Search found 215 matches

by DrWilgy
Thu Oct 08, 2015 10:14 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: [END] Talking Heads Mafia (RYM #90)
Replies: 9232
Views: 281751

Re: [DAY 2] Talking Heads Mafia (RYM #90)

That post is incomplete and I will finish it now...
by DrWilgy
Thu Oct 08, 2015 10:14 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: [END] Talking Heads Mafia (RYM #90)
Replies: 9232
Views: 281751

Re: [DAY 2] Talking Heads Mafia (RYM #90)

Dammit, I was wanting to hit preview to make sure I didn't mess up formatting!!!
by DrWilgy
Thu Oct 08, 2015 10:13 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: [END] Talking Heads Mafia (RYM #90)
Replies: 9232
Views: 281751

Re: [DAY 1] Talking Heads Mafia (RYM #90)

Step 2, work on forming more coherent thoughts about players. Especially ones that appear on my baddiedar.

Long Con

So my thoughts regarding my vote (still subject to change)
Can we please compare his accusations of bea:
Spoiler: show
Long Con wrote:Bea has opinions about who is Civvie, but none about who is bad. A Mafia member knows every Civvie out there, so can proclaim their trust with confidence. I think bea is Mafia, and I'm going to put my vote on her for now.

*votes bea*
Long Con wrote:
bea wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I have my doubts that most mafia teams would be concerned enough with a "Dusk 0" poll that they'd deliberately coordinate their votes beyond a couple people maybe on any one person.
I can testify from experience that a) its not unheard of but also b) it's really really really not a good move to make. I remember one game I played on another site where all but one of our team voted for an advantage to one of our teammates on day 0. After she flipped bad, the civs picked us off one by one. Except the one guy who didn't vote with us. He laughed at us bts. He laughed lots. I still hear his laughter.
bea agrees that the Mafia wouldn't coordinate their votes so early. So, that's the first instance of an opinion of "not-Mafia".
bea wrote:
kneel4justice wrote:My main suspicion at this point is Ricco. First of all, he seems to be saying a lot, without really saying anything. Even when he voiced some suspicion, it's done in an "intrigued" tone, as if he's trying to avoid confrontation. If you add to that what K4J said about how he voted at the end of day 0 on the syndicate, it's another reason to not trust him at the moment.
As for rico - he seems fairly rico for me atm. I don't have a good feel for his civ vs his bad game as I've only played a few with him and tbh, I don't remember where he ended on any of them. (This is my fault not his) but his meta seems to be what I'd expect from him.
I snipped the quote for clarity. Here, bea defends Rico while not defending him at the same time. (This opinion of mine is new upon this reread, actually) If either bea or Rico turn up bad, then this kind of statement would make me look at the other.
bea wrote:
Roxy wrote:
Diiny wrote:I should say that's more than an accusation of you being too quiet per se, it's an accusation of you being fundementally off-meta.

Sorsha also raised my eyebrow, chiming in to answer an easy question about polls and then leaving without sharing any views or making any real attempt to play mafia.

I'm also extremely unhappy with Roxy's off topic to mafia ratio. I won't be happy if you randomise at all. Day 1 is about MAKING concrete evidence through stirring shit and provoking reactions, not just waiting for it to happen and throwing your vote onto random people. :disappoint:
Seems my randomization post got a "provoking reaction" :haha:
It usually does from new peeps. Thanks for taking that bullet. :p ;)

DIINY - Sorsha does that. She's got limited time too. She responds to what's most current/on topic when she catches up.

Rox and others - tend to Day 1 Day 1. We recognise that ALL arguments are based on very little. The weakest of pings. And lacking anything concrete to go on, we reserve the right to random vote.

Some of us feel that a random vote is as logical as a super weak "I got nothing else woe is me" Day 1 vote and JUST as easily manipulated by mafia as a "random" vote. I know one player that refuses to read the roles till like day 3.

I tend to not get anything near a vibe or feeling till like day 3 myself so I understand the random. I've done it. I've done it regardless of being civ or mafia. (Because even when I'm mafia, lots of our games are two mafia teams and then I still want to find baddies, just not my baddies) It's not done, at least in my part, to with hold info. It's done to find info. Some people find info differently than others. Some jump in and look and prod and question. Some sit back and watch the prodding and questioning and go from there. BOTH are needed for the civ cause. :noble:

Different styles for different folks. That's what makes this experiment awesome! :D
Here she defends Sorsha against Diiny's suspicion. Also defends Roxy. Continues that in her next post too... how "Rox and I" have "Civ reasons" for acting this way. How does bea know Rox has Civ reasons at all?
bea wrote:
Long Con wrote:Bea has opinions about who is Civvie, but none about who is bad. A Mafia member knows every Civvie out there, so can proclaim their trust with confidence. I think bea is Mafia, and I'm going to put my vote on her for now.

*votes bea*
Srrsly? Lamest day 1 vote ever LC. I haven't stated at all who I think is civ with confidence. My whole argument is I don't know yet who is or isn't . It's like you aren't even reading my posts....

I expect better from you tbh.
I never said "with confidence". You added that. Are you actually trying to shame me?? :disappoint:

Anyways, gotta go out for lunch, be back in a bit.
to his reasoning (and what I feel is a cop out)?
Spoiler: show
Long Con wrote:
FZ. wrote:LC's vote for Bea did strike me as fake...
I have to get ready and leave for work soon, so it's time to cast a real vote. The bea vote was actually fake. I thought, since votes are changeable, I'd make a fake case and see if I could catch any opportunistic baddies trying to latch on to it and follow the vote. It didn't really bear fruit; looking over BWT's reasons for voting bea, he is coming from a completely different angle. The truth is, bea's behaviour is pretty normal for her, and I don't suspect her much at all.
[...]
Sorry for using you, bea! :haha:
Long Con wrote:
Sorsha wrote:RIPIYWG guys :(

Long Con can you explain why you chose bea and what your ideal outcome would have been yesterday?
I chose bea because I saw the opportunity to make the case I did based on the things she had said. She's a good target for this kind of thing, because unlike Epig or Golden or Llama, she's less likely to take an accusation like that and run with it until it's a big polarized head-to-head between me and my accused. My ideal outcome would have been for someone from The Syndicate to take my points and agree with them and vote for bea, revealing themselves as someone willing to go along with a case because it looks good on the surface. Following this, a baddie lynch, led by me, as I humbly accept cheering Civvie accolades. Alternate ideal: bea actually is a baddie and scumslips in some way in response to the accusation.

More realistic: it develops some conversation where I get some pings from people and keep them in mind as the game progresses. However, despite opinions that it was a convincing argument, it ended up being too clumsy, and most of the conversation was about me instead, which was less helpful. It could still bear fruit, as the lynches go on - when we end up lynching a baddie, I'll be checking up on their response, if any, to the situation. Maybe someone who accused me of being bad will end up being bad, which will necessitate a second look at bea.
by DrWilgy
Thu Oct 08, 2015 9:37 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: [END] Talking Heads Mafia (RYM #90)
Replies: 9232
Views: 281751

Re: [DAY 2] Talking Heads Mafia (RYM #90)

Working on it!
by DrWilgy
Thu Oct 08, 2015 9:31 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: [END] Talking Heads Mafia (RYM #90)
Replies: 9232
Views: 281751

Re: [DAY 2] Talking Heads Mafia (RYM #90)

Wilgy paces around with a checklist, lets see... STEP 1! respond to players addressing me!
Ricochet wrote:And I may have told myself: Wilgy's vote was first, so I doubt it could have influenced the outcome much, but it gives me strange vibe of being a vote planted in the nest and left there. He criticised BWT's as well as my claims of different gameplay once the game started rolling, but he felt satisfied with my explanations, yet kept the suss on BWT. Furthermore, he said he awaited more info or thoughts from BWT himself (which BWT offered, afterwards), but then didn't return for the last 12 hours of the phase.
No I didn't return :( I saw BWT post afew times before addressing me and then went to bed leaving my vote on him. I normally wake up for work around 3:30 am, so I left for the greater good (of being conscious at work).
Rbzmncaeaei wrote:DrWilgy - I love the flair ("exotic" is right) of Wilgy's posts; as for the logic, it seems disingenous, scheming, evil, etc. Baddie read.
Disingenous... normally. Scheming, always. Evil, wrong.
Diiny wrote:Out of all the BWT votes I think Wilgy's is one of the worst. Guy's a scum lean for me, now. Basing a vote on day 0 shit and sticking with it and not grappling with anything else for the rest of the day is bad stuff in my book.
Sounds pretty normal to me. I wasn't here. I specifically addressed how I play earlier, and those who I played recruitment with at least know a little bit about how I play. If you would like a recap of that game from my perspective I'd gladly give one.
FZ. wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:Ok, just now catching up. (I think I did alright on my exams) Voting LC for now, not reading the interactions with bea to be genuine. Still really far behind, though.
This sounds like a baddie who acts like he's constantly behind, so he can't really be accounted for his behaviour.
Or someone who was really busy IRl, and is now trying to catch back up.
Rbzmncaeaei wrote:I see you catching up Wilgy.

Can you change my mind before I change my vote? :SVS:
I will try my best. Don't wanna let everyone down.

General thoughts about the votes that are placed on me. I flubbed by being triggered by BWT. I don't have alot to defend myself with other than sorry I was away. If I do get lynched, I'm sorry that I made it so easy.

From skimming,
I will not be voting for Epi, Zebra, and Diiny.

(Also expect me to be active from here on out I'm actually really excited)
by DrWilgy
Thu Oct 08, 2015 6:38 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: [END] Talking Heads Mafia (RYM #90)
Replies: 9232
Views: 281751

Re: [DAY 2] Talking Heads Mafia (RYM #90)

Ok, just now catching up. (I think I did alright on my exams) Voting LC for now, not reading the interactions with bea to be genuine. Still really far behind, though.
by DrWilgy
Wed Oct 07, 2015 5:52 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: [END] Talking Heads Mafia (RYM #90)
Replies: 9232
Views: 281751

Re: [DAY 2] Talking Heads Mafia (RYM #90)

Good afternoon everyone. My name is DrWilgy, and I am most definitely not a doctor.

I'm sorry for not being active the past days. My midterms will be half complete tomorrow afternoon, and I plan to catch up after that.
by DrWilgy
Mon Oct 05, 2015 11:38 am
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: [END] Talking Heads Mafia (RYM #90)
Replies: 9232
Views: 281751

Re: [DAY 1] Talking Heads Mafia (RYM #90)

Choutas wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Choutas wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
Choutas wrote:The sheer fact that you're in Sweden and play mafia instead of enjoying life proves you're nefarious. Definitely not a guy I'd trust.
That being said don't you find DrWilgy's post too much fluff with little substance?
I'm not in Sweden yet, but I will be in a few days. When I'm there, mafia will definitely take a back seat to seeing the world. My posting rate will probably plummet to the bare minimum. I'm actually picking my friend up at the airport in London today so it might plummet even sooner.

I didn't have that impression about Wilgy's post at a glance, no. I don't entirely remember everything in it though so I'll look again. Have you already stated what about it you found fluffy?

Also, I don't think you were terrible as momokuro. You were just killed too early to make your mark.
He has only post that isn't complete roleplaying this http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 50#p181650 his posts are mostly questions or mentioning Metas, the worthwhile part imo is this "So as I'm browsing it seems there isn't much worth quoting. Disagreements in play style seem to be at large here. I find it amusing and wonder where it will take us. I'll place a vote on BWT for now, until I have further information about what was stated day 0, and why it was stated. I'm with the others on abolishing RVS, and I won't be voting for JJJ, Epi, Diiny, or Choutas." He votes someone without giving reasons or claiming it's RVS and then says his supports the abolishment of RVS and that he won't vote for some of the guys without explaining why.
Maybe I'm reading too much into it?
Good sir! re-read my post. I'm just wanting some feedback about BWT regarding Day 0. I would like to now know from you, is there something wrong with pulling up questions and meta?
What does day 0 mean to you? You know something we don't? Cause you go to great lengths to get an answer about something as trivial as day 0.
Pulling up questions and meta is not bad or unconducive. I found it strange that after all that you linked you said there isn't enough stuff to vote for someone, disregarded SVP and then voted someone(from your reply) in order to force an answer.

Your playing is exotic. I don't get it.
trivial as day 0? nothing is trivial my friend. Even if it was day 0, we knew our roles, and that impacts what we say and do. What is strange about what I did? you voted me so that I'd talk more didn't you?

exotic... a synonym of eye-catching, which is a synonym of impactful, conspicuous, dramatic, impressive, spectacular, breathtaking, dazzling, and amazing. I'm ok with this.
by DrWilgy
Mon Oct 05, 2015 10:33 am
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: [END] Talking Heads Mafia (RYM #90)
Replies: 9232
Views: 281751

Re: [DAY 1] Talking Heads Mafia (RYM #90)

sig wrote:@motel go ahead vote for me, as long as i'm number two it's all good. I however, will be voting for you am I being serious or is it just a random vote who knows? :grin:

Also if a point seems misguided (which in my opinion it isn't) why go after me and not the one who originally said it? I agreed with Epi I didn't piggyback off of him, using the term piggybacking is a way to make it seem like I'm scum for agreeing with him, even if he isn't scum, this seems like a very scummy thing for you to do. I'm a weaker player and easier to get lynched, multiply people have voiced suspicions against me, and making it seem that I've been budding up to a stronger player and "piggybacking" off them will justify a Day 1 lynch against me.
find it interesting that out of everything this is what you zero in on especially since I'm not the first to say this about the RVS.

linki: Wigly the Siggiest Sig post ever(I must admit I giggled at that) Is that a good thing or a bad thing?
Well, considering that you are civilian almost every game we have played together, I would have to say it's a good thing.
Rbzmncaeaei wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:In order to preform my job as well as possible, I will not be voting for JJJ unless absolutely needed.
I'm not voting for JJJ either (today) but what does this even mean?
DrWilgy wrote:So as I'm browsing it seems there isn't much worth quoting. Disagreements in play style seem to be at large here. I find it amusing and wonder where it will take us. I'll place a vote on BWT for now, until I have further information about what was stated day 0, and why it was stated. I'm with the others on abolishing RVS, and I won't be voting for JJJ, Epi, Diiny, or Choutas.
Your unflinching confidence in not voting for certain people is utterly bizarre to me. Can someone (you, preferably) explain to me if this is in-character for you and if so, why?
Wilgy, being followed by a pinto bean man, approaches Zebra, introduces them to one another, hands Zebra a note, then walks away. The note reads: It's a thingy I took from MM, he's my friend. I've noticed that he marks off players that he won't vote for based on the days events. I learned that my normal trigger happy playstyle wouldn't work here (on syndicate) a few games ago, so I'm trying to adopt something similar to this. Find players I like, and keep them around until we obtain more information. Based upon what these players have said, I think they would be very good for our team if they are good. This is why I'm willing to keep them around.
Choutas wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
Choutas wrote:The sheer fact that you're in Sweden and play mafia instead of enjoying life proves you're nefarious. Definitely not a guy I'd trust.
That being said don't you find DrWilgy's post too much fluff with little substance?
I'm not in Sweden yet, but I will be in a few days. When I'm there, mafia will definitely take a back seat to seeing the world. My posting rate will probably plummet to the bare minimum. I'm actually picking my friend up at the airport in London today so it might plummet even sooner.

I didn't have that impression about Wilgy's post at a glance, no. I don't entirely remember everything in it though so I'll look again. Have you already stated what about it you found fluffy?

Also, I don't think you were terrible as momokuro. You were just killed too early to make your mark.
He has only post that isn't complete roleplaying this http://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/viewto ... 50#p181650 his posts are mostly questions or mentioning Metas, the worthwhile part imo is this "So as I'm browsing it seems there isn't much worth quoting. Disagreements in play style seem to be at large here. I find it amusing and wonder where it will take us. I'll place a vote on BWT for now, until I have further information about what was stated day 0, and why it was stated. I'm with the others on abolishing RVS, and I won't be voting for JJJ, Epi, Diiny, or Choutas." He votes someone without giving reasons or claiming it's RVS and then says his supports the abolishment of RVS and that he won't vote for some of the guys without explaining why.
Maybe I'm reading too much into it?
Good sir! re-read my post. I'm just wanting some feedback about BWT regarding Day 0. I would like to now know from you, is there something wrong with pulling up questions and meta?
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Long Con wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:Before any quotes, I'd like to point out an initial suspicion. It never sits right with me when someone claims that they will be changing and/or playing with a different style after role cards have already been distributed. This applies to Rico, and BWT. I'm not going to go back and try to quote the comment because I'm pretty sure it was Day 0. Rico stated that he'd be more zany and BWT followed suit, almost immediately after Rico. I do not recall BWT's reasoning for claiming a more zany (zanier? zaniest? are those actual words? they don't sit right with me.) and would like to hear about this. Also, someone correct me if my memory of Day 0 events are failing me.
I believe a factor of the "zaniness" is the ongoing contest with the prize going to the person who uses the most Talking Heads in their posts. Zanier and zaniest sit fine with me, as the comparative and superlative forms of 'zany'. :srsnod:
BWT was on the chopping block for eight consecutive days in Recruitment, but was finally lynched Day 9 and flipped as a harmless civilian. He subbed back in for another player on Day 10, and was immediately lynched on Day 11, and flipped civilian.

His intention to play zanier/est doesn't surprise me much. :shrug2:
I see, I didn't think about that. Normally players stating that they will be doing something different after roles have been delivered is a scum flag for me. If a player has the intention to change their style and it's not mid game yet, why not declare it in the signup page pre-role distribution?

I'd like to hear BWT's thoughts on what I have said.

linki: Ty Rico, I will also not be voting for you today. (did I liki right? can someone give me an exact definition? I've used context to figure it out up until this point)
by DrWilgy
Sun Oct 04, 2015 10:07 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: [END] Talking Heads Mafia (RYM #90)
Replies: 9232
Views: 281751

Re: [DAY 1] Talking Heads Mafia (RYM #90)

*Wilgy ponders around this virtual landscape, kicking at the ground alittle bit* I should make sure to show my gratitude to those who helped me get the A.CEO position. When we get out of here, I'll take my co-workers out for a good drink. Now... what is the fastest way out of here? *Wilgy looks up to see a humanoid pinto bean standing before him, Wilgy grabs his hand and begins to lead him back towards the others* I should introduce this pinto bean to MM! I'm sure they will be friends!

Good afternoon everyone! Sorry about my delay. *Wilgy straightens his tie* I've been catching up and whatnot. Because I'll be cramming a bunch of catch up thoughts in this post, It may end up out of order. I hope everyone can forgive me for this.

Oh! I should also set a precedent here. In order to preform my job as well as possible, I will not be voting for JJJ unless absolutely needed. That is all I will have to say about that much, but I do hope that others can respect this decision of mine. *Wilgy awkwardly bows before his co-workers. It's obvious that he's trying to act his part as A.CEO, but hasn't fully adjusted to his new position*

Before any quotes, I'd like to point out an initial suspicion. It never sits right with me when someone claims that they will be changing and/or playing with a different style after role cards have already been distributed. This applies to Rico, and BWT. I'm not going to go back and try to quote the comment because I'm pretty sure it was Day 0. Rico stated that he'd be more zany and BWT followed suit, almost immediately after Rico. I do not recall BWT's reasoning for claiming a more zany (zanier? zaniest? are those actual words? they don't sit right with me.) and would like to hear about this. Also, someone correct me if my memory of Day 0 events are failing me.
sig wrote:Rbzmncaeaei I find you suspicious that you find it suspicious that I find you suspicious for thinking I'm suspicious.

Your counter argument is very good, though I don't believe there is any connection. I might have come off as being overly defense, but in my experience it is better to be proactive in defending oneself then being accused of ignoring what others have said about you. As I said Matt I didn't mean to keep the very there it just kinda happened.

When I mentioned bcornett24 I was unaware that we were allowed to change votes this game, this makes his early vote less strange.

linki: Interesting our day 0 poll was about different abilities such as option one does so and so.
This is perhaps the Siggiest Sig post I've ever read...
Ricochet wrote:Oh no, FZ is in Serious Business mode. I don't know why you treat me so bad. Think of all the things we could have had. :workit:

I am not bothered with how I appear in this game, either. Not one bit. I made a statement to the other players, back in the private Syndicate thread, but it's now vanished. It's not my fault you joined the RYM camp and now you seem to be lashing at me for not seeming as consistent as you'd expect like me to be, just because you have such meta on me from previous games.

Anyway, what I said over there can summed like this: I'm immersing in the theme. Incidentally, the Host happened to also issue a contest that totally justifies my plan to have fun and be zany. TH is fun and zany music, so I plan to have fun and be zany. This will not affect my regular gameplay, only add a dimension to it. As for my regular gameplay, I repeat that you may pretend too much from me, 10 hours into Day 1. You're saying I'm talking a lot, without saying anything, but you're accusing me without bringing too much just as well. If you're clinging on the my post on b24, I literally pointed out that I actually questioned him. If my replies haven't satisfied you, it's you shutting the door, not me.

Don't like fun? Lo siento. Take it easy, take it easy. :workit:
:ponder: Rico, how do you feel this "dimension" will affect the game overall?
birdwithteeth11 wrote:
rundontwalk wrote:
Russtifinko wrote:Posting because the host tells me I will be a non-participant if I don't. :sigh:

I will read up throughout today and try to say something intelligent.
Why are you going to put so much thought in what you post? Trying to hide something? Just post your gut reads whether they are intelligent or not.
Or he's been busy and not able to participate?

It really feels like you're jumping down Russ' throat for not being active Day 1.
Is there something wrong with this?
thellama73 wrote:Question for the group:
Was Bea's reaction to one early, changeable vote an overreaction or an appropriate reaction?
Discuss.

Current track: Brian Eno - Sparrowfall (3) (1:24)
I don't know Bea well enough to tell. I would say that it's an overreaction to just one vote when she is a supporter of RVS. If she truly believes that Day 1 is RVS, there's no reason to be worked up over a single vote.
Elohcin wrote:Also, I don't think we gather much from a replacement for day 1.
I disagree, how about we talk about that. Does anyone have decent and/or a bunch of experience playing with TinyBubbles? The one game I played with her she had no alignment so it's hard for me to meta, but from my experience members of the mafia are less likely to ask for replacement. If Bubbles had loyalties to other players would she ask for a replacement Day 1?
Choutas wrote:Thanks MP for tripping and getting us into this mess. I had a date with a scorching brunette and now I have to play a mafia with a bunch of smelly, uncivilized game engineers. When this is over I'll be bringing this over to the union...
Perhaps this reality's time is different? maybe a day in here is 5 minuets in real life. I don't think the boss wouldn't include a failsafe to get us out of here on time right?right?

So as I'm browsing it seems there isn't much worth quoting. Disagreements in play style seem to be at large here. I find it amusing and wonder where it will take us. I'll place a vote on BWT for now, until I have further information about what was stated day 0, and why it was stated. I'm with the others on abolishing RVS, and I won't be voting for JJJ, Epi, Diiny, or Choutas.
rundontwalk wrote:
Russtifinko wrote:Posting because the host tells me I will be a non-participant if I don't. :sigh:

I will read up throughout today and try to say something intelligent.
Why are you going to put so much thought in what you post? Trying to hide something? Just post your gut reads whether they are intelligent or not.
Almost forgot about this, I'd like to see Russtifinko's thoughts as well. Rundontwalk, have there been any other posts that stood out to you like this? Why did you respond to this of all the posts?
by DrWilgy
Sat Oct 03, 2015 7:08 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: [END] Talking Heads Mafia (RYM #90)
Replies: 9232
Views: 281751

Re: [DUSK 0] Talking Heads Mafia (RYM #90)

I sure do hope BWT keeps his word. Would be bad businesses for the company...

*Wilgy can be seen around the corner concealed slightly by a shadow. A red glimmer bounces off his eye as he slaps the head of a baseball bat against his palm. An e-mail appears on BWT's work computer. The message is rather straightforward*
...there was someone who voted for bwt before llama.
by DrWilgy
Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:49 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: [END] Talking Heads Mafia (RYM #90)
Replies: 9232
Views: 281751

Re: [DUSK 0] Talking Heads Mafia (RYM #90)

birdwithteeth11 wrote:Also, I will give my 2 votes to the first 2 people to vote for me. :D

Linki: You're being too complicated, Rico. Bribery works when it's kept simple.

It's about being a good civil servant, like some of my family members.
*Wilgy's head pokes out above his cubical. He runs over to BWT, his hair and clothing are now looking spiffy once again.*

Vote registered for BWT

My name is DrWilgy! and I am most definitely a doctor! Here's my resume in detail for my fine employers and co-workers:
  • DrWilgy

    Objective:
    To obtain a position as assistant CEO of Syndicate Schemes, and further my career within the company.

    Skills and Expertise:
    -Definitely a Doctor
    -Understands Music and Audio editing
    -Efficient in FL Studio 12
    -Efficient bassist
    -Excellent communication skills
    -Has managerial experience
    -Practicing Photoshop guru, and animation guru

    Experience:
    -Former small business owner
    -Event coordinator
    -Master of all Coffees
    -Was at one point, most definitely not a Doctor
    -IT technician
    -Game Designer
    -Life Saver

    Additional information:
    -Enjoys Ambient and Alternative Rock
    -Believes Kansas isn't bad
    -Worries about players that bribe via vote pardoning...
I hope this suffices as an efficient resume of my work!

Wilgy returns to his cubicle and disappears from sight. A co-worker looks into his block, and notices a trap door left open! No one knows where Wilgy went! An email appears on MM's computer screen!
by DrWilgy
Sat Oct 03, 2015 3:15 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: [END] Talking Heads Mafia (RYM #90)
Replies: 9232
Views: 281751

Re: [DUSK 0] Talking Heads Mafia (RYM #90)

Epignosis wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:And please note Rule 6 in the rules section. That applies to this poll as well. :feb:[/color]
*Wilgy removes his suit, runs his hands through his hair messing it up, quietly goes to his cubicle and sits down in his chair.*

Votes registered for Epi and MM
by DrWilgy
Sat Oct 03, 2015 3:09 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: [END] Talking Heads Mafia (RYM #90)
Replies: 9232
Views: 281751

Re: [DUSK 0] Talking Heads Mafia (RYM #90)

Epignosis wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:Wilgy walks into the office dressed slightly spiffier than normal. His hair and beard looks as if it's recently been cleaned up. He carries a decently sized briefcase in his right hand, with two key-chains dangling from it. One is of DrPenguin-Man, the notorious hero who hugs people in a penguin suit. The other is of the Syndicate Schemes logo. He throws out some compliments and high fives as he walks in briskly, and somewhat energetically.

Good afternoon everyone! I would like to nominate myself for the Syndicate Schemes promotion, and MM for the RYM promotion. I promise to not let you down if I'm given this promotion, and I will do my best as the assistant to the CEO! I nominate MM for the RYM promotion due to him being a good friend. I trust that he wouldn't let us and his fellow co-workers down if he is given the promotion.
dr dun goofed
*Wilgy slows down to see Epi staring him down... Wilgy is curious as to why.*
by DrWilgy
Sat Oct 03, 2015 3:04 pm
Forum: Previous Sit Downs
Topic: [END] Talking Heads Mafia (RYM #90)
Replies: 9232
Views: 281751

Re: [DUSK 0] Talking Heads Mafia (RYM #90)

Wilgy walks into the office dressed slightly spiffier than normal. His hair and beard looks as if it's recently been cleaned up. He carries a decently sized briefcase in his right hand, with two key-chains dangling from it. One is of DrPenguin-Man, the notorious hero who hugs people in a penguin suit. The other is of the Syndicate Schemes logo. He throws out some compliments and high fives as he walks in briskly, and somewhat energetically.

Good afternoon everyone! I would like to nominate myself for the Syndicate Schemes promotion, and MM for the RYM promotion. I promise to not let you down if I'm given this promotion, and I will do my best as the assistant to the CEO! I nominate MM for the RYM promotion due to him being a good friend. I trust that he wouldn't let us and his fellow co-workers down if he is given the promotion.

Return to “[END] Talking Heads Mafia (RYM #90)”