The Syndicate

Oh right, no one can vote for me. Heheheheheheheheheheheheheheheh

Anyone that saw this post and didn't vote for me immediately when today started is probably Empire.

a2thezebra wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:That's the point sig, so MP can stop being nice to me and stop getting himself lynched.
Lol, I'll never stop getting lynched.
I feel you there. For what it's worth, I'll be surprised if I'm not next tomorrow once Canuck finishes that ISO.

MovingPictures07 wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:So who are your teammates, MP?
All of the other dead and living civilians.

Boooooooooooooo

So who are your teammates, MP?

Hmmmm....an astute conclusion I suppose.

Here it is:

Russtifinko wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
Simon wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
Simon wrote:I'm here. I see there are a lot of players who aren't talking like me. I think it would be good to find and lynch Boba Fett because he can kill any night. We need to make sure he doesn't survive.
I agree. Now how do you suppose we go about doing that?
We should ask them. Russ, are you Boba Fett?
I'm interested in why you picked Russ first to ask.
No.

What does that "no" even mean? It is a mystery to this day.

There was something he did early on in the game that I missed during my Day 1 ISO analyses. It pinged me a bit, lemme find it.

MovingPictures07 wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:zebra, how do you feel about the color red? I think it suits you.
I welcome any vigilantes to waste their target on me, any time.
Talk to me about Russ.

Russ seems like a cool guy.

MovingPictures07 wrote:In fact, I think I'll do that now.

Votes GlorfinDaisy

NOOOOOO NOT MY TEAMMATE. SHE IS OUR LAST HOPE

MovingPictures07 wrote:zebra, how do you feel about the color red? I think it suits you.

I welcome any vigilantes to waste their target on me, any time.

*3+ hour

MovingPictures07 wrote:zebra, u bad.

Thoughts?

You can't vote for me.

One thing you forgot to mention is that the Hutts killed MM while he was doing an in-depth 3+ analysis of Enrique's interactions with other players. Now would I really do something as malevolent as that?

Despite being a she, pegging won't be necessary on my part.

Canucklehead wrote:Seriously? Not a SINGLE thought on my case?

I'm starting to understand what you high-poster type people are always on about...

Hey, if it helps I had some thoughts on it.

Matt wrote:Should I vote for you again or look elsewhere?

Spacedaisy wrote:I am highly dissatisfied with the fact zebra is off the poll because I believe she is every bit as bad as MP.

Sorsha wrote:

Believe me, I feel your pain.

Wilgy stop f***ing lurking.

I figured you wouldn't out yourself as that role of yours that I am unaware of, but you did make an observation that I foolishly didn't catch. Someone must have done this to her.

If this is true then I take back endorsing a Sorsha lynch. She should have the chance to defend herself with something beyond icons.

Sorsha wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:I'm content with any of the following lynches today...

MovingPictures07
MacDougall
Sorsha

What lynches would you be content with today, Sorsha?

I will tolerate nothing else because I am super closed-minded

I just want llama to see me for who I am

MacDougall wrote:I can't even see my penis

Consider me jealous.

I'm content with any of the following lynches today...

MovingPictures07
MacDougall
Sorsha

Awkward use of quotations but you get the idea.

MacDougall wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
MacDougall wrote:Seriously though how can you be not attacking Wilgy.
Because I'm no more certain about Wilgy than any other insert-expletive-here lurker. You weren't attacking him until his MP vote yourself.
That's not true. I started suspecting him during my analysis of four days worth of votes. A truly villainous activity that only a bad guy would engage in! Lynch the one who posts!

This "I post and put in so much effort" therefore I'm town and anyone who doesn't is bad seriously needs to stop. It's embarrassing.

You didn't mention Bullzeye in your suggestions of baddie lurkers, MM had been dead for some time when you posted that list, and Daisy was once Glorfindel soooooo what makes Sorsha so neutral as opposed to bad, Mac?

Speaking of which, this raises some eyebrows.

MacDougall wrote:Stop stop stop...

Zebra, MP, Dom ... we're being had. We are all good guys just throwing shit at each other. The quiet players that aren't completely absent are the bad guys.

DrWilgy, sig, DFaraday. Quite possibly sorsha. They are the ones you want to kill.

By the way I never got paid when Roxy died so that was a lie.

Why quite possibly as opposed to you being more confident about the other three?

MacDougall wrote:Russtifinko
nijuukyugou
a2thezebra
MovingPictures07
Dom
Elohcin
thellama
Canucklehead
Matt
Sorsha
Bullzeye
Metalmarsh89
Spacedaisy
DFaraday
sig
DrWilgy

Please mod-kill these players:
Bass_the_Clever
Bubbles

Sorsha wrote:

Yeah this is way less suspicious than Wilgy

Seriously while I disagree with everyone that got ticked off about the more vocal posters, I get where they're coming from. And it's pretty much all you Mac. You're the only one advocating lynching anyone just for being more quiet than you.

Actually, that's not true. I'm pretty certain about Sorsha. Any other lurker is a shot in the dark and I don't advocate policy lynches. Unlike some people. Cough.

MacDougall wrote:Seriously though how can you be not attacking Wilgy.

Because I'm no more certain about Wilgy than any other insert-expletive-here lurker. You weren't attacking him until his MP vote yourself.

I KNEW IT

MacDougall wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
MacDougall wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:Cut the straw man suit, Mac.

linki - I know waaaaaaay more than you think.
I know one thing you don't know.

My role.
If only there was an orange version of
You mean this.

Not good enough.

works I guess

MacDougall wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:Cut the straw man suit, Mac.

linki - I know waaaaaaay more than you think.
I know one thing you don't know.

My role.

If only there was an orange version of

Cut the straw man suit, Mac.

linki - I know waaaaaaay more than you think.

MacDougall wrote:For instance a civilian is almost certainly the one who swapped the lynch.

What makes you think this? And why swap it onto Golden? Do you still think he was bad? Oh wait, we know for a fact that he wasn't.

MacDougall wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
MacDougall wrote:
MacDougall wrote:Let's say hypothetically there's a guy named George. And George throws a big rock into the water. And the water makes a splash. He can assume that him throwing that rock made a splash.

But under the water is a big fish chasing another fish. And just as the rock hits the water, the fish being chased hits the surface making a splash. These fish can also assume they caused the splash.

Na mean cowgirl?
This one.

If you don't get it, you should quit Mafia forever.
I get it and you're full of suit.

linki - Oh now you think he's bad, that's hysterical. Oh but then when he's lynched he's going to flip civilian according to you? What????
Lol. I think he's bad, but I think the case is made up. I think he'll flip scum and I think the case was driven by le bad team. I think that sig was bad and was just killed by MPs team for sweet vengeance. I think you are the poor sap being led into this and I am the poor sap that's going to be made the scapegoat no matter what happens.

Why do you think he's bad? You said you thought he, I, and Dom were all civ very recently. What case are you referring to that is made up? Why is it made up and by who? If you think he'll flip scum, why are you predicting what I'll do when he "flips civ"? Again, what case? Why was it driven by mafia? Which team? And if MP is bad, which team would that make MP? Why do you think sig was bad? Why was he killed by MP's team? I sense a lot of assumptions, contradictions and flat-out lies going on here, but sure, Occam's Razor all the way bruh

2 + 2 = MP is bad.

How's that for an analogy?

He can't flip civ. This is literally IMPOSSIBLE.

MacDougall wrote:
MacDougall wrote:Let's say hypothetically there's a guy named George. And George throws a big rock into the water. And the water makes a splash. He can assume that him throwing that rock made a splash.

But under the water is a big fish chasing another fish. And just as the rock hits the water, the fish being chased hits the surface making a splash. These fish can also assume they caused the splash.

Na mean cowgirl?
This one.

If you don't get it, you should quit Mafia forever.

I get it and you're full of suit.

linki - Oh now you think he's bad, that's hysterical. Oh but then when he's lynched he's going to flip civilian according to you? What????

MacDougall wrote:Hmmmm ...

Am I

a) A player who targeted him, and blatantly saying it?
b) A player who observed him being targeted?
c) A player who protected him with a resultant no kill occurance?
d) MPs teammate making something up to protect him

Your call. The answer is there.

You are a player making assumptions that MP is civ, while claiming to know this for certain and then going back to assuming. Where you stand when it comes to what you know and what you merely think conveniently changes depending on the argument that is being used against you. Therefore the correct answer is D.

MacDougall wrote:Pffft you know for certain that what I'm saying isn't true do you? Yes, I do.

How. Your information indicating to you (apparently) that MP was targeted to be killed couldn't be revealed. Neither can mine. We are at a standstill like it or not.

What. You can't vote for me today. No one can.

And read my fucking analogy mater. You're almost as bad as I am when it comes to accusing people of not reading posts that they have in fact read.

Linki: HAHAHAHA if you are civilian you are the suck master of all suck.

MacDougall wrote: Errrrr lying=/=being wrong.

You claimed that you had information that contradicts mine. One of us is lying. These aren't opinions we're talking about.

MacDougall wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
MacDougall wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
MacDougall wrote:
Dom wrote:
MacDougall wrote:Also do you know what Occam's Razor is? Because how the fuck is;

"scum keep trying to cause MP distress = scum MP is not"

anti-occam?
There's multiple factions tbh
Your face is a faction.

When I have 3 indications that he was targeted by scum. I'm going to assume that he's been targeted by both factions.
You're lying.
No I'm not douche.
Yes, you are. Your inconsistencies aren't justified from a town POV. Not anymore.
No I'm not. And put your money where your mouth is. Vote for me. Try to wagon me.

I have not lied. Not at all.

I've already voted MP. Don't worry, you're next.

MacDougall wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
MacDougall wrote:Also do you know what Occam's Razor is? Because how the fuck is;

"scum keep trying to cause MP distress = scum MP is not"

anti-occam?
Because with the context of everything else that's happened, MP not being scum requires more assumptions than him being scum. Hence, anti-Occam.
Says fucking you. I haven't seen jack to convince me he's bad. It's all assumptive. At least I have factual things that occurred to back up what I'm saying.

Bullsuit, none of the facts you've mentioned support your assumption. And that's if these facts were true and I know for certain that at least one of them is not. You have less than nothing to support your claims.

MacDougall wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
Dom wrote:
MacDougall wrote:
Dom wrote:
MacDougall wrote:Also do you know what Occam's Razor is? Because how the fuck is;

"scum keep trying to cause MP distress = scum MP is not"

anti-occam?
There's multiple factions tbh
Your face is a faction.

When I have 3 indications that he was targeted by scum. I'm going to assume that he's been targeted by both factions.
how do you know all the targets were bad?
How does he know ANY of them are bad? Or not Empire trying to get him and others to use this very approach to defending him?
I'm not being controlled at all. I'm just over being tactical. I ain't lying. Go ahead and vote me if you want because I'd like to wrap up my participation before Christmas.

I was forced to vote for MP on day 3. How do you know you were forced by scum?
Players were forced to vote for MP yesterday. How do you know we I mean they were forced by scum?
I did something something something something makes me think MP was attempted to be killed. If you're talking about the night the Hutts failed to kill, I know for a fact you're wrong because something something something something. Therefore, you are lying. That's not alternative information, that's information that contradicts yours. And I'm not the one making claims (such as "scum did this") that are unsubstantiated.

If you have alternative information, well good for you. Check the roles and you'll figure out what I'm getting at pretty fucking easily.

Then try and vote for me.

I've already voted MP, just as you have. Try and vote for ME.

MacDougall wrote:
a2thezebra wrote:
MacDougall wrote:
Dom wrote:
MacDougall wrote:Also do you know what Occam's Razor is? Because how the fuck is;

"scum keep trying to cause MP distress = scum MP is not"

anti-occam?
There's multiple factions tbh
Your face is a faction.

When I have 3 indications that he was targeted by scum. I'm going to assume that he's been targeted by both factions.
You're lying.
No I'm not douche.

Yes, you are. Your inconsistencies aren't justified from a town POV. Not anymore.

MacDougall wrote:Also do you know what Occam's Razor is? Because how the fuck is;

"scum keep trying to cause MP distress = scum MP is not"

anti-occam?

Because with the context of everything else that's happened, MP not being scum requires more assumptions than him being scum. Hence, anti-Occam.

Search found 816 matches