The Syndicate

Never doubt the feng shui.

this is getting spooky

sig wrote:
Glorfindel wrote:
sig wrote:
juliets wrote:sig is too quiet I am getting suspicious.
Sig was making deep fried oreos.
Was no one else repulsed by this?
Would you rather have deep fried kangaroo? :P

We prefer lambingtons.

Quin wrote:
sig wrote:am I being lynched or are you.
It's a tie, I think.

no it waaaaaaaaaaaaaaasn't

sig wrote:am I being lynched or are you.

It's a tie, I think.

I do think sig is civ, so htis sucks.

MovingPictures07 wrote:I still think juliets is suspicious. Someone tell me why she isn't.

Can't. If I'm lynched, take charge.

suspicious about my vote change*

MovingPictures07 wrote:I'm a bit confused of what LC and Quin think of each other right now and why.

I suspect him because I find his early suspicion and vote change disingenuinousousus.

MovingPictures07 wrote:I'm a bit confused of what LC and Quin think of each other right now and why.

I suspect him because I find his early suspicion and vote change disingenuinousousus.

sig wrote:voting me is one of the worst things that could happen to the civs

I don't want to vote for you. Get your vote off me.

sig wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
sig wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:Sig, what are your thoughts? Day phase is half-over now.
INH was killed to frame me!

I think we should lynch Quin!
Why Quin? PoE?
Yeah more or less.

No it isn't.

Guess im VOTING SIG. Nerds.

I actually do civ read MP, just because he's scrutinising these people who are civ-reading him.

And I suspect juliets for that vote.

Long Con wrote:
Quin wrote:
Long Con wrote:
Quin wrote:
Long Con wrote:RIP INH

Quin, when did I accuse you? I just asked you a question.
I interpreted your *two* posts as though you held suspicion for my marmot vote and subsequent switch.

@3J - VOTE LONG CON
I was getting some conversation going, see how you reacted.
What's your conclusion?
Your reaction was to come after me before I could come after you.

Thank god for that. Now you can't suspect me or I'll just dismiss it as an OMGUS

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Quin wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:MP is a civread for me. He spent his catchup reading the thread as opposed to plotting a kill. I won't be voting for him today.

@Made. I suppose that's possible, I find a baddie-sorta alignment to be more believable.
Note that there's likely two baddies out there and for a burglary, there's not gonna be a lot of deliberation going on.
I agree, but if two mafioso have BTSC, they will likely spend at least a little time in there discussing.

The conversation could very well be something like:

Baddie 1: Who are we killing?
Baddie 2 (MP?): No preference. I want to catch up in the thread.

Besides, it's possible for him to do both.

Not saying I scum-read MP, but I don't think he should earn a civ read for that.

Long Con wrote:
Quin wrote:
Long Con wrote:RIP INH

Quin, when did I accuse you? I just asked you a question.
I interpreted your *two* posts as though you held suspicion for my marmot vote and subsequent switch.

@3J - VOTE LONG CON
I was getting some conversation going, see how you reacted.

What's your conclusion?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:MP is a civread for me. He spent his catchup reading the thread as opposed to plotting a kill. I won't be voting for him today.

@Made. I suppose that's possible, I find a baddie-sorta alignment to be more believable.

Note that there's likely two baddies out there and for a burglary, there's not gonna be a lot of deliberation going on.

Long Con wrote:RIP INH

Quin, when did I accuse you? I just asked you a question.

I interpreted your *two* posts as though you held suspicion for my marmot vote and subsequent switch.

@3J - VOTE LONG CON

MovingPictures07 wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:Well, that catchup wasn't particularly illuminating.
Name the top two things that caught your eye.
1. Quin participating in WIFOM openly. I don't think this is alignment indicative or even meaningful, but it caught my eye.

2. It appears that there was a natural inclination for voters to cast their votes towards sig when both sig and Bass were missing, but once the argument was floated that Bass is less likely to be active, the votes flooded away. I'd like to know how everyone came to the determination of their initial votes.

As for 1, I enjoy the fast paced nature of burglaries. I like to play these a lot more casually than I do for the long-term ones. Just fool around a bit.

MovingPictures07 wrote:
Long Con wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:Well, that catchup wasn't particularly illuminating.
What would have made it more illuminating? What would you like to see in Day 2?
I wouldn't say you all wasted Day 1 or anything; these Burglaries are tough to get rolling before any lynch with such a limited time constraint, especially with others not posting. What could have made it more illuminating I suppose was more poo flinging (as Jay calls it). It's practically impossible to differentiate the motives between players who voted a no-poster lynch, whereas at least if the votes were spread around with some pretty baseless observations we could get somewhere.

I'm just having fun.

Vote for Long Con, tho. The feng shui of the thread went to hell when he accused me for my marmot vote.

I like the black background.

Quin wrote:Question:

Are the civs burglars or cops?

Follow up question:

Is the indie an old lady with a broom?

Question:

Are the civs burglars or cops?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Quin wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:I'm here! Let me catch up now.
Don't forget to submit your nightkill!
It's okay, I did it for him.
Crap, I've been out-WIFOM'd.

@inh. Same reason as Long Con. I thought it more likely that sig would come back online than Bass.

I'm metalmarsh892.0

sig wrote:
insertnamehere wrote:I'd like to ask everyone who voted Bass before Sig showed up, why Bass instead of Sig?
Since fish are disgusting

Wrong.

insertnamehere wrote:I'd like to ask everyone who voted Bass before Sig showed up, why Bass instead of Sig?

The other two non-shows had votes already.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:I'm here! Let me catch up now.
Don't forget to submit your nightkill!

It's okay, I did it for him.

sig wrote:LC must be evil.

I agree.

sig wrote:
Quin wrote:
sig wrote:IM HERE AHA>

VOTE INH

since he voted for me.
On a scale of 1-10 how bad are you?
10!

1 = very bad
10 - very good right?

Yeah, actually.

sig wrote:IM HERE AHA>

VOTE INH

since he voted for me.

On a scale of 1-10 how bad are you?

CFD anyone?

Long Con wrote:
Quin wrote:
Long Con wrote:
insertnamehere wrote:
Long Con wrote:
Quin wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:VOTE MADE

Typical marmot trying to lynch all the new guys. Or...the old guys.

VOTE MARMOT
Why are you defending Made?
Why are you defending Marmot?
Why are YOU defending Quin?
Why am I defending Quin?
I'm interested to hear the answer.

I'll have to cop him. Stay tuned.

Long Con wrote:
insertnamehere wrote:
Long Con wrote:
Quin wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:VOTE MADE

Typical marmot trying to lynch all the new guys. Or...the old guys.

VOTE MARMOT
Why are you defending Made?
Why are you defending Marmot?
Why are YOU defending Quin?

Why am I defending Quin?

Made wrote:Quin have we met yet? Hello I am Made, Hru?

We have not. And I'm great, if not slightly perturbed by Long Con reading into my Marmot vote.

Long Con wrote:
Quin wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:VOTE MADE

Typical marmot trying to lynch all the new guys. Or...the old guys.

VOTE MARMOT
Why are you defending Made?

His avatar has a pleasing aesthetic.

I'm on board with the voting non-check-ins-thing

VOTE BASS

Metalmarsh89 wrote:VOTE MADE

Typical marmot trying to lynch all the new guys. Or...the old guys.

VOTE MARMOT

insertnamehere wrote:I'm a boring vanilla civilian.

::kicks dirt moodily::

me too, but it's been raining so it's actually mud.

someone help i'm missing linki again

hey kids

Search found 41 matches