If Hugh's locking, then I support hammering. I don't wanna wake up to this tomorrowHugh Jass wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 12:06 amKrusty the Clown wrote: ↑Sun Nov 08, 2020 11:15 pm Vote Gramps. That's a lock too, this game should end tonight.@Sloonei If you're ok with it.
Would rather not wait 24 hours to know if I fucked up or not lol, and I'm never moving
Search found 185 matches
Return to “The Simpsons [GAME OVER]”
- Mon Nov 09, 2020 12:18 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 7]
- Sun Nov 08, 2020 11:46 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
- Sun Nov 08, 2020 11:36 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 7]
You also made a good point that my vote switch would have saved Krusty who I most scum-read, and I looked at the EOD vote tally in the OP and I think you're right and I'm wrong. That obviously puts me in a tricky position since town!Gramps wouldn't have needed to move at all to get a Krusty chop or to save a town-read Burns. Staying pat would have had everything come up Milhouse. My position of "it was the chaos move" still applies, but the logic I gave fails. And it looks extra terribad because it came at the same time as the flash wagon votes of two confirmed wolves.Grampa Simpson wrote: ↑Sun Nov 08, 2020 11:25 pmYeah.
[VOTE: Krusty] aubergine
I do not think it is you. Krusty's the one who's been content to just sit back and jump in with digs, letting everyone else do the work all game. You've been the one putting in the majority of the work in the latter half of the game and you're the one who ultimately got everyone to vote Allison/Burns. More specifically, if you were the last wolf, the last two days would have been pointless theatre.
You can call my play the play of an idiot and probably be right
All I have is appealing to emotion here. A reasoned, logically coherent play-by-play is evidently not something I am capable of providing. It's not me. I think it's Krusty. In a world of voting for the worst player, I'm the safe bet and won't begrudge you deciding to lock a vote on me. I've had objectively bad play the latter half of this game and spent a couple RL days avoiding the thread entirely.
I want to say that a flash wagon most benefited Krusty. Allison and Burns switching would save him AND Burns, me switching too just gave them the win since I'd automatically be associated. Not a "le master plan," but a very happy accident that they're taking full advantage of. And since then Krusty's just been chilling, throwing in an incendiary comment every now and then, and coasting. Me being locked wolf in turn locked him town.
- Sun Nov 08, 2020 11:25 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 7]
Yeah.
[VOTE: Krusty] aubergine
I do not think it is you. Krusty's the one who's been content to just sit back and jump in with digs, letting everyone else do the work all game. You've been the one putting in the majority of the work in the latter half of the game and you're the one who ultimately got everyone to vote Allison/Burns. More specifically, if you were the last wolf, the last two days would have been pointless theatre.
You can call my play the play of an idiot and probably be right
I thought he was going to flip town.Krusty the Clown wrote: ↑Sun Nov 08, 2020 11:15 pm Vote Gramps. That's a lock too, this game should end tonight.
Hugh, you busted this game wide open by catching the last minute vote switch onto Otto. We've succesfully lynched 2 straight scum. Gramps is the last one, his "gg wolves" with Burns on the chopping block...too funny.
"We've" You've done nothing lol
- Sun Nov 08, 2020 10:44 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 7]
shouldn't have started being AFK either lol
- Sun Nov 08, 2020 10:42 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 7]
I don't know what to tell you guys. I'm not the last wolf. Kind of feeling like I've been set up over the course of days to take this fall. I shouldn't have flash-wagoned.
- Sun Nov 08, 2020 10:41 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 7]
oh I guess Burns really was a wolf
- Sat Nov 07, 2020 10:23 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 6]
anyways, gg wolves
- Sat Nov 07, 2020 10:23 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 6]
why would I admit to something that is not trueKrusty the Clown wrote: ↑Sat Nov 07, 2020 10:16 pm Oh Burns & Gramps, just come clean and admit you're Maf
- Sat Nov 07, 2020 7:54 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 6]
noThe Grumple wrote: ↑Sat Nov 07, 2020 7:43 pm just to clarify, for the 9th time, because I'm sure one of us will be dead tomorrow unless the doctor strikes true, it's Gramps and Burns right?
- Sat Nov 07, 2020 4:43 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 6]
If I held wrong decisions against people, I'd be against all of you! ![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/wink.gif)
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/wink.gif)
- Sat Nov 07, 2020 2:59 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 6]
Burns ain't it chief
- Sat Nov 07, 2020 1:22 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 6]
hugh/krusty wolves ez gg
okay probably not hugh
maybe
okay probably not hugh
maybe
- Sat Nov 07, 2020 1:08 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 6]
and what you saw doesn't match what Hugh saw
so we all saw different things somehow
although krusty seems content to just adopt Hugh's recollection
- Sat Nov 07, 2020 1:06 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 6]
there is nothing to talk about, none of us has receipts and everyone involved has a different idea of the sequence of events
just because you and krusty went "yeah but I choose to believe anyways" doesn't mean you're right and I'm a big liar
just because you and krusty went "yeah but I choose to believe anyways" doesn't mean you're right and I'm a big liar
- Sat Nov 07, 2020 1:00 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 6]
I didn't lie tho
- Sat Nov 07, 2020 12:52 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 6]
hello if i pinky swear with two pinkies, does it count for more than krusty's?Krusty the Clown wrote: ↑Sat Nov 07, 2020 12:42 amI'm not a wolf. Pinky swear.The Grumple wrote: ↑Fri Nov 06, 2020 11:53 pm it's gramps and burns right? krusty is chill?
Krusty Clown are you a wolf? you gotta tell me if you are it's the law
Gramps & Burns. Should be lynched in that order IMO
- Thu Nov 05, 2020 7:31 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 5]
RIP that quote
- Thu Nov 05, 2020 7:30 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 5]
You'll be checking out more thoroughly real soon without it.Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Thu Nov 05, 2020 7:21 pm
that sounds like effort, and tbh I kind of checked out a couple days ago
the "how" is just that. in your proposed world, there is NO reason for Burns OR me to move, since according to your presented vote tally, an Allison switch would have forced a Krusty chop
so you're suggesting I'm a wolf because I apparently saved Krusty, yet Krusty is not a wolf in your world
so I, like, went out of my way to out myself, to get Otto chopped, and I dragged my wolf buddies with me to out themselves too? but why male models
I'm not interested in a how, the polls were exactly as I told you. Just do the inverse route after all the switching, and you'll get them. Alison switching first doesn't make any tie. No one outside of me and Bart were on Burns to give you that illusion.
Burns say you switched first, and Alison switched third. That doesn't align with your timeline, correct?
I already told you that a lack of clear reasons isn't a defense. Mafia make strange moves, and there is a way too much wifom being involved here. A Krusty chop might not have been favorable to y'all, preferring to eliminate Otto first since he was in better standing and could have been a harder misexe down the line. While on the other hand, a switch here gets you the misexe by force and also incriminate Krusty for an easy mischop later. Could also be to as well to use this same rethoric you're using. I don't know.
The one thing I know is that y'all switched all together at the last minute. In what looks like a very coordinated event. I'm calling you a wolf because of that, and because you have no good reason to justify the switch having not checked in at all which is scummy af, and because you switched from your alleged strongest scumread. Also because the timeline doesn't make sense.
If you're saying you aren't, do some work to prove it.
[/quote]
flash wagons at EOD are a legit site meta on CFC
though I don't agree with Burns's position that I can be counted on to show up at EOD for a potential flash wagon... since this is the first time I've participated in one as far as I can remember
i mean yeah I'm not going to pretend it's stellar GOAT play, but it wasn't outside the town consensus from the last time I was in-thread
and again, to my POV, I'm like 85% certain krusty was not in the lead when I switched, since if he was, there would have been no reason for me to switch, wolf or town, unless krusty were my partner
you could say hey, that's setting up for a krusty mischop the next day, okay fine, but then why did burns have to switch too??
i also don't really see how three wolves outing themselves at the same time would put them in a better position to win at mylo than just gambling on one wolf maybe being outed
your super solid lock-confirmed wolf world simply makes no sense lol
it makes more sense that a wolf baited a flash wagon, i took the bait, and burns self-pressed like anyone should, rather than all three wolves deciding "yes we should out ourselves" was the path forward when they could have simply gambled one member to get an even better result
- Thu Nov 05, 2020 7:23 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
- Thu Nov 05, 2020 6:34 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 5]
that sounds like effort, and tbh I kind of checked out a couple days agoHugh Jass wrote: ↑Thu Nov 05, 2020 3:46 pmFeel free to tell me how.Grampa Simpson wrote: ↑Thu Nov 05, 2020 3:39 pm I can't see why I would switch if Krusty was in the lead, which is why I think you're wrongThat isn't a justification against.Grampa Simpson wrote: ↑Thu Nov 05, 2020 3:39 pm and I still can't get over the idea that in your layout, there is zero reason for your proposed trio to collectively switch to Otto. There is just no gainWhy is Krusty fo sho?Grampa Simpson wrote: ↑Thu Nov 05, 2020 3:39 pm Allison and Krusty wolves fo sho
The third... I have no clue.
There are only 3 others players excluding Skinner. Dive in.
the "how" is just that. in your proposed world, there is NO reason for Burns OR me to move, since according to your presented vote tally, an Allison switch would have forced a Krusty chop
so you're suggesting I'm a wolf because I apparently saved Krusty, yet Krusty is not a wolf in your world
so I, like, went out of my way to out myself, to get Otto chopped, and I dragged my wolf buddies with me to out themselves too? but why male models
- Thu Nov 05, 2020 6:30 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 5]
again it has to be pointed out here that in this world, only allison would need to switch to guarantee a mischopKrusty the Clown wrote: ↑Thu Nov 05, 2020 5:13 pm
![]()
![]()
![]()
Dude, you've been scum reading me since the start, and had Otto as a TR from the start...but then switched votes last second at EoD onto Otto with your scum buds at literally the last second to save Burns. Too funny.
so far neither "confirmed town" people have a good explanation for why an entire wolf team would out themselves when a "chance of one being outed" was right there and readily available
- Thu Nov 05, 2020 3:39 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 5]
I can't see why I would switch if Krusty was in the lead, which is why I think you're wrongHugh Jass wrote: ↑Thu Nov 05, 2020 2:21 pmSup GrampsGrampa Simpson wrote: ↑Thu Nov 05, 2020 2:09 pmhi hughHugh Jass wrote: ↑Thu Nov 05, 2020 1:37 pm
I mean feel free to talk to me, you haven't engaged me at all nor have you engaged anyone else. I've engaged the other person I have on that team since they tried but it didn't go anywhere since the timeline they're talking about doesn't fit. If they witnessed Alison switch, Krusty would have been leading so their switch and spiciness make no sense. They actually saved their alleged strongest target.
i think you're wrong but don't have enough of a grasp on the EOD layout to be able to definitively say how (beyond me not being a wolf and thus it is impossible for me to be part of the wolf trio)
one thing that keeps coming to mind is that if you're right, there would've been no reason for your supposed confirmed wolf trio to have outed themselves if only allison switching would've forced a krusty mischop
why would all three wolves out themselves to mischop otto if only one possible outing was needed for a krusty mischop
The layout was pretty clear.
Krusty: You, Burns, Otto
Burns: Bart, me, Alison
Otto: Krusty
Alison switching makes it 3v2v2. You say you noticed this, so I'll ask again. Why did you switch at this point as this has Krusty getting chopped?
I've asked myself that same question since all the switching saved Krusty as well, but it's all just a bunch of wifom and for every thought behind a motivation there is a counter one. Mafia doesn't always make the best of choices. Could also be for this exact reason of saying Mafia wouldn't out themselves like that. One thing for sure is that the whole movement wasn't a coincidental, happened at a lightning pace and looks very much so coordinated. One dude not caring about self preserving earlier, one dude missing in action and coincidently voting a minute before EoD and Alison lol.
You say you're town, and that Burns is town. Who's a wolf then?
and I still can't get over the idea that in your layout, there is zero reason for your proposed trio to collectively switch to Otto. There is just no gain
Allison and Krusty wolves fo sho
The third... I have no clue.
- Thu Nov 05, 2020 2:09 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 5]
hi hughHugh Jass wrote: ↑Thu Nov 05, 2020 1:37 pm
I mean feel free to talk to me, you haven't engaged me at all nor have you engaged anyone else. I've engaged the other person I have on that team since they tried but it didn't go anywhere since the timeline they're talking about doesn't fit. If they witnessed Alison switch, Krusty would have been leading so their switch and spiciness make no sense. They actually saved their alleged strongest target.
i think you're wrong but don't have enough of a grasp on the EOD layout to be able to definitively say how (beyond me not being a wolf and thus it is impossible for me to be part of the wolf trio)
one thing that keeps coming to mind is that if you're right, there would've been no reason for your supposed confirmed wolf trio to have outed themselves if only allison switching would've forced a krusty mischop
why would all three wolves out themselves to mischop otto if only one possible outing was needed for a krusty mischop
- Thu Nov 05, 2020 12:31 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 5]
I'm not thoughKrusty the Clown wrote: ↑Thu Nov 05, 2020 10:06 amDude, she's trying to get us to split our vote between 2 wagons so the wolves can EoD pile on a townie. Grampa is the wrong person to ask, he's a wolf. Guaranteed.The Grumple wrote: ↑Thu Nov 05, 2020 4:38 am hm
@Principal Skinner @Grampa Simpson
we should still talk about this, she's right that burns is the most likely to be mafia under these circumstances, even if it's a distancing ploy or whatever.
I sleep now gnight
![Sad :(](./images/smilies/sad.gif)
- Thu Nov 05, 2020 12:31 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 5]
I disagree with [everyone] and don't think Burns is a wolf. I tried to save him, after all. If everyone switches then I have no choice but to switch too, but he is not my first pick.The Grumple wrote: ↑Thu Nov 05, 2020 4:38 am hm
@Principal Skinner @Grampa Simpson
we should still talk about this, she's right that burns is the most likely to be mafia under these circumstances, even if it's a distancing ploy or whatever.
I sleep now gnight
- Wed Nov 04, 2020 8:15 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 5]
Grampa Simpson wrote: ↑Tue Nov 03, 2020 10:47 pmsame reason for voting allison SOD D4: spicyThe Grumple wrote: ↑Tue Nov 03, 2020 10:31 pm Mr. Burns, Krusty the Clown, Grampa Simpson
Please explain your reasons for voting Ortto
voting outside the POE was the model so many of us were adopting when I was here
also I town-read Burns higher than the two other choices EOD, and my choice was losing
i could have switched to otto and forced a rand or sat put and let burns get chopped
burns switching to otto after me and getting him chopped is not on me
don't think he can be blamed for self-preserving anyways
- Wed Nov 04, 2020 8:15 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 5]
asked and answered
- Wed Nov 04, 2020 7:40 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 5]
[VOTE:
Allison Taylor] aubergine
- Wed Nov 04, 2020 12:15 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 5]
kind of a bad expectation since this is the first time I've participated in a flash wagon I'm p sure lolMr. Burns wrote: ↑Wed Nov 04, 2020 12:02 amThis is such a bullshit assumption.Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Tue Nov 03, 2020 11:54 pmShe isn't. Read the fucking end of day, a townie never switches there. The switch happened in matters of second and it's so obvious that it was orchestrated in private with how quickly it happened.The Grumple wrote: ↑Tue Nov 03, 2020 11:34 pm obviously something shady happened but there are 4 votes on Otto. My concern is that Allison might be clean and the other 3 not.
She's also lying about me switching to Otto. I never did so if you think the team is Krusty/Burns/Grampa and you trust me, I'm telling you she's 100% bad.
I was watching for movement because I was looking to self pres. I figured Gramps would move, because CFCers are always probing at EoD. He did, and I self pressed...I wanted Krusty more than Otto, but I sure as hell wasn't gonna die over it. Your whole "oh it was a big conspiracy" stinks just as much as Allisons "oh it was Hugh, it's a big conspiracy" stinks.
- Tue Nov 03, 2020 10:47 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 5]
same reason for voting allison SOD D4: spicyThe Grumple wrote: ↑Tue Nov 03, 2020 10:31 pm Mr. Burns, Krusty the Clown, Grampa Simpson
Please explain your reasons for voting Ortto
voting outside the POE was the model so many of us were adopting when I was here
also I town-read Burns higher than the two other choices EOD, and my choice was losing
i could have switched to otto and forced a rand or sat put and let burns get chopped
burns switching to otto after me and getting him chopped is not on me
don't think he can be blamed for self-preserving anyways
- Tue Nov 03, 2020 10:43 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 5]
i was on my phone in the clinic lolHugh Jass wrote: ↑Tue Nov 03, 2020 10:26 pmI had time to post twice after noticing your vote. Why didn't you post? Why not even before you vote?Grampa Simpson wrote: ↑Tue Nov 03, 2020 10:10 pmwolfy use of honestly
jk
but seriously, I wasn't here all day and came at EOD to see if there were any flash wagons
can't speak for anyone else but for me it was "oh that'd be spicy, *click*" and then thread lock
it sounds really contrived but it's also true
- Tue Nov 03, 2020 10:10 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 5]
wolfy use of honestly
jk
but seriously, I wasn't here all day and came at EOD to see if there were any flash wagons
can't speak for anyone else but for me it was "oh that'd be spicy, *click*" and then thread lock
- Tue Nov 03, 2020 9:46 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 5]
I expected a rand with Burns tbh
- Tue Nov 03, 2020 9:44 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 5]
i came at EOD to check the wagons and saw Allison had switched, so I switched for the chaos move because Otto and Krusty were thunderdoming earlier when I was there
- Tue Nov 03, 2020 9:43 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 5]
noAllison Taylor wrote: ↑Tue Nov 03, 2020 9:42 pm [VOTE: Burns] aubergine
[VOTE: Hugh] aubergine
[VOTE: Grampa] aubergine
And I'm assuming the Grampa pile on at the last second was called from scum chat as well
- Mon Nov 02, 2020 11:09 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 4]
okBart Simpson wrote: ↑Mon Nov 02, 2020 4:38 amQuote please the evidence for what you recalled, i assumeed you have TMI on that slot and this is why i am voting you.Grampa Simpson wrote: ↑Mon Nov 02, 2020 3:07 am
k you made me paranoid enough to go check Skinner's ISO
nothing except exactly what I just recalled
what are you going on about, dude
claim
track
slot rescind attempt
Principal Skinner wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:52 pmI don't know why this question exists. I'm as vanilla as they come.
Otto's trap and Skinner's reaffirmationPrincipal Skinner wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:54 pmI don't read slot's claim.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:53 pmSo you rescind your slot's claim?Principal Skinner wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:52 pmI don't know why this question exists. I'm as vanilla as they come.
What did slots claim?
Can slots claim?
you even engaged with Skinner during this, so I'm not going to spend any more time on itPrincipal Skinner wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:57 pmThen how'd I know you targeted no one? Docs don't do that.Otto Mann wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:55 pmYour predecessor claimed docPrincipal Skinner wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:54 pmI don't read slot's claim.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:53 pmSo you rescind your slot's claim?Principal Skinner wrote: ↑Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:52 pmI don't know why this question exists. I'm as vanilla as they come.
What did slots claim?
Can slots claim?
Vote Krusty.
if you want to seriously case Skinner as a fake tracker, by all means
- Mon Nov 02, 2020 3:25 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 4]
there is nothing I can say about Krusty that everyone else hasn't already said today, and I'm not going to paraphrase just to appear like I'm contributing something new on that front
- Mon Nov 02, 2020 3:07 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 4]
lol and you vote me for it
alright
alright
- Mon Nov 02, 2020 3:07 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 4]
k you made me paranoid enough to go check Skinner's ISOGrampa Simpson wrote: ↑Mon Nov 02, 2020 3:05 amhaven't read super closely today due to not being here, but my last memory of Skinner is him trying to rescind the tracker claim, Otto trying to trap him, and Skinner reaffirming the track results on OttoBart Simpson wrote: ↑Mon Nov 02, 2020 2:57 amBold from you to assume i know what gaslighting means but anyway i am positive you missed some things in Skinner's Iso. And that for me means you didn't read the thread with attention.Grampa Simpson wrote: ↑Mon Nov 02, 2020 2:52 amare you gaslighting meBart Simpson wrote: ↑Mon Nov 02, 2020 2:49 am Noted how Burns and Gramps didn't read through the thread.![]()
Are you sure my intention is to gaslight you? Wanna go in that direction?
is there something else that's happened since then that casts in serious doubt Skinner is clear?
nothing except exactly what I just recalled
what are you going on about, dude
- Mon Nov 02, 2020 3:05 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 4]
haven't read super closely today due to not being here, but my last memory of Skinner is him trying to rescind the tracker claim, Otto trying to trap him, and Skinner reaffirming the track results on OttoBart Simpson wrote: ↑Mon Nov 02, 2020 2:57 amBold from you to assume i know what gaslighting means but anyway i am positive you missed some things in Skinner's Iso. And that for me means you didn't read the thread with attention.Grampa Simpson wrote: ↑Mon Nov 02, 2020 2:52 amare you gaslighting meBart Simpson wrote: ↑Mon Nov 02, 2020 2:49 am Noted how Burns and Gramps didn't read through the thread.![]()
Are you sure my intention is to gaslight you? Wanna go in that direction?
is there something else that's happened since then that casts in serious doubt Skinner is clear?
- Mon Nov 02, 2020 2:52 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 4]
are you gaslighting meBart Simpson wrote: ↑Mon Nov 02, 2020 2:49 am Noted how Burns and Gramps didn't read through the thread.![]()
- Mon Nov 02, 2020 2:47 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 4]
Grumple's trended down for me. EOD D3 was spent slinging mud with Otto and D4 has been low energy (no actual shade from me on this, I haven't been here either). But what stood out as "eh..." to me was his answer to Bart about reads, which after the flip and NK have remained static
I could see not moving anything around too much but no change at all is Weird, and is also easily proven wrong
he isn't voting within his own POE lol
this is his D3 reads list, with top being town and bottom being scum
Allison Taylor
The Grumple
Hugh Jass
Marge Simpson
Otto Mann
Principal Skinner
Bart Simpson
Grampa Simpson
Krusty the Clown
Lisa Simpson
Mr. Burns
currently voting hugh, was voting otto earlier today
yet insists his reads are the same when asked directly
I could see not moving anything around too much but no change at all is Weird, and is also easily proven wrong
he isn't voting within his own POE lol
this is his D3 reads list, with top being town and bottom being scum
Allison Taylor
The Grumple
Hugh Jass
Marge Simpson
Otto Mann
Principal Skinner
Bart Simpson
Grampa Simpson
Krusty the Clown
Lisa Simpson
Mr. Burns
currently voting hugh, was voting otto earlier today
yet insists his reads are the same when asked directly
- Mon Nov 02, 2020 2:42 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 4]
whatBart Simpson wrote: ↑Mon Nov 02, 2020 2:41 amWhy is Skinner mech town?Mr. Burns wrote: ↑Mon Nov 02, 2020 2:05 amSkinner mech town.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Mon Nov 02, 2020 1:36 am So from everyone i pinged only Alison wanted to share reads, and Hugh promised to do them later, i wonder what stops you to share your reads, everyone else?
If you did this already and i missed, can you link your presvious reads post? Thanks
One in Otto/Krusty...more likely Krusty.
Most likely none but maybe one in: Bart, Hugh
Definitely one, likely two in:
Gramps, Grumple, Alisson
???
claimed tracker D1, no counterclaim
did I miss something critically important about this
- Mon Nov 02, 2020 2:41 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 4]
hiBart Simpson wrote: ↑Mon Nov 02, 2020 1:36 am So from everyone i pinged only Alison wanted to share reads, and Hugh promised to do them later, i wonder what stops you to share your reads, everyone else?
If you did this already and i missed, can you link your presvious reads post? Thanks
skinner
hugh
burns
bart
otto
allison
grumple
krusty
my ISO of Allison was half-assed but I've liked her reactions today so she gets a slight bump up, not in a "yeah she gucci" way but in a "hm, not so confident" way
don't get the sussing of hugh at all beyond tinfoil, he's been rock solid and responsive. He went from "let's chop the slanking nobody" to a pretty level head, and I'll admit his reactions to the wall and tone stuff earlier in the game have been a little town-meld-y for me. gut and substance puts him near the top for me after this long
more thoughts inbound Soon(tm)
- Sat Oct 31, 2020 10:18 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 4]
Marge hella pushed Allison EOD and didn't participate in either of the wagons, so I'll look through that ISO and see if Marge's thoughts align with my weak half-assed "idk man" read from yesterday
- Sat Oct 31, 2020 10:16 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 4]
Otto I hated your EOD but I loved your attempted trap on Skinner lol
- Sat Oct 31, 2020 10:15 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 4]
[VOTE:
Allison Taylor] aubergine
feeling a little bit s p i c y
but also my POE got halved again
feeling a little bit s p i c y
but also my POE got halved again
- Sat Oct 31, 2020 10:14 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 4]
pure shit
- Fri Oct 30, 2020 5:01 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 31922
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 3]
k bye, have fun chopping