Search found 6 matches
Return to “2016 Game of Champions - Hatch [Night 2]”
- Fri Feb 10, 2017 4:03 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch [Night 2]
- Replies: 290
- Views: 7879
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch [Night 2]
Long Con is reading pretty sincere to me. I feel like Sig's overreaction and subsequent posts just keep digging himself deeper, but I'm always hesitant when it comes to Sig since he's so often lynched for strange behavior.
- Thu Feb 09, 2017 3:35 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch [Night 2]
- Replies: 290
- Views: 7879
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
What about LC's Mac vote was suspicious?DharmaHelper wrote:My vote is on LC for now because:
A) My original points from the first thread
B) His defensive reaction to the "Hm" posts
C) His MacDougall Vote
D) General vibes.
- Thu Feb 09, 2017 3:33 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch [Night 2]
- Replies: 290
- Views: 7879
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
Agreed. There's no reason to silence Floyd, since he was contributing almost nothing even before we entered the Hatch.Sorsha wrote:Why on earth would someone silence Floyd?
- Thu Feb 09, 2017 12:50 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch [Night 2]
- Replies: 290
- Views: 7879
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
Wilgy, why did you vote me?
- Thu Feb 09, 2017 12:49 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch [Night 2]
- Replies: 290
- Views: 7879
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
Priz said something about his "sources" telling him something.Long Con wrote:However, I will place a vote on Farnsworth until he gives a full explanation of his Floyd suspicion.
Voting for sockpuppets is a victimless crime - like punching someone in the dark!
DH was like, "Sources? YOU MUST HAVE BADDIE BTSC!" in an obviously joking manner.
Then Floyd came along like, "Yeah, that sounds good." *votes Priz*
He also, to my recollection did not mention Priz again after that point (if he even posted at all afterwards). I know the word opportunistic gets thrown around a lot on here, but there's no better way to describe Floyd's vote. Hiding behind someone else's suspicion then offering no independent thought on the matter.
I'll go ahead and vote Floyd for now. I wouldn't be opposed to a sig lynch either, but I don't actively suspect him the way I do Floyd.
- Wed Feb 08, 2017 2:33 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch [Night 2]
- Replies: 290
- Views: 7879
Re: 2016 Game of Champions - Hatch
I wouldn't call one post quite a bit, but I did answer his questionnaire. Also I did mention my suspicion of Floyd, which I still hold to. It felt like taking an easy way out by leeching onto the nearest suspicion like a brain slug. It's even more obvious that that's what he was doing since DH's post clearly wasn't a serious point against Priz anyway.timmer wrote:So am I remembering right about the prof that someone said he had posted quite a bit to talk about dh's plan but never really posted anything about suspicions?
Prof? Where are you at in terms of suspicions?
@Quin lorab answered the same as me we both posted about seeing 3 instances of mentioning the other thread etc. I was acknowledging that.