The Syndicate

Epignosis wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

S~V~S wrote: "willfully obtuse"? Seriously?

I am laughing at the phrase. It's an oxymoron.

OK, sorry, I am maybe being over sensitive after being essentially called stupid for the second time in a week.

Now really, i should go now

Linki, I know what bukkake means IRL.

Epignosis wrote:

S~V~S wrote: "willfully obtuse"? Seriously?

Well maybe someone can explain this to stupid old me in one syllable words tomorrow, time for me to say good night

Mister Rearranger wrote:SVS, don't be willfully obtuse. Do you think we've all been talking about bukkake for shiggles?

I am not being willfully obtuse, but i bet it is nice being so freaking awesome.

"willfully obtuse"? Seriously?

As i see it, you are just saying that if you are not host killed.

You reproduced a host PM?

And there is this, the only force I can see:

4. Gloryholes: Each night, you may pick a player, and force them to vote for a player of your choice in the following lynch. They may not make it obvious that the vote was forced (ever). If they succeed, you’ll return the favour, making their vote worth 2 the lynch after that. If they fail, any vote they take from that point on will be worth 3. If they succeed the initial forced vote and voted without making it obvious, but then later make it obvious they were forced, you may PM the host with the infraction, and the player will be killed if the host agrees with you.

If the host doesn't mod kill you for that we have a problem with me believing that.

I still think Dom is bad, but maybe you can get some momentum. I love being able to change votes

I will trust FH this and move my vote to INH, it is pointless where it is

Epignosis wrote:

S~V~S wrote:Oh, me too. I feel there is some engineering going on, just as there was in BWTs lynch.

That Aces and INH were eager to jump on reywaS when they themselves were mentioned in FH's analysis is what's doing it for me.

yeah, she pretty much said the same thing:

Flyin' High wrote:I am considering a vote for rey but am wondering why Aces and INH are getting passes as they are also on my list. And I've noticed today they are backing each other up.

This post in particular stood out to me:

AceofSpaces wrote:POwer keeps going out in my house. So I'm voting now for rey. He is the last person the butt could be from FH's list, and when confronted with a direct suspcion he deflected with a joke instead of adressing it. I think he used his powers up because he saw his name being thrown around and thought he didn't have much time left.

Why is rey the last person on the list who could be PB? Did something happen to clear INH that I missed or forgot about?

And same question to INH

insertnamehere wrote:I'm not sure what's going on with SVS vs. Dom, but I find Rey more suspicious then both of them, especially since he's on FH's list. I trust FH and Aces much more then I trust him.

Why do you trust Aces over rey?

I agree that rey is playing a more quiet game and I feel like when he's a civvie he's more talkative, but the stuff between Aces and INH is making me a little nervous.

Flyin' High wrote:

Oh, me too. I feel there is some engineering going on, just as there was in BWTs lynch.

That feels like a very forced made up suspicion, tbh.

LOL< your entire suspicion of me was based on "She seems to be forced".

Not exactly a no u

Epignosis wrote:It smells like somebody farted in here.

Indeed. it could have been Dom

He could be bad, too. I just *personally* feel the Dom thing more.

I can't read him MR all, tbh, he always seems bad to me, so my opinion is fairly useless. And my other game just ended, i have more time to concentrate here.

And you made a better one?

Not sure why not vociferously defending the civ that everyone lynched but me (never voted for him once~) makes me bad.

No opinion on Dom?

I honestly think Dom is behind a plot involving lynching BWT to remove the K4J thorn in his side, tbh.

This whole, "Hmmm who said that first about BWT? " post struck ME as forced and scripted, in light of this:

kneel4justice wrote:

Hedgeowl wrote:

S~V~S wrote:I don't recall that, but that does not mean it did not happen, obv. Generally, I am not a fan of fly bys, and most people are not. I don't recall Sorsha doing this in the past, but lord knows my memory is not all that lol.

I understand not having time and wanting to not miss a vote, but I think everyone should give a reason. Otherwise what is the point of the game? Votes, reasons given are a huge part of the analysis and discussion and where those who prefer pings vibes etc get their vibes from too. So yeah, I dont like no dirve-by, fly-by, sail-by voting.

Dang civvie Ninja! Way to end the Llama wont die saga. Love playing with you Logan! I only wished we had learned his role, but this saves another lynch from being used. Seems like its time for some analyzing.

My current list of suspects: Dom, rey, and DH. I will he back to explore these peeps further and encourage others to do the same.

Can you provide some explanations for your list of suspects? I probably missed them, so a summary would be nice.

As far as Dom, we got off to a rocky start because we were kind of accusing each other under false circumstances. However, I am suspicious of him because I felt like during his vote making decision he was playing confused, it's completely possible that his confusion was genuine, but to me it just struck me as something a scum would do. Later seeing that the following day he voted JJ while he claimed to be suspicious of Llama but not sure it was Llama's baddie behavior, I am very much thinking he was looking for ways to avoid lynching Llama and they could be baddies.
Rey, I haven't paid enough attention to. I will try to work on that, but nothing caught my eye, obviously.
As for DH, I keep repeating it, but he compared himself (?) to FZ, yet was not out of the gates, IMO and I have to wonder why he wasn't? Aside from that I just haven't got any clear townie vibes, or any strong feeling really, and since he compared himself to FZ I was kind of expecting him to be front and center, maybe I expected too much and that is my fault. Not sure!

Aside from those I am concerned about BWT, because he said he wasn't worried about the vote as we had plenty of time (day 1) but yet he ended up randomizing (or self voting) and he just didn't seem to be taking things serious, as I'd expect a townie to. He reminded me of WWE where he gave up but that was so early on that he would have had no reason to want to give up, so either he just doesn't want to be a baddie or it has nothing to do with his alignment.
Then Epi for being so quiet (although I am wondering if this is still in character as far as the I don't care if you suspect me attitude & he just has two major levels, extra quiet and extra talkative), who I now feel better about, but don't know if he is just perhaps on an opposing scum team, so I am keeping that in mind.

kneel4justice wrote:On the phone. I voted BWT. I did not realize people were so suspicious? Do people usually come together for one suspect on this site? In WWE people were so divided, this is new. But I was open to voting BWT and Dom.

Linki~ Non commital attitude? I consistently thought Johns gameplay in his first game did not make him bad in this one, and consistently said that to Llama. Bantering? Having fun makes me a baddie when lots of other people were bantering?

And i really do think it is bad form for baddies to NK each other. like i said in Shawshank where i also bantered and where i was a civ

Also i never even say "RIP", why would I force myself to say welcome back?

Dom wrote:

S~V~S wrote:In what way? I was very sincere, and i want to know why you are finding it otherwise.

It seemed scripted and planned. I don't really know how to expand upon that.

Scripted by who? Me?


I saw someone say something, something I do not feel comfortable pointing out. It leads me to think the BWT lynch was being pushed. Do you have any opinion on that, or just that my one sentence remark seemed "staged"?

Since you are really reading my posts to the point that small nuances leap out at you in this manner, did you notice where i said that I felt K4J was being set up? The main person I saw who might want to set him up would be maybe you, hmmm? Make him gone without having to resort to the "No U"?

Dom wrote:Sorry I've been so absent lately. I've been really busy at school and had some internet troubles today. I hate snow.

TBH, I don't really know where to start. I do think SVS's reaction to BWT seemed very insincere, IMO. But that's nothing much. :/ If anyone can remember who started the discussion on BWT, that might be helpful!

You might have problems saying that yourself, eh? So you needed someone else to go dig up that info.

S~V~S wrote:The cards giveth, the cards taketh away~

Glad to see you back Teef~ based on something someone said, i was wondering who started the case on BWT? We all are to blame, we all voted for him. I was in the middle of a sanctimonious post about how i was OK with my vote when Boo came in and put up the "BWT=Civ" post. But I kinda think this was maybe an engineered thing with vote compulsions perhaps.

What seems scripted to you?

i am voting for you, Dom.

And MR~ why am I on your short list? You think i sound scripted, too?

In what way? I was very sincere, and i want to know why you are finding it otherwise.

OK, I have done some rereading back, with BWT in mind, and the first person to mention him was K4J, on day one, in his very first post. He has been consistent in his suspicion since the beginning; during the Llama/JJ fiasco he said stuff like "The only person i could consider voting for other than Llama is BWT".

For this reason, and becasue of his posting record as a whole, the stuff he has said, the context, i think that possibly there was a plot to kill BWT in order to frame K4J for leading a lynch on him. K4J is cursed, and no one AT ALL bit when i said i wanted to go back and see who was first to mention BWT.

So I will definitely NOT be looking at K4J today, but more likely at those he suspects.

So looking forward to what BWT sees in his catch up as well as Doms explanation for my "insincerity".

Dom wrote:Sorry I've been so absent lately. I've been really busy at school and had some internet troubles today. I hate snow.

TBH, I don't really know where to start. I do think SVS's reaction to BWT seemed very insincere, IMO. But that's nothing much. :/ If anyone can remember who started the discussion on BWT, that might be helpful!

Why do you say that? I used to be able to read BWT like a book, you can ask him. Not so much anymore. I can even pinpoint when it happened. The game at KSite. I had zero read on him that game, and have not really been accurate since.

And like i said, someone said something during the last lynch that got my attention. No target painting here, but i will say that in retrospect it seems to me that the lynch of BWT was a planned pick off. So I am NOT going to work today (a foot of snow, no plows on the horizon) but I do have to go shovel now, but plan to reread this lynch a bit later. There is something rotten in the bukkake and I hope to find it.

The cards giveth, the cards taketh away~

Glad to see you back Teef~ based on something someone said, i was wondering who started the case on BWT? We all are to blame, we all voted for him. I was in the middle of a sanctimonious post about how i was OK with my vote when Boo came in and put up the "BWT=Civ" post. But I kinda think this was maybe an engineered thing with vote compulsions perhaps.

I don't think you want your nose anywhere near pixelated bukkake, lol.

Sorry BWT~ I used to be able to read you pretty well, but your game has evolved, and i guess i have to catch up.

BWT, W, lolol, not BLT. Freaking autocorrect grrr

I have to agree with Epi o.O

BWTs Day One vote was opportunistic, which is how I view bad BLT, also on phone, but want to make sure i vote as I may not be home in time.

*Vote BLT*

Epignosis wrote:I do not understand the poll question.

thats the card question~

And LOL Llama, i have not heard anyone say "Gadzooks" since my Bestafar died (and that was a loooooong time ago)

I don't recall that, but that does not mean it did not happen, obv. Generally, I am not a fan of fly bys, and most people are not. I don't recall Sorsha doing this in the past, but lord knows my memory is not all that lol.

I was talking about Sorsha. She voted but did not post her vote.

I would most like to see FH get it, actually. So I am OK with Sorshas fly by in that respect. At the time I voted for FH, she already had 3 votes.

I really don't love fly by votes, tbh.

Can people be silenced at night? I did not see anything that allowed for that, but i may have missed it? Sorsha voted, but did not post, and she has not posted since Day.

S'ok, I was just like all indignant, I am the only one who answers, and i get the (very mild, true)

I get indignant, lash out and say something stupid, then get all green smiley Thats my major fuck up thing as a player, it is known.

You=MR, DH. Not sure about Dom, I want to trust him but my belief in him is EVER SHATTERED

Mister Rearranger wrote:

Dom wrote:MR, you tried to manipulate Sorsha's posts when you implied she wasn't paying attention and thought JJ was still alive.

I think she made it pretty clear that she knew I was just cracking wise.

Not directed at Dom, but I think a lot of you guys are full of sh*t with your choices tonight. How anyone could be reading DH as civ enough to trust him with some of these lynch manipulation powers is beyond me.

Kill me for this night talkativeness, whatever, but risking a lynch switch coming into baddie hands for use tomorrow seems like THE stupidest move to make right now.

TBH, I don't think I can trust either one of you, lol.

insertnamehere wrote:

S~V~S wrote:Explain the benefits, it looks to me like it would make someone an Indy? Why would that be good, or am I being boorishly literal?

It could be ok if the person we choose is a baddie.

Oh, I see, as a stop gap in case we choose poorly? But if they are a civvie, we lose a civvie, basically? Still think thats a risk I am ok with not taking.

Explain the benefits, it looks to me like it would make someone an Indy? Why would that be good, or am I being boorishly literal?

I looked to see what the powers that corresponded to the lost numbers were, they did not seem to be powers that would overpower anyone (although the people I picked were civvies, IMO) were they to fall into the wrong hands, so i went with the LOST numbers as i like to do.

Is bizarre random behavior more acceptable from some people than others? If Kate were playing, she would have picked 8 too, solely becasue it is 8.

I always pick LOST numbers when there are numbers to be picked. It's a luck thing, I guess.

Aw, you two are so sweet

I will vote the two of you, Bass & FH (neither has given me reason not to) and myself as well, and the first 3 LOST Numbers, 4, 8, 15

Yeah, right? Baddies who won't die are so tedious.

Yeah, i would not want to explain to my IT guy why i am looking at a site featuring the word "smegma" lol.

Yeah, i gotta go with you on this.

Votes Llama

Aw, thats sad Metalmarsh, dying so fast in your first game And gross, too, dying vis smegma yuk.

Biting maggoty corpse

kissing bloated roadkill

Poor John