand me pointing out the Us thing at all. Iim NOT trying to get you lynched by saying that I am showing how absurd it is. My point is that it is so stupid and makes no sense since it takes a simply word and twists it to mean something it doesn't which is the same thing bulls did do my post. Then any response given will be bad since he is lynching me with no case but based off of a little word. There is no way to properly defend yourself when there is no case and everything I've said in my defense has been shot down by people who want me lynched. Since I'm either reacting wrongly, or my tone is based or my defense is weak.

So tell me how should I have responded? Should I have ignored Bulls then I would be accused of scum for ignoring his case.
I change my mind about the early post I think both Bulls and Zebra are scum.

I'm pointing out that my post makes as much sense as Bulls first post about me. In fact I could say your response just furthered my belief that you're mafia since the tone/way you responded to my accusations.

Which isn't the case since these post are meant to prove a point.

This isn't my thoughts but is basically the same as Bulls argument on me I just substituted the situation.

Notice In my third line I said Zebra said our team instead of us this is basically the same by definition but just different enough to make it seem slightly more sinister.

linki: Notices Bull's has already set up there defense for when I flip civ? Just the right amount of remorse while already pinning the blame on the other people who might vote for me and even though Bulls is the one pushing my wagon it won't be their fault. This is a strong case no matter how I flip so even when I flip civ it won't mattersince my case was strong, I wasn't the first to vote for him, and it will be to bad.

Three things scum so commonly say when trying to lynch a civ, also another point Bulls says he isn't the first to vote for me this is true, however he is the one pushing my lynch and is waiting until it gains enough steam to vote on it. This stops Bulls from looking as scummy. His whole posts reeks of scummyness he has just pre lynch given his reason for why he won't be a baddie when I flip civ. This doesn't seem strange that Bull's is already defending his vote on me as if I already flipped civ and he is in the hotseat for pushing a civ wagon>

Zebra usage of the word Us means obviously she is on the mafia team.
No civ would use such wording instead they would say townie or the civs.

Zebra on the other hand using the wording of our team obviously means she is mafia and made a word slip

I am seeing the difference . When people in the thread pretend to be so shocked by his death. This is more scummy then myself not being shocked by it and I still say there is a difference. it is very small wording but paraphrasing what I said in a way that appears to make what I said slightly more scummy is pingy.
"so hope you don't think I'm twisitng your words by saying baddie" You seem to be acting slightly inmature here. baddie scum it is the same changing my words right after quoting me isn't. Especially when Bull's argument revolves around a SPECIFIC word, if Bulls argument is based on that which it is then yes it does matter when later in trying to get me lynched he says I said something I didn't say. That you fail to comprehend the importance when Bulls whole argument is based around my wording is strange.

Just as I said in my last post this was the same way LC tried to get me lynched and many others in the past.Bulls is know using the threat that if I'm bad they will lynch HB next in an attempt to get HB to stop defending me. This is a very typical scum threat when someone opposes a lynch.

linki: Your know just being foolish, why would either of your things make sense. It is a logical thought especially for day 1, are you saying I would make such a scum slip, and in said slip reveal the mafia plan to only kill low posters? I'm quite insulted you think my scum play would be that bad.

Not finding the death strange means it wasn't strange I wasn't shocked as some pretend to be. However, when he says unsurprised it takes a new dimension to it imo. Finding it not strange as I said means it isn't weird being unsurprised means I have foreknowledge of the event. The wording while slight has very different implications.

@a2thezebra what do you think about Bulls, do youhave any other reasons for voting for Elohcin?

Just dropping this underlined is one of the times Bulls puts words in my mouth.

Bullzeye wrote:
Thank you, DictionaryBoy, for explaining what currently means :P It's still an odd way to phrase it. If there'd been a few kills in this game so far, it'd make more sense IMO. In my experience baddies often do make specific plans for how they're going to kill, by no means set in stone but as a "if we don't need to kill anyone in particular we may as well kill a low poster". Saying "the baddies are currently killing low posters so Timmer's death is unsurprising" doesn't make sense given that the baddies of this game weren't 'currently' doing anything until they killed Timmer. It was just something that caught my eye, but the fact that so many other people seem to agree with me makes me more confident. Especially when this is at least the second time I've noticed you defending Sig this game.

Linki - nice NO U there. I have other suspicions than you and wasn't necessarily going to vote for you today, but keep digging that hole.

While I actually said

Bullzeye wrote:

sig wrote:First off I don't find Timmers death strange at all. The mafia team is currently killing low poster/lurkers he made almost no posts so nothing to trace back to the mafia team. This reminds me of SVS strategy in Frisky Dingo but that is quite a common mafia strategy so it probably nothing. But it was worth noting.

Besides that I would be willing to lynch Canucklehead right know but it appears she is off the poll.
@BUGLABUSH current thoughts on the game?

The phrasing of this post bothers me... There's been one mafia kill all game, so how can you say what they're 'currently' doing? One point isn't even a line, let alone a pattern. It makes it sound to me like you know what the mafia's current plan is.

I don't like this at all, he jumps at me for a wording choice and then twist and even changes what I say to fit his view.

Bullzeye wrote:

HamburgerBoy wrote:"Currently" just means "at present", which is clearly the case if we're talking about the most recent nightkill, even if it was only a single one. Not to mention that it assumes a scumteam made some kind of mandate that they are going to exclusively kill low-posters in the future; I seriously doubt a scumteam would be that inflexible. That case looks like a forced "scumslip" that rarely actually catches someone, and from what I can tell, people have a habit of doing it to sig with poor results. Note that Long Con, who flipped scum day 2, was going after sig for that.

Thank you, DictionaryBoy, for explaining what currently means :P It's still an odd way to phrase it. If there'd been a few kills in this game so far, it'd make more sense IMO. In my experience baddies often do make specific plans for how they're going to kill, by no means set in stone but as a "if we don't need to kill anyone in particular we may as well kill a low poster". Saying "the baddies are currently killing low posters so Timmer's death is unsurprising" doesn't make sense given that the baddies of this game weren't 'currently' doing anything until they killed Timmer. It was just something that caught my eye, but the fact that so many other people seem to agree with me makes me more confident. Especially when this is at least the second time I've noticed you defending Sig this game.

Linki - nice NO U there. I have other suspicions than you and wasn't necessarily going to vote for you today, but keep digging that hole.

Many people seem to agree with you, why does that give you confidence it is an easy thing for a baddie to leach onto so maybe they are just preparing for a wagon. Even ignoring that what other wording would you'd have used? They are killing low poster? Right know, it seems. Any way I would have phrased it could be seen as scummy since I addressed Timmer death instead of just saying RIP or "why would the mafia do that" I'm one of the few who provided a reason for why scum might have done that from there you could investigated with meta who potential might have called the shot on Timmer.

It isn't a no you in fact that linki of yours make it more likely your mafia. You're trying to dismiss my suspicion of you thus making it seem scummy for anyone to think your mafia. Part of the reason I think your mafia is your suspicion of me yes, but the way you phrased it and the method of your attack not to mention your above post.

We played the sock puppet game (Roxys/Splints) but we were socked so I'm not sure if that counts. Besides that I think we've played one other but i can't recall which.
I forgot about the baddie range, mostly when I see a low poster killed that is my thought I know in past experiences as mafia this is what I do, people were questioning why Timmer and that seemed the most logical reason to me. Also I'm still getting down the map mechanics so I forgot about the range thing.

I'll be looking over a few people mostly the ones on zebra's list later.
I don't like Bulls comment about my post being weird for using the wording currently it seems like a nitpicky mafia thing to do in an attempt to start a lynch against me my vote could end up there today.

linki: splints I don't understand why if I'm saying he was killed for being a low poster which he had been so far, it is an attempt by me to lynch a low poster? Especially since I'm always closer the low posting spectrum then the high posters. Or are you saying someone else is trying to set up low posters.
@julietes we don't have a trend line at all, I'm going with the data I see, what I find much more interesting is the people asking "why timmer?" In fact maybe they just asked to help set up a bandwagon on someone who would comment on it. If so you can see players already doing this to both mine and LoRabs post.

First off I don't find Timmers death strange at all. The mafia team is currently killing low poster/lurkers he made almost no posts so nothing to trace back to the mafia team. This reminds me of SVS strategy in Frisky Dingo but that is quite a common mafia strategy so it probably nothing. But it was worth noting.

Besides that I would be willing to lynch Canucklehead right know but it appears she is off the poll.
@BUGLABUSH current thoughts on the game?

I'll be voting Spock.

The only reasoning you gave for a Dom lynch is that you think from his tone you could be bad. So anyone else who votes on Dom would either think the same thing or follow your vote based on good faith/trust of your read. Also I don't trust you enough on day 1 to follow your vote, which is why I'm not your vote comes down to nothing but a small meta/tone read. I find it very curios MM voted for Dom.

@MM why did you go with a Dom lynch.

For the time I will be placing my vote on BANANA, He didn't answer the questions in regard to his vote and his second and only other post was nonsensical.

I also find the reasoning for his Matt vote to be strange so for know
NANANANANANA_BANANA

I'll be around for awhile longer, but will then be off until later tonight. However, unless Banana posts I'll most likely keep my vote on him.

I don't trust Epi enough to follow him on the Dom lynch. Could others who have played with Dom tell me if he is playing scummy right know?

Know we have had some discussion about the prog thing, I don't think a member of the mafia team would vote for this option if something strange were to happen. If they did I believe they wouldn't vote for it just cuz as in bulls case, but they would pretend to actually like it. Know it could happen, but I won't be putting much weight in it.

Sorsha wrote:

sig wrote:

Sorsha wrote:

Matt F wrote:Sorry Zebra, vote stays. I was pretty caught off guard with this nonsense, but as Sorsha demonstrated, it's obviously not just Mac who feels this way. If I'm around after Day 1, legit scum hunting will begin. If not, good luck town!

I'm sorry Matt. I don't want you to feel like you're unwanted here and I really don't like being associated with advocating the policy lynch of you (or anyone). All I was really trying to say was that if no pings or suspicions or anything came up that I might consider voting you, just today, just this one game.... Not forever and ever on every game we play together. I'm sorry if it seemed like I was hanging up on you there.

Well lets hope something comes up then. Since personally this post seems quite pingy to me. Your basically saying you would vote for someone if nothing else came up since others are voting for him? Though it seems you only made this post since Matt mentioned you specifically in his post. It seems you're backpedaling but still leaving the option of a Matt lynch it is a good wagon for the mafia to join, you won't really need a reason and I can easily see scum making a post like this, then quoting it later in the phase to justify their lynch.

I've already explained how I'd vote today in the posts between LoRab and I. And I thought it was clear that I'd not be voting for Matt? This explanation here was an apology for Matt for making him feel like he's not wanted. Trying to explain what I meant I guess.!

Okay Sorsha I read that over thanks for answering. Right know who are you suspicious off?

NANANANANANA_BANANA wrote:I vote for Matt F because he has caused a lot of arguments for no good reason.

Why Matt didn't Mac start this argument?

Long Con wrote:A message has been written in smoke above you in the sky:

Dear thread,
As we all know, Yin & Yang have been searching for each other their whole life. The least we can do is help them follow their destiny.

I suggest that Yin & Yang meet at E6 on Day 4. We may all enjoy the unexpected results of their encounter.

Yes, dear thread, I understand your concerns. Is this a trap? Are we all going to get killed? Why are you trying to help Yin & Yang?
All very valid questions… But the fact remains that this is the best chance Yin & Yang have of meeting.
Do with that as you please.

Greetings,
A concerned party.

Who wants to crash the yin and Yang party with me on Day 4?

MacDougall wrote:

TheFloyd73 wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

TheFloyd73 wrote:Matt F, I'm perplexed by your vote for yourself and the statements you're making in both threads.

Mac, your confusion makes me wonder how much of the thread you have read.

Floyd, you referencing posts in both threads makes me wonder how much of the thread you have read.

Fine, go ahead, vote for me.

Oh, wait.

Okay I will ensure you are lynched on day 2 for this post alone.

NANANANANANA_BANANA wrote:Oh come on get a sense of humour!

This is really kinda weird especially considering this was his only other post besides his vote and he didn't answer any questiosn directed at him.

Epignosis wrote: I swear to God I'm going to bring Don McLean back from the dead so he can write a song about the day the humor died.

Who? :P

BUGLABUSH wrote:I voted for a2thezebra because he bad

@BUGLABUSH Why?

a2thezebra wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:Well that's something at least. Thoughts on BUGLA besides me and Mac, anyone?

I was actually insinuating that your reaction was the scummy one but your complete obliviousness to that totally flipped my ping hahaha.

Wow.

It is okay haha your total lack of consideration that it could have been possible makes you look great.

What kind of wow am I looking at here?

The wow is I can't believe no one else thinks BUGLA looks remotely bad here, newbie or no newbie.

Yeah I don't like BUGLA's posts and I would be willing to vote for him even if he is a newbie.

MacDougall wrote: 1. Matt is town
2. One of SVS or LoRab is scum but not both
3. Zebra is town
4. Sorsha is town

Why is Sorsha town?
I don't understand the SVS or LoRab why would only one be mafia?

S~V~S wrote: This is interesting. Not becaue I think it says anything about YOU, but what is says about US.

I thought about this post while I took my shower & walked my dog this AM. I don't think Lorab has EVER voted for me in the 6 years we have been playing together, unless I was an outed baddie, and even then, I don't think she has voted for me. In StLGirls Computer Lab game on The Piano, I WAS an outed baddie, my avatar was a cackling demon, my sig said something like "I'm going to kill you all" and she still wanted to think I was on her side. And tbh, maybe I was, becasue i don't recall that I have voted for her in a very long time, if at all. Or NKing her voluntarily, like if my teammates wanted to do it, but i did not and they won type of thing. I can't remember the last time we were bad together, it may have been on LP.

We tend to be in agreement about most things, and I think there is some mutual respect going on there since we play vastly different games, yet still manage to see eye to eye. And that is likely what you are seeing here. I don't even think about it anymore.

I think that anyone else who has played with us over the years would agree with me here.

I can believe this I don't see anything weird about SVS/LoRab, but when did I belong to you?

S~V~S wrote:No he is totally someone I would expect to vote prog. So are Epi & BWT. Lots of the people at TS came from a site called Progressive Archives. I was surprised MORE people did not vote Prog, tbh. If one stood out to me it was Bullz, but even if he had info, which he denies, not just baddies had info, so

I would be curious about what the other consequences of the poll might be/have been, all the voters for one option being off the poll is very plain vanilla for LC/BR. I wonder if the people who voted for other options might have gotten less public results?

This could lead to mafia members, but if three players knew something was going to happen they might have avoided voting for that option regardless of alignment. I think it could help us catch a baddie but at the same time it could hurt the town. So I wouldn't put to much weight in this.

MacDougall wrote:

Elohcin wrote:

Golden wrote:Friends may stick together, but don't forget that you might be on different sides in this game.

And that there is no illegal BTSC. 'Cause them both coming in like that is a little suspicious.

Okay I apologise but this needs addressing.

Team Floyd pop in reacting to each others interactions and are only online at the same time.

I see three possibilities.

1. Illegal BTSC
2. Floyd is using alts
3. Flod was given a role by Long Con that involves him posting with two dummy accounts as part of role flavour

I would like to believe it's the third because that would be awesome.

Unfortunately none of the three possibilities indicate alignment. The only reason I am entertaining option 3 is because I have played a role just like it and happened to link the thread in the Talking Heads game to it which may or may not have given LC a last minute idea.

I cannot see how they could be coordinating post timing if they aren't communicating outside the thread.

This could be possibly but in my own experience it gets rather easy to catch someone with alt accounts especially with the ability to check IP. They could also have legal BTSC considering the map, potential items, and teammates.