Return to “Game of Champions: West Facility (Night 2)”
You, if you're gonna be that fickle with your vote.
I mean, it was true in the role madness game and in Paris, so...Porscha wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 5:41 amdid you know on MU the joke is "Porscha (0) = must be town" lmaoleetic wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 11:11 pm I'll just do GTHs of the people who already posted here, 'cause I'm not in the mood to go through the other thread:
TSP: GTH wolf, nothing here looks more impressive than what they posted in Severance.
LC: GTH town, one of the only people doing some light prodding here
Seanzie: GTH wolf, the attitude feels deflated in a way that doesn't really look towny.
Sloonei: GTH wolf, I expect better from him than what he's posted so far.
falcon: GTH town, I appreciate the boldness here.
Epignosis: GTH wolf, the jump on me is lame (I mean, there's nutella?)
Porscha: GTH wolf ("If Porscha has a single digit postcount for the first 24 hours of a phase, she's a wolf!")
Abby: GTH wolf ("Ouch")
Y'all better start towntelling
Do you really expect me to contrive townreads on people who haven't done anything towny? If a player has only done wolfy things, that's not my problem
I appreciate the irony. But seriously, there was no reason for that comment, it's not like it's an attempt to solve anything or ascertain the game state. If anything, it's almost a legitimate use of LAMIST. Almost.falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 3:34 pmleetic wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 11:27 pmHate to use this term, but LAMIST
Have you seen our interactions in Philosophy 2? That was nothing.I suspect leetic and nutella have that advantage. Their Day 0 interaction was goofy and over the top. It was acting. Check it out.
You said I never suspected anyone, then I bring up someone I had openly suspected, and now you wanna play dumb?Unprompted, leetic brings up nutella in this thread by way of accusing me as though I can do jack shit about it. Acting.
Why use the term LAMIST if you dislike it, especially to describe a post that is borderline LAMIST?
What exactly gives you the impression I don't want activity? I'm roasting people for not contributing, not for contributingEpignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 12:42 amI admire that.leetic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 12:36 amMaybe I have other things to do besides playing mafia all day? I was volunteering at a food bank this afternoon
I was working all day myself.
You're in Pennsylvania. Afternoon passed several hours ago.
My point is that I don't care about real life and I think you're stuck. You pretend to clamor for activity but don't really want it.
You should've seen me in the MU game and Severance, so why are you holding me to the standard of only this one game? Furthermore, that's a convenient wagon for you to join when you're starting to get pushbackDelta wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 6:49 pm Which
[VOTE: leetic] aubergine
Would like to maintain some sort've pressure here, reading N0/D1 today I'm really just. Not feeling many townie vibes from them? Compared to our other game where they were v blatant town even with a faked redcheck on them
Not saying that one game is a perfect sample but eh. Feels very different
If it has exceptions, it's not a law. Though I will still remember the game where despite bringing it up earlier you completely ignored it because it would've ended up indicting you☆Princess Abigail☆ wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 9:39 pmFirst wagon to 3 votes has 1 mafia in the 4 names involvedSloonei wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 8:15 pmDefine Zenon’s Law☆Princess Abigail☆ wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 8:08 pmObligatory Zenon's Law mentionDelta wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 6:49 pm Which
[VOTE: leetic] aubergine
Would like to maintain some sort've pressure here, reading N0/D1 today I'm really just. Not feeling many townie vibes from them? Compared to our other game where they were v blatant town even with a faked redcheck on them
Not saying that one game is a perfect sample but eh. Feels very different
Maybe I have other things to do besides playing mafia all day? I was volunteering at a food bank this afternoon
Civilians don't know who the other civilians are, what are you talking aboutEpignosis wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 12:02 amThat's mathematically false.leetic wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 11:59 pmWhen you think about it, wolves are more likely to receive items due to their partners knowing who they are. That just ensures everything is balanced!
Civilians are more likely to receive something simply because there are...you know...more of them.
Mafia can privately strategize, which is something that would be really helpful for me right now.
When you think about it, wolves are more likely to receive items due to their partners knowing who they are. That just ensures everything is balanced!
Who said they would be advantages? I for one welcome the chaos.Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 11:49 pmI am currently preaching restraint on the gifts. Maybe discussion with the group before firing off advantages to other players of unknown alignment. Maybe there's someone who towntold during Night 0, with majority agreement? We could go all-in and shower that one player with many gifts.
Lots of possibilities, I just don't think treating it like an innocent subgame is a smart way to play.
Hate to use this term, but LAMIST
Have you seen our interactions in Philosophy 2? That was nothing.I suspect leetic and nutella have that advantage. Their Day 0 interaction was goofy and over the top. It was acting. Check it out.
You said I never suspected anyone, then I bring up someone I had openly suspected, and now you wanna play dumb?Unprompted, leetic brings up nutella in this thread by way of accusing me as though I can do jack shit about it. Acting.
Probably because they're one of the people I'm more familiar with who didn't piss me off in the other thread
