The Syndicate

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

Epignosis wrote:I am keen on lynching INH or SokothQultuq. Speak now or forever hold onto your butts.

the dead can't speak, so I guess I'll hold my butt...

I will hold your butt with my cold dead hands.

Epignosis wrote:I am keen on lynching INH or SokothQultuq. Speak now or forever hold onto your butts.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:drunk help

I'm dead help

Epignosis wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

Epignosis wrote:DrWilgy:

Do mafia fight to save their teammates? Or do they let the circumstances determine their actions?

You weren't kicking up any fuss over Scotty's lynch over the single token post you made. Is anybody going to kick up any fuss over yours?

It depends on the player. The fundamental rule of mafia being harder to lynch than civilian will be unchanging due to the nature of the game.

Probably not. Unless someone has any means of knowing my alignment. The only reason why I knew Scotty most likely wasn't bad was due to vote pattern analysis which I pointed out previously here:

DrWilgy wrote:Scotty has a 5 vote lead? I'll be shocked if this is a baddie.

This makes me wonder why you would say I didn't kick up any fuss when I did disagree. (I'm currently catching up in the thread to become more involved in the game)

Single token post.

Russtifinko wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

Epignosis wrote:DrWilgy:

Do mafia fight to save their teammates? Or do they let the circumstances determine their actions?

You weren't kicking up any fuss over Scotty's lynch over the single token post you made. Is anybody going to kick up any fuss over yours?

It depends on the player. The fundamental rule of mafia being harder to lynch than civilian will be unchanging due to the nature of the game.

Probably not. Unless someone has any means of knowing my alignment. The only reason why I knew Scotty most likely wasn't bad was due to vote pattern analysis which I pointed out previously here:

DrWilgy wrote:Scotty has a 5 vote lead? I'll be shocked if this is a baddie.

This makes me wonder why you would say I didn't kick up any fuss when I did disagree. (I'm currently catching up in the thread to become more involved in the game)

Wilgy, to attempt to put a finer point on what Epi said: you seem plenty happy to say "I told you so" and throw in snarky comments about how we're headed down the wrong path, but when it comes to the actual work of proposing a better option/building a case/even actually trying to convince people to move their votes rather than just saying they're poor votes, you've fallen woefully short. So your condescension rings hollow.

Epignosis wrote:DrWilgy:

Do mafia fight to save their teammates? Or do they let the circumstances determine their actions?

You weren't kicking up any fuss over Scotty's lynch over the single token post you made. Is anybody going to kick up any fuss over yours?

DrWilgy wrote:Scotty has a 5 vote lead? I'll be shocked if this is a baddie.

BigDamnHero wrote:

DrWilgy wrote: Wait. I can understand reading him as baddie, but how is Scotty saving himself not civ minded? A civ only knows thier own alignment. If I had the choice of me or an unknown I'd take the unknown in a heartbeat. At least that way there's a cance there's a mafia lynch.

Follow the logic here...Scotty read as bad (which you just said you could understand) and so we voted to lynch him. That lynch resulted in Scotty, presumably the baddie, switching the lynch to save himself and throwing a civ player under the bus. Under those sets of circumstances, it was easy for the narrative to continue being written that it was a baddie trying to save himself, hence why a 2nd lynch attempt was made.

BigDamnHero wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:Ok... So I wasn't here (or paying attention recently) but now have more time to play.

So why did everyone somehow agree that lynching Scotty (again) was a good idea after his first vote was a landslide?

I actually need everyone to answer this question. Why the hell did we lynch Scotty?

It was 10-3 the first Scotty lynch yes? meaning mafia (a team of 3) was OK with lynching him. There were probably 2 of them on the Day 2 Scotty vote.

So why, when Scotty was given second chance, and everyone hops on his boat again, did nothing change?

9-4??? When baddies were already A OK with him dying? Why was that a thing when we had evidence that the baddies already were OK with him dying?

His posts read as bad. Especially the one where he said "I haven't lied once in this game. YET." He really wasnt acting civ at all, IMO. Plus there was the little tidbit where he saved his own ass by throwing Buzz under the bus in his place...not very civ minded, on the surface.

DrWilgy wrote:Ok... So I wasn't here (or paying attention recently) but now have more time to play.

So why did everyone somehow agree that lynching Scotty (again) was a good idea after his first vote was a landslide?

MovingPictures07 wrote:Effective immediately (I'm announcing since Daisy is at work), Soneji is replacing S~V~S.

Welcome, Soneji! Thanks for playing, S~V~S!

birdwithteeth11 wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:Sig I can't tell if you are feigning ignorance of my suspicion of Dom.

BWT you say I'm here but not... What is causing that feeling? Also there's no need to beat around the bush. I stated that I didn't read day 0 after all.

Can at least 3 others validate my suspicion please?

I meant here but not here in that I feel like you've posted some, but don't have much substance. I am hoping to see that change.

Dom wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

Scotty wrote:Good news! I'm not bad!

I also want to state that Wilgy is DEFINITELY not a doctor. That is all.
Dont be a lying Doctorpants like Wilgy

Lies!

Lol, actually yes Dom. They were the same. Just because LoRab quoted you instead of me doesn't change the intent of your post. What was it without saying "Don't be dat boi (oh shit, waddup) who's barling at nothing?"

Don't be a confounding Caitlyn.
Your post was vague. Your post didn't elicit specific thoughts or clarification out of LoRab's post. In fact, I read it as a jokey-Wilgy post.

Scotty wrote:Good news! I'm not bad!

I also want to state that Wilgy is DEFINITELY not a doctor. That is all.
Dont be a lying Doctorpants like Wilgy

Dom wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:Dom is bad.

He's poking at Lorabbit's twirlibirdimarks after I already inqured about them. While not being directly opportunistic, he's looking for reasons to vote.

Don't be a ninny.
I have reasons for asking LoRab questions. I'm not looking to vote for her.

BigDamnHero wrote:Also, I dont wanna be a nitpicking nancy, but why does it say it still say Day 0?

LoRab wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

sig wrote:You?

I wish ;__; I'm feeling rather stabby lately. Not being able to let loose this pent up feeling on my friends in a game of mafia may lead to catastrophe soon...

??????

sig wrote:You?