The Syndicate

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
LoRab wrote:Putting vote on Wilgy for now. Mainly because I don't want to forget to vote tomorrow.

I may change. Likely will. But Wilgy feels like the right choice for the moment.
-__-

Hmm... I don't think this is the case, but how would the votes look if both Elo and Lorab were bad?
If you don't think it's the case, what interest is it to you?

Simply because we can't ignore plausible options. If enough evidence appears for me to believe that Lorab may be bad it will be a good thought.

LoRab wrote:Putting vote on Wilgy for now. Mainly because I don't want to forget to vote tomorrow.

I may change. Likely will. But Wilgy feels like the right choice for the moment.

-__-

Hmm... I don't think this is the case, but how would the votes look if both Elo and Lorab were bad?

Just got blasted at work. I'll try to finish my response for you JJJ. U 2 Sloonei.

There's actually another scenario of false information spread by Sloonei. This one may have been caused by lazy reading but I'll quote it here.

Sloonei wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:Taking a look at Sloonei and I have some things I found that I didn't respond to before.
Sloonei wrote:Taking a look at Wilgy.
DrWilgy wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:Voting Ricochet. If anyone's here, ask me questions and I'll ask you questions back. Let's generate some content. Deal?
Where do you read me zeebs?
Null, but GTH good because with what content you have, you haven't given me a reason to think otherwise. Where do you read me?
GTH good.

I have barely read the thread though. What do you think of Mac Declining my invite to team up?
These represent his first real posts in the game. On the one hand I want to like that he's able to produce a GTH read on the spot, but on the other I can't like it too much since he discredits himself by being honest and telling us he hasn't read the thread. This post does nothing for me.

DrWilgy wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:What is your strongest read at the moment, considering that you haven't fully caught up?
Baddie Rico with potential as Mac temmie.

I don't think Rico is the type to lose sight of what would gain him advantage in the game for a policy lynch.

What do you think was the most interesting exchange so far?
He's at least loosely on the Rico bandwagon here. I don't like that, but he did give a reason to feel that way so it's not the worst. What I do like is his question. I thought it was a good early game, looking-to-get-involved type of question. This brief appearance is what I was referencing earlier when I said I gave him an early town read. When he came in here it looked like he was genuinely trying to both get himself involved and get others thinking about things in the game.
DrWilgy wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:DrWilgy, do you have any other gut and/or vibe-based reads you would like to share?
The only other player that I have thought about is Sprityo, whom I gut read as bad.

I like your analysis of Rico. I'd like an answer from Rico as to why he thought to interject here. Not sure if this has been explained yet or not, but I'm not willing to go back and check.

Zebra, how would you respond to me voting Rico right now?

Sloonei, mind telling me the exchange that interested you most?
He lists sprityo as an early baddie read. I'd be interested to hear how that's developed. He also gave me and LoRab gut scum reads. I think he's since dropped the read on me,and his LoRab read seems to have been dependent on Rico being bad as well.

Turns out that his most substantial post in the game to this point is a big one about why LoRab is bad. Interesting. I don't think it's all consistent. For instance, the second to last point he makes in this post indicates that a certain post of LoRab's was directed toward him, when it was really directed at Jay.

So I dunno. There's not much here. There are a few things that give me slight town vibes in his post history but nothing overwhelming. A lack of content is always going to be a concern, so I can't do much with Wilgy right now.
So in regards to the inconsistency that you believe tou saw, the subject of my post was mostly LoRab ignoring my question. The 1 or 2 quotes above the one you claim to be inconsistent is the subject (the question), and the following quotes were to show that the question was ignored.

What are your thoughts on this now that I've explained this error?
That explains that, thanks. My mistake. But it doesn't change the way I am reading you at all. This incident is mostly irrelevant to my read on you.

And this makes 3 cases of false information Sloonei. Explaine this.

Linki - kay gimme one moment.

I responded here ,

Sloonei wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:I actually trust the wagon without Lorab and sloon on it more.

Changed my vote.
Am I back in your bad graces?
You were never out of my bad graces and I still gth you bad. While I didn't want to vote with you, it's better than a tie.

For safe keeping I'll notate my vote record this phase. I was on INH, changed to Indiglo and changed back to INH all within 3 min to prevent a tie.

DrWilgy wrote:
Quin wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:@Sloonei I gut read you as bad from me due to a feeling of dancing around the pizza last night. A forced non-grasping of the Rico situation. This is heavily dependent upon other's alignements though.

@Sprityo I gut read you due to your request of wishing to team with Mac following mine.

@Lorab, yes that is what I stated. Your point?
What's your view on Sloonei now that you have an alignment to work with?
Sloonei is no longer on my baddiedar.
Losing track of your fake reads, Doctor?
No baddiedar is different. I have no impulse to vote for you but in a gth scenario I do think you are still bad.

Honestly at this point with how little time ive had to read/contribute all my thoughts are just a gth random mess.
You think this computes over here? "Off the baddiedar" seems to strongly suggest "not a suspect".

And followed up here.

DrWilgy wrote:Nah. Baddies I'd vote for. GTH baddies I still need to think about.

Glorf why is it 5-3 then?

And that was the full conversation on the subject, unless you adressed me without a quote and I missed it.

DrWilgy wrote:
Sloonei wrote:if INH is town, Wilgy looks bad right now.
Actually, you are bad. Explain this Sloonei.

While a single sentence may be hard, the strongest cause of suspicion is in the above quote.

I feel that Sloonei was fully expecting a INH civ flip and over eagerly tried to throw fault at me for thus flip.

Follow up to that as follows:

Sloonei wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Sloonei wrote:if INH is town, Wilgy looks bad right now.
Actually, you are bad. Explain this Sloonei.
It's not my fault, G-man made me do it.
What does this mean?
I was making a funny joke because I'm not bad and you are just pointing fingers at me because what the hell
How about explaining your non-joke claim that came before the joke then Sloon my friend.
Mostly your treatment of after the deadline. I only qualified the statement because if INH flipped bad it'd be hard to argue that the guy who just hammered on a baddie is also a baddie. But, from my perspective, it looks like you genuinely just forgot that you'd dropped your suspicion of me and then had to cover your tracks.
Plus you never told us why you went from INH to indi and back to INH in the final minutes. What inspired you to move your vote to indiglo? How do you feel about Glorfindel?

This is irrelevant to the question I asked. "from my perspective" is also a fodder statement. Of course this is from your perspective, this is your thought. I get baddie vibes from fodder statements like this, as it's symptoms of a skittling player. Baddies skittle more than civs.
This is just false as I explained my vote changes in the following quotes.

DrWilgy wrote:No ties. I didn't even get to catch up tho...

DrWilgy wrote:I actually trust the wagon without Lorab and sloon on it more.

Changed my vote.

DrWilgy wrote:Glorf almost tied it and had to change it again.

DrWilgy wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:I actually trust the wagon without Lorab and sloon on it more.

Changed my vote.
Am I back in your bad graces?
You were never out of my bad graces and I still gth you bad. While I didn't want to vote with you, it's better than a tie.

For safe keeping I'll notate my vote record this phase. I was on INH, changed to Indiglo and changed back to INH all within 3 min to prevent a tie.

(on a side note, I am only now noticing that I didn't actually respond to the Glorf question. The only real judgement I have on him comes from the vote carbuncle we had. To me it read as a civilian who didnt Realize what was going on around him. I would think that a baddie would've been more aware of the situation due to caution.)

Linki - Stop saying things that aren't happening Sloonei.

Sloonei wrote:And another thing about Wilgy! This might be unfair, but my suspicion of him started because he claimed to be suspicious of me. But since then he has appeared very concerned with my read on him and wants to talk me out of it (here, here, and here). If he thinks I am bad, why is my scum read on him such a big deal? Shouldn't he just laugh at my obvious OMGUS?

Wilgy don't read this spoiler, it's not for you, KEEP OUT
Spoiler: show
I get that just because he GTHs me as bad doesn't mean he has to approach me as a 100% certain baddie, but this is one of those instances where I'm asking a question to get a response, not because I am perplexed.

Because I am having trouble reading your suspicion of me as to whether or not it is genuine. As someone who I think is bad, it bothers me that I am having trouble reading it one way or the other. I have no problem with you sussing me if it's genuine and would like to validate that.

I'll go back and read now, just thought Id address this as it was recent.

Then Sloonei what is the defining factor in your read on me?

Yo, Sloon. Wanna reply to me?

I see that Indiegogo hasn't flipped yet. A shame. I'll be back later.

MacDougall wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:Elo analyzed
Elohcin wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:It pains me to disparage a lady, but I do believe Elohcin's response to that random vote from her husband was a bit lifeless. Considering she is here to see Neil Hartley live and in the flesh, I know she isn't that bored. The look on her face, it's giving Neil the wrong impression.

So yeah, it was like after midnight when I posted that response to Epi. Maybe that's why it seems lifeless. Last night was my monthly ladies night out and I didn't come home until I had my fill of caramel apple sangria.

I cannot even remember what emoji I used. Wait....I do remember. Was it was "I'm wacko" one ...I think so. That emoji makes me think of someone being crazy and silly with their post/vote. I actually didn't even look to see he ACTUALLY voted for me. I thought he was kidding at the time. Maybe I ought to vote him back But probably not as I might be voting to save myself with it being so close and all.

I know nothing of this show, so JJJ is confusing me a bit. I may vote him. It seems a little 'trying too hard' to come in here role play like that right off the bat. Like he is trying to win us over. What do y'all think? And this is not WIFOM talking...whatever that is. I never understood that term completely. but you all seem to use it for when you go after someone who has gone after you? I don't know.

I'll hold off on voting for now.
Eloh explaining something she was called out on. Unless JJJ is Eloh's teammate, I think this may be a good reference for looking into Eloh's general tone for something she has to be careful about i.e. vote reasons and interactions with teammates. All tonal reads that fit this motif shall be the same color.

Elohcin wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
Elohcin wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
Elohcin wrote:going for self preservation here...
What's ya beef with the bird with teeth?
Nome...it was one of two
..him or Mac. No need.
Votes are changeable and the day is barely half over. This is not the time to be casting preservation votes. Vote wherever your suspicions are!

Elohcin wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
Elohcin wrote:going for self preservation here...
What's ya beef with the bird with teeth?
Nome...it was one of two
..him or Mac. No need.
A preference of not voting for Mac. Noted.

Oh my goodness! I was thinking days were 24 hours for some reason! I thought I got my vote in like 3 minutes before the bell!!! I wake up this morning looking hard for a host post and everything. GAH! I'm gettin' OLD. Someone save me!!

Okay, I have like 2 pages to catch up on. I am busy today, but I will get there eventually.
This matches the tone I read earlier. Unfortunately I'm having trouble reading into it do to already having too many preconceived notions about Sloonei affecting my thoughts and reads.

Would an exchange between teammates happen outside of btsc in regards to time frames?

Elohcin wrote:
LoRab wrote:Epi expressed suspicion of Elo earlier, which interests me because they read each other well. Would love for him to elaborate on his thoughts.
I seriously thought his actions were a joke or trying to get a rise out of me or something. I think my reaction was what would determine his thoughts of me. Too bad I had to react after midnight after several drinks (when I don't drink often at all). It probably is what started me off on the wrong track for this game.
No longer super suspicious of the LoRab.

Elohcin wrote:The players I will be looking at today are:
Mac - simply b/c other players are finding him suspicious and I seem to be missing the hype. I need to reread him.
Lorab - b/c (no offence) I always see her playstyle as sneaky and bad and I need to decide if it's real or just my predisposition.
Quin - b/c he replaced a non-participant before replacing Glor who also said he cannot participate. I imagine a baddie would be replaced before a civ.
and
....not sure who else atm.
I love lists like this. Who wants to bet that one of these 3 vote candidates was mentioned as distancing?

Elohcin wrote:
MacDougall wrote:I am interested to see what Elo has to say.

I am placing a vote for spirityo.
Why are you placing a vote for Sprit? Just curious.
This is the last part of Eloh's ISO I'd like to point out. A question that felt out of nowhere, and only one other question that I feel is similar to this is addressing me. Oddly enough I was addressing Mac in that question. This question feels as if it was forced, and im unsure if it was forced by the existance of Mac or Sprityo, but due to my involvement with Mac earlier, I think it is actually Mac that drew this question. I read it as a teammate interaction.

Unfortunately, anyone who was addressed in the orange tone is dead except Sloonei, and I cannot make a tonal read regarding the Slooner. Something to note, is that due to this tone, it may have been originally broadcasted due to interaction with a teammate, however I do not think JJJ and Elo are teammates.

I'll place my vote on Mac. Interesting... I don't think Elo interacted with Indiglo or INH. Oh well.
Wilgy I voted for Elo when she was behind 4 to 3. I also did so to take no credit. I could have voted for anyone and achieved the same outcome. How as Mafia can I justify voting for Elo at that juncture? If I was bussing her would I not have made a song and dance routine to get as much credit as possible? Would I even bus a teammate at that point?

You aren't even attempting to read your deeply informed meta knowledge of my scum game.

Did I claim to read that Mac? This was solely off Elo, nothing more nothing less. Judging and justifying the actions of a non-confirmed player is harder than a dead confirmed player. This was all I had time for.

Elo analyzed

Elohcin wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:It pains me to disparage a lady, but I do believe Elohcin's response to that random vote from her husband was a bit lifeless. Considering she is here to see Neil Hartley live and in the flesh, I know she isn't that bored. The look on her face, it's giving Neil the wrong impression.

So yeah, it was like after midnight when I posted that response to Epi. Maybe that's why it seems lifeless. Last night was my monthly ladies night out and I didn't come home until I had my fill of caramel apple sangria.

I cannot even remember what emoji I used. Wait....I do remember. Was it was "I'm wacko" one ...I think so. That emoji makes me think of someone being crazy and silly with their post/vote. I actually didn't even look to see he ACTUALLY voted for me. I thought he was kidding at the time. Maybe I ought to vote him back But probably not as I might be voting to save myself with it being so close and all.

I know nothing of this show, so JJJ is confusing me a bit. I may vote him. It seems a little 'trying too hard' to come in here role play like that right off the bat. Like he is trying to win us over. What do y'all think? And this is not WIFOM talking...whatever that is. I never understood that term completely. but you all seem to use it for when you go after someone who has gone after you? I don't know.

I'll hold off on voting for now.

Eloh explaining something she was called out on. Unless JJJ is Eloh's teammate, I think this may be a good reference for looking into Eloh's general tone for something she has to be careful about i.e. vote reasons and interactions with teammates. All tonal reads that fit this motif shall be the same color.

Elohcin wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
Elohcin wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
Elohcin wrote:going for self preservation here...
What's ya beef with the bird with teeth?
Nome...it was one of two
..him or Mac. No need.
Votes are changeable and the day is barely half over. This is not the time to be casting preservation votes. Vote wherever your suspicions are!

Elohcin wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
Elohcin wrote:going for self preservation here...
What's ya beef with the bird with teeth?
Nome...it was one of two
..him or Mac. No need.
A preference of not voting for Mac. Noted.

Oh my goodness! I was thinking days were 24 hours for some reason! I thought I got my vote in like 3 minutes before the bell!!! I wake up this morning looking hard for a host post and everything. GAH! I'm gettin' OLD. Someone save me!!

Okay, I have like 2 pages to catch up on. I am busy today, but I will get there eventually.

This matches the tone I read earlier. Unfortunately I'm having trouble reading into it do to already having too many preconceived notions about Sloonei affecting my thoughts and reads.

Would an exchange between teammates happen outside of btsc in regards to time frames?

Elohcin wrote:
LoRab wrote:Epi expressed suspicion of Elo earlier, which interests me because they read each other well. Would love for him to elaborate on his thoughts.
I seriously thought his actions were a joke or trying to get a rise out of me or something. I think my reaction was what would determine his thoughts of me. Too bad I had to react after midnight after several drinks (when I don't drink often at all). It probably is what started me off on the wrong track for this game.

No longer super suspicious of the LoRab.

Elohcin wrote:The players I will be looking at today are:
Mac - simply b/c other players are finding him suspicious and I seem to be missing the hype. I need to reread him.
Lorab - b/c (no offence) I always see her playstyle as sneaky and bad and I need to decide if it's real or just my predisposition.
Quin - b/c he replaced a non-participant before replacing Glor who also said he cannot participate. I imagine a baddie would be replaced before a civ.
and
....not sure who else atm.

I love lists like this. Who wants to bet that one of these 3 vote candidates was mentioned as distancing?

Elohcin wrote:
MacDougall wrote:I am interested to see what Elo has to say.

I am placing a vote for spirityo.
Why are you placing a vote for Sprit? Just curious.

This is the last part of Eloh's ISO I'd like to point out. A question that felt out of nowhere, and only one other question that I feel is similar to this is addressing me. Oddly enough I was addressing Mac in that question. This question feels as if it was forced, and im unsure if it was forced by the existance of Mac or Sprityo, but due to my involvement with Mac earlier, I think it is actually Mac that drew this question. I read it as a teammate interaction.

Unfortunately, anyone who was addressed in the orange tone is dead except Sloonei, and I cannot make a tonal read regarding the Slooner. Something to note, is that due to this tone, it may have been originally broadcasted due to interaction with a teammate, however I do not think JJJ and Elo are teammates.

I'll place my vote on Mac. Interesting... I don't think Elo interacted with Indiglo or INH. Oh well.

I'm shifting my focus. I should be looking at Elo's posts because I have yet to do so.

Taking a look at Sloonei and I have some things I found that I didn't respond to before.

Sloonei wrote:Taking a look at Wilgy.
DrWilgy wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:Voting Ricochet. If anyone's here, ask me questions and I'll ask you questions back. Let's generate some content. Deal?
Where do you read me zeebs?
Null, but GTH good because with what content you have, you haven't given me a reason to think otherwise. Where do you read me?
GTH good.

I have barely read the thread though. What do you think of Mac Declining my invite to team up?
These represent his first real posts in the game. On the one hand I want to like that he's able to produce a GTH read on the spot, but on the other I can't like it too much since he discredits himself by being honest and telling us he hasn't read the thread. This post does nothing for me.

DrWilgy wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:What is your strongest read at the moment, considering that you haven't fully caught up?
Baddie Rico with potential as Mac temmie.

I don't think Rico is the type to lose sight of what would gain him advantage in the game for a policy lynch.

What do you think was the most interesting exchange so far?
He's at least loosely on the Rico bandwagon here. I don't like that, but he did give a reason to feel that way so it's not the worst. What I do like is his question. I thought it was a good early game, looking-to-get-involved type of question. This brief appearance is what I was referencing earlier when I said I gave him an early town read. When he came in here it looked like he was genuinely trying to both get himself involved and get others thinking about things in the game.
DrWilgy wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:DrWilgy, do you have any other gut and/or vibe-based reads you would like to share?
The only other player that I have thought about is Sprityo, whom I gut read as bad.

I like your analysis of Rico. I'd like an answer from Rico as to why he thought to interject here. Not sure if this has been explained yet or not, but I'm not willing to go back and check.

Zebra, how would you respond to me voting Rico right now?

Sloonei, mind telling me the exchange that interested you most?
He lists sprityo as an early baddie read. I'd be interested to hear how that's developed. He also gave me and LoRab gut scum reads. I think he's since dropped the read on me,and his LoRab read seems to have been dependent on Rico being bad as well.

Turns out that his most substantial post in the game to this point is a big one about why LoRab is bad. Interesting. I don't think it's all consistent. For instance, the second to last point he makes in this post indicates that a certain post of LoRab's was directed toward him, when it was really directed at Jay.

So I dunno. There's not much here. There are a few things that give me slight town vibes in his post history but nothing overwhelming. A lack of content is always going to be a concern, so I can't do much with Wilgy right now.

So in regards to the inconsistency that you believe tou saw, the subject of my post was mostly LoRab ignoring my question. The 1 or 2 quotes above the one you claim to be inconsistent is the subject (the question), and the following quotes were to show that the question was ignored.

What are your thoughts on this now that I've explained this error?

MovingPictures07 wrote:I want some brains.

I'll give u brains alright.

Sloonei wrote:
Scotty wrote:Dom: GOOD
DrWilgy: BAD
Epignosis 2.0: GOOD
Glorfindel: BAD
Indiglo: BAD
insertnamehere: GOOD
JaggedJimmyJay: GOOD
LoRab: GOOD
MacDougall: GOOD
motel room: GOOD
Quin: BAD
Sloonei: BAD

I feel like Glorf could go either way for me, and I'm still operating under the assumption that INH saved himself.
Quin is literally a gut read based on dribblings of post she he has made, and I have no evidence to think him bad besides that.
indi and wilgy seem to be pretty universally suspected. I am confident that we can find at least one baddie between the two of them.

I'm surprised at your bad reads on myself and Quin, Scotty. Can you explain those?

What is up with these all encompassing blame trains?

Just u wait Sloon... ONE DAY I'LL HAVE TIME TO POST

Sloonei wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Sloonei wrote:if INH is town, Wilgy looks bad right now.
Actually, you are bad. Explain this Sloonei.
It's not my fault, G-man made me do it.
What does this mean?
I was making a funny joke because I'm not bad and you are just pointing fingers at me because what the hell

How about explaining your non-joke claim that came before the joke then Sloon my friend.

A note: based on interactions between 7 and results, motel and Sloonei seemed to be expecting a result and are not the lynch pardoner.

a2thezebra wrote:Just so it's said, all of you (and I really do mean ALL of you) have been great and this has been fun for me. My life just can't handle this anymore.

Die wanna wagna. Die wanna wanga Zebra friend.

Sloonei wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Sloonei wrote:if INH is town, Wilgy looks bad right now.
Actually, you are bad. Explain this Sloonei.
It's not my fault, G-man made me do it.

What does this mean?

Sloonei wrote:if INH is town, Wilgy looks bad right now.

Actually, you are bad. Explain this Sloonei.

Sloonei wrote:
Glorfindel wrote:
Sloonei wrote:Here's what I remember:
Wilgy dropped a vote on INH, making it 4 to 3.
Wilgy then moved his vote to indiglo. It was 4 to 4, with Glorfindel as the 4th INH voter.
Wilgy moved his vote back to INH.
Result pending.
When I voted, it was 4 all between Indiglo and INH.
I voted INH making it 5 to 4 in INH's favour
I refreshed and the vote had changed to 5 all (hence my response to Mac's post).
I refreshed again and it was 5 to 3 in INH's favour.

I'm seriously starting to see the advantages of non-changeable votes...
This math does not check out. It was 3 to 3 for the longest time. Wilgy made it 4 for INH to 3 for indi. I am not sure when he changed his vote relative to your vote, but for a brief moment he was on indi and you were on INH. This made it 4 to 4, but then he changed his vote.

Wilgy, why did you change your vote to indiglo?

Because I saw who I was voting with and didn't like it.

Sloonei wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:Nah. Baddies I'd vote for. GTH baddies I still need to think about.

Glorf why is it 5-3 then?
Why was I off your baddiedar on Day 2? Am I back on it now?

I don't remember when u got off of it, and you are still off it.

Nah. Baddies I'd vote for. GTH baddies I still need to think about.

Glorf why is it 5-3 then?

Nah. Baddies I'd vote for. GTH baddies I still need to think about.

Glorf why is it 5-3 then?

Sloonei wrote:
Glorfindel wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:Glorf almost tied it and had to change it again.
My vote BROKE the tie and put INH ahead 5 votes to 4 - what on earth is going on here?
you guys appeared to vote simultaneously.

it was 4 against 4 until I moved my vote, setting it 3/5.

Sloonei wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:I actually trust the wagon without Lorab and sloon on it more.

Changed my vote.
Am I back in your bad graces?
You were never out of my bad graces and I still gth you bad. While I didn't want to vote with you, it's better than a tie.

For safe keeping I'll notate my vote record this phase. I was on INH, changed to Indiglo and changed back to INH all within 3 min to prevent a tie.

DrWilgy wrote:
Quin wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:@Sloonei I gut read you as bad from me due to a feeling of dancing around the pizza last night. A forced non-grasping of the Rico situation. This is heavily dependent upon other's alignements though.

@Sprityo I gut read you due to your request of wishing to team with Mac following mine.

@Lorab, yes that is what I stated. Your point?
What's your view on Sloonei now that you have an alignment to work with?
Sloonei is no longer on my baddiedar.
Losing track of your fake reads, Doctor?

No baddiedar is different. I have no impulse to vote for you but in a gth scenario I do think you are still bad.

Honestly at this point with how little time ive had to read/contribute all my thoughts are just a gth random mess.

Sloonei wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:I actually trust the wagon without Lorab and sloon on it more.

Changed my vote.
Am I back in your bad graces?

You were never out of my bad graces and I still gth you bad. While I didn't want to vote with you, it's better than a tie.

For safe keeping I'll notate my vote record this phase. I was on INH, changed to Indiglo and changed back to INH all within 3 min to prevent a tie.

Glorf almost tied it and had to change it again.

I actually trust the wagon without Lorab and sloon on it more.

Changed my vote.

No ties. I didn't even get to catch up tho...

Thinks: I like the vote spread. It generally means we are on the right track.

Sloon can you inform me what reactions you are speking of? I'll look through but, I'm also at work and shouldn't be playing mafia

Why is this the meme whenever I check the thread?

I'm doing what I can. I check thread, read the last 50 or so posts and then share my thoughts if I have any.

Why do I have votes?

Question that is currently in my head. What would Mafia Mac gain from revealing my alignment?
1. Possible support from me
2. Possible Credit when I'm killed
3. Possible forcing of connections

Why would Mafia Mac need any of these 3 at the moment of him declaring his civ read of me? Is my next question.
1. He just lost a teammate?
2. He doesn't want to keep lying?
3. He wants comrades to vote with him?
...
...

Unknown...

...
...
Back to browsing memes. Bye everyone.

a2thezebra wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:That result makes me feel worse about MP actually.
How so?
He seemed to follow the yellow brick road in terms of his read of Eloh.

linki - Yes. I don't see why you're asking him if he's serious in regards to a true statement.
Simply because there was a lack of analysis of my vote. Thus It interested me.
Huh.
What?
Right.

Kay...

a2thezebra wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:That result makes me feel worse about MP actually.
How so?
He seemed to follow the yellow brick road in terms of his read of Eloh.

linki - Yes. I don't see why you're asking him if he's serious in regards to a true statement.
Simply because there was a lack of analysis of my vote. Thus It interested me.
Huh.

What?

a2thezebra wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:That result makes me feel worse about MP actually.
How so?
He seemed to follow the yellow brick road in terms of his read of Eloh.

linki - Yes. I don't see why you're asking him if he's serious in regards to a true statement.

Simply because there was a lack of analysis of my vote. Thus It interested me.

a2thezebra wrote:Are you denying that that's where your vote went? Because we can all still see the poll results.

Is this adressed to me zeebs?

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Generic JJJ post about baddie interactions -- Elohcin and DrWilgy

Elohcin:

Spoiler: show
Elohcin wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:Yo Mac, wanna team up?
What is this?
This is her only acknowledgement of Wilgy. It's a tiny little post, but I think it might actually say a lot. Elohcin showed herself to be the person taking easy opportunities in this game, particularly in her suspicions about my roleplay. This post looks like another similar example. Wilgy's post was typical Wilgy, and she took his bait by asking him about it (I think as a feeler to set herself up for an eventual Wilgy vote). That'd be a good look for the Doc.

~~~

DrWilgy:

Spoiler: show
DrWilgy wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:DrWilgy, do you have any other gut and/or vibe-based reads you would like to share?
The only other player that I have thought about is Sprityo, whom I gut read as bad.

I like your analysis of Rico. I'd like an answer from Rico as to why he thought to interject here. Not sure if this has been explained yet or not, but I'm not willing to go back and check.

Zebra, how would you respond to me voting Rico right now?
I would support it and encourage others to do the same until a better suspect comes up, assuming that happens before the day phase ends.
I suppose that means votes are changeable?

Zebra what are your thoughts on Elochin and JJJ?
Isolated prod for Elohcin thoughts.

Spoiler: show
DrWilgy wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
Elohcin wrote:I initially accused JJJ of seeming like he was trying too hard with his roleplaying. But that was to see his reaction. I was trying to feel him out as I was not sure about him. But...I later said that even though his role playing confuses me and that I don't like it, I still think he is civ. So...not sure what you are talking about when you bring up the word suspicion.
I don't buy this. You seemed plenty sincere in your accusation.
MP can you link me to the accusation?
Wilgy requested a link related to Elohcin. I don't believe there was ever a follow-up on it.

His vote went to LoRab, the 4th of 5. That's a bad look.

~~~

I like a couple little things here, and I don't like the Day 3 vote. I wouldn't call him a town read at least.

I can't tell if your serious or not...

MacDougall wrote:I'd like to think I am an expert at Wilgy and I think he is a civilian here.

Why is "Wilgy Expert" a title people are striving for?

G-Man wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:I could not possibly be in more anticipation of this flip.
And you'll be in anticipation for this flip for another 10 minutes or so.

RIOT

Sloonei wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Quin wrote:I guess I answered my own question. Is there anything beyond the fact that they have a vote that's bothering you, Wilgy?
nah, ties are cool dude
You understand that a tie will result in a no lynch, right?
oh...

ABORT MISSION!!! regardless I feel like this scenario has given us some useful data. Considering that everyone is dancing around the pizza regarding this tie and no one will drop a vote, I think we are on the right path.
Who's doing the Pizza Dance, Wilgy?
The rude doods that wouldn't make it a foursome...
I want names! Don't make me click back to the last page!

Everyone but motel room!!

Sloonei wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Quin wrote:I guess I answered my own question. Is there anything beyond the fact that they have a vote that's bothering you, Wilgy?
nah, ties are cool dude
You understand that a tie will result in a no lynch, right?
oh...

ABORT MISSION!!! regardless I feel like this scenario has given us some useful data. Considering that everyone is dancing around the pizza regarding this tie and no one will drop a vote, I think we are on the right path.
Who's doing the Pizza Dance, Wilgy?

The rude doods that wouldn't make it a foursome...

Sloonei wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Quin wrote:I guess I answered my own question. Is there anything beyond the fact that they have a vote that's bothering you, Wilgy?
nah, ties are cool dude
You understand that a tie will result in a no lynch, right?

oh...

ABORT MISSION!!! regardless I feel like this scenario has given us some useful data. Considering that everyone is dancing around the pizza regarding this tie and no one will drop a vote, I think we are on the right path.

Quin wrote:I guess I answered my own question. Is there anything beyond the fact that they have a vote that's bothering you, Wilgy?

nah, ties are cool dude

Quin wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:It's been a long day for Neil Hartley, and I'm going to have to take the rest of evening off. I wouldn't leave you without a parting tune though, and a few friends of mine you may have heard before will be joining me for something special. Hit it Charlie!
I missed these.
I miss you
Awww you2 baby

Lol. Seriously though, we need to meet up again soon.

Linki - we want a 3 some. Make it a fourway and vote MP or Zebra
If I did that you wouldn't have a 3 way at all

Why MP or Zebra?

You are right... your vote has already been placed... My plan is ruined.

MovingPictures07 wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:It's been a long day for Neil Hartley, and I'm going to have to take the rest of evening off. I wouldn't leave you without a parting tune though, and a few friends of mine you may have heard before will be joining me for something special. Hit it Charlie!
I missed these.
I miss you
Awww you2 baby

Lol. Seriously though, we need to meet up again soon.

Linki - we want a 3 some. Make it a fourway and vote MP or Zebra

MovingPictures07 wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:It's been a long day for Neil Hartley, and I'm going to have to take the rest of evening off. I wouldn't leave you without a parting tune though, and a few friends of mine you may have heard before will be joining me for something special. Hit it Charlie!
I missed these.

I miss you

Anyone wanna vote MP or Zebra and make this a 4 way?

Search found 125 matches