The Syndicate

robyn wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 10:59 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 10:56 pm
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 10:53 pm If that’s where you’re trying to count onliners
No, I'm talking about the online status on the site, which is still visible when logged out. We would be able to see the other players online if there was truly another thread on this site.
try to visit this thread while logged out mf

I'm talking about the site as a whole, not this thread. Stop being denser than a block of iridium.

If the people in this thread are still shown as online when logged out, as can be shown by an incognito tab listing the same amount of people online, people from the other thread should be visible as well. Thus, I highly doubt this other thread exists, at least not right now.

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 10:53 pm If that’s where you’re trying to count onliners

No, I'm talking about the online status on the site, which is still visible when logged out. We would be able to see the other players online if there was truly another thread on this site.

Ranmilia wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 10:44 pm As per the rules we should not discuss or read into technical quirks like that.

At that point, it's a flaw in the setup. How am I supposed to argue against robyn when I'm not allowed to mention the evidence that disproves them? Regardless, I feel it should be fine because I'm not using it to make reads, although it is a grey area. Still, it goes to show why I think disallowing discussion of activity statuses is not a good idea even if some consider it "angleshooting" (it can be played around, so I don't see why some people see it as unfair)

robyn wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 10:36 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 10:33 pm
robyn wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 10:26 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 10:00 pm Evening One is underway
ah the other thread is at work
I'm not sure if there is another thread going on right now; there don't seem to be enough people online for that to be the case. Perhaps it's going on on Discord?
27 signed up for this game, 13 are in this thread, you can't see this thread without an account

so there's a thread concurrent to us, and they're at work

If that were true, we'd be able to see people online who are in that thread, yet we don't. It's not an issue with the account, either, as the number of people online is consistent between when I'm logged on and off.

robyn wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 10:26 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 10:00 pm Evening One is underway
ah the other thread is at work

I'm not sure if there is another thread going on right now; there don't seem to be enough people online for that to be the case. Perhaps it's going on on Discord?

Let's get things started with a [VOTE: Dyslexicon] aubergine. Absolutely nothing substantive in their ISO, and their weird ignoring of me doesn't square with the games I've played with t!Dyslexicon.

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 9:50 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 9:39 pm
☆Princess Abigail☆ wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 9:35 pm I want Mac to post
Why not engaging with the people who are actually playing the game?
Because you’re a silly goose

Your goose is officially cooked.

☆Princess Abigail☆ wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 9:35 pm I want Mac to post

Why not engaging with the people who are actually playing the game?

☆Princess Abigail☆ wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 9:34 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 8:56 pm And we've backslided into nonsense. We at least had a little bit of progress going there!

So why don't you quit crying and do something about it?

And we've backslided into nonsense. We at least had a little bit of progress going there!

☆Princess Abigail☆ wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 8:13 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 5:59 pm
pyxxy wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 5:55 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 5:52 pm
pyxxy wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 5:48 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 5:37 pm
pyxxy wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 5:34 pm

this is a good point. consider me moving towards 2 simul games that are somehow linked, lots of handwaving around "somehow"
Mechanical speculation is an easy thing for wolves to generate. I want to know yoiur thoughts on the people we're actually playing with.
It's easy for wolves to post pointless nagging on players they totally remember playing with yet want to GTH town that same player for the easy pocket.
This is the lamest attempt at shading I've seen in my entire life
You thinking that you are in any way an authority of what is and is not lame is funny enough to have me institutionalized for pseudobulbar affect
At least I'm doing more than whining and engaging in pointless mechanical speculation.
You are?

I remember a lot of whining from you tbh

I know you are but what am I?

WindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 6:07 pm Yeah but we're on D0 with no info, so why would a mech discussion be bad? We'll have other things to focus on by D1 that aren't setup spec.

But we do have info in players' posts and reaction. Otherwise, you're just doing nothing until we have a flip, which is a good way to build up inertia but not a good way for town to actually win the game.

pyxxy wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 6:07 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 5:59 pm
pyxxy wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 5:55 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 5:52 pm
pyxxy wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 5:48 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 5:37 pm
pyxxy wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 5:34 pm

this is a good point. consider me moving towards 2 simul games that are somehow linked, lots of handwaving around "somehow"
Mechanical speculation is an easy thing for wolves to generate. I want to know yoiur thoughts on the people we're actually playing with.
It's easy for wolves to post pointless nagging on players they totally remember playing with yet want to GTH town that same player for the easy pocket.
This is the lamest attempt at shading I've seen in my entire life
You thinking that you are in any way an authority of what is and is not lame is funny enough to have me institutionalized for pseudobulbar affect
At least I'm doing more than whining and engaging in pointless mechanical speculation.
You are whining about me "whining".

I've been fearkilled N1 for "mech speculation".

> insert shaq quote where you're not familiar with my game

So your only response is a tu quoque and bragging about supposed events in prior games. Yeah sure. Want to give me some actual substance?

WindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 6:06 pm Random and unrelated to everything, but I suddenly remembered that probably the only other time I've played with leetic, we tunnelled each other for a while iirc. I'm 100% willing to attribute it to a playstyle difference, given how this game's been going.

Nah, you were just tunneling me. I only went after you when I was at my wit's end

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 6:06 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 6:03 pm
Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 6:02 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 5:59 pm
Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 5:55 pm In my mind, TSP specifically is known to post more and give more effort as wolf than as town.

Although, in reality, I think it all varies.

But I'll take the town spew on TSP.
This is hedgy. Got any thoughts on what they actually posted?
No, I haven't read their posts.

I am once again, unlikely to answer your questions. And if I do, unlikely to be in a way that satisfies you. We will have to manage.
If you haven't read their posts, then why did you make a read on them? Are you just pulling names out of a hat?
seems like a simple progression to me

Alright, I'll use a random number generator from one to thirteen. It rolled seven, which means that Abby is town. Now it rolled ten, which means robyn is a wolf. How's that for a progression?

WindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 6:03 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 6:01 pm
WindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 6:00 pm I don't think the mech spec is pointless, but I also dont think it's worth trying to convince leetic that it's somewhat important.
1. It isn't telling us about anyone's alignment and 2. it isn't telling us how we should proceed. Mechanical discussion can be useful, but now isn't one of those times.
Nothing is going to tell us how we should proceed on D0, lol.

Forget about D0, I'm talking about D1

Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 6:02 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 5:59 pm
Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 5:55 pm In my mind, TSP specifically is known to post more and give more effort as wolf than as town.

Although, in reality, I think it all varies.

But I'll take the town spew on TSP.
This is hedgy. Got any thoughts on what they actually posted?
No, I haven't read their posts.

I am once again, unlikely to answer your questions. And if I do, unlikely to be in a way that satisfies you. We will have to manage.

If you haven't read their posts, then why did you make a read on them? Are you just pulling names out of a hat?

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 6:00 pm I’ll say it

Leetic is bad for thread health (this is a meme)

If I'm bad for thread health, then maybe that means thread health itself is bad

WindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 6:00 pm I don't think the mech spec is pointless, but I also dont think it's worth trying to convince leetic that it's somewhat important.

1. It isn't telling us about anyone's alignment and 2. it isn't telling us how we should proceed. Mechanical discussion can be useful, but now isn't one of those times.

Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 5:55 pm In my mind, TSP specifically is known to post more and give more effort as wolf than as town.

Although, in reality, I think it all varies.

But I'll take the town spew on TSP.

This is hedgy. Got any thoughts on what they actually posted?

pyxxy wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 5:55 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 5:52 pm
pyxxy wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 5:48 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 5:37 pm
pyxxy wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 5:34 pm
tedxtr wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 5:31 pm pyxxy, i thought about the thing where they play during our nights, but then the night actions would be split which seems like a disaster

guess we’ll have to see
this is a good point. consider me moving towards 2 simul games that are somehow linked, lots of handwaving around "somehow"
Mechanical speculation is an easy thing for wolves to generate. I want to know yoiur thoughts on the people we're actually playing with.
It's easy for wolves to post pointless nagging on players they totally remember playing with yet want to GTH town that same player for the easy pocket.
This is the lamest attempt at shading I've seen in my entire life
You thinking that you are in any way an authority of what is and is not lame is funny enough to have me institutionalized for pseudobulbar affect

At least I'm doing more than whining and engaging in pointless mechanical speculation.

pyxxy wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 5:48 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 5:37 pm
pyxxy wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 5:34 pm
tedxtr wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 5:31 pm pyxxy, i thought about the thing where they play during our nights, but then the night actions would be split which seems like a disaster

guess we’ll have to see
this is a good point. consider me moving towards 2 simul games that are somehow linked, lots of handwaving around "somehow"
Mechanical speculation is an easy thing for wolves to generate. I want to know yoiur thoughts on the people we're actually playing with.
It's easy for wolves to post pointless nagging on players they totally remember playing with yet want to GTH town that same player for the easy pocket.

This is the lamest attempt at shading I've seen in my entire life

pyxxy wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 5:34 pm
tedxtr wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 5:31 pm pyxxy, i thought about the thing where they play during our nights, but then the night actions would be split which seems like a disaster

guess we’ll have to see
this is a good point. consider me moving towards 2 simul games that are somehow linked, lots of handwaving around "somehow"

Mechanical speculation is an easy thing for wolves to generate. I want to know yoiur thoughts on the people we're actually playing with.

Most likely this is just a split thread game and the threads will merge after a certain point. I'm most interested in the apparent asymmetry here, but there's no use speculating on it now.

pyxxy wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 5:23 pm I'm gonna say this now sorry if someone got it it between p7 and current

I don't think this is a 26/27/28 player game

having watched ½ of the first episode of Severance, I could see a setup with "13" players where if you die at work you die in real life and vice versa

maybe something weird where they only get to play during our "nights", thus the phase zero was their "D1" (otherwise really boring to have ~13 people sit around for 72 hours?)

no deaths ofc bc it would also suck to kill someone on this side of the work-life balance before we even got to play

all theoretical ofc

someone please tell me the normal # of scum for a 13p, ty in advance

We can't see this thread when logged out, so chances are that the other fourteen can't see this at all. I haven't seen anyone not of the thirteen viewing this thread, which corroborates this belief. Thus, it is likely that what we do here is likely of no effect to the other fourteen.

As for number of wolves in thirteen, three is standard in mountainous, but depending on the power roles and/or possible independents, two and four are plausible as well.

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 5:17 pm Pyxxy town

Elaborate.

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 5:08 pm I will say on background I have not played with many people in this game, or at least not when I cared about games, and simply don’t feel super comfortable making individual reads on air (unlike some people who think they’re good enough to do that).

You don't have to be "good" to make GTH reads. You know what GTH means right? Also, why are you the third person in this game that I needed to ask that to?

Gira wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 4:58 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 4:55 pm
Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 4:38 pm
Ranmilia wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 4:15 pm Aight. Does knowing my first post was a quote from the TV show make you less scared of it?
You already tried to imply this on the first page.

Nervously.

Hi, wolfmilla.
When you have so little in your ISO, the fact that you felt the need to jump on this seems fishy.
why's that?

Out-of-nowhere jumps in a largely fluffy or nonexistent ISO look wolfy

Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 4:38 pm
Ranmilia wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 4:15 pm Aight. Does knowing my first post was a quote from the TV show make you less scared of it?
You already tried to imply this on the first page.

Nervously.

Hi, wolfmilla.

When you have so little in your ISO, the fact that you felt the need to jump on this seems fishy.

Ranmilia wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 4:00 pm
tedxtr wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 3:53 pm im not aware of how much leetic's improved, but a lot of years ago, if he was not being influential, he was a wolf. this is basically a full 180 from that, so i lean village

if he's decided to emulate this as his wolfgame, then godspeed. it's draining

and imo you should put wwa in villa list, it's possible they could've faked their reaction to my mech callout, but it doesn't seem that way to me. i kinda lean a wolf would know exactly what i mean, and not that people haven't posted. if it's faked on the spot then it's a pretty witty frame swap
Yeah the mech is definitely a thing. I suppose we're far enough in now that I can say that's also what I was doing.

@leetic So, remember my first post? It wasn't fluff, it's a quote from the TV show the game is based on, and it has a meaning in context. It was indeed a friendly opener but also it was a probe to see who would recognize it and be familiar with the flavor. leetic, wind and pyxxy all showed they were unfamiliar, Gira seemed to catch it (and also affirmed this signal back as early as p#88 and reaffirmed it recently when ted brought the mech up again).

What exactly are you trying to glean from whether or not people are familiar with the flavor? If the answer is "nothing", it's still fluff

☆Princess Abigail☆ wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:48 pm If I could vote right now I would vote me

Thankfully, the rules disallow that.

WindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:36 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:35 pm Although I will say that I'm beginning to add "thread health" to my list of mafia pet peeves. As long as activity is going on, that shouldn't be a concern.
You mean in terms of thread getting too heated, or thread getting too quiet?

What is even the point of "thread health"? The only time when I would say the thread isn't "healthy" is when nobody's trying

☆Princess Abigail☆ wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:34 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:34 pm I will say that Abby hasn't made an odd push on me like in the last game where she was a wolf. Then again, she may have learned her lesson.
Learned what lesson lol I won

Even though you nearly fell D1?

Although I will say that I'm beginning to add "thread health" to my list of mafia pet peeves. As long as activity is going on, that shouldn't be a concern.

I will say that Abby hasn't made an odd push on me like in the last game where she was a wolf. Then again, she may have learned her lesson.

WindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:29 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:27 pm
WindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:24 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:23 pm Just to clear it up, "planning" doesn't necessarily mean wolves put their openers in the wolfchat and consult with other wolves before posting, although that happens sometimes too. It's more thinking "how do I open without attracting too much attention/while setting up future mislynches/while providing slank cover so I'm not expected to contribute/etc." before they post
I completely disregard any thought of how much attention any of my posts will get. I know I make weird posts sometimes so I just deal with it. No use in being overly worried about it as a wolf if I fuck up just as often as town.
Which of these a player considers is dependent on the player and the game, but arguing otherwise is saying that wolves aren't thinking or playing to wincon
I don't think or play to wincon as a wolf
According to plenty of people, I don't play to wincon as town either tbh

That's cool and all, but 99% of players play to win, otherwise what's the point? Assuming people don't play to wincon doesn't get us anywhere, as any "wolfy" behavior can be excused as town that just doesn't care

WindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:26 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:24 pm This is a pointless discussion, since knowledge of your (and others', if you're a wolf) alignment will inevitably be reflected in your posts regardless of whether you want to or not
Yeah, and my point is, reading people off of whether their openers look planned or not really isn't alignment indicative for everyone.

It's not just planning but the motivation behind doing so. I have planned openers as town before.

WindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:24 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:23 pm Just to clear it up, "planning" doesn't necessarily mean wolves put their openers in the wolfchat and consult with other wolves before posting, although that happens sometimes too. It's more thinking "how do I open without attracting too much attention/while setting up future mislynches/while providing slank cover so I'm not expected to contribute/etc." before they post
I completely disregard any thought of how much attention any of my posts will get. I know I make weird posts sometimes so I just deal with it. No use in being overly worried about it as a wolf if I fuck up just as often as town.

Which of these a player considers is dependent on the player and the game, but arguing otherwise is saying that wolves aren't thinking or playing to wincon

This is a pointless discussion, since knowledge of your (and others', if you're a wolf) alignment will inevitably be reflected in your posts regardless of whether you want to or not

Just to clear it up, "planning" doesn't necessarily mean wolves put their openers in the wolfchat and consult with other wolves before posting, although that happens sometimes too. It's more thinking "how do I open without attracting too much attention/while setting up future mislynches/while providing slank cover so I'm not expected to contribute/etc." before they post

☆Princess Abigail☆ wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:16 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:14 pm
WindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:11 pm
robyn wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:08 pm
WindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:07 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:53 pm
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:51 pm

I like seeing existent discussion between Ran / WWA / Robyn because I think they are capable of coming to reasonably conclusions but I cannot bring myself to pretend that I think such discussions are useful or necessary
What do you think of their discussions thus far? This post is just fluff
I like how leetic is allowed to call other people's posts fluff but for some reason I'm not
you’re allowed, you just haven’t been calling posts “fluff” as effectively as leetic
Yeah but does anyone seriously think the openers from Gira and Ran were indicative of alignment?? Why is that not fluff?
There's a good chance they would have opened differently under a different alignment. Remember, openers from wolves are usually planned, and this sometimes holds for townies as well.
Openers from wolfs are planned?

Holy fuck I've been wolfing wrong this whole time

To varying extents but almost always yes. At the very least, wolves are going to think about how they enter the thread.

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:15 pm Ran will be outed by results and thread position by day 3 at the latest and this is a 27 player game so I’m just not worried

I don't give a rat's ass about D3, I want to know who you find wolfy now

☆Princess Abigail☆ wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:14 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:12 pm
☆Princess Abigail☆ wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:11 pm
WindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:02 pm
☆Princess Abigail☆ wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:45 pm Town Core

Dubz
WWA
Bereft

Begrudgingly Leetic
Why Bereft?
Because Bereft is not doing anything that will accomplish anything except getting him unnecessary attention and push pushback and that's town
So is the argument "too wolfy to be a wolf"?
No TWTBAW literally doesn't exist

The argument is what I said

"He's doing things that make him get unnecessary attention by looking wolfy, wolves would never do this" what else is there to that argument?

WindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:11 pm
robyn wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:08 pm
WindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:07 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:53 pm
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:51 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:49 pm
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:47 pm

yes I’ve given some of them
Not having thoughts is not a thought.
I like seeing existent discussion between Ran / WWA / Robyn because I think they are capable of coming to reasonably conclusions but I cannot bring myself to pretend that I think such discussions are useful or necessary
What do you think of their discussions thus far? This post is just fluff
I like how leetic is allowed to call other people's posts fluff but for some reason I'm not
you’re allowed, you just haven’t been calling posts “fluff” as effectively as leetic
Yeah but does anyone seriously think the openers from Gira and Ran were indicative of alignment?? Why is that not fluff?

There's a good chance they would have opened differently under a different alignment. Remember, openers from wolves are usually planned, and this sometimes holds for townies as well.

Gira wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:13 pmtsp kinda scummy

Do elaborate.

☆Princess Abigail☆ wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:11 pm
WindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:02 pm
☆Princess Abigail☆ wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:45 pm Town Core

Dubz
WWA
Bereft

Begrudgingly Leetic
Why Bereft?
Because Bereft is not doing anything that will accomplish anything except getting him unnecessary attention and push pushback and that's town

So is the argument "too wolfy to be a wolf"?

WindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:10 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:08 pm
WindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:07 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:53 pm
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:51 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:49 pm
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:47 pm

yes I’ve given some of them
Not having thoughts is not a thought.
I like seeing existent discussion between Ran / WWA / Robyn because I think they are capable of coming to reasonably conclusions but I cannot bring myself to pretend that I think such discussions are useful or necessary
What do you think of their discussions thus far? This post is just fluff
I like how leetic is allowed to call other people's posts fluff but for some reason I'm not
Here's the difference: I only call out actual fluff, while you for some reason think that GTH reads are "fluff"
You literally made GTH reads on two FLUFFPOSTS. I still don't understand how you don't see why that's just silly. I didn't say your reads were fluff, I said they were fake. And I said that the posts you were reading were fluff. Get it right.

Why can't you make reads based on fluffposts?

WindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:07 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:53 pm
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:51 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:49 pm
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:47 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:47 pm
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:44 pm Bold of you to assume that me knowing that someone is Schweppes would impact my reads. I have no reads. Besides, I do not know who Schweppes is.
Got any actual thoughts for us?
yes I’ve given some of them
Not having thoughts is not a thought.
I like seeing existent discussion between Ran / WWA / Robyn because I think they are capable of coming to reasonably conclusions but I cannot bring myself to pretend that I think such discussions are useful or necessary
What do you think of their discussions thus far? This post is just fluff
I like how leetic is allowed to call other people's posts fluff but for some reason I'm not

Here's the difference: I only call out actual fluff, while you for some reason think that GTH reads are "fluff"

WindwardAway wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:06 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:52 pm
☆Princess Abigail☆ wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:51 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:49 pm
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:47 pm
leetic wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:47 pm
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 1:44 pm Bold of you to assume that me knowing that someone is Schweppes would impact my reads. I have no reads. Besides, I do not know who Schweppes is.
Got any actual thoughts for us?
yes I’ve given some of them
Not having thoughts is not a thought.
Yes it is

It's just one you don't like
So then I guess not having reads is a read and not having hobbies is a hobby
If you try everything in your might to not have a hobby, then yes, you've made not having a hobby into a hobby.

Doing nothing isn't a hobby, it's just laziness

Search found 1023 matches