The Syndicate

a2thezebra wrote:After seeing DrWilgy in TH, Pet Sounds, and the ongoing Star Wars as well as this game, I've concluded that DrWilgy's play style is to never have the same play style twice. I wish I had the audacity to attempt such a meta as that.

Wilgy is actually a puppet account that quite a few different people use.

Diiny wrote:Join the fun.

You had to insist!

Epignosis wrote:I'm voting Floyd. He said he wouldn't be playing Mafia for a while- yet here he is.

Did you forget to put the sarcastic font on this post?

Diiny wrote:Talk to me about day one vanilla civ role claims. My question is: why bother?

Floyd's undermining your efforts as we speak

This is the post of a scum player who was caught out by an RVS vote and didn't pause to breathe before making it.

a2thezebra wrote:

Diiny wrote:attempting to start conversation about currently barely-relevant game mechanics on day 1 seems like the opposite of a meaty day 1 to me and has a record of being pretty scummy behaviour.

but yeah, it could.

Who said I was attempting to start conversation at all, let alone about something as silly as that? I'm starting the action itself (indirectly of course, but you better believe I will take full credit), and given that I have triggered the first mention of "scummy behaviour" in the game, it seems to have worked.

Here is the Zebs calling out that horsecrap.

Diiny wrote:

Enrique wrote:

TheFloyd73 wrote:I gotta ask, MM, what inspired you to base this around trees?

Yeah, of all the off topic stuff this one pinged me the most. I don't know why. It might be because this is already seriously reminding me of floyd's previous game where he was scum combined with that being his only game. Might be because it's an interaction with someone who isn't playing; it's more timid.

Floyd, say something game relevant please

Errrrr you are so frickin' scum.

So you got RVS voted and lashed out like a scum. Then Epi and Enrique throw shade on Floyd for nothing, so you chime in to try to make him look worse with... this?

Your whole post about not knowing but then making a big point against him (that frankly is blurgh).

Dis goiiiiiiiiiii.

Enrique wrote:

TheFloyd73 wrote:I gotta ask, MM, what inspired you to base this around trees?

It's fine Floyd. I was wondering that too. Don't worry about the bullies.

a2thezebra wrote:For the record, I am not remotely pinged by Floyd's post.

Loving you, is easy cuz you're beautifulllllllllllllllll.

Diiny wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

Diiny wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

Diiny wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

Diiny wrote:attempting to start conversation about currently barely-relevant game mechanics on day 1 seems like the opposite of a meaty day 1 to me and has a record of being pretty scummy behaviour.

but yeah, it could.

Who said I was attempting to start conversation at all, let alone about something as silly as that? I'm starting the action itself (indirectly of course, but you better believe I will take full credit), and given that I have triggered the first mention of "scummy behaviour" in the game, it seems to have worked.

I'm glad you agree it's silly and glad to know you weren't trying to get the thread talking about it. Why'd you post that, then?

To gauge reactions, and not just from you. I think baddies are most vulnerable at the start of the game, so I'd like to raise the chances of catching them in the awkward stage before they've adjusted to the temperature.

It's like they're slowly dipping their feet into a cold pool and my job is to run up from behind and shove them in.

And how does what you posted about the setup raise the temperature for baddies?

It creates more opportunities for them to accidentally reveal opportunistic/staged/disingenuous behavior. Case in point, why are you so interested?

You're telling me you posted that to get a conversation going to catch scum off guard, but a few posts ago agreed with me that starting such a conversation would be silly. What's going on?

I'm interested because of your responses to my prods. I'm trying to find out whether you're doing some prodding of your own as a townie or making yourself look good as scum. Help me out.

You are really trying to pull the old double cross here aren't you. Trying to make Zebra out to be confused and bad after you throw shade on Floyd without voting. Kind of like putting your right indicator on during a car chase but turning left. You're bad to the bone Dinman. Bad to the bone.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Hello. I'm foolishly on the Internet at 3:30 a.m. on a work night. My alarm is going off in two hours, so I'm not sticking around.

This is me advocating an active Day 1 and all that stuff rah rah rah *shakes pom poms*

JJJ isn't supatowning. He bad.

DrWilgy wrote:Peek on Diiny was red. EZ$$

I heart u Wilgtown.

I am voting for Jimmy.

Whoa so many posts so fast. So many online players. This shit is great.

a2thezebra wrote:Well I'm positive this is one of the paradigms featuring a vanilla civilian in it.

Heh