The Syndicate

Metalmarsh89 wrote:@Donna, I didn't realize what you were asking. But the spirit of the vote is still there, whether it counted or not.

Let's see Jay hack my computer and delete my spreadsheets.

So a spirit would determine whether there is a tie or not?

thellama73 wrote:Does it matter whether the Cheerleader's vote counted?

No,
It matters if MM knows though.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Quotes fixed

Donna Meagle wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Because sig was a solid lynch candidate on Day 1, making someone who voiced a suspicion of him a solid contributor to trying to lynch him.

How does that make a soneji lynch so obviously a bad iea?

Since this is almost like another Day 1, I thought it good enough reason to PoE Soneji.

Donna Meagle wrote:

Boomslang wrote:Arrgh, shitty result. RIP Soneji. Cheerleader putting him over the edge looks really shady, but I don't know how much can be gleaned from that considering the sock. My gut tells me whoever is controlling that account wouldn't double up? I think MM comes out looking the best from this lynch: made valid points in counter of Soneji, voted where his mouth was. I thought llama had a good case, but I hope we hear from him in the aftermath.

How do you know that this happened?

The lynch poll says so.

hwo do you know the cheerleaders vote counted?

Made wrote:

Donna Meagle wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:@golden i hated how he wanted to talk about the other thread and not this one. I said that when I voted for him.

I still don't understand this tbh.

I would rather bea have been lynched than Soneji. I thought Boomslang made a good point on her. Did nobody care that Soneji suspected sig?

I do agree that sig is suspicious
I do agree that Soneji was not a good lynch
why is this connected?

Do you know why you weren't on the poll?

It's fairly obvious why I wasn't on the poll.
So yes.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Donna Meagle wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:@golden i hated how he wanted to talk about the other thread and not this one. I said that when I voted for him.

I still don't understand this tbh.

I would rather bea have been lynched than Soneji. I thought Boomslang made a good point on her. Did nobody care that Soneji suspected sig?

I do agree that sig is suspicious
I do agree that Soneji was not a good lynch
why is this connected?

Because sig was a solid lynch candidate on Day 1, making someone who voiced a suspicion of him a solid contributor to trying to lynch him.

How does that make a soneji lynch so obviously a bad iea?

Boomslang wrote:Arrgh, shitty result. RIP Soneji. Cheerleader putting him over the edge looks really shady, but I don't know how much can be gleaned from that considering the sock. My gut tells me whoever is controlling that account wouldn't double up? I think MM comes out looking the best from this lynch: made valid points in counter of Soneji, voted where his mouth was. I thought llama had a good case, but I hope we hear from him in the aftermath.

How do you know that this happened?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:@golden i hated how he wanted to talk about the other thread and not this one. I said that when I voted for him.

I still don't understand this tbh.

I would rather bea have been lynched than Soneji. I thought Boomslang made a good point on her. Did nobody care that Soneji suspected sig?

I do agree that sig is suspicious
I do agree that Soneji was not a good lynch
why is this connected?

if i'm role playing, i sck at role playing.

bea and juliets have both said i am role playing.

describe.

so... like... how am i role playing at all?

Prisoner 27385 wrote:I take it this means Donna thinks the baddies decided to all hang out in the Hatch today.

not really

i think there are more. I'm just clueless as to who they are.

bea - bad
boomslang - good
cheerleader - indi/whocares/good? idk what's going on
donna - supatown
golden - good
john coltrane - good
juliets - good
made - good
mm89 - good
prisoner - good
llama - good
scotty - good
soneji - good (tbh bc i missed the case on him and am very tired)
svs - good

Made wrote:

Donna Meagle wrote:

Made wrote:

juliets wrote:

Boomslang wrote: Llama's case on Soneji seems the most solid out of anything so far. Omitting the lynchee from discussion while questioning the judgment used to lynch him is textbook indirect mafia support. I also don't like Soneji quickly jumping to "You didn't see me defend Mac, did you?" when talking about his distrust of meta. That seemed to me to be ahead of llama's questioning. Doth protest too much. And whoa, Soneji saying "As for a GTH, everyone is bad in my eyes until they flip otherwise" is just a tremendous cop-out of responsibility. Could at least say he didn't have time or just ignore the request altogether. And there's some snarky sarcasm that doesn't read right.

The tone reads consistent through Soneji's post. Regardless, this is kinda big. I can think of reasons not to give reads, Soneji, but what are yours? Do you actually think everyone in here is bad?

linki- polls ends at like 8 EST

it says 6 for me

juliets wrote:Donna, my point about your memory is you did not post much in the other thread and I would expect you to remember if you had a post with llama's name in it whether you suspected him or were responding to him. I remember a lot of things from the other thread though not everything. I certainly remember who I suspected and I would expect you to too.

I didn't mean to imply that I suspected Llama. I suspected sig.

Yo, while i have you, GTH?

uhhh i don't like gth but sure why not hold on.

Made wrote:

juliets wrote:

Boomslang wrote: Llama's case on Soneji seems the most solid out of anything so far. Omitting the lynchee from discussion while questioning the judgment used to lynch him is textbook indirect mafia support. I also don't like Soneji quickly jumping to "You didn't see me defend Mac, did you?" when talking about his distrust of meta. That seemed to me to be ahead of llama's questioning. Doth protest too much. And whoa, Soneji saying "As for a GTH, everyone is bad in my eyes until they flip otherwise" is just a tremendous cop-out of responsibility. Could at least say he didn't have time or just ignore the request altogether. And there's some snarky sarcasm that doesn't read right.

The tone reads consistent through Soneji's post. Regardless, this is kinda big. I can think of reasons not to give reads, Soneji, but what are yours? Do you actually think everyone in here is bad?

linki- polls ends at like 8 EST

it says 6 for me

juliets wrote:Donna, my point about your memory is you did not post much in the other thread and I would expect you to remember if you had a post with llama's name in it whether you suspected him or were responding to him. I remember a lot of things from the other thread though not everything. I certainly remember who I suspected and I would expect you to too.

I didn't mean to imply that I suspected Llama. I suspected sig.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:There was a time when I thought Donna Meagle was Mongoose. That time has passed (thanks for posting in another thread hun).

:whistle:

juliets wrote:This is the post that sounded disingenuous to me. You haven't posted that much yet you say you don't remember the post in question. First you say you wrote something about him, then you say maybe it was a response to something he said. It just seemed to me you would remember better than this.

I realize it's just one post but it just gave me a bad feeling. My baddie read was not a strong baddie read but in GTH you have to pick a side.

Donna Meagle wrote:i wrote something about llama in the other thread it might have just been a response to something he said.

i think i agreed with him.

idk i'm peeved i can't go back and read the other thread.

Juliets I actually have a few questions in regard to this:

You say I should remember, but admit you don't remember many things here. So, why am I expected to remember everything, but you aren't?

I think I agreed with his analysis on sig.
You're asking for a response, but I don't really know what there is to say about what you've pointed out?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Same with you Donna. Let's get some input!!!

I don't like doing GTH's or Rainbows, but I'll share some thoughts now that i'm here.


I don't think I trust bea very much. I don't think bea would make up fake excuses, but I don't like her tone in responding to SVS who is her friend. It seems manipulative to me.

I am questioning juliets who thinks I should remember everything, but openly admits her memory is "not the best".

juliets wrote:Donna Meagle I see you voted for bea without explaining. Could you tell us why you voted for her?

Doesn't the poll end like 10 minutes ago?
I voted for someone I mildly suspect and really am having a hard time finding my footing in this game. So I made it a three way tie.

thellama73 wrote:Coltrane has given no one any reason to trust him. I don't have a specific ping about him like I do against Soneji, but he definitely has work to do if he wants to stick around. I'd say the same for Donna Meagle, who appears to not be trying at all.

i'm trying.

S~V~S wrote:Now see, Donna Meagle is another one that was quiet and said not much then posted a few big posts during the night phase, but I don't recall anything specific she said.

i know i talked about sig.

juliets what makes me bad to you?

why do y'all think bea is bad?

i wrote something about llama in the other thread it might have just been a response to something he said.

i think i agreed with him.

idk i'm peeved i can't go back and read the other thread.

i like golden

I want to lynch sig.