The Syndicate

Thoughts regarding this fun little sprint in thread:

Michelle/SVS/Guillo has one, likelier Michelle/SVS than Guillo.

Falcon/LP is not W/W

LP/SVS is not W/W

Falcon/SVS is not W/W

Michelle/Seanzie is not W/W

Michelle/SVS is not W/W

Falcon is the firmest TR.

LP feels like a TR, but not as firm as Falcon.

Guillo is in an odd position for me. I'm aware that Guillo is very good about putting out a town perspective as W. While I think this is a T perspective Guillo, I need to be cognizant of them pushing both Me and Michelle (two of their own voters) and their ability to shout in a towny way as wolf. Guillo has moved to null with this in mind. I wonder if threadstate will spew them one way or the other.

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:17 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:03 am

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:59 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:54 am

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:52 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:50 am

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:47 am

Implying that I'm pocketing you off of me asking what's happening with my dear friend Falcon when I see them enter the thread?

Weird shade buddy.

Nah, it's pretty standard after last game

I mean, I think I have a good read on you. That being the case, as T I'm just correct on you and excited to see you enter the thread, as W I have to pretend to be correct on you and excited to see you enter the thread.

What makes my T read on you differ from my W read on you? What makes my T excitement at you entering thread, different from my W excitement at you entering the thread?

It's my intro post, you can't WR or TR me off it...as you say, you're excited to see me (and I you), but I can't tell the difference if you're fakin' it or not.





So you get the side-eye

My town read of you didn't come until you were able to suspect S~V~S in a way I find reasonable of T Falcon though, not your intro post.

OK...but my side-eye came before my SVS sus...

Aye, but you made the point of 'you can't WR or TR me off it' to which the response was when I started to TR you. I did think your side eye was weird as I don't think I'd see excitement at seeing someone entering the thread as a pocket.

Moot point, but I felt that clarification should be made.

LinearPoint wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:19 am A side note, I do not think falcon and Wilgy could ever both be scum.
This is mostly since Wilgy did not put falcon into their reads list at all and comes across as a genuine accident that they forgot than intentionally leaving a wolf partner out. If anything I expect them to defiantly have at least a read on a partner.

Had falcon entered thread by then? I didn't think so.

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:11 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:08 am

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:03 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:01 am

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:55 am

LinearPoint wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:51 am

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:46 am How about we stop speculating about mafia:town ratios?

It gives scum the opportunity to hide under the guise of creating content by talking about it.

I for one think it's productive as it's likely to draw in wolves to the discussion and open them up for slipping.

Plus it's not like there is anything else we can realistically do at the very start of day 1. There's no mechanical info to go off of so we need people to talk, associate, and take positions.

But there is a far better subject than mechanical talk now.

Me

Why would discussion strictly on you be more beneficial than discussions on set up?

Assuming you are T, it can escalate you into the game yes, but does this escalate the entire thread into the game like a mechanical discourse would?

Pushes on people generate associative and disassociatives and then they can branch out to geberate content about other players, mechanical does not.

Mechanical can lead to interaction, interaction in general can be observed and processed and disagreements/agreements about mechs can lead to pushes and pockets that are observable as well.

To define a momentum as being more beneficial than another is inherently flawed. You may, in isolation, think one benefits you more than the other, but to dissuade the entire thread from it, while others can benefit from it, is again, negative value to town.

I wholeheartedly disagree. I dont see the benefit of talking about me h on day 1 other than allowing wolves try to blend in with it, i wanna catch them slipping, i want to take their hopes of winning early, i want to crash their chances, i want them to feel suffocated by having to make reads on people, i want them to associate with people.

What prevents you from catching them slipping, taking their hopes, and crashing their chances within mechanical discussion. Since when does mechanical discussion not have players interacting and associating?

I believe several perspectives on SVS and Michelle have come out of this mechanical discussion and their interactions with each other there.

We are associating and interacting now on the basis of mechanical vs read discussion now are we not?

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:08 am I like direct and bold, people with guts who mean what they say.

If you see im trying to take us out of rvs and begin playing seriously and you get in my way of that, you got yourself a tunnel! Congratulations! You are the lucky winnet!

I like bold and aromatic coffees, something with depth that wakes me up in the morning.

How did your bored posting take us out of rvs? As I recall it took, Seanzie, Michelle and I to do that. Why is it pro T to tunnel me? Where is the actual review and analysis of my thoughts... Outside of meta, you won't catch me on meta.

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:06 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:05 am

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:00 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:57 am

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:54 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:51 am

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:50 am

Who is making fake reads?

I could be, why aren't mine fake?

Stop,playing dumb, it is obvious you were insinuating it was me, i just asked you to see if you had the guts to tell it to my face and then i'd ask you why are they fake, which are fake.

I don't think your reads are fake. I agree with your Michelle read and I think it makes sense for you to have it. I do think your approach to d1 and game start was negative town ev. I also think discouragement of any form of discussion is negative town ev. I do not know if that was motivated by a W perspective or a flawed one.

To assume I'm playing dumb though, how feisty.

Feisty? You forgot we wolfed and won together not less than a month ago?

Aye, how does that have impact on your alignment here? Are you implying I should be seeing something that I have not voiced?

Or are you implying that me playing dumb is in my wolf meta?

What is the insinuation here?

You playing dumb is in your wolf meta and i dont see how playing dumb benefits finding each other if you are town.

Jokes on you Guillo, I am dumb. There's no bit of play to me whatsoever.

My questions help me find you, I do not care if you find me or not.

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:03 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:01 am

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:55 am

LinearPoint wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:51 am

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:46 am How about we stop speculating about mafia:town ratios?

It gives scum the opportunity to hide under the guise of creating content by talking about it.

I for one think it's productive as it's likely to draw in wolves to the discussion and open them up for slipping.

Plus it's not like there is anything else we can realistically do at the very start of day 1. There's no mechanical info to go off of so we need people to talk, associate, and take positions.

But there is a far better subject than mechanical talk now.

Me

Why would discussion strictly on you be more beneficial than discussions on set up?

Assuming you are T, it can escalate you into the game yes, but does this escalate the entire thread into the game like a mechanical discourse would?

Pushes on people generate associative and disassociatives and then they can branch out to geberate content about other players, mechanical does not.

Mechanical can lead to interaction, interaction in general can be observed and processed and disagreements/agreements about mechs can lead to pushes and pockets that are observable as well.

To define a momentum as being more beneficial than another is inherently flawed. You may, in isolation, think one benefits you more than the other, but to dissuade the entire thread from it, while others can benefit from it, is again, negative value to town.

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:00 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:57 am

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:54 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:51 am

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:50 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:49 am

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:46 am How about we stop speculating about mafia:town ratios?

It gives scum the opportunity to hide under the guise of creating content by talking about it.

Damn, may as well stop discussing in general because it allows scum the opportunity to hide under the guise of fake reads and observations.

Who is making fake reads?

I could be, why aren't mine fake?

Stop,playing dumb, it is obvious you were insinuating it was me, i just asked you to see if you had the guts to tell it to my face and then i'd ask you why are they fake, which are fake.

I don't think your reads are fake. I agree with your Michelle read and I think it makes sense for you to have it. I do think your approach to d1 and game start was negative town ev. I also think discouragement of any form of discussion is negative town ev. I do not know if that was motivated by a W perspective or a flawed one.

To assume I'm playing dumb though, how feisty.

Feisty? You forgot we wolfed and won together not less than a month ago?

Aye, how does that have impact on your alignment here? Are you implying I should be seeing something that I have not voiced?

Or are you implying that me playing dumb is in my wolf meta?

What is the insinuation here?

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:59 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:54 am

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:52 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:50 am

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:47 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:39 am

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:32 am I AM TOWN!






Round the decay of that colossal wreck, boundless & bare, the lone & level sands stretch far away

Ohshitdudewhat'sup?

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:40 am

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:34 am Ok, Wilgy is towmie

No pocketing me. Pockets taste like chalupas with too much sour cream.

Implying that I'm pocketing you off of me asking what's happening with my dear friend Falcon when I see them enter the thread?

Weird shade buddy.

Nah, it's pretty standard after last game

I mean, I think I have a good read on you. That being the case, as T I'm just correct on you and excited to see you enter the thread, as W I have to pretend to be correct on you and excited to see you enter the thread.

What makes my T read on you differ from my W read on you? What makes my T excitement at you entering thread, different from my W excitement at you entering the thread?

It's my intro post, you can't WR or TR me off it...as you say, you're excited to see me (and I you), but I can't tell the difference if you're fakin' it or not.





So you get the side-eye

My town read of you didn't come until you were able to suspect S~V~S in a way I find reasonable of T Falcon though, not your intro post.

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:55 am

LinearPoint wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:51 am

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:46 am How about we stop speculating about mafia:town ratios?

It gives scum the opportunity to hide under the guise of creating content by talking about it.

I for one think it's productive as it's likely to draw in wolves to the discussion and open them up for slipping.

Plus it's not like there is anything else we can realistically do at the very start of day 1. There's no mechanical info to go off of so we need people to talk, associate, and take positions.

But there is a far better subject than mechanical talk now.

Me

Why would discussion strictly on you be more beneficial than discussions on set up?

Assuming you are T, it can escalate you into the game yes, but does this escalate the entire thread into the game like a mechanical discourse would?

S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:54 am @falcon45ca nah

You’re reading too much into one word. I’ve noticed you tend to do this with me.

Do you think Michelle is town?

I mean, I kinda saw it too.

I think assumption of aggro from Michelle was somewhat overplaced, I do think W's are immediately more aware or easier to perceive pushes against them. i.e. aggro.

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:54 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:51 am

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:50 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:49 am

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:46 am How about we stop speculating about mafia:town ratios?

It gives scum the opportunity to hide under the guise of creating content by talking about it.

Damn, may as well stop discussing in general because it allows scum the opportunity to hide under the guise of fake reads and observations.

Who is making fake reads?

I could be, why aren't mine fake?

Stop,playing dumb, it is obvious you were insinuating it was me, i just asked you to see if you had the guts to tell it to my face and then i'd ask you why are they fake, which are fake.

I don't think your reads are fake. I agree with your Michelle read and I think it makes sense for you to have it. I do think your approach to d1 and game start was negative town ev. I also think discouragement of any form of discussion is negative town ev. I do not know if that was motivated by a W perspective or a flawed one.

To assume I'm playing dumb though, how feisty.

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:52 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:50 am

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:47 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:39 am

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:32 am I AM TOWN!






Round the decay of that colossal wreck, boundless & bare, the lone & level sands stretch far away

Ohshitdudewhat'sup?

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:40 am

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:34 am Ok, Wilgy is towmie

No pocketing me. Pockets taste like chalupas with too much sour cream.

Implying that I'm pocketing you off of me asking what's happening with my dear friend Falcon when I see them enter the thread?

Weird shade buddy.

Nah, it's pretty standard after last game

I mean, I think I have a good read on you. That being the case, as T I'm just correct on you and excited to see you enter the thread, as W I have to pretend to be correct on you and excited to see you enter the thread.

What makes my T read on you differ from my W read on you? What makes my T excitement at you entering thread, different from my W excitement at you entering the thread?

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:50 am

S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:44 am

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:29 am

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:27 am Actually Michelle is wolfing

[VOTE: Michelle] aubergine

I dont believe you question how 3 wolves would be unbalanced in a game with 10 players

2 is a bit town sided.

Fight me, I am bored ^^

@falcon45ca even she thought she was sounding a bit aggro ^^ eh?

Although she might have been shading me, she made this post after the one I made implying she was sounding a tad aggro.

@Michelle Are you aggro?






We all have heard players say 'fight me I'm bored', and we've all seen players actually get aggro....the two are not the same






SVS is making mountains of molehills






[VOTE: SVS] aubergine

Falcon is town and I agree with this.

LinearPoint wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:47 am I don't know really how to feel about the Guillotine situation right now.

Early gut is telling me it's a wolf and one of the semi-joke votes on Guillotine is a second wolf.

I just don't really know why they are pushing so hard on the Michelle thing.

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:41 am

LinearPoint wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:34 am

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:52 am

LinearPoint wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:22 am It was a late night start.

But no matter, the thread shall not be dead forever.

You still here?

Had stepped away for a sec, but yes.

As for what has been said so far. 3 wolves is pretty much always pushing it on a 10 player setup. Although I don't think I agree on susing Michelle for questioning the ruling out of 3 wolves.

As for all the meta talk about Guillotine and Michelle I don't really know much about right now since it's been a hot minute since I played with either.

I think what's more so, is that it's easier for a W to advise 'this is town favored' than a T to do so, especially without the set up being revealed.

That is true that mafia are a bit more tempted to join speculation talk due to knowing the answer. But I find that kind of talk is more a point against people when we get a few flips than a basis for a read.

Well, with what little we have, what else would you like to form a basis of a read upon?

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:50 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:49 am

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:46 am How about we stop speculating about mafia:town ratios?

It gives scum the opportunity to hide under the guise of creating content by talking about it.

Damn, may as well stop discussing in general because it allows scum the opportunity to hide under the guise of fake reads and observations.

Who is making fake reads?

I could be, why aren't mine fake?

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:47 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:39 am

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:32 am I AM TOWN!






Round the decay of that colossal wreck, boundless & bare, the lone & level sands stretch far away

Ohshitdudewhat'sup?

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:40 am

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:34 am Ok, Wilgy is towmie

No pocketing me. Pockets taste like chalupas with too much sour cream.

Implying that I'm pocketing you off of me asking what's happening with my dear friend Falcon when I see them enter the thread?

Weird shade buddy.

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:46 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:45 am

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:44 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:41 am

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:40 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:39 am

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:37 am

The boring state was on everyone who posted not just me.

I at least bait you guys into reacting to me, what did you do before that?

I interacted with Epi and I went to sleep.

The interaction was trash

Still better than your lack of.

I geberated all of this, i bested your trash entrance.

90% sure you'd still be saying you were bored had 3 players not chimed in. You are welcome.

And i wouldnt have been wrong.

incorrect.

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:46 am How about we stop speculating about mafia:town ratios?

It gives scum the opportunity to hide under the guise of creating content by talking about it.

Damn, may as well stop discussing in general because it allows scum the opportunity to hide under the guise of fake reads and observations.

S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:44 am

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:29 am

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:27 am Actually Michelle is wolfing

[VOTE: Michelle] aubergine

I dont believe you question how 3 wolves would be unbalanced in a game with 10 players

2 is a bit town sided.

Fight me, I am bored ^^

@falcon45ca even she thought she was sounding a bit aggro ^^ eh?

Although she might have been shading me, she made this post after the one I made implying she was sounding a tad aggro.

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:24 am

S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:18 am

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:50 am How many mafia we have in this game?

Well a post up there ^^ mentions that the “team” can start BTSC, so more than 1. Prolly 2. More than that would be unbalanced and Jay is all about balance.

Why would be 3 unbalanced?

@S~V~S is this the post you are referring to as shade in?

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:44 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:41 am

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:40 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:39 am

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:37 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:29 am

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:24 am





So the votes are because you disagree the thread was dead and boring or?

You chose to not make it less boring.

The boring state was on everyone who posted not just me.

I at least bait you guys into reacting to me, what did you do before that?

I interacted with Epi and I went to sleep.

The interaction was trash

Still better than your lack of.

I geberated all of this, i bested your trash entrance.

90% sure you'd still be saying you were bored had 3 players not chimed in. You are welcome.

S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:39 am

S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:28 am

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:24 am

S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:18 am

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:50 am How many mafia we have in this game?

Well a post up there ^^ mentions that the “team” can start BTSC, so more than 1. Prolly 2. More than that would be unbalanced and Jay is all about balance.

Why would be 3 unbalanced?

With only 10 players? That’s almost a third of the players list?

His Solar System game had 11 players, 2 mafia. With fewer players more wolves seems unlikely?

This is rather a debatable point to get aggro about?

Did I put enough question marks in this ^^? Maybe I need a few more?

@DrWilgy mathematical balance is not my strong suit; I was working on the premise that he wouldn’t have more wolves than in a game with more players than this. Hopefully he chooses to tell us, but if not, not.

I mean, It just depends on misyeet count for me. How many mistakes are town allowed to make before W's win. I've seen more arguments for a 4 misyeet game being balanced than I've seen of a 3 misyeet game being balanced.

with 8-2 we are a 4 misyeet game, 7-3 a 3 misyeet game.

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:40 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:39 am

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:37 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:29 am

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:24 am

Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:23 am [VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

See y'all tomorrow.

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:04 am

Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:23 am [VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

See y'all tomorrow.

I agree with Sean

[VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:15 am

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:04 am
I agree with Sean

[VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

Now I'll feel weird because I'm third, but I also agree.

[VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

So the votes are because you disagree the thread was dead and boring or?

You chose to not make it less boring.

The boring state was on everyone who posted not just me.

I at least bait you guys into reacting to me, what did you do before that?

I interacted with Epi and I went to sleep.

The interaction was trash

Still better than your lack of.

LinearPoint wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:34 am

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:52 am

LinearPoint wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:22 am It was a late night start.

But no matter, the thread shall not be dead forever.

You still here?

Had stepped away for a sec, but yes.

As for what has been said so far. 3 wolves is pretty much always pushing it on a 10 player setup. Although I don't think I agree on susing Michelle for questioning the ruling out of 3 wolves.

As for all the meta talk about Guillotine and Michelle I don't really know much about right now since it's been a hot minute since I played with either.

I think what's more so, is that it's easier for a W to advise 'this is town favored' than a T to do so, especially without the set up being revealed.

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:34 am Ok, Wilgy is towmie

No pocketing me. Pockets taste like chalupas with too much sour cream.

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:32 am I AM TOWN!






Round the decay of that colossal wreck, boundless & bare, the lone & level sands stretch far away

Ohshitdudewhat'sup?

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:37 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:29 am

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:24 am

Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:23 am [VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

See y'all tomorrow.

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:04 am

Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:23 am [VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

See y'all tomorrow.

I agree with Sean

[VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:15 am

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:04 am

Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:23 am [VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

See y'all tomorrow.

I agree with Sean

[VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

Now I'll feel weird because I'm third, but I also agree.

[VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

So the votes are because you disagree the thread was dead and boring or?

You chose to not make it less boring.

The boring state was on everyone who posted not just me.

I at least bait you guys into reacting to me, what did you do before that?

I interacted with Epi and I went to sleep.

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:32 am

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:26 am

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:24 am

Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:23 am [VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

See y'all tomorrow.

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:04 am

Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:23 am [VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

See y'all tomorrow.

I agree with Sean

[VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:15 am

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:04 am

Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:23 am [VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

See y'all tomorrow.

I agree with Sean

[VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

Now I'll feel weird because I'm third, but I also agree.

[VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

So the votes are because you disagree the thread was dead and boring or?

It's because town Guillo would try to create content imo

Im pretty sure i created content with three votes against me

Nah, you got lucky that several yucked it.

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:29 am

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:27 am Actually Michelle is wolfing

[VOTE: Michelle] aubergine

I dont believe you question how 3 wolves would be unbalanced in a game with 10 players

2 is a bit town sided.

Fight me, I am bored ^^

Feels wolfy in perspective.

Arguing bored while voting Guillo for bored posting.

S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:28 am

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:24 am

S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:18 am

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:50 am How many mafia we have in this game?

Well a post up there ^^ mentions that the “team” can start BTSC, so more than 1. Prolly 2. More than that would be unbalanced and Jay is all about balance.

Why would be 3 unbalanced?

With only 10 players? That’s almost a third of the players list?

His Solar System game had 11 players, 2 mafia. With fewer players more wolves seems unlikely?

This is rather a debatable point to get aggro about?

Mmmm yes this is tasty.

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:27 am Actually Michelle is wolfing

[VOTE: Michelle] aubergine

I dont believe you question how 3 wolves would be unbalanced in a game with 10 players

Why is this?

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:24 am

S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:18 am

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:50 am How many mafia we have in this game?

Well a post up there ^^ mentions that the “team” can start BTSC, so more than 1. Prolly 2. More than that would be unbalanced and Jay is all about balance.

Why would be 3 unbalanced?

10 with no more than 2-3 prs

10 players is often AROUND the realm of 8 v 2 making a 4 misyeet game, see below: However, I do not know JJJ's definition of balance and my general observations can be wrong.

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:24 am

Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:23 am [VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

See y'all tomorrow.

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:04 am

Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:23 am [VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

See y'all tomorrow.

I agree with Sean

[VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:15 am

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:04 am

Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:23 am [VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

See y'all tomorrow.

I agree with Sean

[VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

Now I'll feel weird because I'm third, but I also agree.

[VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

So the votes are because you disagree the thread was dead and boring or?

You chose to not make it less boring.

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:23 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:20 am LP
Seanzie
Cat
Epi
SVS
MR
Michelle
Guillo

I mean, looking at this

Also explain the list

LP had encouragement energy, generally pro town.

Seanzie provided a vote and contributed momentum, generally pro town.

Cat's entry was at least an interaction with another player, soliciting interaction, generally prow town.

Epi provided a discussion point in entry, generally pro town, but the lightest of trs.

SVS provided an explanation for being away, but at least brought interaction to Epi's entry, null but close to tr.

MR provided an explanation for being away, null.

Michelle feels high energy, but in the situation where Guillo is town the vote is wolfy. Guillo dependant. Michelle is always red or high green, but without Guillo's data, will remain red.

Guillo saw a lack of energy and decided to do nothing about it. Discussion hooks had been provided and Guillo chose none of them.

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:22 am

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:15 am

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:04 am

Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:23 am [VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

See y'all tomorrow.

I agree with Sean

[VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

Now I'll feel weird because I'm third, but I also agree.

[VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

Why do you agree with me?

Technically, we agree with Sean.

It's easy to bored post, it's hard to create game momentum.

Guillo observed game momentum was needed and chose the easy option.

LP
Seanzie
Cat
Epi
SVS
MR
Michelle
Guillo

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:04 am

Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:23 am [VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

See y'all tomorrow.

I agree with Sean

[VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

Now I'll feel weird because I'm third, but I also agree.

[VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 12:00 am My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!

My name is DrWilgy, Doctor of Doctors;
Look on my fraud, ye goober, and doober!