The Syndicate

juliets if you were scum who would you defibitely not kill?

Stop biting my style.

Canucklehead wrote:I prefer that Canucklehead not die, but I may be biased here.

Yo dawg. I reckon you and I are soul bretheren. We should flock together likes birds of a feather.

If you alive.

Epi do you still think dom is a badder?

Do you think I am a badder Epi? Cuz I think u r based Epi master of civ fwiw. I also think dom is civ. I rection wilgtown outed himself as a badder switching to chucklehead the way he did.

I think this game is hard because even the scum can hunt so all the hunterooni is tight and ginuwine. The only ponies that are badders via threvidence are the ones like what Wilgtown is doing. Wilgtown is mecha scum.

Ugh hurry up with the lynch result.

How intriguing and fun.

DrWilgy wrote:
MacDougall wrote:Wilgy changing his vote because of my joke is going to look really hilariously bad when juliets flips.
Are you saying the bonfire is still on? I'm not going to bail if there's still a party.

Does anyone think I'm cum?

FYI I got in trouble for the cum stuff.

LoRab wrote:For the record, I'm totally convinced that nothing happens when Mac gets votes. He's just trying to get people to not vote for him.

I am a genius?

Thank you based epi.

Wilgy changing his vote because of my joke is going to look really hilariously bad when juliets flips.

sig wrote:I'm not sure about Mac I almost agree with Lorab but am not sure
I don't really trust players on either wagons but Mac's insistent to lynch Juliet is strange as well as Floyds vote.

I'll be voting for Canucklehead
I've seen a better case for her lynch and after rereading I'm not sure if I buy the indy claim I've made it before as mafia and got out of lynches so that is were I'll be placing my vote.

I also believe Floyd is mafia. If he could be lynched over Juliet I'd be happy if not lynching him tomorrow could work as well.
So I'll be placing a vote on Juliet

No. Bad sig. Bad fucking sig.

Do not change this lynch. juliets must be lynched. The prophecy foretells it.

TheFloyd73 wrote:
MacDougall wrote:Uh please?
I'm willing to get you want another vote on you for a role power.

Ok.

Uh please?

Floyd vote for me dude.

If anyone wants to waste their vote I will gladly take it.

This juliets bonfire lynch party is dead. I might go to the canucklehead one.

Cool use of the meme.

There you go kids two scum confirmed.

I am going to start night killing my own teammates if this game doesn't get less boring.

Dom wrote:
LoRab wrote:
MacDougall wrote:Just replying to sorsha and LoRab who seem to think I am some kind of bad guy. I am heaps civ.
Well, gee. That totes convinces me.

And pro-civ is not civ. Are you claiming indy now, too?
He's probably bad.

Yeah probs

I would urge typhoony to self vote.

Hey LoRab. Why are you voting for me when I won't be lynched? You just hiding your vote from a definite scum lynch? Cool.

Typhoony wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:Speaking of completely ignoring the points raised against you...

Typhoony wrote:There is a case on me? All I see is a bunch of my posts quoted with a "You're weirding me out".
Your "case" was serious?

For reference, here is his case.
You quote 5 posts where I talk about juliets (2 of which were spurred on because you asked me to talk about her, 2 of which were because I wanted to look indepth at juliets, as I've done with Bubbles and nutella before).

You then say this:

nub wrote:There's something fishy about how you're approaching juliets in this game Typh. You clearly want to talk about her, albeit through the lens of her being talked about by others, but in all of these posts, with all of these questions directed at other players' cases, I have no idea where you really stand on the subject of juliets. Your posts seem designed to either dispute the points made by others, or push them to reinforce their cases. While I appreciate you being so considerate, it feels like you're being a mediator rather than a participant in the discussion. It's weirding me out.
These are observations. There is no accusation. There is no question. Hell, later on you even say that your opinion of me is reliant upon juliets.

Which points (plural, please. You said points, give me multiple things) in your case against me would you like me to respond to TH? Come on, let's have some fun here.

For the record, I will not vote juliets. I do not think she is bad. I looked at her posts in the Champions game epi linked. When she was put under pressure, never did she go into panic mode like she did in this game. She made multiple long winded catch-uppy like posts talking about everything that had been going on, and she didn't seem to go to that much trouble in this game.
I see a lazy juliets who asks a shitload of questions to blend in, I see a juliets who mixes things up, who is iffy and uncertain, a juliets who seems disinterested at times. If she had teammates I don't think she would be playing like this.

Lol no.

Linki: Yes I am indy civ scum.

Just replying to sorsha and LoRab who seem to think I am some kind of bad guy. I am heaps civ.

Heaps pro civ.

I am heaps pro civ.

This juliets lynch party is the coolest.

Epi y u gotta march to the beat of your own drum all the time. Y u not vote juliets huh?

What. The. Heck.

Can you guys just lynch me instead please?

Pfft nothing you said is true.

Sorsha wrote:
MacDougall wrote:It's probably the one where I said I was scum.
Lol... When did you start that though? Day two or three? She hasn't actually voted for you since you've been saying it...

I know what's with nobody voting me?

It's probably the one where I said I was scum.

juliets explain how u r not scum when in fact u r scum?

Worth noting that poisoner man only bit it yesterday so that's at least 3 poisoned players out there, one of whom is having their lynch vote count tripled today. And Witherdeath know who they are. So if we happen to get votes up on a WC player they could easily slip a vote or two onto a poisoned player and watch as some antagonists go against the grain because of unique snowflake syndrome.

juliets can you tell us who you actually suspect? I am seeing defending but not much alleging.

juliets, if u r not scum then explain how your role card has 'maphia' written on it in big capital red letters please?

Furthermore explain why you were seen purchasing large volumes of fertalizer from the farm store? Are you a farmer?

Do you want me to change my vote? I am just buddying HamburgerBoy so he stops accusing me of being bad.

Wilgy I came to your bonfire party you have to come to mine now. We sacrificing some juliets to the god of maphia.

Me too

I am voting for whoever sig votes for today

TheFloyd73 wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
TheFloyd73 wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Matt F wrote:The interaction between Luke/Bug is interesting Epi. I was going to say "perhaps Luke's team told him to say that to Bug", but those posts are within 10 minutes of each other. Add to that the Drac stuff...

My only problem with the theory and it's a small problem. Bug and Luke are friends. If Bug was on Luke's team, do you think he would've had more of a motivation to play?
No. I've invited many people to sign up here and play, and they hate it and never come back.
BUGLA won't be back, I didn't think he would enjoy Mafia much. Luke looks like he'll be here to stay.
Based on BULGA's input before being replaced, do you think BULGA's replacement should be lynched?

Maybe have a read of his posts and decide whether your mate was having a lend k?

Oh cum is also fingersplints too

Ha Engrish teacher just made a dumb dumb.

If I get night killed by the bad guys I become the antichrist and all the bad guys powers become mine and I become unkillable and unlynchable and Epignosis is forced to come to the bonfire party and watch me tweak my nips for a millenium.

I am a secret role. The Messiah. If I get lynched and there are only civs on my wagon then the game ends and everyone wins and an age of peace is brought upon the world.

Me? No I am quite sad that all these beautiful and interesting creations keep dying.

Nah don't have dogs either sadly. I do have the good will of our lord and savior Jesus Christ though.

Epignosis wrote:
MacDougall wrote:As the only member of anti-civ with the bawsz to post itt I suggest we band together to take down Van Helgnosis. Who with me?
You don't have the numbers. Or the nuts.

I have the nuts. Probs not numbers though you are right about dat.

As the only member of anti-civ with the bawsz to post itt I suggest we band together to take down Van Helgnosis. Who with me?

Search found 408 matches