The Syndicate

I see both Floyd and Bcornett online. You two harolds of Lynching Luke! What doth thou thinketh of eachothereth?

Im also a doctor.

bea wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:Idk, seems pretty relevant. I'd rather take a lynch on someone who isn't going to play than someone who isn't.

Also not being productive my ass! We are discussing babe, so the dance goes on!

When you get the chance FZ, what part of his post gives you the heebee-jeebies?

who do you think isn't playing?

Mr. Luke. He stated he hadn't read, but he did vote for Enrique. Makes me wonder why vote if he isn't around to play currently.

We also kinda have quite the bit of time to keep dancing

Poll runs till Fri Nov 13, 2015 9:10 pm

Idk, seems pretty relevant. I'd rather take a lynch on someone who isn't going to play than someone who isn't.

Also not being productive my ass! We are discussing babe, so the dance goes on!

When you get the chance FZ, what part of his post gives you the heebee-jeebies?

When did I say I was trying to get a wagon going? It was just unfortunate that you already had a vote when you described no lynch as awesome, that's all. Plus we did get something good out of it, luke's questionable vote, that I would like to hear about in detail from him.

Do I believe in RVS'ing day one though? not really... Is it a better alternative to No Lynching though? I suppose... Will I eventually change my vote to someone I think is scum vs someone who is just on no lynch? Maybe

(sorry for the triple post)

RVS is referring to random vote state (I think), basically a gamestate where we vote randomly due to too little intel.

What? what am I plating off? I was being predatory, that's not a question, my goal, avoid no lynch, ezpz bb.

Hmm... I also don't like Luke's vote... Meh, staying on Choutas for now.

a2thezebra wrote:I initially voted for DrWilgy as a joke but I don't dig this:

DrWilgy wrote:Enrique gets my vote for now. I don't think "no lynch" has ever been a fantastic option for civilians in any game I've played.

As I said, I don't understand why you would vote for someone for showing interest in something they are unaccustomed to, whether it's pro-town or not. It seems opportunistic and too easy.

too easy indeed, if I wanted to put a vote on someone early and stick to it for purposes of mislynch I'd put alittle more effort into it, perhaps by playing off someone's opportunism?

Voting someone for showing interest in a mechanic they don't know about is fine when we have nothing else to go on, but I'll move my vote to Choutas for actually being on no lynch.

I mean... I'd rather have RVS than No Lynch, at least that way we get info. Even if I were to die via RVS, you may be able to pick out some baddies via vote patterns later on. The only times where I've seen a LYLO situation as civ (I say seen, because I was always dead at that point) were due to no lynching, so let's not do that.

Would y'all believe me if I said I was a Doctor? I don't think I've set my tempo yet... What do I do this game?

Enrique gets my vote for now. I don't think "no lynch" has ever been a fantastic option for civilians in any game I've played.

a2thezebra wrote:DrWilgy

Why select MM and Matt to be your teammates of this humorous scenario? Is that so when you are lynched bea and I will be implicated as your actual teammates because you were careful not to implicate us here?

SSSHHHH!!! Zebra, they will learn our plans if you talk! They'll never suspect a 4th member of the mafia!

Ah! New game! Ok.

MM and Matt, since we don't have btsc yet, I'll ask something here. Which civ are we going to try to get a lynch wagon on today?