The Syndicate

pyxxy wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 7:42 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 7:40 pm
pyxxy wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 7:39 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 7:38 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 7:34 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 7:33 pm I did a quick scan of pyxxy's posts. Their latest one is by far the most substantive:

pyxxy wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:49 pm
Spoiler: show

almost certainly can't claim puppet master bc rules

given unfamiliarity with my most recent game / didn't open or read it, yet familiarity with me

given not wanting to vote delta or whoever the other one was

given sloonei probably unlikely to stack on himself bc of self-professed "focus topic votes", which would lead to scrappy being used sooner + differently

math says caitlin

and because I'm already using this post for lots of things, scrappy = caitlin = town caitlin

that's the juice I've got

[/spoiler]

I am left feeling underwhelmed and have no reason to give this player a town read. @pyxxy you got any late-day thoughts to get off your chest?
"no reason to give this player a town read", but do you have a reason to give them a wolf read?
Delta's post did just give me one. Pyxxy's fixation on Scrappy Doo's identity could be a very easy thing to latch onto for a player who is struggling to engage with any genuine scum-hunting in this thread right now.
ah yes

because that's what my scum game is known for

failure to engage and fool people
I know zero things about your scum game.

Show me your town game.
if I had used the word "slank" instead of the word "juice", would all this go away

there is nothing I can do now that will change people's mind, regardless of that I don't want to

You could at least give us something to work with here. Can you name three townleans and wolfleans?

pyxxy wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 7:39 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 7:38 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 7:34 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 7:33 pm I did a quick scan of pyxxy's posts. Their latest one is by far the most substantive:

pyxxy wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:49 pm
Spoiler: show
Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:44 pm I want to know who is controlling Scrappy, AND I feel like it's distasteful to try and crack it out of him in the thread.
almost certainly can't claim puppet master bc rules

given unfamiliarity with my most recent game / didn't open or read it, yet familiarity with me

given not wanting to vote delta or whoever the other one was

given sloonei probably unlikely to stack on himself bc of self-professed "focus topic votes", which would lead to scrappy being used sooner + differently

math says caitlin

and because I'm already using this post for lots of things, scrappy = caitlin = town caitlin

that's the juice I've got

[/spoiler]

I am left feeling underwhelmed and have no reason to give this player a town read. @pyxxy you got any late-day thoughts to get off your chest?
"no reason to give this player a town read", but do you have a reason to give them a wolf read?
Delta's post did just give me one. Pyxxy's fixation on Scrappy Doo's identity could be a very easy thing to latch onto for a player who is struggling to engage with any genuine scum-hunting in this thread right now.
ah yes

because that's what my scum game is known for

failure to engage and fool people

That's basically what you were doing in Beans D1

Hope Daisy's a wolf 'cause they're probably gonna get modkilled at this rate

It is true that wolf!pyxxy's D1 ISO in Beans was much lamer than town!pyxxy's D1 ISO in Severance, but those are the only two games I have of experience

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 7:33 pm I did a quick scan of pyxxy's posts. Their latest one is by far the most substantive:

pyxxy wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:49 pm
Spoiler: show
Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:44 pm I want to know who is controlling Scrappy, AND I feel like it's distasteful to try and crack it out of him in the thread.
almost certainly can't claim puppet master bc rules

given unfamiliarity with my most recent game / didn't open or read it, yet familiarity with me

given not wanting to vote delta or whoever the other one was

given sloonei probably unlikely to stack on himself bc of self-professed "focus topic votes", which would lead to scrappy being used sooner + differently

math says caitlin

and because I'm already using this post for lots of things, scrappy = caitlin = town caitlin

that's the juice I've got

[/spoiler]

I am left feeling underwhelmed and have no reason to give this player a town read. @pyxxy you got any late-day thoughts to get off your chest?

"no reason to give this player a town read", but do you have a reason to give them a wolf read?

Caitlin wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 7:32 pm Leetic kinda dropped on my suspect list which kinda makes it awkward that now they ARE a vote lol

Rank the three people at two (Delta, pyxxy, Seanzie) in terms of most to least preferred vote

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 7:02 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:56 pm
I have no interest in listening to people who aren't town, that is correct. If you want me to engage with you, actually say something bold or interesting.
Perhaps you should stop operating as though only bold statements are worth responding to.

I've been calling out milquetoast and meaningless statements all the time, what are you talking about?

Ricochet wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 7:00 pm
Ricochet wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 7:00 pm Ok, gotta go to bed.

Sticking with what I've gathered, [VOTE: leetic] aubergine.

On main performance, even from recent ISO, I still sense a lot of barking and not biting. Even their most fleshed out suss (Sloonei) went on with no finger on the trigger, instead switching to wagoning the unnamed sock.

On side aspect of playlist, even after swimming through all the acid, I have no meta and vibe to tell if it's all stubborn towniness or manipulative wolf aggro. Would flip in search of enlightenment.

Night.
Wrote this before seeing that they now pushed the vote button on Sloonei, after all.

Does that make you reconsider anything or are you confbiased?

Scrappy Doo wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:55 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:54 pm
Scrappy Doo wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:51 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:48 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:48 pm
sig wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:46 pm Also I’m 100% ignoring scrappy they’re a sock of likely an active player, they’ve got an active vote, and there’s a high chance they’re 3P imo. Having said all that we’d gain nothing from voting there especially no info
Scrappy seems to be making some reads, so it's not crazy to glance at their posts in order to be maximally informed.
Parroting everybody else's reads ≠ "making reads"
Reads you have not once engaged me on

Reads that you do not care about because it is easier to toss me aside as 3P and encourage kills because it suits your agenda as mafia.

It is easier to direct people to me so you can go 'oops thought that was 3p silly me'
Why should I engage with you when I have engaged with the actual people and you have said nothing interesting or novel? Besides, you're almost certainly not town so why should I give a damn what you think,
Because it shows you have no active interest in actually solving the people you scumread, you just throw out names and then refuse to do anything about it.

You have no real interest in your solve.

I have no interest in listening to people who aren't town, that is correct. If you want me to engage with you, actually say something bold or interesting.

[VOTE: Sloonei] aubergine

Probably going to have to converge for self-preservation but I'd be happy with a vote here.

Scrappy Doo wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:51 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:48 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:48 pm
sig wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:46 pm Also I’m 100% ignoring scrappy they’re a sock of likely an active player, they’ve got an active vote, and there’s a high chance they’re 3P imo. Having said all that we’d gain nothing from voting there especially no info
Scrappy seems to be making some reads, so it's not crazy to glance at their posts in order to be maximally informed.
Parroting everybody else's reads ≠ "making reads"
Reads you have not once engaged me on

Reads that you do not care about because it is easier to toss me aside as 3P and encourage kills because it suits your agenda as mafia.

It is easier to direct people to me so you can go 'oops thought that was 3p silly me'

Why should I engage with you when I have engaged with the actual people and you have said nothing interesting or novel? Besides, you're almost certainly not town so why should I give a damn what you think,

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:48 pm
sig wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:46 pm Also I’m 100% ignoring scrappy they’re a sock of likely an active player, they’ve got an active vote, and there’s a high chance they’re 3P imo. Having said all that we’d gain nothing from voting there especially no info
Scrappy seems to be making some reads, so it's not crazy to glance at their posts in order to be maximally informed.

Parroting everybody else's reads ≠ "making reads"

sig wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:46 pm Also I’m 100% ignoring scrappy they’re a sock of likely an active player, they’ve got an active vote, and there’s a high chance they’re 3P imo. Having said all that we’d gain nothing from voting there especially no info

If they're ITP, we lose nothing as well. It would also likely give us info on whoever Scrappy's an alt of. That said, vigging them is probably optimal.

Scrappy Doo wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:40 pm [VOTE: LEETIC] aubergine

Call it OMGUS if you like, you're not townie

I'm not not not not not not townie

Scrappy Doo wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:38 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:37 pm
Scrappy Doo wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:30 pm If Leetic opts to focus me over any named players here, I would prefer a vote on them. For now, I am content here.
OMGUS much?
Yeah
Do something about it

Already am, thank you very much

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:37 pm Not feeling good about sloonei or leetic uere

This doesn't even deserve a response, just a letter

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:36 pm Dislike the pyxxy votes a lot

Lame

Scrappy Doo wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:30 pm If Leetic opts to focus me over any named players here, I would prefer a vote on them. For now, I am content here.

OMGUS much?

Seanzie wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:15 pm I'd elim Rico.

I don't want to hear random names you want to lynch, I want you to actually give us reasons here

Delta wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:07 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:06 pm
Delta wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:05 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:04 pm
Delta wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:01 pm @leetic

who do you scumread outside of scrappy?

feels kinda odd to focus the sock puppet over talking about people who we know the identities of and feels like a bit of a cop out
Epi, Sloonei, and you since your effort isn't impressive. You still haven't answered my question as far as I can tell.
Which question? ?_?
The one I asked you. It's called an ISO, you can ctrl+F through it.
Or you could. Restate the question?

Why are you reading me based off of one game when you have experience with me in at least three? It doesn't really demonstrate a good-faith effort in reading my slot

Delta wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:05 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:04 pm
Delta wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:01 pm @leetic

who do you scumread outside of scrappy?

feels kinda odd to focus the sock puppet over talking about people who we know the identities of and feels like a bit of a cop out
Epi, Sloonei, and you since your effort isn't impressive. You still haven't answered my question as far as I can tell.
Which question? ?_?

The one I asked you. It's called an ISO, you can ctrl+F through it.

Delta wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:01 pm @leetic

who do you scumread outside of scrappy?

feels kinda odd to focus the sock puppet over talking about people who we know the identities of and feels like a bit of a cop out

Epi, Sloonei, and you since your effort isn't impressive. You still haven't answered my question as far as I can tell.

Caitlin wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:01 pm WAIT

But Leetic

How do you know theres sixteen in the other thread as well?

Scotty wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 2:28 pm When the team showed up to their facility, a new notice, printed on a boldly-colored multicolor slab, was posted on the bulletin board.

Upon closer inspection, it was just titled 'EAST FACILITY' and listed names and corresponding checkboxes beneath it. When Coach Scotty arrived to open up the equipment lockers, someone asked him what the purpose of the list was, and Scotty shrugged. "Dunno. Never seen that before in my life. Also I can't read."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

EVENT: SECRET SANTA?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Alison
Cape90
DarlingMonroe
Davos
DrWilgy
Dyslexicon
Guillotine
Lemonfairy
Lime Coke
Master Radishes
Michelle
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME
nutella
RondoDimBuckle
Sabiplz
WindwardAway

At any point today, a player may select a player on the list and tag one of @Scotty or @S~V~S.

leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 6:00 pm
Caitlin wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 5:59 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 5:59 pm
Caitlin wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 5:55 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 5:55 pm Oh wait, you mean someone who signed up and is missing from the playerlist, and only exists as an alt?
Yea!
There are sixteen of us here including Scrappy, and apparently sixteen more in the other thread? Something isn't adding up, but no one seems to be unaccounted for
Wait

There's been sixteen here this entire time?
Counting Scrappy, yes

Although Spacedaisy seems to be slanking

Caitlin wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 5:59 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 5:59 pm
Caitlin wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 5:55 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 5:55 pm Oh wait, you mean someone who signed up and is missing from the playerlist, and only exists as an alt?
Yea!
There are sixteen of us here including Scrappy, and apparently sixteen more in the other thread? Something isn't adding up, but no one seems to be unaccounted for
Wait

There's been sixteen here this entire time?

Counting Scrappy, yes

Caitlin wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 5:55 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 5:55 pm Oh wait, you mean someone who signed up and is missing from the playerlist, and only exists as an alt?
Yea!

There are sixteen of us here including Scrappy, and apparently sixteen more in the other thread? Something isn't adding up, but no one seems to be unaccounted for

Delta wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 5:10 pm dog comes across townie, I dont really have any complaints there or will to kill

Yeah, an overly performative posting style with the easiest "wolfreads" ever. Really towny people

[VOTE: Scrappy Doo] aubergine

Scrappy Doo wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 4:34 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 4:33 pm
☆Princess Abigail☆ wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 4:16 pm
Caitlin wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 3:21 pm
Delta wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 3:15 pm
Caitlin wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 3:14 pmOmg hi Delta
hihi o/

where's your head at roughly right now?
My head is at having way too many SRs lmao

But Sloonei and Leetic I think are the most sus

But if I had to guess, I'd say this chat has more scum than the other one
I bet there's 3 in each since the game the thread split is based off of had equalized wolfs in each thread and that makes it 12 v 3 in each
Given the presence of Scrappy, there are likely ITPs here and that can throw the numbers off
I AM NOT A THIRD PARTY, I AM ALIGNED WITH THE TOWN

That's totally not an easy thing to lie about or anything

☆Princess Abigail☆ wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 4:16 pm
Caitlin wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 3:21 pm
Delta wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 3:15 pm
Caitlin wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 3:14 pmOmg hi Delta
hihi o/

where's your head at roughly right now?
My head is at having way too many SRs lmao

But Sloonei and Leetic I think are the most sus

But if I had to guess, I'd say this chat has more scum than the other one
I bet there's 3 in each since the game the thread split is based off of had equalized wolfs in each thread and that makes it 12 v 3 in each

Given the presence of Scrappy, there are likely ITPs here and that can throw the numbers off

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 3:49 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 3:23 am I do not believe that leetic’s posts reflect the mindset of a player who is honestly trying to solve the players around them.
Following up on this thought from last night:

leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 2:45 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 2:37 am
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 2:34 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 2:28 am
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 2:22 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 2:13 am [VOTE: pyxxy] aubergine because I'm interested in hearing more about Epi's observation there, and wouldn't mind some focus on them in the meantime.
You know, you can at least take a quick glance at their ISO and give us an original thought. Is your entire ISO just gonna be sheeping people?
Has my entire ISO been sheeping people?
If you ignore the posts that say nothing, yes. And I'm being generous as to what counts as "something"
I implore you to go through my posts and point out all of the ones that constitute “sheeping”.
I've already confronted you over one. Deflection much?
I do not believe that this is a genuine thought process from a player. Does that necessarily mean that leetic is mafia? No, it does not. Maybe they're just trying to conjure up reactions from me and others. Maybe they genuinely thinks they're onto something and don't recognize how off-base it is. Or maybe there is some other ulterior motive at play here. BUT this particular chain of posts is not believable.

It begins with leetic accusing me of "sheeping" throughout my "entire ISO". Even if we grant that my pyxxy vote is sheeping, I do not believe there is a single post in my ISO that can be interpreted as "sheeping" in any sense whatsoever. I say this because the claim was so bizarre that I went back to re-read my own posts to try to understand where leetic was coming from. And there is literally nothing in there that even has a little bit of wool on it.

So I asked leetic to explain what they're talking about. And their response was to just kinda blindly double down and talk down to me? So I asked a second time to support the claim, and this time their response was basically "I don't need to, stop dodging me."

This does not look like a person who actually cares about developing a read. If that was the case, they would have either provided examples of me "sheeping", or gone back to look and admitted the mistake.

It looks instead like a person who is just hurling verbiage around to be confrontational. That is a bold approach to take if he is mafia. But maybe it's simply a matter of over-compensation from a player who's trying to look like an aggressive scum-hunter. I don't know. I have not played with leetic for several years, but I do not remember them ever acting like this at all.

If you've played with me remotely recently, you know that poking around is what I do, especially when I don't have the time to be developing super in-depth reads. I perhaps used a bit of hyperbole to rile you up by saying "everything" is sheeping, but there is a real problem with your posts in that they don't say anything meaningful about the game state and your votes seemingly go out of the way to try to dodge any reasoning that can be used to determine alignment from either party, and the whole thing feels really dodgy. I also haven't played with you in a while but I remember you being more bold and vocal than this.

Anyway, the other game I was playing is now over, which was the other reason I was busy that I couldn't talk about. That game was at LyLo, so it simply took priority. Now I might be able to start contributing in earnest.

Caitlin wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 3:31 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 3:31 pm
Caitlin wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 3:29 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 3:28 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 3:19 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 3:59 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 3:23 am I do not believe that leetic’s posts reflect the mindset of a player who is honestly trying to solve the players around them.

I’ll have more to say about this when it’s not 2:30 in the morning. Goodnight.
At least I'm not just saying the most milquetoast posts ever in an attempt to blend in
Regardless of alignment of any players, posts like this are simply hostile and rude and unhelpful.
Another post that's basically a deflection and says absolutely nothing about the game.
Why do I suddenly have an idea you two are distancing scum lol
"Suddenly"? Weren't you trying to argue we both were wolves earlier? This feels contrived
Mhm, I accused you two individually

Individual reads =/= team reads but sure you can pretend they are

So you're confbiasing then, got it.

Why am I being accused of distancing with everyone I have a negative interaction with lol

Caitlin wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 3:29 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 3:28 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 3:19 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 3:59 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 3:23 am I do not believe that leetic’s posts reflect the mindset of a player who is honestly trying to solve the players around them.

I’ll have more to say about this when it’s not 2:30 in the morning. Goodnight.
At least I'm not just saying the most milquetoast posts ever in an attempt to blend in
Regardless of alignment of any players, posts like this are simply hostile and rude and unhelpful.
Another post that's basically a deflection and says absolutely nothing about the game.
Why do I suddenly have an idea you two are distancing scum lol

"Suddenly"? Weren't you trying to argue we both were wolves earlier? This feels contrived

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 3:19 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 3:59 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 3:23 am I do not believe that leetic’s posts reflect the mindset of a player who is honestly trying to solve the players around them.

I’ll have more to say about this when it’s not 2:30 in the morning. Goodnight.
At least I'm not just saying the most milquetoast posts ever in an attempt to blend in
Regardless of alignment of any players, posts like this are simply hostile and rude and unhelpful.

Another post that's basically a deflection and says absolutely nothing about the game.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 3:23 am I do not believe that leetic’s posts reflect the mindset of a player who is honestly trying to solve the players around them.

I’ll have more to say about this when it’s not 2:30 in the morning. Goodnight.

At least I'm not just saying the most milquetoast posts ever in an attempt to blend in

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 2:52 am
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 2:45 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 2:37 am
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 2:34 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 2:28 am
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 2:22 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 2:13 am [VOTE: pyxxy] aubergine because I'm interested in hearing more about Epi's observation there, and wouldn't mind some focus on them in the meantime.
You know, you can at least take a quick glance at their ISO and give us an original thought. Is your entire ISO just gonna be sheeping people?
Has my entire ISO been sheeping people?
If you ignore the posts that say nothing, yes. And I'm being generous as to what counts as "something"
I implore you to go through my posts and point out all of the ones that constitute “sheeping”.
I've already confronted you over one. Deflection much?
Nope. That is not how this works. You just made a blanket accusation about me “sheeping” repeatedly in this thread. The post in question should not even qualify as that. I am not saying “I suspect pyxxy because Epi said so.” I an saying “Epi brought up a topic of conversation that I would like to focus on.”

But I digress. You just made the bold statement that my “entire ISO” is just me “sheeping people.” I am not deflecting anything by asking you to back that up. Back that shit up or stop saying things like that.

That is steeping, because you are passing the buck to someone else with that vote, it didn't come naturally. As for your "rebuttal", part of my problem is you aren't suspecting pyxxy at all. If you were, this progression would make a lick of sense.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 2:37 am
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 2:34 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 2:28 am
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 2:22 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 2:13 am [VOTE: pyxxy] aubergine because I'm interested in hearing more about Epi's observation there, and wouldn't mind some focus on them in the meantime.
You know, you can at least take a quick glance at their ISO and give us an original thought. Is your entire ISO just gonna be sheeping people?
Has my entire ISO been sheeping people?
If you ignore the posts that say nothing, yes. And I'm being generous as to what counts as "something"
I implore you to go through my posts and point out all of the ones that constitute “sheeping”.

I've already confronted you over one. Deflection much?

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 2:28 am
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 2:22 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 2:13 am [VOTE: pyxxy] aubergine because I'm interested in hearing more about Epi's observation there, and wouldn't mind some focus on them in the meantime.
You know, you can at least take a quick glance at their ISO and give us an original thought. Is your entire ISO just gonna be sheeping people?
Has my entire ISO been sheeping people?

If you ignore the posts that say nothing, yes. And I'm being generous as to what counts as "something"

leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 2:22 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 2:13 am [VOTE: pyxxy] aubergine because I'm interested in hearing more about Epi's observation there, and wouldn't mind some focus on them in the meantime.
You know, you can at least take a quick glance at their ISO and give us an original thought. Is your entire ISO just gonna be sheeping people?

It's not even "I'm voting there because Epi made a point I agree with", it's just "I'm voting there because Epi said something about them". It's like you're trying to give us as little as possible

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 2:13 am [VOTE: pyxxy] aubergine because I'm interested in hearing more about Epi's observation there, and wouldn't mind some focus on them in the meantime.

You know, you can at least take a quick glance at their ISO and give us an original thought. Is your entire ISO just gonna be sheeping people?

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 1:40 am I can see 'Invisible Mode' players, as can some other Syndicate staff members. Just wanted to put that reminder out there.

If you want to be 100% stealthy and read the thread, then best to sign out first. I don't want this kind of thing on my mind.

It's why I never use stealth mode. I feel like if some users can see me anyway, it might as well be public information.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 1:34 am leetic played me on a double negative and I fell into the trap, did I not? Battle of wits and I lost. No worries.

GG

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 12:59 am I'm a man of my word

Are you now?

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 1:22 am
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 1:21 am
Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 1:20 am
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 1:18 am
Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 1:14 am Half a brew left. If you've anything to say to me, do it now.
How 'bout I give your question back to you: who are two people ('xcluding me obviously) who you want to die?
Well, I gave you a deal that I wouldn't vote for you. You aren't peddling that same price.
I promise I won't never vote for you if you take me up on that deal.
All right.

I promise I won't never answer your fucking question.

Where is your answer then?

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 1:20 am
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 1:18 am
Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 1:14 am Half a brew left. If you've anything to say to me, do it now.
How 'bout I give your question back to you: who are two people ('xcluding me obviously) who you want to die?
Well, I gave you a deal that I wouldn't vote for you. You aren't peddling that same price.

I promise I won't never vote for you if you take me up on that deal.

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 1:14 am Half a brew left. If you've anything to say to me, do it now.

How 'bout I give your question back to you: who are two people ('xcluding me obviously) who you want to die?

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 12:59 am
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 12:56 am
Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 12:48 am I don't doubt you want activity.

Tell you what.

I'll move my vote off of you if you name two people you want dead in this particular room right now and explain why.

And I won't vote for you again this Day. You have my word.
You, if you're gonna be that fickle with your vote.

As for the second one, Scrappy Doo, assuming I am correct in my belief that it's some kind of ITP thing. If that's the case, we know they're not town and I don't trust ITPs as they will not hesitate to screw over town if it benefits their wincon and they often cause a lot of disruption besides. Granted, that would still be a shruglynch option but any Vigs/etc. are welcome to kill them in my book.
Thanks.

I'm a man of my word, so I won't vote you.

I encourage everybody else to do so.

You're voting me now

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 12:55 am
leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 12:43 am
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 4:29 pm I have no issue with Seanzie here so far.
Uninspiring post. I guess this hints at a townlean (sort of), but it has no engagement with what other people's "issues" are with Seanzie
Nah

Even more uninspiring post

Search found 172 matches