
Im still quite inexperienced at Mafia so if anyone has some constructive critisism to me, I would be pleased to listen

Return to “Zodiac Mafia [GAME OVER]”
Oh, yeah youre right. But how are there 3 night kills then?Quin wrote:I don't see any feasible way for there to be a total of six mafia and a rogue. If that were the case, the game would have ended the moment it started since mafia would outnumber town.Nerolunar wrote:Can we assume that there are 2 baddies left and one ninja/rogue/indy, although the baddies are on different teams? Is it a coincidence that 3 people so far have voted for me?
Could the rogue be rooting for the mafia and helping them eliminate the civs, and then hope they target eachother/the last civ? I don´t like that 3 people were quick to vote for me and now seems to be riding the wave to victory.
If one of you 3 is civ or rogue, please reconsider your vote.
Meanwhile I will be voting Epignosis. He is the one that strikes me as bad the most out of all of you.
I have been suspicious of Epi for a few days. IIRC I have voted for him a few times. Im inclined to trust Daisy a little more since she just doesn´t jump on me at every chance she gets. With this many NKs in the game and presumably 3 baddies/rogue I don´t trust anyone who desperately wants to get rid of meBullzeye wrote:I thought you wanted Daisy lynched? Where has this sudden Epi suspicion come from?
For starters I just want some thoughts on what has been happening this night and today. What do you think about the 3 nightkills?Spacedaisy wrote:Why do you want to lynch me today? Aside from the obvious reason of not wanting to be lynched yourself?
Me neitherBullzeye wrote:Why would you have had a message? The explanation will presumably be part of your role. I can't see any explanation for your survival or any reason for you to deny knowledge of what happened.Nerolunar wrote:I didn´t get a message or anything that explained why I survived.Quin wrote:With four mafia down and still so many night kills, I think it's possible that the game setup itself could account for at least one of the night kills. I'm not sure how, though. I would suspect it has something to do with individual star signs, though.
Nero has me extremely confused, and I hope he can expand on his 'I don't know' attitude. There is no reason for him to lie about how he survived a lynch. Nobody has chimed in to take responsibility of his survival, either. If we were to consider rogues in this game he would be my top suspect.
My thoughts on Bullzeye still stand, as usual. But he takes the backseat today as I am feeling a Nero lynch.
*Votes Nero*
I didn´t get a message or anything that explained why I survived.Quin wrote:With four mafia down and still so many night kills, I think it's possible that the game setup itself could account for at least one of the night kills. I'm not sure how, though. I would suspect it has something to do with individual star signs, though.
Nero has me extremely confused, and I hope he can expand on his 'I don't know' attitude. There is no reason for him to lie about how he survived a lynch. Nobody has chimed in to take responsibility of his survival, either. If we were to consider rogues in this game he would be my top suspect.
My thoughts on Bullzeye still stand, as usual. But he takes the backseat today as I am feeling a Nero lynch.
Yeah I know.Bullzeye wrote:Well if you had a lynch stop or survival ability there'd be no reason for you to deny it. If someone else had a lynch stop there'd be no reason for them not to save it for themselves.
Its not fake. I honestly don´t know why I didn´t get lynched.Bullzeye wrote:That reaction seems incredibly false. G-Man was a civ and happily admitted he knew how he survived, and Llama claims to have the same power while MM implied others might to by saying he doesn't view that mechanic as a power role. So for you to say you don't know what happens feels really fake to me.
Im almost forced to vote for you now then. I would prefer Daisy for todays lynch, but there doesn´t seem to be much support for that at the moment.Bullzeye wrote:I guess I'm voting Nero to save myself then.
This quote is from Llama. I find it weird that you begin to accuse Daisy and Sorsha when you voted for G-man too. Were you not fully convinced that G-man was bad when you voted for him?I'm extremely disappointed in Sorsha and Daisy for casting such foolish votes. Nero had at least a possibility of being bad. One of you at least had better be mafia, or else there is no excuse for what you have done.
My rainbow list continues to be 100% accurate.
This post is from Daisy. Do you still not suspect Llama?I'm putting my vote on G-Man. I doubt both he and llama are civ and I feel more confident that llama is civ than g-man. I will be around off and on, I'm at work. We will see if I leave my vote there.
Probably what the baddies were going for. I will read the ISOs of the people who voted for him.Bullzeye wrote:Also I thought G-Man was one of the most obvious civs going, no idea where that lynch came from.
Im sorry because I would like to play more with you. I should have painted that green.Epignosis wrote:You're "honestly" reading me as bad, eh? Why the superfluous adverb? Why are you sorry for it?Nerolunar wrote:Hey guys. Im honestly reading you as bad Epi, sorry about that. It goes the other way around too - don´t accuse me of posting fluff earlier this gameIts like you are passing on your accusations to me when I did in fact post some reads as soon as I joined.
Im getting pinged by Quin and Sig too. Im going to look at them very closely![]()
Ugh, Im gojng to bed soon, and I have to vote. Im giving it 30 minutes.
On what basis are you reading me as bad? We've never been in a game together, and you've never experienced me at all.
It isn't until I call you out on your low productivity (after you called for high productivity from everybody else) that you suspect me.
They tell me there's plenty of fish in the sea, and I think I caught me a good one.
Just not the kind of fish I was hoping for, metaphorically speaking.
At the moment of this post there had been almost nothing but fluff and roleplaying. The three posts about G-man are responses to people who wondered about what I meant.Epignosis wrote:Wonders why people don't try to get some thoughts circulating.Nerolunar wrote:Okay I have read the thread and here are some thoughts:
C-man is almost the only one trying to engage discussion. I wonder why people don´t follow up on it and try to get some thoughts circulating.
Has seven posts.![]()
And three of those call G-Man's alignment into question, essentially restating the same idea without considering fresh evidence. That last one sounds bitter that G-Man didn't get lynched and could possibly come out looking good for it.
You know what else I noticed? Take this how you want, but Bubbles never popped in saying how good she was, which is like, her trademark. I realize she didn't post at all, but that's a minor thing to consider.
A major thing to consider is how I'm gonna get a girlfriend.
I just wanted to mention that G-man should not receive an opportunity to clailm civ based on this. Thats all.Sloonei wrote:What is your point? We still don't know anyone's alignment.Nerolunar wrote:This is what I was questioning earlier. We still don´t know G-man´s alignment.Bullzeye wrote:It pretty much is a non-issue. You knew you weren't going to die - that explains why you didn't save yourself. You probably deliberately allowed yourself to be lynched in hopes of gaining civ cred upon surviving.G-Man wrote:If I had died, you guys would have wondered about my vote. I am highlighting the fact that it's treated as a non-issue today. Did nobody notice my vote or is it because I didn't die?Sloonei wrote:hey, why this?G-Man wrote:I just thought it worth mentioning since people are giving Epi heat. His vote helped to save Bullzeye but it wasn't the last word. No one has yet asked me why I didn't try saving myself. You would all be wondering that one had I actually been lynched.
All other points of discussion are valid and I apologize for derailing.
This is what I was questioning earlier. We still don´t know G-man´s alignment.Bullzeye wrote:It pretty much is a non-issue. You knew you weren't going to die - that explains why you didn't save yourself. You probably deliberately allowed yourself to be lynched in hopes of gaining civ cred upon surviving.G-Man wrote:If I had died, you guys would have wondered about my vote. I am highlighting the fact that it's treated as a non-issue today. Did nobody notice my vote or is it because I didn't die?Sloonei wrote:hey, why this?G-Man wrote:I just thought it worth mentioning since people are giving Epi heat. His vote helped to save Bullzeye but it wasn't the last word. No one has yet asked me why I didn't try saving myself. You would all be wondering that one had I actually been lynched.
All other points of discussion are valid and I apologize for derailing.
This pinged me.G-Man wrote:Fun fact: I changed my vote after Epi voted for me. I could have voted for Bullzeye and forced a tie-breaker but didn't.
Seconding this question. Im under the impression that rainbows are used when someone has a good and fairly solid idea about the various alignments of the players. Llamas rainbow just looked so random to me. Fx what´s the difference between the yellow and green colors at this point anyway? How can someone look slightly bad compared to clearly civ and clearly bad when the first 3 pages barely contained discussion?Sloonei wrote:Why make a rainbow if it's so heavily reliant on pure gut reads?