The Syndicate

Tranq wrote: ↑Fri Dec 14, 2018 9:00 am
colonialbob wrote: ↑Fri Dec 14, 2018 8:55 am
LoRab wrote: ↑Fri Dec 14, 2018 8:02 am What are the actual seats of baddies dying 2 nights in a row? In particular on nights 1 and 2? I’m so used to games where night kills aren’t revealed that I’m actually not sure.

And an alternate theory: what if the trickster is an Indy role who kills every night? Juleit’s Death doesn’t read as a baddie dying. Not to mention that we have no idea who is killling. Personally, I’m Not going to push that people aren’t who they seem, but I’m not going to personally make that assumption. And I personally believe it’s a dangerous assumption to make.

Strongly leaning towards an INH vote. Possibly sabie.
So if we're not assuming any of the night deaths are who they say we are, we've got two civ lynches. Good luck hunting after throwing out 2/3rds of the hard info we have.
Two civ lynches? Wilgy still screams Hollow Man to me

We get it Tranq. You have info but don't want anyone to know about it. We get it.

this is my first time witnessing a scum juliets. i'll tell my children about it one day.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 12:33 am
Quin wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 12:27 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 12:25 am
Quin wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 12:23 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 12:16 am
Quin wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 12:15 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 12:03 am

See my response to sprityo. I consider it "abstaining" if you're here and you don't vote on a viable wagon. I'm looking at Quin and Enrique primarily.

Thoroughly uninspiring result to this day, but I didn't absolutely hate a wilgy lynch.
Who defines what is and is not a viable wagon? You all could've voted with me. Why didn't you do that?
I am defining it right now as "a wagon which has the realistic opportunity to produce a lynch." Epignosis was never ever going to be lynched today and you sat on him while watching the clock tick down.
Actually I was eating shortbread
the only thing shorter than your bread is your time in this game, bucko.
You've crapped on my Epi vote multiple times but haven't told me what you think of the case itself. Please do that.
I told you, both at the time and today, that I disagree with it and don't think that Epi is implicated in any way whatsoever by the things you are suggesting about him.

My objection is less with the case and more with the vote. You defended me earlier by arguing to timmer that a townie's most powerful weapon is their vote. Today you threw that power away by plopping a meaningless vote on Epignosis.

That's true. The vote is town's most powerful asset. That does not mean there is one way to use it. As far as I'm concerned making sure my vote is going onto the mainstream lynch candidate is a waste of a vote. I vote who I want, always have and always will.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 12:25 am
Quin wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 12:23 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 12:16 am
Quin wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 12:15 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 12:03 am
LoRab wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 12:02 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 11:58 pm Either lots of people willfully abstained from the lynch, or the site is glitching for everybody. If it's the former, I disapprove once again. If it's the latter then, well, that was inconvenient.
22 votes. 27 living players. So, 5 missed votes. Is that a lot these days? I ask as a real question.
See my response to sprityo. I consider it "abstaining" if you're here and you don't vote on a viable wagon. I'm looking at Quin and Enrique primarily.

Thoroughly uninspiring result to this day, but I didn't absolutely hate a wilgy lynch.
Who defines what is and is not a viable wagon? You all could've voted with me. Why didn't you do that?
I am defining it right now as "a wagon which has the realistic opportunity to produce a lynch." Epignosis was never ever going to be lynched today and you sat on him while watching the clock tick down.
Actually I was eating shortbread
the only thing shorter than your bread is your time in this game, bucko.

You've crapped on my Epi vote multiple times but haven't told me what you think of the case itself. Please do that.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 12:16 am
Quin wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 12:15 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 12:03 am
LoRab wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 12:02 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 11:58 pm Either lots of people willfully abstained from the lynch, or the site is glitching for everybody. If it's the former, I disapprove once again. If it's the latter then, well, that was inconvenient.
22 votes. 27 living players. So, 5 missed votes. Is that a lot these days? I ask as a real question.
See my response to sprityo. I consider it "abstaining" if you're here and you don't vote on a viable wagon. I'm looking at Quin and Enrique primarily.

Thoroughly uninspiring result to this day, but I didn't absolutely hate a wilgy lynch.
Who defines what is and is not a viable wagon? You all could've voted with me. Why didn't you do that?
I am defining it right now as "a wagon which has the realistic opportunity to produce a lynch." Epignosis was never ever going to be lynched today and you sat on him while watching the clock tick down.

Actually I was eating shortbread

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 12:03 am
LoRab wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 12:02 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 11:58 pm Either lots of people willfully abstained from the lynch, or the site is glitching for everybody. If it's the former, I disapprove once again. If it's the latter then, well, that was inconvenient.
22 votes. 27 living players. So, 5 missed votes. Is that a lot these days? I ask as a real question.
See my response to sprityo. I consider it "abstaining" if you're here and you don't vote on a viable wagon. I'm looking at Quin and Enrique primarily.

Thoroughly uninspiring result to this day, but I didn't absolutely hate a wilgy lynch.

Who defines what is and is not a viable wagon? You all could've voted with me. Why didn't you do that?

Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 11:15 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 7:19 am
S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 5:57 am
Quin wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 9:18 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 10:32 am
Quin wrote: ↑Sun Dec 09, 2018 9:34 pm
nutella wrote: ↑Sun Dec 09, 2018 9:19 pm

I don't follow pls explain
Sloonei and Luna's qualifiers are different. One could argue Sloonei was qualifying his post - "I have a genuine suspicion..." but Luna's use of valid is a reference to her earlier rebuttal where Mac said Day 1 cases are based on nothing and a direct quote using the term valid from SVS. The fact that she repeats the word valid in the same post should make this obvious.

Epi made a blanket statement about how women post which means he didn't check context. If he did he'd have realised the difference between the two. I don't expect this from town.
I didn't need to check context because I understood the post the first time I read it. And I read it as being deliberately snarky. I smiled when I read it.
then why didn't you say that?
FWIW I read that usage as snarky as well. She didn't write it this way, but I READ "valid" in caps lock and quotes, or maybe italics..
Yes, so did I. That's my issue. If Epi knew as well, why did he make a blanket post saying "women write differently than men" when asked about the difference between her and Sloonei instead of "Lunalee's post was ironic and snarky".

3/10 response

speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 11:12 pm Hey, if I vote for G-Man, it'll cause a tie.

*begins to sweat*

Do it bitch

the only thing about me that shines in this game is my ass

Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:51 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 9:18 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 10:32 am
Quin wrote: ↑Sun Dec 09, 2018 9:34 pm
nutella wrote: ↑Sun Dec 09, 2018 9:19 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Sun Dec 09, 2018 8:24 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Dec 09, 2018 8:16 pm

No.

Double-standards, and what not, but I don't care.

Women write differently than men.
Epi is bad for not checking the context behind why Luna was using the word valid.
Or Turnip is bad for posing the question without checking the context behind why Luna was using the word valid.

got em
I don't follow pls explain
Sloonei and Luna's qualifiers are different. One could argue Sloonei was qualifying his post - "I have a genuine suspicion..." but Luna's use of valid is a reference to her earlier rebuttal where Mac said Day 1 cases are based on nothing and a direct quote using the term valid from SVS. The fact that she repeats the word valid in the same post should make this obvious.

Epi made a blanket statement about how women post which means he didn't check context. If he did he'd have realised the difference between the two. I don't expect this from town.
I didn't need to check context because I understood the post the first time I read it. And I read it as being deliberately snarky. I smiled when I read it.
then why didn't you say that?
I needed to say "I didn't need to check context because I understood the post the first time I read it" before someone accused me of not checking the context?

Do you care about my opinion or are you just stirring up shit?

I don't understand this post but it also does nothing to change my opinion so I guess it's cool.

sig wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:48 pm Popping in between studying for a final tomorrow.

I dont want to lynch wilgy, quin, or SVS I think they're all not mafia atm.

If I had to pick between quin and wilgy I'd probably go with quin. Just because I see no reasoning for rhe wilgy lynch beyond the usual reasons given which normally equal a mislynch

maybe suggest a name that isn't one of the ones you think are good next time

Putting aside the fact I've only ever played a burglary with Dana so I don't know what she's remembering, that post is contradictory. How is being my normal self giving you bad vibes? What's different?

Dana wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:42 pm I'm about 8 pages behind and I forgot the end time was moved up so I'll [VOTE: Quin] aubergine for now and possibly change my mind by the time I catch up. He seems very angry (which I think is normal for him but I don't really remember), and I am not getting the best vibe. I see that Wigly is in the lead right now but I don't have much of an opinion on him, and he also isn't on the Sloonei list if that discussion is still going on right now. I feel sort of okay about the other 4 on the list at the moment.

I'm not angry. I'm making shortbread though so we'll see how things go.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:41 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:39 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:37 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:32 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:28 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:26 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 9:26 pm
why on the earth would you do that?
i would love it if you would read my posts
I remember your beef with him. It's aged beef and not relevant to the current discussion. Who else are you thinking about?
im thinking about why you've got a problem with aged beef.
I wouldn’t if it made sense to vote for Epi right now. We’ve got ~1 hour to go and a tightly contested lynch with a couple options. Throwing a loner vote on Epi for a minor issue from three days ago seems like not the best move.
If he's bad it sounds like a great move. And so I make it.

[VOTE: epi] aubergine
Disagreed. How do you feel about the key wagons?

I am one of them and that's not cool.

G-Man should be one of them.

I don't know what's going on with Wilgy, bar his EoD1 defence. And that I don't think anything about.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:37 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:32 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:28 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:26 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 9:26 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 9:21 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 9:18 pm @Quin you feel like doing anything yet?
probably vote for epi at some point but otherwise no
why on the earth would you do that?
i would love it if you would read my posts
I remember your beef with him. It's aged beef and not relevant to the current discussion. Who else are you thinking about?
im thinking about why you've got a problem with aged beef.
I wouldn’t if it made sense to vote for Epi right now. We’ve got ~1 hour to go and a tightly contested lynch with a couple options. Throwing a loner vote on Epi for a minor issue from three days ago seems like not the best move.

If he's bad it sounds like a great move. And so I make it.

[VOTE: epi] aubergine

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:28 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:26 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 9:26 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 9:21 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 9:18 pm @Quin you feel like doing anything yet?
probably vote for epi at some point but otherwise no
why on the earth would you do that?
i would love it if you would read my posts
I remember your beef with him. It's aged beef and not relevant to the current discussion. Who else are you thinking about?

im thinking about why you've got a problem with aged beef.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 9:26 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 9:21 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 9:18 pm @Quin you feel like doing anything yet?
probably vote for epi at some point but otherwise no
why on the earth would you do that?

i would love it if you would read my posts

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 9:18 pm @Quin you feel like doing anything yet?

probably vote for epi at some point but otherwise no

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:18 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:17 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:15 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:13 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:12 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:10 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:10 pm
Both of them? Why?
You said it was a GTH. This is against the rules.
It was. Now I'm pulling the gun away and asking why you said those words.
Well I am running away with my fingers in my ears going nanananananananana
Then imma leave my vote right here.
That would be somewhat inconvenient.
Go do some town things without me meddling and I'll see how I feel.

If I feel like it.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:16 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:14 pm ok. i'll be serious.

timmer is bad because i made a case on him day 1 and even if i don't believe in it anymore that still tilts the read.
g-man is bad because i agree with some early assessments of g-man making big posts that say nothing.
why does your vanished Day 1 read still influence you if you don't believe in it or know what it was?

i know what it was

i acknowledge one bad thing compared to zero good things about timmer. thus, he bad.

maybe i'm just not that funny?

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:15 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:13 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:12 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:10 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:10 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:08 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:06 pm

GTH reads on timmer and G-man, go!
dey bad
Both of them? Why?
You said it was a GTH. This is against the rules.
It was. Now I'm pulling the gun away and asking why you said those words.
Well I am running away with my fingers in my ears going nanananananananana
Then imma leave my vote right here.

That would be somewhat inconvenient.

ok. i'll be serious.

timmer is bad because i made a case on him day 1 and even if i don't believe in it anymore that still tilts the read.
g-man is bad because i agree with some early assessments of g-man making big posts that say nothing.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:12 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:10 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:10 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:08 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:06 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:04 pm
speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 5:52 pm @Quinnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

Where are you
im right here bby
GTH reads on timmer and G-man, go!
dey bad
Both of them? Why?
You said it was a GTH. This is against the rules.
It was. Now I'm pulling the gun away and asking why you said those words.

Well I am running away with my fingers in my ears going nanananananananana

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:10 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:08 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:06 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:04 pm
speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 5:52 pm @Quinnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

Where are you
im right here bby
GTH reads on timmer and G-man, go!
dey bad
Both of them? Why?

You said it was a GTH. This is against the rules.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:06 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:04 pm
speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 5:52 pm @Quinnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

Where are you
im right here bby
GTH reads on timmer and G-man, go!

dey bad

speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 7:03 pm Quin isn't responding today and I'm going to be busy this eve.

Voting doc Wilgy

Still want Quin's reaction to recent events.

My reaction is "this is unfortunate."

Ask me specific questions and I will give you specific answers.

speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 5:52 pm @Quinnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

Where are you

im right here bby

S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 7:39 am @Quin ,OK now I see your point. I thought you were reading her as serious and I was all

And @sabie12 oops, thanks for pointing it out. I guess I saw his vote for you in the generic "S" section and clicked that. Fixed.

Nah. My point is that I don't believe Epi truly checked for context and made a preemptive judgment. This is a thing I don't like.

S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 5:57 am
Quin wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 9:18 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 10:32 am
Quin wrote: ↑Sun Dec 09, 2018 9:34 pm
nutella wrote: ↑Sun Dec 09, 2018 9:19 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Sun Dec 09, 2018 8:24 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Dec 09, 2018 8:16 pm

No.

Double-standards, and what not, but I don't care.

Women write differently than men.
Epi is bad for not checking the context behind why Luna was using the word valid.
Or Turnip is bad for posing the question without checking the context behind why Luna was using the word valid.

got em
I don't follow pls explain
Sloonei and Luna's qualifiers are different. One could argue Sloonei was qualifying his post - "I have a genuine suspicion..." but Luna's use of valid is a reference to her earlier rebuttal where Mac said Day 1 cases are based on nothing and a direct quote using the term valid from SVS. The fact that she repeats the word valid in the same post should make this obvious.

Epi made a blanket statement about how women post which means he didn't check context. If he did he'd have realised the difference between the two. I don't expect this from town.
I didn't need to check context because I understood the post the first time I read it. And I read it as being deliberately snarky. I smiled when I read it.
then why didn't you say that?
FWIW I read that usage as snarky as well. She didn't write it this way, but I READ "valid" in caps lock and quotes, or maybe italics..

Yes, so did I. That's my issue. If Epi knew as well, why did he make a blanket post saying "women write differently than men" when asked about the difference between her and Sloonei instead of "Lunalee's post was ironic and snarky".

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 9:27 pm Why’d you kill nutella, quin?

bite me

Epignosis wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 10:32 am
Quin wrote: ↑Sun Dec 09, 2018 9:34 pm
nutella wrote: ↑Sun Dec 09, 2018 9:19 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Sun Dec 09, 2018 8:24 pm
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Dec 09, 2018 8:16 pm
Turnip Head wrote: ↑Sun Dec 09, 2018 10:59 am
Lunalee wrote: ↑Sat Dec 08, 2018 8:30 pm My valid suspicion of Colin shows that day one can contain valid suspicions.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Dec 09, 2018 1:07 amI have a genuine Day 1 suspicion of Colin
My question is for Epignosis, is the first quote suss?
No.

Double-standards, and what not, but I don't care.

Women write differently than men.
Epi is bad for not checking the context behind why Luna was using the word valid.
Or Turnip is bad for posing the question without checking the context behind why Luna was using the word valid.

got em
I don't follow pls explain
Sloonei and Luna's qualifiers are different. One could argue Sloonei was qualifying his post - "I have a genuine suspicion..." but Luna's use of valid is a reference to her earlier rebuttal where Mac said Day 1 cases are based on nothing and a direct quote using the term valid from SVS. The fact that she repeats the word valid in the same post should make this obvious.

Epi made a blanket statement about how women post which means he didn't check context. If he did he'd have realised the difference between the two. I don't expect this from town.
I didn't need to check context because I understood the post the first time I read it. And I read it as being deliberately snarky. I smiled when I read it.

then why didn't you say that?

kyle i bought smash let's run off into the sunset together and forget this game ever existed

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 3:36 am Did Quin just accuse me of buddying after I called him a scum read?

yea

also I AM TOWN QUIN

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 1:52 am Is that Quin I see? My god I think it is!

Quin wrote: ↑Fri Dec 07, 2018 9:03 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 07, 2018 8:59 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Fri Dec 07, 2018 8:55 pm i voted "will you become more" because it's either a rhetorical question with a motivating connotation or a question as to whether i'm going to get super fat this christmas in which case the answer is yes
Town.
i won't be buddied this time, punk.

Quin wrote: ↑Sat Dec 08, 2018 9:59 pm
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Sat Dec 08, 2018 5:29 pm
G-Man wrote: ↑Sat Dec 08, 2018 2:19 pm Keep an eye on the folks who darted in here early and, in light of the D0 poll result, pooh-poohed ties on the lynch poll. It’s a subtle way to establish a preemptive cop-out for either train-hopping later (to show they stick to their convictions) or blame-shifting to set up fall guys who tie polls that result in mislynches.

Close lynches and ties (whether mid-phase or at EOD) are valuable sources of information. Granted, that information is best in hindsight after the herd has thinned some.

We may not know who is on the Tribunal but we’re starting out with more civs than baddies (unless this game is extra-double whacky) and there are also two baddie factions, so the odds are against Tribunal being filled with one baddie team.
This post is an amazing piece of wisdom and logic that doesn't acrually do any scumhuting.
yes
Supports DDL's critique of G-man. Noted

Quin wrote: ↑Sat Dec 08, 2018 10:02 pm
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Sat Dec 08, 2018 5:55 pm Has anyone seen Quin? At this point I'd expect to see him angrily hissing at the people accusing him.
nobody is accusing me so i have nothing to do
THAT'S NOT TOWN QUIN. Also perhaps he's a baddie overcompensating for his general lack of scrutiny to this point. -1 townie point.

Quin wrote: ↑Sat Dec 08, 2018 10:04 pm
timmer wrote: ↑Sat Dec 08, 2018 7:04 pm I hate Day 1. I don't know how you guys do it. I hate so much the voting and trying to make cases based on so little that Day 1's just make me twitchy. As of this moment, I am mostly on the lookout for people who seem to eager to make something out of nothing. Luna's vote fits the bill, for instance.
no
Is Quin saying "no" to timmer's general stance on Day 1, or is Quin saying "no" to timmer's criticism of Luna? LET'S HEAR IT QUINNY QUIN QUIN.

Quin wrote: ↑Sat Dec 08, 2018 10:05 pm
timmer wrote: ↑Sat Dec 08, 2018 7:17 pm Actually, to be more clear, Luna's vote seems fine. I was trying to reference this POST of hers: "Sorry, but that is not a god reason to vote someone. Anything Jack has done this game to make you suspect him?"

I don't like when people try to make big deals out of anyone's day 1 vote, because frankly, to me they ALL are weak votes. Why call one specific one out?
because if you want someone lynched you need to make a case on them. that is how mafia works.

[VOTE: timmer] aubergine
A vote for timmer. I don't love this, it feels kind of forced.

Quin wrote: ↑Sun Dec 09, 2018 7:40 pm
timmer wrote: ↑Sun Dec 09, 2018 7:31 pm I thought I saw an epig vote mixed in there, maybe I misread?

I guess what I'm stuck on is... why not leave your vote on sig, who you seem pretty strong on, relative to it being day 1, WHILE you talk up other candidates?
Don't you weaken your own ideas by removing your vote from your #1 guy? You and me both know that a number of people will show up in the last few hours and vote with little thought, and they will do so using the current votes as a sort of weaksauce guide.
For Sloonei, this is a waste of town's greatest asset. Their vote. Sloonei throwing his vote around with varying degrees of seriousness is not something I think is scum indicative for him.

I'm not caught up but this has been "Quin sticks his nose where it doesn't belong and make a fool of himself doing so". Tune in next time.
Sounds like Turnip Head! caveat is that quin probably knows me better than anyone else in this game so if there's anyone i trust to read me accurately it's him, BUT! imma be wary of the buddy system.

Quin wrote: ↑Sun Dec 09, 2018 7:49 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Dec 09, 2018 7:42 pm
timmer wrote: ↑Sun Dec 09, 2018 7:31 pm I thought I saw an epig vote mixed in there, maybe I misread?

I guess what I'm stuck on is... why not leave your vote on sig, who you seem pretty strong on, relative to it being day 1, WHILE you talk up other candidates?
Don't you weaken your own ideas by removing your vote from your #1 guy? You and me both know that a number of people will show up in the last few hours and vote with little thought, and they will do so using the current votes as a sort of weaksauce guide.
I joked about voting for epi because he said I smell.

And I'm usually just loose with my vote. I move it around based on where I want the conversation to go. I've been yelling about sig for a while and it's become clear that a number of people, whose opinions I trust and appreciate, don't feel the same way that I do. In light of that, I think it's more productive to turn my attention elsewhere. My stance on sig is out there if anyone wants to pick it back up (and he promised to return later, so I'm sure it will). But in the meantime, I'd rather focus on developing other reads.

I'm leaving now, for real this time. If I had spent 1/4 of the time I've been in here on my paper today I'd be done with schoolwork for the semester.

linki: thank you quin. listen to quin. he knows my deal.
STOP BUDDYING ME
Right back atcha, slick.

Objects to sig suspicion on principle. I don't care for this general sentiment. If a player is genuinely suspicious, feel free to suspect them. I don't care what his reputation is.

Quin wrote: ↑Sun Dec 09, 2018 8:02 pm actually no i want to vote for [VOTE: g-man] aubergine because ddl said super rad things about him
Okay. This is 5 hours before the deadline, for the record.

This exchange is vintage Quin, but I don't know if it tells me anything about his alignment.

Votes for wilgy to protect me a half hour before the deadline. Thanks.

Seems to be trying to develop his read on me. Cool, I guess.

Then he is one of the first to jump on the wolbre wagon. Scum Quin may not need to do that, but scum Quin also doesn't stand to lose much from it either. Both wagons were equally terrible.
I wanna note now that Quin seems to be generally supportive of me during the end of day phase and things were chaotic enough when he showed up that the votes could have gone just about anywhere. He never turned his attention to a candidate outside of the two main wagons. I was shouting about juliets all the while, but Quin never said a word. He's certainly not the only person who's guilty of this, but I point it out because he was one of my most vocal supporters at the time, along with Turnip Head, and yet neither of them ever really advocated for the case that I was trying to make. Am I being paranoid and unfair? Perhaps. But it's an idea that just struck me as I was reading Quin's posts and now it exists in the thread.

Quin wrote: ↑Mon Dec 10, 2018 12:40 am hey here's an idea

if sloonei is bad for coordinating reads with temmie g-man, let's lynch g-man who some of us already have gripes with
He does want to push us over to G-man though. Or he gives it a limp suggestion, at least.

There's absolutely nothing here that screams "I AM TOWN QUIN" and this entire post history is compatible with clever, low-key scum Quin.

I was saying no to both. In my mind they are the same thing. Who decides whether something is actually "nothing"? not timmer.

I wasn't objecting to the sig lynch on principle. I was objecting to it because it was trash.

I'm not sure if works both ways re reading eachother. I trust you to read me better than most people because you've played with me the longest. By the time I was playing with you, however, you'd been part of the other mafia sites for a good while. Feels like buddying.

Dana wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 3:12 am
Enrique wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 2:06 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 2:04 am
Kylemii wrote: ↑Tue Dec 11, 2018 2:02 am ok so, 2 kills at night means....

mafia + sakana sashimi/savage pixie/trickster/dark worshipper?

is the general consensus that the trickster is probably a mafia role? it mentions some special rules/modifications involved in killing but doesn't mention specifically being able to kill on its own
I mean, TH's role is listed as "corrupted remnant", which may actually just be indie.
may it?
Yes, Sloonei's comment is very suspicious to me also.

111 if you're in the mood for a dana lynch today

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Dec 10, 2018 7:49 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Mon Dec 10, 2018 7:44 pm
nutella wrote: ↑Mon Dec 10, 2018 7:43 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Mon Dec 10, 2018 7:37 pm
Tranq wrote: ↑Mon Dec 10, 2018 7:03 pm Voted Auriel Unmysterium.

I caught up on the EoD posts while at work. I don't regret my Wilgy vote.
talking about regret when talking about voting a player who hasn't flipped yet

preemptive defence because tranq knows wilgy is town

got em

except there's two scum teams SHIT
I think you got that backwards, he said he didn't regret it
it is the act of talking about "regret" not whether he did or did not regret it

regret indicates a bad outcome.
I don't follow. Saying he doesn't regret it implies he thinks wilgy is bad, no?

If he thought that then regret is an odd word to use. Multiple scum teams makes this redundant anyway.

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Dec 10, 2018 7:43 pm
Quin wrote: ↑Mon Dec 10, 2018 7:37 pm
Tranq wrote: ↑Mon Dec 10, 2018 7:03 pm Voted Auriel Unmysterium.

I caught up on the EoD posts while at work. I don't regret my Wilgy vote.
talking about regret when talking about voting a player who hasn't flipped yet

preemptive defence because tranq knows wilgy is town

got em

except there's two scum teams SHIT
I think you got that backwards, he said he didn't regret it

it is the act of talking about "regret" not whether he did or did not regret it

regret indicates a bad outcome.

Tranq wrote: ↑Mon Dec 10, 2018 7:03 pm Voted Auriel Unmysterium.

I caught up on the EoD posts while at work. I don't regret my Wilgy vote.

talking about regret when talking about voting a player who hasn't flipped yet

preemptive defence because tranq knows wilgy is town

got em

except there's two scum teams SHIT

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Dec 10, 2018 1:06 am I generally disapprove of the entire lynch proceedings that just unfolded.

how about the part where you didn't die?

i voted for the one that sounds like minor injuries because im hoping for a MK/everyones insane kind of situation

but it wouldve been so funny if he was bad though

if wolbre is bad i insist he add that post to his sig

lol the tribunal is gonna have a field day with this

Lunalee wrote: ↑Mon Dec 10, 2018 12:55 am Wilgy on the other hand, has said nothing that looks lock-town.

So, who has said something that is lock town?

colonialbob wrote: ↑Mon Dec 10, 2018 12:52 am People: "wilgy is a bad vote for people scared to be held responsible"

Also people: "nah let's not vote for anybody on his wagon"

i dunno. there are very few scum in this game I believe would take that bait. it's the level 1 scum play.

[mention]Kylemii[/mention] i have 2 questions right now

1. Who are you voting for?
2. If I buy a switch and smash will you play with me im lonely

actually speedchuck hasn't mentioned his quindar yet so he might be bad

Dana wrote: ↑Mon Dec 10, 2018 12:43 am I'm gonna [VOTE: MacDougall] aubergine because I trust him the most and I am always wrong.

we got some a-grade scum hunting happening here today folks

wolbre04 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 10, 2018 12:41 am I always self destruct under pressure look back at the Peloponnesian war mafia game where I was town

not sure when you were under pressure before you blew yourself up with a hand grenade

Search found 232 matches