The Syndicate

DrWilgy wrote:Voting Wilgy because he doesn't exist.

Zebra, would you ignore me?

Bullzeye wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:Only the last sentence of this paragraph indicates a suspicion. The rest of it is a criticism of what MP is doing, as if he were a civilian that you simply disagree with. I think that you're trying to make MP's recent posts to be more alignment-indicative than you know them to actually be.

Bullzeye wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:I don't understand why I'm getting votes. How else do you all propose we figure out Dizzy's alignment then? Anyone?

It just seems counter-productive to be lynching no shows who might be civs when there are so few players overall. If this were a full game, then maybe. But if Dizzy is bad right now the only people he's hurting are his own team, who would probably be quite willing to throw him under the bus since he's a no show. So either we lynch a civ and go into day 3 with 8 of us left (assuming someone dies tonight) or we lynch a baddie who wasn't playing and whose teammates probably gain more from the civ cred of throwing him under the bus than they would have done from him just continuing to not play. I feel like you know and would have considered this.

Me saying I think a baddie Dizzy's teammates would probably want to throw him under the bus/gain more from doing so isn't considered me thinking he might be bad? I said that in literally the third sentence of the post. It was late at night and I made a hurried vote not knowing if the day would be ending soon or not. I intended to go to bed right after my vote tbh.

sig wrote:I was under the assumption you thought it was scummy of MP to want to policy lynch from your post?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:There's a seven-way tie. Now this looks fun.

How's everyone doing? Who's bad?

Draconus wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:So the poll ends around 3 CT but the day ends at 8 CT?

I haven't figured out how to manipulate the exact time and day on the poll, itself. Ignore the time on the poll and just keep in mind what I post in thread.

Bullzeye wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:I don't understand why I'm getting votes. How else do you all propose we figure out Dizzy's alignment then? Anyone?

It just seems counter-productive to be lynching no shows who might be civs when there are so few players overall. If this were a full game, then maybe. But if Dizzy is bad right now the only people he's hurting are his own team, who would probably be quite willing to throw him under the bus since he's a no show. So either we lynch a civ and go into day 3 with 8 of us left (assuming someone dies tonight) or we lynch a baddie who wasn't playing and whose teammates probably gain more from the civ cred of throwing him under the bus than they would have done from him just continuing to not play. I feel like you know and would have considered this.

insertnamehere wrote:sorry, the only reason I didn't vote was because of the deadline being for the 31st.

leetic wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:With that said, I think we should consider a policy lynch of Dizzy by Day 3, if not for Day 2, if he doesn't show up or get replaced.

I will not consider that under any circumstances and if anyone else does I will actively fight it.

Agreed. What's with MP and policy lynching? I'm throwing a vote down for that, plus his interactions with the wolves. My wallpost won't be as long as I anticipated it, since I realized ika's replacement died, but I will address MP and one or two others.

MovingPictures07 wrote:With that said, I think we should consider a policy lynch of Dizzy by Day 3, if not for Day 2, if he doesn't show up or get replaced.

Bullzeye wrote:Fair enough Zebra. Do you have any suspects for today?

Bullzeye wrote:Who do you think you'd have voted for, Zebra?

Bullzeye wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:

leetic wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:I'll also *Vote Quin*, at least for now. I might change my mind while I'm catching up. I definitely think there's a chance at least one of Silver and Ika were bad, and how Quin flips would colour my opinion of a few other people.

Alright, this is a fair enough reason to vote, even if it still isn’t fair to Quin.

I've been lynched for reasons waaaaay less fair than that many times. I do feel sorry for Quin, he replaced into a crappy situation. But it was going to happen eventually anyway, I'm sure. I also don't think it's the people who lynched Quin that owe him the apology.

Who does owe him an apology then, Silver?

If she hadn't dropped out, Quin wouldn't have been in that situation. When someone is suspected, the suspicion shouldn't die just because they get replaced. I don't necessarily think anyone owes anyone an apology tbh, that's how this game is played and if we all sat around apologising every time a civ died we'd never get anywhere. Yes it's bad he died and I regret voting for a civ but I just don't agree that it was unfair to lynch Quin.

Bullzeye wrote:

leetic wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:I'll also *Vote Quin*, at least for now. I might change my mind while I'm catching up. I definitely think there's a chance at least one of Silver and Ika were bad, and how Quin flips would colour my opinion of a few other people.

Alright, this is a fair enough reason to vote, even if it still isn’t fair to Quin.

I've been lynched for reasons waaaaay less fair than that many times. I do feel sorry for Quin, he replaced into a crappy situation. But it was going to happen eventually anyway, I'm sure. I also don't think it's the people who lynched Quin that owe him the apology.