...and Malakim!


Return to “Mass Effect Mafia (END)”
Lol.CaptainNifty wrote: ↑Tue Apr 18, 2017 2:07 pmIt's mostly about DOE, and Dyslexicon is a better choice than you or SVS as far as I'm concerned. Also, Dyslexicon comes onto the thread after being relatively quiet for a while, and starts accusing people who have been all but cleared.
The questions are not answered. Nowhere does Nifty explain why he targeted Nut specifically. In fact the little he talked about her earlier was him NOT trusting her and her being on "everybody's scum list". Nowhere has he said who he now has targeted, as he does have more shots he should've targeted someone else. I picked up on the link between Nifty/Nut before this even happened. And I hinted to Nifty that if he was town he should target me cause I have a x-shot role (as do many roles to be fair). All Nifty has done is become LESS active after being "pretty much confirmed" and refusing to answer my questions because I've been inactive. The link between gfish and Nifty were strong. It's actually blantantly obvious imo. This game is not breakable, if you follow Nifty and Nut's claim to the grave you're going to lose no matter what side you're on.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Lol and?
Also, assume Nut/Nifty did get that question earlier (I don't remember the details but I remembered reading your post like "asked and answered").
Would you still be certain they are bad together? If so, why?
Get what question earlier? Did Nifty say who he targeted this last night?Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Lol and?
Also, assume Nut/Nifty did get that question earlier (I don't remember the details but I remembered reading your post like "asked and answered").
Would you still be certain they are bad together? If so, why?
In which case: YES.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Care to claim, Dizzy?
Then answer them again, they are not hard. I do not believe Nifty and Nut has gotten those questions before. I do not have the time to get caught up with the game, that is just reality for me right now. I'll spend my time go look at what I find interesting, and if I ask questions that are simple to answer, I hope town will be cooperative enough to actually answer them instead of just say that it's been said before.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:@Dizzy
You're asking a lot of questions that have been answered. Glad you're back but you'll be more convincing if you catch up first. You can ISO me for a recent summary I gave MP and start from there if you have to.
You claim:Dizzy hasn't been interested in catching scum, imo. They've floated from lynch train to lynch train, seemingly happy to lynch anybody. I've had Dizzy down as LMS but wasn't too scared of the LMS roles since they are relatively weak. LC's flip and the above reasoning behind Epi being neutral means Dizzy can't be a LMS. This means Dizzy is town or scum. I'm not seeing Phenon town Dizzy. I'm seeing coasting. I'm seeing "tunneling". I'm seeing no gambits. I'm seeing few gifs. I'm seeing no hunting. This leads me to believe Dizzy is mafia. With 8 living town roles and 5 of them identified and 1 living neutral role that is also identified, there are only 3 good guys of all the players I don't know. If I assume you or Nutella or Sprityo or MP are town, that makes Dizzy look even more likely to be mafia. I want mafia gone most of all.
Lol. He is like the one person I would expect to actually listen to me. Well, next day I guess.nutella wrote:I take it Fred is silenced
I know all this, which should be evident from my posts. Don't pretend you don't understand what I'm saying. I'm saying you two are lying. Why wait? If you got an upgrade he is telling the truth, no other role can do that. Why do you think he chose you of all people? He didn't seem to trust you. Why is he now refusing to answer questions? Why is he trusting you? Why has he become less active after being "pretty much confirmed" by his own admission? These are all rethoric questions for the other players to consider.nutella wrote:Dys, in case it wasn't entirely clear, I did vouch for Nifty because I did get an extra shot that night, and no I wasn't expecting it. I waited for him to bring it up to confirm that it was him, so since he brought it up I believe he must be that role. So he is cleared. That was like, so yesterday. You caught up on the facts now? Also, you're bad. Sorry but that's just how the game goes.
Seriously though. What is your basis for saying this? And why am I put in a group with SVS like this? Show it, don't tell it.CaptainNifty wrote:You've been relatively inactive, I've been pretty much cleared. I don't owe you an explanation for anything. I'm going to either vote you or SVS, I get that you guys overhear don't like claiming, but the fact that you ignored the claims altogether is crazy. Gut-reads, POE, scumhunting are all great tools, but you and SVS have completely ignored those things.
If I'm reading things correctly it looks like Thane went after Wilgy. Any other explanation I'm missing for the two kills?
Aren't we all? But cool, can you vote Nifty?^^MovingPictures07 wrote:Dump it. You're wrong. I'm Legion.
Are the questions uncofortable for you to answer? If you have nothing to hide it shouldn't be a problem. I will be damned if the rest of town would be so blind as to not listen to what I have to say. Tell me more about the "pretty much cleared" and what you mean by those words. I'm especially interested in who you targeted other than Nut, if you really want to prove yourself. And you should answer all the other questions I already gave you. Why so uncooperative?CaptainNifty wrote:You've been relatively inactive, I've been pretty much cleared. I don't owe you an explanation for anything. I'm going to either vote you or SVS, I get that you guys overhear don't like claiming, but the fact that you ignored the claims altogether is crazy. Gut-reads, POE, scumhunting are all great tools, but you and SVS have completely ignored those things.
If I'm reading things correctly it looks like Thane went after Wilgy. Any other explanation I'm missing for the two kills?
nutella wrote:Cool no death!
Now I need to sort out my thoughts for this lynchSeveral players I'm iffy on (Nifty, Wilgy, Jack, SVS) but nothing really confident.
And then Nifty asks if Nut didn't get a message from the mod, which Nut never answers and it isn't brought up again. But Nifty brings up Nut vouching for him.nutella wrote:Not anymore.CaptainNifty wrote:Really, you're iffy on me after what I did for you?nutella wrote:Cool no death!
Now I need to sort out my thoughts for this lynchSeveral players I'm iffy on (Nifty, Wilgy, Jack, SVS) but nothing really confident.
Wait, when did this happen?TonyStarkPrime wrote:MP claimed something that can basically be confirmed. Dizzy for sure, I want to keep MP around.Adam wrote:I am currently thinking MP and Dizzy should be the next two lynches. Someone feel free to contradict me.
Not a chance, and I'm not really guessing. =) Voting JackS~V~S wrote:Show of hands~ does ANYONE think Jack is a civ?
This is one of the strangest vote justifications I've ever read. What exactly was I supposed to connect or not connect? Explain this better.S~V~S wrote:I did not realize we had two potential silencers (and on both of MY suspects, lol).
At this stage, not sure where I am gonna shift to though.
Linki@MP~ I don't have reads on most people, you know I don't really play that way. If I had to make choices, I feel better about Wilgy than LC, I feel better about you than Nutella, after today Dizzy went a bit into the red for me. When I looked back at Jacks posts and saw that he had not posted (I thought) today, and Dizzy asked me about it, she said, first, Oh yeah, I did notice he was voting a lot, like it was something she had not connected to being silenced, but then she said, but he did post today. And she was right, once after the NP, I did not notice it since it was the post right after the NP. So she noticed that his one post was today, but did not connect the way his vote was moving all over the place?
So those two things did not go together for me.
I think I talked myself into *Voting Dyslexicon*
Linki @Epi, he "feels" bad to me, I just think he's bad. Not sure why other people do.
-_- Then let me remind you. Pretty sure you stated a towny read of me D1. This is a really bad look for you.MovingPictures07 wrote:Moving to Dizzy in an attempt to create another wagon. I think I trust S~V~S enough and I have no immediate recollection of a read on Dizzy which is concerning, despite my spotty activity. I know, this vote isn't great.
Excuse me, but I detest this comment. I may not be hunting in a way that you would do or you would want, but I am most certainly hunting and quite frankly I feel I'm doing well with it. You bet your bum I was willing to lynch three people, and I'm still willing to lynch at least one of them. Hello, before Silver was lynched there was still 7 non town players in the thread. What shade is this? Explain to me how being willing to lynch multiple people indicates no preference for lynching or saving anyone. Actually, this is an outright lie, I've explicitly said I did not want to lynch Wilgy or Adam, but I did want to lynch you, Nifty and Silver. Not idicating a preference. Gurl bye.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Dizzy does not appear to be hunting at all. Several times, Dizzy's been like "I'm okay with lynching *three people*." Dizzy's voting behavior also indicates no preference for lynching or saving anyone.
Likely LMS type role. Almost too easy is all.
What are you even trying to argue here? What did I lie about supposedly? I was willing to lynch you this phase and that had nothing to do with you being silenced or not, but I'm not a player who's going to back off just because someone is silenced or someone is feeling bad or someone has an exam or whatever. When people started discussing that you might've been silenced they were moving off of you. Explain my lie. Don't throw shit like this around. Seriously annoying.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Oh yeah. One more reason Dizzy isn't town and likely needs to go.
Dizzy tried to lynch me in spite of my silencing, arguing that my silence was a trick that essentially put me out of sight and out of mind.
However, ctrl+f "Jack" on the previous page got 37 results and I was tied for the most votes on me at the time.
Not sure if Diz was trying to set me up as part of the silencing or if they were just trying to get rid of one of the few players that suspected him but either way, I like lynching liars.
Lulwut. Me and Jack are literally the last people who would be teamed in this game. Explain how I'm mafia, LC, if you want to go that route.Long Con wrote:Nah. I'd lean more toward that's Mafia Dizzy, but I don't really know Dizzy's playstyle that well. From this post, I would be looking hard at you, Jack, should Dizzy ever turn up bad. And vice-versa, I guess.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Dizzy does not appear to be hunting at all. Several times, Dizzy's been like "I'm okay with lynching *three people*." Dizzy's voting behavior also indicates no preference for lynching or saving anyone.
Likely LMS type role. Almost too easy is all.
Good point about the vote. Dunno.TonyStarkPrime wrote:So are we thinking Silver was silenced or just is absent? He doesn't have a vote up.
Why do you believe his claim?nutella wrote:yeah, looks like he hasn't. ugghhh. I would usually feel bad voting for someone who's silenced and can't defend but in this case I'm confident enough about Silver that I don't think he'd convince me anyway... and I don't feel as confident in a vote for anyone else at this point. I'd feel like shit if I end up wrong about him though.
I suppose I could entertain a vote on SVS for a reason or two, but I'm still working out that suspicion.
linki again: I believe Nifty's claim, I think?
You had BTSC with Dom?sprityo wrote:Of course that'd only be true if we had both lived.
It's the last part I don't really buy. It doesn't seem logical to assume that he would be able to devanillarize you. Also I would assume any player to clarify how their role works. I want him to explain it again. I guess he's welcome to prove himself though, not sure how. Hi.Fredwood wrote:Anderson grants an extra use of a limited ability. He targeted me because A: I'm as close to a confirmed townie as you can get and B he wanted to prove his innocence to me.Dyslexicon wrote:Did anyone else get Nifty's claim and why he targeted Fred?
Unfortunately I guess there's a lost in translation, or misunderstanding between him and the mods between stripped of powers and vanilla. It's a strong enough claim that I didn't want to push too hard on it before hand, and at some point, it's possible he can be verified. I still don't like a lot of the voting he did and how he did it, but for now Anderson is a strong claim for me, especially when we have a much better option I think.
I've noticed players on CK being rather polite in the way they play. Having a rule of not voting or killing new players the first day etc. It's admirable for sure, but I'm a mean girl and I do what I want regardless.S~V~S wrote:Yeah that was the etiquette where I first played, and I carried it with me. Sometimes people DO pretend to be silenced, but more often than not they don't, especially if they are taking suspicion. I would rather wait a day than lynch someone unable to respond. But as you say, you do you. I feel archaic for feeling that way at times
Yeah was just going to say is it just me or is Jack moving his vote around a lot. In any case my logic is regardless of if he can't respond or is pretending to not be able to respond or will respons later or whatever that doesn't change his alignment. So I'm still voting for him, but you do you I guess.S~V~S wrote:I think he's silenced becasue he's voting and not posting. It is more common than not for silencing to NOT be announced. But after I voted him, he moved his vote from Adam to me, then when I saw his last post was before the night post, and unvoted him, he moved his vote OFF of me. Either he is silenced or he is pretending to be silenced, but in either case, being unable to ascertain which, I prefer not to vote for him if he cannot respond.
Why are you reacting to that NOW? I took it as a joke.Long Con wrote:ImmortalRaven no, the fakeslip is Wilgy pretending to accidentally post something to the thread that was supposed to be posted in his baddie BTSC.
I only voted for Epi because LC did it *points to LC* I'm innocent! But seriously, I hadn't even read what was going down. I don't think LC is Cerb actually. All the other three I could see.Adam wrote:Long Con
Dyslexicon
Immortal_Raven
JackofHearts
Captain Nifty
gfishfunk
I may or may not be missing other votes for Epignosis after his Geth reveal, I kind of hate how you can move your vote around the poll without there being any record of it.
But I guarantee you Cerberus is on that lynch.
I also am very confident at least one Syndicateer is Cerberus.
Who else voted for Epi that I missed? Nifty mentioned there were 5 votes when he threw down, I don't know if that includes all 5 from above or not.