I do find it interesting that Ricochet basically refused to push Lemonfairy. He even basically told everyone to ignore the Lemonfairy wagon, which I thought indicted NANOOK but actually indicted Lemonfairy lol. It seems that D3 at least, they considered falcon the weak link and Lemonfairy worth saving over them. Then again, maybe Lemonfairy just had a great ability, I don't know. If the arbiters killed nutella, maybe they just did it out of spite lol.WindwardAway wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2024 8:59 pm I'm sure the arbiters had to shift gears after falcon flipped, but the thing is that if they intended to send someone to go deep, it would likely have been Rico, who apparently went so deep that he got NK'd lol. Unless that was just a super good vig shot.
Cause I'm guessing they didn't really expect Rico to die before Lemon, and as I said earlier, I thought Rico was one of the most ignored players from the West Facility because almost nobody was talking about his slot. I feel like it would be weird to also have Delta in that position, where Rico was mostly townread and Delta was mostly scumread, but both were treated as if they were background characters in this thread.
Search found 436 matches
Return to “Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]”
- Wed Feb 21, 2024 11:15 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [DAY 9]
- Wed Feb 21, 2024 11:11 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [DAY 9]
If Delta is the last arbiter, falcon managed to spend the entirety of D3 not interacting with any of their partners. He did interact with Ricochet and Delta a little bit in the previous thread thoughWindwardAway wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2024 8:54 pm I guess my biggest question is, how likely is it that all of the Arbiters decided to avoid interacting with their last partner?
- Wed Feb 21, 2024 11:09 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [Day 4]
I want to contest the idea that Ricochet wanted to lynch falcon. To be fair, I made this mistake before, but Ricochet only voted falcon after there were like seven people on the wagon and he only did it after throwing shade at all the falcon voters. Sure, he had falcon as the wolfiest between them, DM, and Lemonfairy, but when you consider that Lemonfairy was also partnered it makes sense to put the townie in the middle. I believe Ricochet's falcon vote was a reluctant move.WindwardAway wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2024 8:11 pmOk so here's the first thing. Rico hedged a LOT on leetic here, but in fairness, I don't know what happened in the West Facility so I'm missing a bit of context from earlier. His read on me is here too, if either of you want to look at it. He wrote no such readlist including Delta, but he wrote an earlier one before this including Lemon and falcon so I'm gonna compare it below.Ricochet wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 2:15 pm Anyway, dumping the first batch.
Wagoners*
* given the VC at the time of submitting this
NB: not sure the poll reflects the vote chronology as well, but I'll just roll with the names as they appear
falcon
Monroe
-- seems to have parked on falcon just now, despite all their posts being bark back at Epignosis. I suppose it counts as self-pres?
-- just to add to their read, minus point for their recent post aimed at Epignosis, tone still aggro defensive and not the most respectable wording towards Epignosis, either
sig
pyxxy connection: labelled it as unlikely
much of what I've noted down from sig's activity is in fact case-making on falcon, arguments being that falcon is within wolf range and that the Western night kills could show pattern of clean-up in his aid. also admits mindmeld with leetic on the night kills angle. seems fine
Master Radishes
-- for someone from East, therefore info-less on falcon, vote drop was sudden, without hint of inquiry or reading into others' takes and a bit of "nuh-uh" retort to falcon calling it opportunistic (even prodding him to vote back). not ideal elements. later more elaborate, dismissing falcon's "exasperation" as outweighed by poor tone, something I do meld with.
-- had a good impression of him otherwise - active in developing reads and opinionated on enough players and events - but this on its own is a mixed bag
Windward
-- noted her more of a Lemon wagoner for much of D3; falcon switch comes down to disliking falcon's "opportunism" rebuttal at Radishes, it seems. bit cheeky to word it as "happy to join the opportunistic train". later camps reactive attitude, in principle, towards mafia lean. again, had more interest in others, but I can see how the view on falcon might have soured in time and treat the gameplay as wolf-likely
-- activity-wise, I'd rate Windward towny. ample material, not gonna develop full read at this time.
Long Con
pyxxy connection: labelled him sussworthy
-- it is accurate that LC has suss on falcon throughout West period
-- it is also accurate that his waffle on falcon came from trusting Abigail's tone/meta read, true both during West time and during D3 here
-- as far as coming back on falcon wagon, late on seems to make a read - not agreeing with his towning claim, finding his counter-suspicions omgusey. think it's adequate
-- didn't note down any pings from LC today tbh, though overall I find him a bit puzzling. his D3 is probably the better-looking phase of his activity thus far, engaged and opinionated more on the topics, but at times I also he's tagteaming others (much "starting to see this" responses), quite the buddy dynamic with Epignosis, lighthearted banter and focused replies in equal measures. ech, probably wouldn't focus on deciphering this for now
leetic
pyxxy connection: labeled him unlikely
-- pretty much wagons falcon for the nightkill angle; dismisses falcon's defense on that as wifom; don't recall him tackling any other point about falcon
-- really conflicted about leetic overall: was my topwolf pick and vote D1, the aggro-tone was prevalent; Abigail (in West) and Dizzy (in here) mentioned that this is normal leetic; then D2 he shifts into a Pyxxy Scientist (ISO'ing interactions), drop most of the prod and poke tone, a solving attitude I shared and in turned like;
-- now? I'm seeing way less of D2. announced ISOs from West D2, did not deliver; had to defend a bit re: gifting a player who flipped wolf, don't know if that's a topic of suss. informed the merged group of his Pyxxy Science findings, that's fair. couple more reads (Nanook for instance), no definitive wording. still, really slowed down performance. puzzling.
DrWilgy
-- seems to base and bank his falcon vote on lack of townspewing alone. I'd label this a tad narrowing
-- no developed read on his activity atm. word that came to mind, upon quick scroll, was "scrambled". perhaps within expectations.
Distanced/bussed falcon and hedged on Lemon. Note that it was probably easier for Rico to slip out of reading Lemon because they were split for two days. He did the same to DM, who was town in the other thread.Spoiler: showRico has this side mentioning of Delta by way of focusing on Epi's treatment of them, and without directly giving a read on Delta here. It's like Rico is gearing to push Epi on the basis of not following through on Delta, which I kind of think could go either way on Delta. The next mention of Delta is more direct, though.Ricochet wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 5:32 pm Epignosis wrt Delta pauses me a lot toDay.
He was chief detective on case-making Delta D2 wrt pyxxy interactions (lifelining him intermittently and starting what proved pyxxy's counterwagon chance). The thing about too many townreads was also a point.
Then the Delta wagon fizzled through.
And now Epignosis comes into the merge with just that one point about the townreads.
"I didn't even process Delta toDay" is a very odd thing to say about a teammate. I mean, yes, it can be faked, but the wording is more specific than that because Rico is saying he forgot about Delta, but still hedging on the slot. This comes more often from wolves on town, than wolves on their partners.Ricochet wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 5:51 pm I'm le tired.
I didn't even process Delta toDay.
Only note I had was that they noted Davos's drive-by vote on Lemon. No input.
Delta was my main pyxxy teammate profile, though. In that regard, I melded with Epig's D2 case. Signs of lifelining pyxxy into playing better and creating a cushion for a feasible counterwagon, till it proved too late. Could be.
Emoji post ^Spoiler: show
And interestingly enough, the first time Rico interacts directly with Delta in the thread is when he's (supposedly) under post restriction. I'm not going to try to make sense of it right this second because I have a headache and trying to decode emojis isn't really helping, but it's some food for thought.
How much did Rico interact with Delta in the West thread? It sounded like there was a push there, but what about direct interactions?
Spoiler: show
And another emoji post, this time reactions to leetic. Again, it's the first time Rico has interacted with leetic directly in this thread. How did it look over in West? (I feel like a broken record, repeating questions like this, I'm sorry lmao)
Man, this is so tediousSpoiler: show
Here's Rico's emoji reactions to me in case you guys wanna see it. He did talk to me directly before the emojiposting, though, when I asked him to give reads and he spit out those readlists I quoted earlier.
I think from Ricochet's ISO I lean slightly more town on Delta, because of the way it seemed like Rico tried to keep suspicion on the slot more consistently than on leetic, but he didn't push to yeet Delta the way he openly advocated to kill falcon. That sort of backhanded pushing is more likely on town.
- Wed Feb 21, 2024 11:04 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [DAY 9]
Fair enough, but that was more directed at this post:WindwardAway wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2024 7:47 pmThat's incorrect, I didn't comment on the falcon post because falcon had *no* interactions at all with Delta. Rico on the other hand mentioned Delta a couple of times, mainly in context of their wagon in the West. I'm trying to rewrite and requote what I had, but I'm on my phone so sorry for the slowness.
The "yes sure" without considering falcon does read like you're more comfortable with just voting me and wanting to be done with it than you're letting on. With that said, I definitely did not expect you to take your vote off me here, so that is something that gets me to think twice.WindwardAway wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2024 7:22 pmYes sureDelta wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2024 7:21 pm it doesnt take into account everything, just to highlight a disparity
can both of you run through the flipped arbiters' posts here and try case the other off of them? I'll do so myself as well but I do want to focus on partner interactions since this was a team that came into the thread with every wolf alive, so there is more there
I believe leetic already cased me off the arbiter interactions today btw
- Wed Feb 21, 2024 11:00 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [DAY 9]
My replacement phone just came in! It seems like this like the power outage was but a temporary setback. I should most likely be able to make EoD now, which is nice. Anyway, catching up again.
- Wed Feb 21, 2024 7:38 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [DAY 9]
Yeah, WWA was quite quick to take Delta's offer of casing me without slowing down to also consider Delta. It looks like a wolf that wants to take the most convenient path to survival, so that's another point against them.
- Wed Feb 21, 2024 7:36 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [DAY 9]
Remember, while I think that WWA is the most likely wolf I'm still willing to hear a case on Delta. Town should be focused on voting correctly here, not just on surviving a crossvote.
- Wed Feb 21, 2024 7:32 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [Day 3]
Mind also doing this with Delta, to avoid confirmation bias?WindwardAway wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2024 7:27 pm Falcon
This is falcon's only interaction with leeticfalcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2024 11:44 amleetic wrote: ↑Fri Feb 02, 2024 8:26 pmSig was CW to Porscha. I'll have to reread everything though. I didn't expect the Seanzie NK, so might have to look over his reads.nutella wrote: ↑Fri Feb 02, 2024 8:24 pmoh huh alright then
was there counter to porscha
anyone look bad
Who did you think would be NK'd?![]()
- Wed Feb 21, 2024 7:17 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [DAY 9]
Why are reads from D1 still relevant to the gamestate? I feel a lot has happened since thenDelta wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2024 7:15 pm the issue is if I disregard a mech standpoint:
I came into this thread townleaning WWA & I pushed you D1 in our thread
so while I feel like speculation around mech leads me to WWA, reads wise I feel like I should lean you?
which is why I want to be thorough with this, try build a pros/cons kind of thing for both
- Wed Feb 21, 2024 7:16 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [DAY 9]
There's still quite a distinction between one team having one more and one team having two more. Further, if there was only one arbiter in the thread there was a chance that the entire team could have missed everything that happened D2 in that thread, and that's another consideration. Plus, it leads to a level of bastardry – would they really have a team wolf with no partners? It would make any partner analyses, which many people use here, completely useless.WindwardAway wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2024 7:13 pmBut there's a disparity no matter how you frame it. Landlords already had one more in one thread. Mech discussion has been closed, and I believe the arbiters had some form of mech compensation since they didn't have a puppet.
- Wed Feb 21, 2024 7:10 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [DAY 9]
If EoD was in two minutes, who would you vote?Delta wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2024 7:09 pm;_; I do apologise, been a series of unfortunate events & other things that are my fault
this is the first f3 ive been part of and being handed hammer - its not really hammer but theres the cross there so it does feel like it comes down to me - is terrifying so I want to be thorough, both from a mech standpoint and a reads one
- Wed Feb 21, 2024 7:09 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [DAY 9]
Yesterday wasn't LyLo in the truest sense. The game could have still went on if we mislynched as long as a wolf went down N8.WindwardAway wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2024 7:25 am Doing a quick skim of yesterday and I just feel no urgency from Delta to solve
I mean yeah it could be easily explained by Wilgy being pretty much guaranteed to flip by popular vote
Which is why I said yesterday it felt like Delta was just sitting back and letting things happen. But I don't know if that's a wolfy approach. I guess Wilgy was right and we were in LyLo yesterday toomeaning if we'd landed on town, town would already have lost and we would've been picking which wolf we wanted to win, lol
- Wed Feb 21, 2024 7:07 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [DAY 9]
The more I think about it, the less likely a significant disparity of 3 vs 1 wolf in one thread seems. I'm glad Delta seems to be stepping up here, I was a bit worried the game might already be lost due to them not showing up.
- Wed Feb 21, 2024 7:05 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [Day 7]
Hm, an interesting possibility. Still not one I'd bet the game on since we know little about the game mechanically, and I don't think there's a no lynch option anyway. The thing we have to consider about any night kill is that we don't know about any vigs/redirectors/etc.WindwardAway wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2024 7:02 pmWait a secondleetic wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2024 6:59 pmThere are a couple of holes in this case. Number one, Epi died tonight, and he couldn't have been killed by the landlords. If I'm the arbiter and kills are alternating I could not have killed sig.WindwardAway wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2024 6:18 pmsig wrote: ↑Fri Feb 16, 2024 3:02 pm I could see whatever mafia team killed Nutella to have a member in the East than the other team to have someone in the West.
This would mean WWA/Wilgy still have mafia potential.
Epi doesn’t make sense as mafia for either team right now given that he’s encouraging we look at both areas.sig wrote: ↑Fri Feb 16, 2024 3:09 pm I’ve got that end of game certainty now that the final two mafia are Wilgy and Leetic. I’ve got very little solid reasoning to back this up, but it just seems like the most logic thing, having said that I will be reading up on those two before eod and hopefully everyone else also, but it just doesn’t seem viable that both mafia are West with only 2 West players leftI've been reading through D7 again and Sig's reads caught my attention againsig wrote: ↑Fri Feb 16, 2024 3:11 pm Or I guess it could be delta, but they read very genuine as a lost civ, Epi seems to have been hunting both team evenly, and I guess that leaves WWA.
Now the big reason to suspect Leetic is they seem to have really slowed down and take a back seat. I also find the way they’re pushing Nutella read post death to be a bit scummy.
I’m open to hearing other thoughts, buuuuut given I literally don’t have a town core anymore I prob won’t listen![]()
I said yesterday that I didn't see Wilgy making the Sig kill except maybe for one post above these quotes, where Sig said Wilgy was pretty towny but also probably was a wolf anyway.
But looking at these reads again, they also point to the possibility that leetic could've killed Sig. I'm certain Delta couldn't have killed Sig because of their missed votes, and I think Sig's leetic take is notable, given that leetic and Wilgy had been pushing each other all day. Of course this still could've been a Wilgy kill, but either way I think leetic/Wilgy being wolf vs wolf in the thread is a pretty striking take. I said that I thought it *could* be two wolves consolidating on the Davos wagon just before eod, and it wasn't Epi, and it also wasn't me.
What I said in my observation that day, when Wilgy and leetic were going back and forth, was that leetic seemed to be focused on pushing whoever was about to perform the next night kill, while Wilgy was pushing whoever he thought was wolfiest. I still believe Wilgy was genuinely wolfhunting at that point in time, because I thought at least some of his case against leetic made sense, but I shelved it because I believed Wilgy was simply more likely to flip wolf, and Davos was going to be a key flip (and I was right about that). I believe that leetic pushing on the basis of "who performed the kill on which night" is a pretty convenient way for a wolf to hunt a wolf on the opposing team, because they can genuinely focus on it while knowing already which kills were theirs.
I was Wilgy's secondary push that day. Wilgy said I probably wouldn't flip town, but didn't put any casework into pushing me until the next day when it was very blatantly OMGUS. Feel free to go through his case on me from yesterday and tell me whether you believe any of it was valid, btw. The tone of it was nothing like how he cased leetic the day before. And when I look at leetic's response to being pushed by Wilgy, I see that they drop their push on me to start pushing Wilgy back. Suddenly their case on me takes a backseat to Wilgy, and notably I'm not really pushing leetic at all there. I fence-sit for a while, say that I think leetic is wolfier but Wilgy is more likely to flip wolf, and that I think we need the Davos flip first. What I think now is that Sig saw how leetic shifted gears when being pushed, and correctly determined that it was the last two wolves pushing each other.
If kills are still alternating despite the landlords being dead, then if we no-lunch today, you're claiming that nobody would die tonight as a result.
That seems super weird because then this is MyLo and not LyLo.
- Wed Feb 21, 2024 7:02 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [DAY 9]
Here's my most recent one: https://wintreath.com/forums/index.php?topic=8157.0
- Wed Feb 21, 2024 6:59 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [Day 7]
There are a couple of holes in this case. Number one, Epi died tonight, and he couldn't have been killed by the landlords. If I'm the arbiter and kills are alternating I could not have killed sig.WindwardAway wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2024 6:18 pmsig wrote: ↑Fri Feb 16, 2024 3:02 pm I could see whatever mafia team killed Nutella to have a member in the East than the other team to have someone in the West.
This would mean WWA/Wilgy still have mafia potential.
Epi doesn’t make sense as mafia for either team right now given that he’s encouraging we look at both areas.sig wrote: ↑Fri Feb 16, 2024 3:09 pm I’ve got that end of game certainty now that the final two mafia are Wilgy and Leetic. I’ve got very little solid reasoning to back this up, but it just seems like the most logic thing, having said that I will be reading up on those two before eod and hopefully everyone else also, but it just doesn’t seem viable that both mafia are West with only 2 West players leftI've been reading through D7 again and Sig's reads caught my attention againsig wrote: ↑Fri Feb 16, 2024 3:11 pm Or I guess it could be delta, but they read very genuine as a lost civ, Epi seems to have been hunting both team evenly, and I guess that leaves WWA.
Now the big reason to suspect Leetic is they seem to have really slowed down and take a back seat. I also find the way they’re pushing Nutella read post death to be a bit scummy.
I’m open to hearing other thoughts, buuuuut given I literally don’t have a town core anymore I prob won’t listen![]()
I said yesterday that I didn't see Wilgy making the Sig kill except maybe for one post above these quotes, where Sig said Wilgy was pretty towny but also probably was a wolf anyway.
But looking at these reads again, they also point to the possibility that leetic could've killed Sig. I'm certain Delta couldn't have killed Sig because of their missed votes, and I think Sig's leetic take is notable, given that leetic and Wilgy had been pushing each other all day. Of course this still could've been a Wilgy kill, but either way I think leetic/Wilgy being wolf vs wolf in the thread is a pretty striking take. I said that I thought it *could* be two wolves consolidating on the Davos wagon just before eod, and it wasn't Epi, and it also wasn't me.
What I said in my observation that day, when Wilgy and leetic were going back and forth, was that leetic seemed to be focused on pushing whoever was about to perform the next night kill, while Wilgy was pushing whoever he thought was wolfiest. I still believe Wilgy was genuinely wolfhunting at that point in time, because I thought at least some of his case against leetic made sense, but I shelved it because I believed Wilgy was simply more likely to flip wolf, and Davos was going to be a key flip (and I was right about that). I believe that leetic pushing on the basis of "who performed the kill on which night" is a pretty convenient way for a wolf to hunt a wolf on the opposing team, because they can genuinely focus on it while knowing already which kills were theirs.
I was Wilgy's secondary push that day. Wilgy said I probably wouldn't flip town, but didn't put any casework into pushing me until the next day when it was very blatantly OMGUS. Feel free to go through his case on me from yesterday and tell me whether you believe any of it was valid, btw. The tone of it was nothing like how he cased leetic the day before. And when I look at leetic's response to being pushed by Wilgy, I see that they drop their push on me to start pushing Wilgy back. Suddenly their case on me takes a backseat to Wilgy, and notably I'm not really pushing leetic at all there. I fence-sit for a while, say that I think leetic is wolfier but Wilgy is more likely to flip wolf, and that I think we need the Davos flip first. What I think now is that Sig saw how leetic shifted gears when being pushed, and correctly determined that it was the last two wolves pushing each other.
- Wed Feb 21, 2024 6:55 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [DAY 9]
Sucks that my phone has to die in F3. At least the power's still on, I guess. Catching up now
- Wed Feb 21, 2024 1:30 am
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [DAY 9]
After going back and forth on it a little, I think I have a decision. [VOTE:
WindwardAway] aubergine No, this is not just because of symmetry between the threads, but I would be lying if I said that didn't factor in a little. In reality, there are two major things that make me have a hard time seeing Delta as the remaining wolf:
1. Delta has better-looking interactions with the flipped arbiters. If Delta was an arbiter, then all three of their partners tried to push them aside at every opportunity for little apparent gain. While WWA has some interactions that look decent at a glance, there's nothing that couldn't be said to help advance a wolf gamestate, especially when the dynamics of the wagons and WWA's progression are taken into account. But Lemonfairy having them as their lowest read? Ricochet having Delta in the same really low tier as falcon, meaning they had two partners in that thread, a likely huge advantage, and disregarded them both? falcon opportunistically joining thee push too? It seems all excessive, especially when you can't say they really gained any towncred for it as none of them ended the day on Delta. It was likely setting up Delta for a future PoE,
2. In order for a solo wolf to make it this far, they had to have a solid plan. If Delta is a wolf, it's clear that they've just made it here via dumb luck. Like, they had to have it pointed out to them that they were roleblocked N7, would a wolf really be this careless? Delta seems more in line with the weakly positioned townies that wolves love to leave around at LyLo so they can swoop in for an easy victory.
Ultimately, I think you played a great game regardless of what happens and as BDS said of my play in one game, it's not one big thing that gives you away but a bunch of little things that make sense if you're the last arbiter. I'm still open to hearing arguments and being swayed, so feel free to defend yourself, it's just that this is the direction I'm strongly leaning in at the moment.
1. Delta has better-looking interactions with the flipped arbiters. If Delta was an arbiter, then all three of their partners tried to push them aside at every opportunity for little apparent gain. While WWA has some interactions that look decent at a glance, there's nothing that couldn't be said to help advance a wolf gamestate, especially when the dynamics of the wagons and WWA's progression are taken into account. But Lemonfairy having them as their lowest read? Ricochet having Delta in the same really low tier as falcon, meaning they had two partners in that thread, a likely huge advantage, and disregarded them both? falcon opportunistically joining thee push too? It seems all excessive, especially when you can't say they really gained any towncred for it as none of them ended the day on Delta. It was likely setting up Delta for a future PoE,
2. In order for a solo wolf to make it this far, they had to have a solid plan. If Delta is a wolf, it's clear that they've just made it here via dumb luck. Like, they had to have it pointed out to them that they were roleblocked N7, would a wolf really be this careless? Delta seems more in line with the weakly positioned townies that wolves love to leave around at LyLo so they can swoop in for an easy victory.
Ultimately, I think you played a great game regardless of what happens and as BDS said of my play in one game, it's not one big thing that gives you away but a bunch of little things that make sense if you're the last arbiter. I'm still open to hearing arguments and being swayed, so feel free to defend yourself, it's just that this is the direction I'm strongly leaning in at the moment.
- Wed Feb 21, 2024 12:23 am
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [DAY 9]
At a glance, the Epi kill seems to point to Delta. Epi was pretty much focused on Delta (and Wilgy), to the exclusion of anyone else. The thing is, does WWA have a better target here?
- Tue Feb 20, 2024 11:59 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [DAY 9]
I can see good arguments for and against WWA and Delta being the last wolf. I'd like to be able to talk to them, but my touchscreen barely works so it'll be a challenge to be online most of the time. First a power outage, and now this. Man, F3s are stressful.
- Tue Feb 20, 2024 11:58 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [Day 4]
Page 8, and the last one pre-flip
Lemonfairy's comment here is interesting, as we know both their remaining partners did bus falcon. It does give an opportunity for distancing, I guess.WindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 11:50 pmeven though there were two other wagons as options (DMs and yours), and at that point none of falcon's team had flipped yet?Lemonfairy wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 9:27 pmwith so many people on him, yeah, they probably bussedWindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 2:53 pmOk, thanks for sharing.Lemonfairy wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 2:48 pmhaven't sorted them yet but I like Epi's case postsWindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 2:44 pmFair
Have any of your reads changed since the falcon flip?
ig leetic's were not bad either
Do you have any thoughts as to whether someone on falcon's team bussed him or if his partners stayed off of his wagon?
I mean, if he was going to go over anyway, why not get the cred?
or do you mean more of a late bus when it seemed like he was almost definitely going over?
Another theatre-y interaction. I'm not sure if they were trying to push each other here or just arguing for the sake of it.WindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 11:51 pmall rightLemonfairy wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 9:31 pmI don't think I said anything of the sortWindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 2:55 pm??Lemonfairy wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 2:52 pmohWindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 2:45 pmI said "low" because I couldn't remember any and I skipped a chunk of posts in my catchup. The last time I accused someone of "no engagement" they had actually posted but I didn't see their posts, so I'm not doing that dumb thing again.Lemonfairy wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 2:40 pmyou mean "no engagement" (this is assuming you haven't yet read my most recent posts)
this kind of feels like you're making stuff up
Anyway, I thought you townread me? What's with the hostility?
that's fair ig
I thought you were making up some BS reason to scumread me out of nowhere
which now I know was my mistake
carry on
you're the one who pointed out that I had actually sussed you in the East Facility thread before. it wouldn't be a reason I pulled out of nowhere as an excuse to scumread you, for sure.
iirc the reason you sussed me in the first place was because I had you consistently at the bottom of each of my read lists (which I explained were unordered) and also due to my low activity, which was fair enough
but saying I had low activity when I in fact was not actually in the thread makes me think you made up your suspicion on me because it reads to me like you are acting as though you've read my posts when you haven't
and it's an easy breezy way to start scumreading someone artificially
hence my reaction
it would be stupid for me to lie intentionally about your activity to push you if it's easy enough for anyone to look for receipts in the thread, though
Does suggest a Lemonfairy vote to Epi, so it's not like that suspicion completely disappeared. Still though, a little odd when more of the recent posts were either defending Lemonfairy or arguing about non-alignment-related stuff.WindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 11:59 pmI'd rather Cape than DM
but why not Lemon?
The only Lemonfairy interaction from D5 before the flip. It is interesting that WWA's activity rose sharply after their death; the two of us were neck-and-neck before with me being ahead in terms of postcount for much of it, but now they have 150 posts over me. Still, that could be explained by the rapidly thinning amount of people from their side meant that they had to try harder to defend themselves.WindwardAway wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 1:54 amIsn't that like, all the remaining lowposters from East Facility? LolLemonfairy wrote: ↑Thu Feb 08, 2024 9:12 pm I'm thinking DM/Wilgy/Nanook as my top SRs
DM/Nanook on one team
Wilgy on the other
only there's a wrench here because DM and Nanook have just been sitting on my wagon for the last 2 days and I don't think partners would do that
it'd be too obvious
- Tue Feb 20, 2024 11:46 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [Day 4]
Page 9
At this point is moving away from wolfreading Lemonfairy. It could be Lemonfairy giving them an excuse to get off their wagon, though I believe the wagon petered out at that point. And granted, they seem to be following ITP Cape90's read here.WindwardAway wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 11:26 amI still need to finish reading her wallpost
I will say that she makes posts like that more as town than as scum, though
Already went over this one, nextWindwardAway wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 1:41 pmFalcon hasn't shared any townreads?Ricochet wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 1:10 pm So I'll work my way from the wagons to others, within my capability.
Wagons
Overall, I'd favor a falcon lynch over a Lemon or Monroe one. Grouping bias is a factor, cuz I've played and judged falcon down in West, whereas I know less on why the other two are wolfread or didn't catch all the details from others' cases.
Between Lemon and Monroe, I'd place Monroe within question marks, both in regards to why they've become a D3 wagon and what they've done in response.
So, falcon > Monroe > Lemon
falcon
West - pyxxy connection: none that could have been established, because they interacted with / mentioned each other a total of zero times
West D1-D2 judgement: ended D2 with a low opinion on him and down on my would-vote list; excluding pyxxy connections I considered (Porscha, Delta), he was the lowest ranked de facto. West gameplay resembled current gameplay: brief intervals of engagement, much of which was spent prodding others (with a degree of randomness, never focused) or reactive-toned defending when voted/wagoned
D3 judgement:
-- pretty much the same, tone and grasp of play have not improved.
-- noted him hitting back in rebuttal form at most of his wagoners (Sloonei's characterisations, calling MRadishes opportunistic, bark back at nutella), plus placing three others (leetic, sig, Abigail) within wolf pairings with no reasoning. so pretty much a kind of "you're all bad" howl.
-- parked defense into two main ideas: that the Western nightkills are a frame and that he is towning like mad and we fail to see it. Former boils down to wifom, as leetic also said; latter is not something I can agree with, based on what I've judged. I've read or remember no strong meta read from others on this gameplay, as it stands, being town!falcon indicative
-- meanwhile, withheld to offer townreads (apart from not wanting to vote LC and Epignosis).
-- of his votes, Abigail and Monroe were/are without discernible cause. Monroe isn't even the counterwagon to self-pres on, at the moment
Monroe
D3 judgement: only 3 posts, of which their essence is an aggro response and vote on Epignosis (for their vote / case on them); other reads (Delta ping, wouldn't wagon Lemon) all vague. It doesn't look great, of course, to drop and omgus upon the very first interaction with a player from the other group. But also not the deepest material to make a solid case out of. Hence the question mark status.
Lemon
D3 judgement: I'd structure 3 phases, thus far, of activity.
-- first phase (posts 1-3) in which she mentioned postponing activity and also a statement on the merger being a sensible disorienting moment. I think some wagoned her starting for as little as this and, without proper context if this would classify as a pattern from wolf!lemon (that I can remember), I felt it was undeserved.
-- second phase (pre legacy post), with a first wave of rebuttals (at nutella and Windward). something about wanting to sit more on it. at worst, could display nerviness in face of pressure.
-- third phase (the legacy post): quite a shift from small bites to extensive reads. rebuttal-wise, argues more than the cases on her are not solid or convincing, then also tiers the wagoners based on individual performance. if this alone (or more of this throughout D3), without suss pressure, would have been Lemon's activity, I'd probably read it well. given suss and wagon pressure, I am missing meta info on whether Lemon would as to go steroids, from feeble to opinionated, as wolf. also, a bit funny to have labeled it as "legacy", as if the lynch is a done deal.
tldr: falcon suss (with no prevailing meta info that he towns this way), Monroe who knows (startled by bad form, but tis all so far), lemon no real ping on her elaborate reply
@falcon45ca is this true?
And actually, the way Lemon said she expires D3/D4 made it sound more like she might die from a mechanical effect and not just because she might get lunched. I could be reading into it too much, though, and I know she can't confirm or deny it.
This post stood out in hindsight, as we now know that there were two arbiters who bussed falcon and that Lemonfairy was the only remaining arbiter that was off-wagon. It could be an attempt at misdirection if they are a wolf.WindwardAway wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2024 8:22 pm anyone wanna discuss the Lemonfairy and DM wagons yesterday that were the alternatives to falcon's wagon? I would not be surprised if we had all remaining landlords (including Abbi) on falcon and the Arbiters on the counterwagons.
Eh, falcon had one teammate that was on DM, but it was Lemonfairy funnily enough. WWA isn't pushing this worldview too hard, which is an alright sign I guess.WindwardAway wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2024 11:54 pmEOD3 votecount.S~V~S wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 8:00 pm Who is trying to sabotage the team?
Poll ended at Sun Feb 04, 2024 7:00:00 pm
Cape90
0
No votes
Voters: None
DarlingMonroe
6
24%
Voters: falcon45ca, Master Radishes, TonyStarkPrime, Epignosis, Sloonei, Lemonfairy
Davos
0
No votes
Voters: None
Delta
1
4%
Voters: nutella
DrWilgy
1
4%
Voters: Cape90
Dyslexicon
0
No votes
Voters: None
Epignosis
0
No votes
Voters: None
falcon45ca
9
36%
Voters: ☆Princess Abigail☆, sig, Delta, WindwardAway, Ricochet, Long Con, leetic, DarlingMonroe, DrWilgy
leetic
1
4%
Voters: Dyslexicon
Lemonfairy
2
8%
Voters: NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME, Davos
Long Con
0
No votes
Voters: None
Master Radishes
0
No votes
Voters: None
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME
0
No votes
Voters: None
nutella
0
No votes
Voters: None
☆Princess Abigail☆
0
No votes
Voters: None
Ricochet
0
No votes
Voters: None
Sabiplz
0
No votes
Voters: None
Scrappy Doo
0
No votes
Voters: None
sig
0
No votes
Voters: None
Sloonei
0
No votes
Voters: None
TonyStarkPrime
0
No votes
Voters: None
WindwardAway
0
No votes
Voters: None
Unvote
0
No votes
Voters: None
Coaches/Spectators/Other
5
20%
Voters: Seanzie, JaggedJimmyJay, Caitlin, S~V~S, Scotty
I think falcon's vote on DM is *probably* indicative that he also may have had teammates on DM and maybe Lemon trying to save him, depending on whether they spread out or tried to consolidate. The one thing about his vote on DM that gives me pause is that he kinda worded it like he was just voting to self-pres, and that's still a move a wolf can make on a teammate, but DM arguably had a sizable wagon on them.
I really question why Davos the sock was voting Lemon rather than falcon, though. And I don't see Scrappy's vote, but at least they've been more active than Davos. I don't know where Davos's reads even come from because all they ever say is "Arrr!" which doesn't really tell us much.
A bit theatry of an interaction, and I don't have the meta to know if either of them interact with their partners like that. It does follow from their early D3 interactions, so there is that.WindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 2:45 pmI said "low" because I couldn't remember any and I skipped a chunk of posts in my catchup. The last time I accused someone of "no engagement" they had actually posted but I didn't see their posts, so I'm not doing that dumb thing again.Lemonfairy wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 2:40 pmyou mean "no engagement" (this is assuming you haven't yet read my most recent posts)
this kind of feels like you're making stuff up
Anyway, I thought you townread me? What's with the hostility?
And eh.WindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 3:11 pm I'll bbl for more discussion
hopefully Lemon will be able to reply to me again before I'm gone for the day
- Tue Feb 20, 2024 11:31 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [Day 3]
WindwardAway wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2024 12:08 amshe was doing that a bit in the East Facility thread, tooSloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2024 12:06 am [VOTE: lemonfairy] aubergine
In an atmosphere of groovy solving energy, these posts stick out:Lemonfairy wrote: ↑Fri Feb 02, 2024 10:52 pm it's nice to have everyone in one thread again but at the same time, it feels so disorienting and I can't remember half of you
she did come back a couple times to engage some of us who had questions on her reads, but I feel like she wasn't very energetic about solving.
WindwardAway wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2024 12:21 am [VOTE: Lemonfairy] aubergine
I'm fine with this wagon
WindwardAway wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2024 11:54 amAll right, @Lemonfairy, if you think the cases against you are bad, do you think that any of us voting you are pushing you in bad faith?Lemonfairy wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2024 11:39 amnutella wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2024 12:08 amI agree with thisSloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2024 12:06 am [VOTE: lemonfairy] aubergine
In an atmosphere of groovy solving energy, these posts stick out:Lemonfairy wrote: ↑Fri Feb 02, 2024 10:52 pm it's nice to have everyone in one thread again but at the same time, it feels so disorienting and I can't remember half of you
I made an early hipster
light push on Lemon
She would fit as wolf
from her general vibe in thread
blending in just right
She was active ish
on day one posting readlists,
but almost too niceWindwardAway wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2024 12:12 amactually, yeah. she had a defense for her reads but wasn't trying too hard to push it as the correct worldview.nutella wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2024 12:08 amI agree with thisSloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2024 12:06 am [VOTE: lemonfairy] aubergine
In an atmosphere of groovy solving energy, these posts stick out:Lemonfairy wrote: ↑Fri Feb 02, 2024 10:52 pm it's nice to have everyone in one thread again but at the same time, it feels so disorienting and I can't remember half of you
I made an early hipster
light push on Lemon
She would fit as wolf
from her general vibe in thread
blending in just right
She was active ish
on day one posting readlists,
but almost too nice
in my experience, she's more willing to engage as town, but i've been giving her the benefit of the doubt because i can sympathize with not having a lot of time for this game. but then again, over half of our thread was slanking yesterday and they can't all be scum.and from being tired and too niceWindwardAway wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2024 12:21 am [VOTE: Lemonfairy] aubergine
I'm fine with this wagon
kind of a weak case
WindwardAway wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2024 5:50 pmI'll chime in here since I think it's a worthwhile discussion.Master Radishes wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2024 5:44 pmLemonfairy started D1 in the East Facility fairly talkative. Did her own thing and didn't really get mixed up in any larger arguments or discussions. Probably a few individual posts I'd lean 'town' on, but nothing I'd call unfakeable. Readslists seemed a bit questionable (e.g. the quieter Nook and Dizzy higher up, someone chatty like Windy unsorted, a sudden drop of Dizzy, etc) though they all were given explanations. Big drop off D2.
Feels like a slot worth pushing, but not a definite hit.
Haven't really paid attention to the individual votes on her.
she sorted me as a townlean later on but I'd have to recheck her reasoning on that.
she didn't really seem to be too interested in my vote on her and acknowledged that I've been questioning her since sometime on D2, so I guess that lines up at least.
I feel like if she's one of those players who loses motivation after losing 2 partners on D1, she probably would flip wolf here, but the 5 votes on her are kind of interesting. I felt decent about Sloonei and nutella voting Lemon, then I voted her too, and then Dizzy and Nook went back and forth on each other but both ultimately landed on Lemon. I'd be curious to hear their reasoning, in their own words, because they're also both from our thread, so I feel like they might have substantial opinions even if they're testing the waters first.
Page ten of the ISO (no interactions on page 11). Okay, I see why I was willing to skip WWA, as it does look like a strong push, and I believe that was before the falcon wagon was even a thing. They were the third vote on the wagon however (by their own admission) and got just a little bit hedgy when it grew to five. Voting a partner with a wagon on them so early in the day is certainly a bold move, but I'll have to see where this fits in their overall progression before making any further conclusions.WindwardAway wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 1:34 amI didn't really think of it like thatCape90 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2024 9:09 pmit's almost like lemon is saying "yeah i agree that i should be shrugyeeted here" like the consensus was here at this time. Like Lemonfairy saying "I also agree with whoever proposed we each vote for the scummiest within each facility" WHEN BY CONSENSUS RIGHT NOW THEY ARE THE SCUMMIEST FROM OUR FACILITY seems rather LMAO to meSloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2024 9:05 pmi'm not sure I follow your thought process here.Cape90 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2024 9:01 pmi immediately see this and really question if pushing Lemonfairy is actually a good idea like this just buries lemon more I think, esp when i scroll up and see a bunch of votes on them alreadyLemonfairy wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2024 12:12 pm side note, I also agree with whoever proposed we each vote for the scummiest within each facility to make w/w wagons
I think each side has better reads on their own facility than the other and even if we paraphrase, a lot of context can get lost
while we did have N0, it almost feels like I should start over with reads on the West
maybe have 2 separate reads list and then combine them together later
isn't that a kind of easy thing for scum to fake, though?
- Tue Feb 20, 2024 11:25 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [Day 4]
And apparently only one more Ricochet interaction before the flip, so I didn't even need to split it lol. I mean, it's an interaction based on someone else's interaction, so it's a bit hard to glean things here. Maybe it's a little weird that they decided to focus on Cape's read of Ricochet over anyone else, but that's about all.WindwardAway wrote: ↑Wed Feb 07, 2024 3:17 pm I feel like cape isn't solving with the intent to root out the other mafia team, and not to win the game for town. I think it's very likely his confidence in his reads comes from knowing who he's not teamed with.
And I don't remember him mentioning Ricochet much before suddenly putting them in townreads? I'll try to check again but my flight is boarding soon.
I'm going to move my vote just in case I don't make it back again before eod.
[VOTE: Cape90] aubergine
- Tue Feb 20, 2024 11:21 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [Day 4]
I'll probably go through WWA's ISO page by page, starting with Ricochet. Pages 10 and 11 have nothing, so here's page 9.
So gives this response to try to get Ricochet to contribute. Epi was convinced Delta was pyxxy's partner due to similar interactions, but that case turned out to be untrue. "I'd like to hear your take on the current wagons" seems to have prompted Ricochet's look at people on the falcon wagon, which was seemingly a vehicle to try to spread suspicion on someone other than falcon or Lemonfairy. For their part, Ricochet gave WWA a townread, a more unconditional one than just about anyone else who was on the wagon.WindwardAway wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 11:32 amI'm curious what your thought process is, and tbh I keep forgetting you're in the game because I haven't seen anyone from West Facility mention having a read on you.WindwardAway wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 11:30 am@Ricochet i know it's been a while since you last popped in, but when you catch up, I'd like to hear your take on the current wagons.
Perhaps this is where my "coordinated bussing effort" thought came from, as I'm not sure why she would point out information that looks bad for falcon in response to that vote, although Ricochet had already decided to bus at that point so it wasn't like they were nudging Ricochet into voting falcon. They seem to defend Lemonfairy at the end, too, so it could be a "sacrifice falcon to save Lemonfairy" situation (I guess Lemonfairy was starting to put some effort at the end of the phase, which may have made them more valuable than falcon at that point), still I'd expect Lemonfairy to vote falcon for towncred if that were the case. Maybe they were hoping Lemonfairy wouldn't attract too much attention?WindwardAway wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 1:41 pmFalcon hasn't shared any townreads?Ricochet wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 1:10 pm So I'll work my way from the wagons to others, within my capability.
Wagons
Overall, I'd favor a falcon lynch over a Lemon or Monroe one. Grouping bias is a factor, cuz I've played and judged falcon down in West, whereas I know less on why the other two are wolfread or didn't catch all the details from others' cases.
Between Lemon and Monroe, I'd place Monroe within question marks, both in regards to why they've become a D3 wagon and what they've done in response.
So, falcon > Monroe > Lemon
falcon
West - pyxxy connection: none that could have been established, because they interacted with / mentioned each other a total of zero times
West D1-D2 judgement: ended D2 with a low opinion on him and down on my would-vote list; excluding pyxxy connections I considered (Porscha, Delta), he was the lowest ranked de facto. West gameplay resembled current gameplay: brief intervals of engagement, much of which was spent prodding others (with a degree of randomness, never focused) or reactive-toned defending when voted/wagoned
D3 judgement:
-- pretty much the same, tone and grasp of play have not improved.
-- noted him hitting back in rebuttal form at most of his wagoners (Sloonei's characterisations, calling MRadishes opportunistic, bark back at nutella), plus placing three others (leetic, sig, Abigail) within wolf pairings with no reasoning. so pretty much a kind of "you're all bad" howl.
-- parked defense into two main ideas: that the Western nightkills are a frame and that he is towning like mad and we fail to see it. Former boils down to wifom, as leetic also said; latter is not something I can agree with, based on what I've judged. I've read or remember no strong meta read from others on this gameplay, as it stands, being town!falcon indicative
-- meanwhile, withheld to offer townreads (apart from not wanting to vote LC and Epignosis).
-- of his votes, Abigail and Monroe were/are without discernible cause. Monroe isn't even the counterwagon to self-pres on, at the moment
Monroe
D3 judgement: only 3 posts, of which their essence is an aggro response and vote on Epignosis (for their vote / case on them); other reads (Delta ping, wouldn't wagon Lemon) all vague. It doesn't look great, of course, to drop and omgus upon the very first interaction with a player from the other group. But also not the deepest material to make a solid case out of. Hence the question mark status.
Lemon
D3 judgement: I'd structure 3 phases, thus far, of activity.
-- first phase (posts 1-3) in which she mentioned postponing activity and also a statement on the merger being a sensible disorienting moment. I think some wagoned her starting for as little as this and, without proper context if this would classify as a pattern from wolf!lemon (that I can remember), I felt it was undeserved.
-- second phase (pre legacy post), with a first wave of rebuttals (at nutella and Windward). something about wanting to sit more on it. at worst, could display nerviness in face of pressure.
-- third phase (the legacy post): quite a shift from small bites to extensive reads. rebuttal-wise, argues more than the cases on her are not solid or convincing, then also tiers the wagoners based on individual performance. if this alone (or more of this throughout D3), without suss pressure, would have been Lemon's activity, I'd probably read it well. given suss and wagon pressure, I am missing meta info on whether Lemon would as to go steroids, from feeble to opinionated, as wolf. also, a bit funny to have labeled it as "legacy", as if the lynch is a done deal.
tldr: falcon suss (with no prevailing meta info that he towns this way), Monroe who knows (startled by bad form, but tis all so far), lemon no real ping on her elaborate reply
@falcon45ca is this true?
And actually, the way Lemon said she expires D3/D4 made it sound more like she might die from a mechanical effect and not just because she might get lunched. I could be reading into it too much, though, and I know she can't confirm or deny it.
Another minor thing that looks good, if Ricochet was faking it (we don't know if one or both of them were real) presumably he wouldn't want people knowing about it. It's not to the extent that I can't discount distancing, however.WindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 6:26 pm why are there two people with supposedly the same post restriction? sig and ricochet
could be one of them faking it, i guess
- Tue Feb 20, 2024 11:10 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
- Tue Feb 20, 2024 11:08 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [Day 4]
Yeah, I think need to redo this one. "I think I'll stop here" is not a sufficient level of analysis for this point in the game. Further, I ended up overstating Ricochet's contribution to the bus, when in looking at the general game state and what they were trying to accomplish with their ISO does not seem like an enthusiastic effort to bus.leetic wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 2:01 pmWindwardAway wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 11:32 amI'm curious what your thought process is, and tbh I keep forgetting you're in the game because I haven't seen anyone from West Facility mention having a read on you.WindwardAway wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 11:30 am@Ricochet i know it's been a while since you last popped in, but when you catch up, I'd like to hear your take on the current wagons.WindwardAway wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 1:41 pmFalcon hasn't shared any townreads?Ricochet wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 1:10 pm So I'll work my way from the wagons to others, within my capability.
Wagons
Overall, I'd favor a falcon lynch over a Lemon or Monroe one. Grouping bias is a factor, cuz I've played and judged falcon down in West, whereas I know less on why the other two are wolfread or didn't catch all the details from others' cases.
Between Lemon and Monroe, I'd place Monroe within question marks, both in regards to why they've become a D3 wagon and what they've done in response.
So, falcon > Monroe > Lemon
falcon
West - pyxxy connection: none that could have been established, because they interacted with / mentioned each other a total of zero times
West D1-D2 judgement: ended D2 with a low opinion on him and down on my would-vote list; excluding pyxxy connections I considered (Porscha, Delta), he was the lowest ranked de facto. West gameplay resembled current gameplay: brief intervals of engagement, much of which was spent prodding others (with a degree of randomness, never focused) or reactive-toned defending when voted/wagoned
D3 judgement:
-- pretty much the same, tone and grasp of play have not improved.
-- noted him hitting back in rebuttal form at most of his wagoners (Sloonei's characterisations, calling MRadishes opportunistic, bark back at nutella), plus placing three others (leetic, sig, Abigail) within wolf pairings with no reasoning. so pretty much a kind of "you're all bad" howl.
-- parked defense into two main ideas: that the Western nightkills are a frame and that he is towning like mad and we fail to see it. Former boils down to wifom, as leetic also said; latter is not something I can agree with, based on what I've judged. I've read or remember no strong meta read from others on this gameplay, as it stands, being town!falcon indicative
-- meanwhile, withheld to offer townreads (apart from not wanting to vote LC and Epignosis).
-- of his votes, Abigail and Monroe were/are without discernible cause. Monroe isn't even the counterwagon to self-pres on, at the moment
Monroe
D3 judgement: only 3 posts, of which their essence is an aggro response and vote on Epignosis (for their vote / case on them); other reads (Delta ping, wouldn't wagon Lemon) all vague. It doesn't look great, of course, to drop and omgus upon the very first interaction with a player from the other group. But also not the deepest material to make a solid case out of. Hence the question mark status.
Lemon
D3 judgement: I'd structure 3 phases, thus far, of activity.
-- first phase (posts 1-3) in which she mentioned postponing activity and also a statement on the merger being a sensible disorienting moment. I think some wagoned her starting for as little as this and, without proper context if this would classify as a pattern from wolf!lemon (that I can remember), I felt it was undeserved.
-- second phase (pre legacy post), with a first wave of rebuttals (at nutella and Windward). something about wanting to sit more on it. at worst, could display nerviness in face of pressure.
-- third phase (the legacy post): quite a shift from small bites to extensive reads. rebuttal-wise, argues more than the cases on her are not solid or convincing, then also tiers the wagoners based on individual performance. if this alone (or more of this throughout D3), without suss pressure, would have been Lemon's activity, I'd probably read it well. given suss and wagon pressure, I am missing meta info on whether Lemon would as to go steroids, from feeble to opinionated, as wolf. also, a bit funny to have labeled it as "legacy", as if the lynch is a done deal.
tldr: falcon suss (with no prevailing meta info that he towns this way), Monroe who knows (startled by bad form, but tis all so far), lemon no real ping on her elaborate reply
@falcon45ca is this true?
And actually, the way Lemon said she expires D3/D4 made it sound more like she might die from a mechanical effect and not just because she might get lunched. I could be reading into it too much, though, and I know she can't confirm or deny it.I think I'll stop here. Yeah, unless Ricochet and WWA had this coordinated bussing effort on falcon, they're not partners.WindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 2:52 pmoh yeah, falcon never replied to me there lmaoleetic wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 12:43 amSuspects falcon from N0WindwardAway wrote: ↑Fri Feb 02, 2024 10:22 pmI suspected both sig and falcon in the N0 thread lol
maybe it's time I should do a little backreading but I'd like to hear the cases on them too
Surprisingly has like fifty posts after without mentioning falcon, but does vote them when their wagon is starting to pick up momentum. No stated reason beyond vague "don't think falcon's doing himself any favors" and presumed continuity with N0 readWindwardAway wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2024 6:48 pmI use the word more when I'm town, but regardless, I'm happy to join the "opportunism" :PLong Con wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2024 6:44 pmIt's the cheapest and easiest go-to reason for a Wolf to use as (part of) a reason to cast a vote on someone.
Town probably use it sometimes as well, it's an understandable way to feel when you're feeling besieged.
But mostly wolfy.
[VOTE: falcon] aubergine I do not feel like this is opportunistic, since I've made a case on you in the past, and have you in the red zone of my rainbow list.![]()
[VOTE: falcon] aubergine
don't think falcon's doing himself any favors right now.
Finally, some significant Abby interactions! Speaks on Abby's behalf here while refuting part of a falcon defenseWindwardAway wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 1:27 amdidn't Abbi change her mind?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2024 7:26 pm all of the people who claim to be good at reading falcon, dead and alive, think falcon is town
Says they would "never clear" Abby based off the nightkill, still I think Abby was more depending on the bus. Otherwise townreads AbbyWindwardAway wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 1:48 amI've seen wolf!Abbi kill town!Caitlin on N1 in a game before so I'd never clear her off of thatLong Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 1:22 amIf it's multiball, then the kill may not have come from him.☆Princess Abigail☆ wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 1:06 amUgh I hate that I town read thisfalcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2024 9:33 pm Has nobody stopped to consider that scum falcon killing players who SR him is about as subtle as a brick?
Fur reelz, I have way more panache than that
Unvote
To be fair, if it's multiball, then Caitlin dying early to nightkill doesn't clear you either.![]()
I think Abbi's been ok so far, though, and judging by what I've heard from her progression in the West Facility, she's probably town
Asks falcon to respond to one of Ricochet's arguments. Otherwise, stays parked on falconWindwardAway wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 1:41 pmFalcon hasn't shared any townreads?Ricochet wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 1:10 pm So I'll work my way from the wagons to others, within my capability.
Wagons
Overall, I'd favor a falcon lynch over a Lemon or Monroe one. Grouping bias is a factor, cuz I've played and judged falcon down in West, whereas I know less on why the other two are wolfread or didn't catch all the details from others' cases.
Between Lemon and Monroe, I'd place Monroe within question marks, both in regards to why they've become a D3 wagon and what they've done in response.
So, falcon > Monroe > Lemon
falcon
West - pyxxy connection: none that could have been established, because they interacted with / mentioned each other a total of zero times
West D1-D2 judgement: ended D2 with a low opinion on him and down on my would-vote list; excluding pyxxy connections I considered (Porscha, Delta), he was the lowest ranked de facto. West gameplay resembled current gameplay: brief intervals of engagement, much of which was spent prodding others (with a degree of randomness, never focused) or reactive-toned defending when voted/wagoned
D3 judgement:
-- pretty much the same, tone and grasp of play have not improved.
-- noted him hitting back in rebuttal form at most of his wagoners (Sloonei's characterisations, calling MRadishes opportunistic, bark back at nutella), plus placing three others (leetic, sig, Abigail) within wolf pairings with no reasoning. so pretty much a kind of "you're all bad" howl.
-- parked defense into two main ideas: that the Western nightkills are a frame and that he is towning like mad and we fail to see it. Former boils down to wifom, as leetic also said; latter is not something I can agree with, based on what I've judged. I've read or remember no strong meta read from others on this gameplay, as it stands, being town!falcon indicative
-- meanwhile, withheld to offer townreads (apart from not wanting to vote LC and Epignosis).
-- of his votes, Abigail and Monroe were/are without discernible cause. Monroe isn't even the counterwagon to self-pres on, at the moment
Monroe
D3 judgement: only 3 posts, of which their essence is an aggro response and vote on Epignosis (for their vote / case on them); other reads (Delta ping, wouldn't wagon Lemon) all vague. It doesn't look great, of course, to drop and omgus upon the very first interaction with a player from the other group. But also not the deepest material to make a solid case out of. Hence the question mark status.
Lemon
D3 judgement: I'd structure 3 phases, thus far, of activity.
-- first phase (posts 1-3) in which she mentioned postponing activity and also a statement on the merger being a sensible disorienting moment. I think some wagoned her starting for as little as this and, without proper context if this would classify as a pattern from wolf!lemon (that I can remember), I felt it was undeserved.
-- second phase (pre legacy post), with a first wave of rebuttals (at nutella and Windward). something about wanting to sit more on it. at worst, could display nerviness in face of pressure.
-- third phase (the legacy post): quite a shift from small bites to extensive reads. rebuttal-wise, argues more than the cases on her are not solid or convincing, then also tiers the wagoners based on individual performance. if this alone (or more of this throughout D3), without suss pressure, would have been Lemon's activity, I'd probably read it well. given suss and wagon pressure, I am missing meta info on whether Lemon would as to go steroids, from feeble to opinionated, as wolf. also, a bit funny to have labeled it as "legacy", as if the lynch is a done deal.
tldr: falcon suss (with no prevailing meta info that he towns this way), Monroe who knows (startled by bad form, but tis all so far), lemon no real ping on her elaborate reply
@falcon45ca is this true?
And actually, the way Lemon said she expires D3/D4 made it sound more like she might die from a mechanical effect and not just because she might get lunched. I could be reading into it too much, though, and I know she can't confirm or deny it.
so i was happy to keep a vote on him if he wasn't going to counterargue with anything except that he was "towning his ass off" which he wasn't
- Tue Feb 20, 2024 11:04 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [Day 4]
falcon interactions, the Abby stuff is now irrelevant. It's surprisingly not as much of a push as you'd expect, then again the same criticism can be said of some people who flipped town like Epi's push on pyxxy. Bussing at that point would have been weird as it would have gone against the other teammates' apparent strategy, then again maybe the vote is why they were all so reluctant to bus?leetic wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 12:43 amSuspects falcon from N0WindwardAway wrote: ↑Fri Feb 02, 2024 10:22 pmI suspected both sig and falcon in the N0 thread lol
maybe it's time I should do a little backreading but I'd like to hear the cases on them too
Surprisingly has like fifty posts after without mentioning falcon, but does vote them when their wagon is starting to pick up momentum. No stated reason beyond vague "don't think falcon's doing himself any favors" and presumed continuity with N0 readWindwardAway wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2024 6:48 pmI use the word more when I'm town, but regardless, I'm happy to join the "opportunism" :PLong Con wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2024 6:44 pmIt's the cheapest and easiest go-to reason for a Wolf to use as (part of) a reason to cast a vote on someone.
Town probably use it sometimes as well, it's an understandable way to feel when you're feeling besieged.
But mostly wolfy.
[VOTE: falcon] aubergine I do not feel like this is opportunistic, since I've made a case on you in the past, and have you in the red zone of my rainbow list.![]()
[VOTE: falcon] aubergine
don't think falcon's doing himself any favors right now.
Finally, some significant Abby interactions! Speaks on Abby's behalf here while refuting part of a falcon defenseWindwardAway wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 1:27 amdidn't Abbi change her mind?TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2024 7:26 pm all of the people who claim to be good at reading falcon, dead and alive, think falcon is town
Says they would "never clear" Abby based off the nightkill, still I think Abby was more depending on the bus. Otherwise townreads AbbyWindwardAway wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 1:48 amI've seen wolf!Abbi kill town!Caitlin on N1 in a game before so I'd never clear her off of thatLong Con wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 1:22 amIf it's multiball, then the kill may not have come from him.☆Princess Abigail☆ wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 1:06 amUgh I hate that I town read thisfalcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2024 9:33 pm Has nobody stopped to consider that scum falcon killing players who SR him is about as subtle as a brick?
Fur reelz, I have way more panache than that
Unvote
To be fair, if it's multiball, then Caitlin dying early to nightkill doesn't clear you either.![]()
I think Abbi's been ok so far, though, and judging by what I've heard from her progression in the West Facility, she's probably town
Asks falcon to respond to one of Ricochet's arguments. Otherwise, stays parked on falconWindwardAway wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 1:41 pmFalcon hasn't shared any townreads?Ricochet wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 1:10 pm So I'll work my way from the wagons to others, within my capability.
Wagons
Overall, I'd favor a falcon lynch over a Lemon or Monroe one. Grouping bias is a factor, cuz I've played and judged falcon down in West, whereas I know less on why the other two are wolfread or didn't catch all the details from others' cases.
Between Lemon and Monroe, I'd place Monroe within question marks, both in regards to why they've become a D3 wagon and what they've done in response.
So, falcon > Monroe > Lemon
falcon
West - pyxxy connection: none that could have been established, because they interacted with / mentioned each other a total of zero times
West D1-D2 judgement: ended D2 with a low opinion on him and down on my would-vote list; excluding pyxxy connections I considered (Porscha, Delta), he was the lowest ranked de facto. West gameplay resembled current gameplay: brief intervals of engagement, much of which was spent prodding others (with a degree of randomness, never focused) or reactive-toned defending when voted/wagoned
D3 judgement:
-- pretty much the same, tone and grasp of play have not improved.
-- noted him hitting back in rebuttal form at most of his wagoners (Sloonei's characterisations, calling MRadishes opportunistic, bark back at nutella), plus placing three others (leetic, sig, Abigail) within wolf pairings with no reasoning. so pretty much a kind of "you're all bad" howl.
-- parked defense into two main ideas: that the Western nightkills are a frame and that he is towning like mad and we fail to see it. Former boils down to wifom, as leetic also said; latter is not something I can agree with, based on what I've judged. I've read or remember no strong meta read from others on this gameplay, as it stands, being town!falcon indicative
-- meanwhile, withheld to offer townreads (apart from not wanting to vote LC and Epignosis).
-- of his votes, Abigail and Monroe were/are without discernible cause. Monroe isn't even the counterwagon to self-pres on, at the moment
Monroe
D3 judgement: only 3 posts, of which their essence is an aggro response and vote on Epignosis (for their vote / case on them); other reads (Delta ping, wouldn't wagon Lemon) all vague. It doesn't look great, of course, to drop and omgus upon the very first interaction with a player from the other group. But also not the deepest material to make a solid case out of. Hence the question mark status.
Lemon
D3 judgement: I'd structure 3 phases, thus far, of activity.
-- first phase (posts 1-3) in which she mentioned postponing activity and also a statement on the merger being a sensible disorienting moment. I think some wagoned her starting for as little as this and, without proper context if this would classify as a pattern from wolf!lemon (that I can remember), I felt it was undeserved.
-- second phase (pre legacy post), with a first wave of rebuttals (at nutella and Windward). something about wanting to sit more on it. at worst, could display nerviness in face of pressure.
-- third phase (the legacy post): quite a shift from small bites to extensive reads. rebuttal-wise, argues more than the cases on her are not solid or convincing, then also tiers the wagoners based on individual performance. if this alone (or more of this throughout D3), without suss pressure, would have been Lemon's activity, I'd probably read it well. given suss and wagon pressure, I am missing meta info on whether Lemon would as to go steroids, from feeble to opinionated, as wolf. also, a bit funny to have labeled it as "legacy", as if the lynch is a done deal.
tldr: falcon suss (with no prevailing meta info that he towns this way), Monroe who knows (startled by bad form, but tis all so far), lemon no real ping on her elaborate reply
@falcon45ca is this true?
And actually, the way Lemon said she expires D3/D4 made it sound more like she might die from a mechanical effect and not just because she might get lunched. I could be reading into it too much, though, and I know she can't confirm or deny it.
- Tue Feb 20, 2024 11:00 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [DAY 9]
Now I'll probably have to look at WWA, but a 525-post ISO isn't making that easy, plus I can't see Lemonfairy interactions from D1-2. I'll probably bring up my previous analyses
- Tue Feb 20, 2024 10:56 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [DAY 9]
I believe that the falcon wagon used to be even more dominant earlier in the day, for instance, MR was on the wagon before later switching to DM. So I guess I could see why bussing may have seemed a good idea at the time, even if in hindsight it wasn't. Delta was a late joiner, which inherently raises more eyebrows than WWA's vote (especially as two other late joiners, Abby and Ricochet, flipped wolf) but eh. I'm surprised Lemonfairy wasn't bussed at all, the arbiters must have thought they were more valuable or something.
- Tue Feb 20, 2024 10:52 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [DAY 9]
I was first on the wagon I believe, WWA joined shortly afterward, and Delta was much later (to the point they weren't on the wagon when Ricochet was looking at the falcon voters).
- Tue Feb 20, 2024 10:51 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [DAY 9]
All three living players voted falcon at EoD3. This means that there had to have been a second busser on the wagon besides Ricochet. A bit odd since if Ricochet and the remaining arbiter voted DM instead, falcon would have been saved. Granted, it would have meant all four arbiters piling on the same wagon.
- Tue Feb 20, 2024 10:48 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [DAY 9]
Also it's important to note that my phone's touchscreen isn't working properly. This will limit the amount of time that I'll be able to be reliably online, as I'll have to use my laptop.
- Tue Feb 20, 2024 10:46 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [DAY 9]
If I had a nickel for every time one of the landlords made an ill-advised bus, I would have two nickels but isn't it strange that it happened twice? Still, it makes me wonder about the possibility of the arbiters trying something similar. Ricochet did bus falcon, but it appears to have been a very reluctant bus, given that they were relatively late on the wagon and tried throwing fire at every one of falcon's voters before the bus. Was Epi's influence just that unavoidable? Still, Ricochet ended on Porscha while falcon was on a vanity wagon on Seanzie, so this only means so much.
- Tue Feb 20, 2024 10:42 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [DAY 9]
Ricochet put Delta in the "zone of concern" alongside falcon no less. (I was the only one below both) It's interesting that if Delta is arbiter, both Ricochet and Lemonfairy had little faith in them. Like falcon, Ricochet fully jumped on the "Delta is pyxxy's most likely partner" bandwagon.
- Tue Feb 20, 2024 10:39 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [DAY 9]
For comparison's sake, falcon had two Ricochet interactions: calling their reads "bland" and responding to Ricochet pointing out that falcon had no pyxxy interactions.leetic wrote: ↑Tue Feb 20, 2024 10:36 pm Ctrl+Fing "Delta" in falcon's ISO gives 45 results... Of which like 90% of them are from one of Epi's quoted posts. falcon asked Delta for reads D1, asked for the case on them D2, seemingly agrees with Epi's case that Delta was partnered with pyxxy, and pushed them once over it. At least you can't say that falcon never interacted with Delta
- Tue Feb 20, 2024 10:36 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [DAY 9]
Ctrl+Fing "Delta" in falcon's ISO gives 45 results... Of which like 90% of them are from one of Epi's quoted posts. falcon asked Delta for reads D1, asked for the case on them D2, seemingly agrees with Epi's case that Delta was partnered with pyxxy, and pushed them once over it. At least you can't say that falcon never interacted with Delta
- Tue Feb 20, 2024 10:32 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [DAY 9]
Delta townread Ricochet. A lot of people did, so this on its own is not evidence to indict.
- Tue Feb 20, 2024 10:30 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [DAY 9]
Delta starts by townreading falcon due to an alleged slip, then says they would vote them to save a townread, then says they would vote them GTH, but never seems to get around to voting them.
- Tue Feb 20, 2024 10:28 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [DAY 9]
It is quiet in here. Then again, what do you expect from F3. I'll have to look at Delta's falcon and Ricochet interactions from the other thread. Fortunately, I do not have to go through Abby's ISO again.
- Tue Feb 20, 2024 8:22 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [DAY 9]
falcon never interacted with Ricochet or Lemonfairy D3. He also didn't interact with Delta, while having one brief interaction with WWA.
- Tue Feb 20, 2024 8:19 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [DAY 9]
There's also the weird assymetry. So far, we have flipped:
- 2 landlords, 2 arbiters, 1 ITP, 8 townies, 1 town by proxy (my side)
- 2 landlords, 1 landlord by proxy, 1 arbiter, 1 ITP, 10 townies (other side)
I thought that Davos would count as the second landlord, meaning any remaining wolves from that side are arbiters, but apparently there were three with Wilgy. WWA being town would create a weird asymmetry between threads and teams, leaving Lemonfairy as the only wolf without a partner D1, but the very existence of Davos means things are already weird and asymmetrical.
- 2 landlords, 2 arbiters, 1 ITP, 8 townies, 1 town by proxy (my side)
- 2 landlords, 1 landlord by proxy, 1 arbiter, 1 ITP, 10 townies (other side)
I thought that Davos would count as the second landlord, meaning any remaining wolves from that side are arbiters, but apparently there were three with Wilgy. WWA being town would create a weird asymmetry between threads and teams, leaving Lemonfairy as the only wolf without a partner D1, but the very existence of Davos means things are already weird and asymmetrical.
- Tue Feb 20, 2024 8:13 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [DAY 9]
So for mechanical information, we know that Delta couldn't have killed sig. Makes sense, sig was likely a Wilgy kill. nutella was probably an arbiter kill, as it makes no sense for the landlords to believe that nutella was an arbiter when she killed Lemonfairy. Additionally, Seanzie was likely killed by falcon N2, while Abby had motivation to go after Caitlin N1. Thus, if kills are alternating, it makes sense for landlords to be on odd nights and arbiters to be on even nights.
- Tue Feb 20, 2024 8:10 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [Day 3]
The other side. They put WWA in the same position they put Ricochet, though if they were partnered it would indicate that they were very loathe to bus. Not entirely out of the realm of possibility given the arbiter's strong position going into D3, but even Ricochet knew which way the wind was blowing.Lemonfairy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 6:32 pm Going to try to finish up what I did yesterday but I'm not in the mood to go in as much detail for the explanations.
Cape - Generally vibed with reads. Feels like they have been reading my posts. Similar to town Cape I've seen in the past.
Sabi - Never really vibed with Sabi's reads. Didn't pay much attention to them either. Skimmed through ISO and think they could be wolf. I did think their post about thread being boring and hoping someone will stir the pot was kind of towny but it's not something solid I can lean on.
Master Radishes - Hmmm Radishes is actually OK. Next.
DrWilgy - Wilgy's ISO is not as bad as I thought it would be TBH. The frog noises tickled me. This is more of a tone read though.
DarlingMonroe - Not a lot of reads. Not feeling the tone either. Could be wolf.
Would probably order like so:
Cape
Master Radishes
Sabi
DrWilgy
Darling Monroe
If I added everyone else:
Cape
Windward
nutella
Dyslexicon
Master Radishes
DrWilgy
Nanook
Sabi
Darling Monroe
IDK how I feel about this but it is what it is.
- Tue Feb 20, 2024 8:06 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [Day 3]
The post I keep returning to. Interestingly, the only living player from my side who can possibly be their partner is directly on the bottom. Granted, they put their other partners in high and middle and were insistent that they'd only vote someone from their own side, but they weren't confident enough to put Ricochet directly on top.Lemonfairy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 7:46 pm Quick ISOs. This list is alphabetical btw.
Delta - Cheerful and cutesy first impression. Posts have mostly neutral/even tone. Will put them at mid now and change later after I've seen everyone. Could be scum.
Epignosis - Couple of takes. Feels alright.
falcon45ca - Couple of takes. Too many spaces. Feels alright.
leetic - Strong focus on pyxxy wagon and what happened. Feels alright/mid.
Long Con - Likes some posts. Probably first slot I feel OK putting in towns.
☆Princess Abigail☆ - Fighting for wolf pelt means this is probs town Abigail? Can see a few takes from rest of posts. Might be being a bit too generous.
Ricochet - Now that I've seen these wallposts, I've realized how obnoxious mine was. Sorry. ISO feels alright/pretty good.
sig - Not much there. Feels alight/mid.
Sloonei - It's kind of alright. Although the bar is set pretty low at this point. A bit wordy.
TonyStarkPrime - I remember Dyslexicon calling Tony town at least twice (not relevant but thought I'd mention it). After ISOing, feels mid.
Scrappy Doo - Definitely better than whatever Davos is doing. Towny tone. Feels alright.
Ordered list:
Long Con
Ricochet
Princess Abigail
Epignosis
falcon
Sloonei
Scrappy Doo
leetic
Tony
sig
Delta
Something like this.
I skimmed a lot so take it with salt.
- Tue Feb 20, 2024 8:01 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [DAY 9]
A song to celebrate our achievement:
Unfortunately, the arbiters have not been defeated yet. The good news is there can only be one remaining, as if there were two the game would be over already. Time to look over WWA and Delta one more time
Unfortunately, the arbiters have not been defeated yet. The good news is there can only be one remaining, as if there were two the game would be over already. Time to look over WWA and Delta one more time
- Mon Feb 19, 2024 7:42 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [Day 8]
Unless I'm missing something, you didn't vote D5 eitherDelta wrote: ↑Mon Feb 19, 2024 7:40 pmI think only other day was 6? And that was because I got caught up talking ab mech & time caught up to me ;_;leetic wrote: ↑Mon Feb 19, 2024 7:39 pmPretty sure you didn't vote in a couple of days before that
- Mon Feb 19, 2024 7:39 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [Day 8]
Pretty sure you didn't vote in a couple of days before that
- Mon Feb 19, 2024 7:17 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [Day 8]
They're dead; we can no longer test such an idea
- Mon Feb 19, 2024 7:10 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [GAME OVER- SERIAL KILLER WINS]
- Replies: 3227
- Views: 46164
Re: Game of Champions- Merged Thread [Day 8]
That's basically unfalsifiable at this point. Although if Davos's votes don't count, why did they vote at all?WindwardAway wrote: ↑Mon Feb 19, 2024 7:06 pm I *still* think Davos's vote didn't count, regardless of what the OP says about ties
You can get on my case for it, it's fine, but I don't believe that was randomized