The Syndicate

COMFORTABLENESS
FORESHADOWED
MAGGOTY
MHO
TEN

I would prefer to lynch Bubbles, tbh.I think her vote was informed, regardless of her past history.

And I cannot say re Typh; I don't think he would play civ or Inmate differently, tbh.

I have said repeatedly that I don't think he's bad. Indy maybe, but not bad.

And I am not after you, but repeatedly saying someone is lying in a Mafia game like that has any meaning whatsoever is pointless. We get it; you think TH is lying about his experience with the Riddler. But speaking about it like it is a *fact* that ALL of us can agree is a fact is somewhat hyperbole to me.

Why do you keep insisting it is false? I think TH sounds more civ than you do in this case.

Glorfindel, I am sorry I was wrong about you.

I understand frustration; perhaps we have more in common than you might think. Whatever you eventually decide, I for one will be happy should you choose to return

Golden wrote:@Mac - I understand why SVS was laughing at my case now. I understand.

One thingI have to say, I do owe apologies to DH & to Mac. I behaved very badly, and I am the person playing this game who should behave the best, not the worst. Telling people to shut the fuck up is inexcusable. And saying things so terrible that I thought I drove Mac off is also inexcusable. I am very sorry, and will work as hard as I can not to do those sorts of things going into the future

Glorfindel, I very often AM irresponsible and self indulgent.

Golden wrote:
S~V~S wrote:
juliets wrote:
S~V~S wrote:What changed to make you think differently?

This whole thing with Bubbles has me very paranoid.
Are you paranoid because you think she might be civ or because you think she might be bad?
I am worried she might be civ. Your ISO ramped that up for me. Since the whole "Let's lynch Bubbles first, if she's bad, then we lynch Glorfindel" thing followed by Glorfindels wide eyed innocence when he questioned why anyone would vote Bubbles makes me very nervous; very nervous, indeed.
I can understand that. I don't object to glorfindel going first. Even if I end up getting lynched for it before bubbles, I think at this point if glorf flipped bad then bubbles is his teammate.

But not if Bubbles flips civ, amirite?

You can understand why I am paranoid, right?

juliets wrote:
S~V~S wrote:What changed to make you think differently?

This whole thing with Bubbles has me very paranoid.
Are you paranoid because you think she might be civ or because you think she might be bad?

I am worried she might be civ. Your ISO ramped that up for me. Since the whole "Let's lynch Bubbles first, if she's bad, then we lynch Glorfindel" thing followed by Glorfindels wide eyed innocence when he questioned why anyone would vote Bubbles makes me very nervous; very nervous, indeed.

What changed to make you think differently?

This whole thing with Bubbles has me very paranoid.

Once again, how many years have you played with Typh? Have you ever seen him save anyone?

Do you have any opinion of Bubbles vote, and how it does or does not reflect on Glorfindel? Her timing was amazing, his wide eyed, "Why would you lynch Bubbles" has me worried she actually IS civ, especially with Goldens promise to lynch Glorfindel if she flips bad.

linki, OK.

I am getting very paranoid about this. I still would rather lynch Glorfindel, and if he flips bad then lynch Bubbles. It just seems so convenient.

Yeah but they were playing.

Theonly person inthis thread less likely to save Sabie besides me is Typh. And DH. Maybe TH.

You get the point. I have only seen Typh actively save a teammate ONCE, and that was Juliets. The only time.

Glorfindel wrote:
S~V~S wrote:My point was that you mischaracterized her post, like you mischarcterize my posts and anyone who suspects you posts.
And to you S-V-S, for the second time today...
Glorfindel wrote:
S~V~S wrote:Let's let Juliets speak for herself. From my reading of her post she said that her first impression was that my performance this game and Star Wars were not similar and then qualified her opinion by saying the context of the two was different. She asked for others to offer their opinions and what happened? Nothing. Surprise, surpise...
Not a mischaracterisation of her post at all. Your strategy of continuoiusly misrepresenting my posts is really becoming quite tiresome.

I am sorry if you find me tiresome. I don't intend it, I just want ot get to the truth of things. I can't say as I did misrepresent, so we must agree to disagree, hrm?

Linki Bye Bubbles

Glorfindel wrote:
MacDougall wrote:
Glorfindel wrote:
MacDougall wrote:
Sorsha wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
Sorsha wrote: I agree with this about MP so I've changed my mind about voting him today. I'm guessing he's an inmate, I don't see him asking for lynch and letting either civ or mafia teammates down like that. Of course that could be what he wants us to think
What changed your mind? I've been asking for my lynch since before you changed it, so it can't be that.
I don't think you're bad and now that you are apparently cured you're more likely to help out/participate. I'd rather vote a low poster than you at this point. Bubbles has been lurking in the thread since I've been around today but not posting.
Sure if you want to put a vote on someone who's not getting lynched go right ahead.
Perhaps not my friend but given the choice of voting for players that I believe to be Mafia and those that I know aren't (my assumption on MP that I'd stated previously) I'll go for players that I think are Mafia EVERY time.
That's all well and good but sorsha has given no indication that she thinks bubbles is mafia so what's your point?
"The Duke of Norfolk: Damn it... Why can't you do as I did and come with us, for fellowship?
Thomas More: And when we die, and you are sent to heaven for doing your conscience and I am sent to hell for not doing mine, will you come with me, for fellowship?"

A Man for All Seasons - Robert Bolt

This was an interesting post. So is this one.

Glorfindel wrote:
Glorfindel wrote:
Glorfindel wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:
Golden wrote:I really wouldn't object to a low/non-poster vote at this point. I remember in Bullets Over Broadway how much trouble that was giving the civilians in the end, having all these people still alive who weren't even there. With Equivocate, ekeknat, Bubbles, Bass and Floyd all being non-contributory, that number is high.
Chrysanthemums tawdrier maid nag.
This is the first remark you've made this Day phase my friend with which I concur...
To clarify, not necessarily THOSE low posters...
I'm REALLY not entirely comfortable with what I see here, Golden. There seems to be a focus in this game not so much on the low posters as it is on the newbies. To illustrate my point, take a look at the TS career posts of the players you named; Equivocate (5), ekeknat (78), Bubbles (195), Floyd (291) the only exception being Bass with a more impressive total of 1732 (despite the fact that I don't think they have posted since very early in the game). Look at the primary candidate for lynching last Day phase - it was me (again, <200 TS career posts) until MP's vote took off. And now there are people looking at Sprityo and while I haven't looked, I'll wager he's in the same boat.

While I agree that having 'non-active' players in the game is a bad thing (and I agree if they could be subbed that would be awesome) I don't see a lot of value in pursuing them at this point other than as you say, to simply thin the herd. I feel it would be more prudent to pursue those players that are somewhat more active and whose elimination is based on some perceived evidence/logic and whose departure may give us something to work with.

And this.

Glorfindel wrote:
MacDougall wrote:
Glorfindel wrote:By the way, if anyone were remotely interested in my take on the GTH process I'd be happy to contribute. I'm guessing that it would however be a complete waste of my time...
On the contrary. It would be an incredibly incredibly valuable thing imo.
Very well...

Bass_the_clever: Good (but deserves a closer look)
Bubbles: Good
Bullszye: Initially good (starting to have serious doubts)
Dharmerhelper: Probably OK
Dom: Not sure but I doubt pure Town
Golden: Town/Town-leaning independent
Glorfindel: Pure as the driven snow
Juliets: Good (pretty confident)
Ekeknat: Likely bad
Equivocate:
Lorab: Town/potentially independent
MacDougall: Good
Matt: Good/potentially independent
MetalMarsh89: Bad
Moving Pictures: Good (and misguided)
Sorsha: Good (but I'd want to look closer on this one)
Sprityo: Independent
S-V-S: Independent/bad
The Floyd73:
Turnip Head: Good (but seriously misguided)
Typhoony: Independent/bad

Golden wrote:
Golden wrote:I'd be willing to vote bubbles. It would actually be a pretty good test... if she is bad, and her team isn't gone, I think I've been wrong about glorfindel all along. If she isn't bad, then what we are losing is someone who has really been too busy to play in this game and so isn't really playing.
How do you feel about this, SVS?

I already voted. I would ask everyone else. I will say that that was the baddiest vote I have seen in, well, rather recently actually, but still it was pretty bad.

Ah I thought it was tonight lol.

My point was that you mischaracterized her post, like you mischarcterize my posts and anyone who suspects you posts.

S~V~S wrote:The next post she made after that one, she said this, Glorfindel:

juliets wrote:I read Pikmin Mafia and Glorfindel's posts did look significantly different - he never appeared frustrated or upset. BUT there is a big difference between that game and the Star Wars game - he never had any pressure on him about being bad. So I don't think I can compare that game with this one.

I'd really like those thinking of voting for Glorfindel to read those two games - it doesn't take long - because I'd like to hear other opinions based on the reads.

Here you go Glorfindel, for the second time today

Glorfindel wrote:
S~V~S wrote:Between work, and Admin-y things, I have spent all of my Mafia time here. I need to go see the other thread, I have barely been in there, so I am going to vote now.

Glorfindel, I think you are a very kind person, a gentleman, and a breath of fresh air. I also think you drew a bad role this game.

*Glorfindel*
My role is not the issue here my friend (as you will see for yourself at some point). The issue is purely the distorted lens through which you and others have and are judging my comments throughout this game. I doubt a single one of you (with the exception of Golden and maybe Juliets) has even attempted to stand back and consider the possibility that I am genuine. I'd like to think that (in that respect) there would be a perceptible similarity between my performance and my Pikmin game. Thank you for saying those nice things about me and I'm sorry but the fact that you can see that and believe that I am bad in spite of that says more about how you see things than it does about me. I've explained ad nauseum to you that the post to which you refer was 'crafted' the way it was out of respect for my fellow players. I could see grounds for your suspicions had you been able to identify some inconsistency with my subsequent posts but you haven't and I doubt you can. It's much the same thing that we've just witnessed with Matt and Golden and that ridiculous Two-Face accusation that has been leveled at me. The fact that Matt interpreted that 'data' he collected in the way he did, in an unbalanced way illustrates well the struggle that I'm having with this game right now in that his first assumption was that I was bad and he interpreted my posts in that way.

Well, you obviously convinced Bubbles, too

And Juliets changed her mind. I posted the post earlier today.

*Teammate sends PM to Bubbles, "you have to get in here & vote, hurry up!!"*

They should have said to make it convincing.

Bubbles wrote:good job on sabie everyone, probably wouldve voted her (he?) as well if i'd been in time for the vote. i feel like im barely in this game but ive been trying to keep up with reading.
anyway voting wayne's manor cause it sounds cozy

This is her last post, Weds night at 5 pm

Holy cow it's Bubbles.

It is not just me, though.

I am going to politely bang my head against the wall, lol.

Between work, and Admin-y things, I have spent all of my Mafia time here. I need to go see the other thread, I have barely been in there, so I am going to vote now.

Glorfindel, I think you are a very kind person, a gentleman, and a breath of fresh air. I also think you drew a bad role this game.

*Glorfindel*

Glorfindel wrote:OK, thanks for the consideration of allowing me to address my technical issues. I'm afraid Dom that I could not reply to you earlier. My keyboard gave up the ghost and would only work intermittently and it took ages to type anything. I was at work on a break when I sent that last message and as much as I'd have wanted to reply to you, it simply wasn't going to happen - I appreciate your patience.

Basically, I agree with what's been said already - the well of newer players being Mafia has dried up. On the law of averages, you'd have to assume that there are one or two more experienced players involved as part of the Mafia families.

On that note, some time ago I was playing a Mafia game where (as Town) I'd concocted this theory on the guilt of one of my fellow players based on their use of certain punctuation in their posts. I was absolutely convinced of their guilt and put my case to the rest of the players in that game. Needless to say I got laughed out of town and rightly so, I was completely wrong. Now please don't misunderstand me here - I fully respect the ability of each and everyone of you, my fellow players and in particular S-V-S. I know we had that run-in early on over my post that you thought was too carefully worded. I think that case was pretty thin (more so than the one I described above) and what's more, it was wrong.

I found your argument with Golden interesting and for better or worse, I think his judgement is pretty good from all accounts (after all, you don't win all those Socky's for nothing). And then, in the dying shadows of dawn, you started accusing me again. You said that you would vote for me because I am not direct in answering questions - and that may be true. I do the best I can to contribute fully and respect each and everyone of you in the face (sometimes) of some considerable provocation. You would do well not to misjudge me for that.

In terms of my vote right now, I think it will be S-V-S. I have an open mind and if someone comes up with a better case before tomorrow morning, I'll happily consider it.

[/quote]

Thank you.

OK, so you suspected me because of the early suspicion I had of you.

You are misconstruing what I said. I said that I suspected you for how carefully you answered someone elses wuestion, writing a big long post to say you trusted Zebra, and then you had to be poked before you would list a suspicion, and you worded it ever so carefully~ it was Matt, the person who suspected Zebra. I suspected you for, not only how carefully you answered, but WHAT you answered. You keep implying it was becasue it was too careful, and I keep correcting you. Same thing as the more recent thoughts on you; you keep saying it is BECAUSE of the comparison with Star Wars, but it is actually becasue of your content. You keep couching it in the terms of Star Wars, not the rest of us.

For me, misconstruing the cases against you are a very big bad tell and it has nothing to do with Meta.

Did anything ever come of your suspicion of Matt, btw? Have you moved past that?

And you also suspect me for suspecting you of being selective & evasive, yes? Well, that still holds true. I would hope you had some suspicions that were not self referential. All of the reasons you had for suspecting me have to do with me suspecting YOU.

And I did see this post, from what you said, I thought there was another one, this one reads like a summary. So sorry for badgering you.

Golden wrote:I think SVS might be a good judge.

At first I was not sure, but either he has been super careful, or he is not a baddie. I don't think he has been particularly careful, so

I am not planning on voting for him.

Glorfindel wrote:
juliets wrote:sprityo, i'm sorry I participated in your lynch. I guess there were just some things I took wrong or misunderstood. I hope you'll be back to play again in another game.

S~V~S wrote:
And I appreciate it when I would not even defend myself that day. I really had just thrown my hands up and said, "Fine, I'll show them" that day, and I appreciate you putting in the effort for me. Yesterday was different. Yesterday the self vote was more of a pressure vote. I wanted to see who would put their money where their mouth was. Golden keeps saying, "I don't know why SVS thinks I am gonna vote for her". Well, I was his main topic of discussion, every post where he mentioned me he mentioned some form of "bad", for starters. And Glorfindel (writing "Glor or Glorf" seems disrespectful to the High Elven, lol) clearly stated he was going to vote for me. I asked 3 tumes for his reasons, finally he said, search my posts. And I did and I could not find it, and asked him to link me to it two or three times,and he ignored me,even though he replied to posts both before & after mine.
Glorfindel, you did say you would vote for SVS and she did ask for your reasons. Why, especially after she couldn't find anything in your posts, did you ignore her request for a link?
Hey, Juliets . Basically for two reasons:

1. I didn't understand what she meant. If she wanted me to copy my post (please refer point 2). If she was expecting something else, I don't know what she expected or how to perform that operation on this site.

2. Given that my post was within a single page of her post, I considered her request vexatious,

I'm happy to cooperate with anyone who shares my desire to have this game turn out right but I'm harbouring grave doubts that S-V-S truly does. I note my question to MP remains unaddressed, I know he probably hasn't been around all that much but out of courtesy, I expect a reply when he does.

I DID look for it, I couldn't find it. I just looked for it again. I can't find it.

Can you please link me to it? I was not trying to be vexatious. And tbh, ignoring people because you find them annoying does not make you look more civvie.

The next post she made after that one, she said this, Glorfindel:

juliets wrote:I read Pikmin Mafia and Glorfindel's posts did look significantly different - he never appeared frustrated or upset. BUT there is a big difference between that game and the Star Wars game - he never had any pressure on him about being bad. So I don't think I can compare that game with this one.

I'd really like those thinking of voting for Glorfindel to read those two games - it doesn't take long - because I'd like to hear other opinions based on the reads.

Golden wrote:
Golden wrote:
S~V~S wrote:I had forgetten that I read somewhere where Golden posted that he does not think drawing targets is an issue any more, iirc?

In any case, no matter what my role is, I am not going to hint at it or confirm it to you.
I didn't ask you to hint at or confirm anything.

Golden wrote:I am saying that, if you are not the Batman, you have been perfectly happy to let my theory that you are lie for days. To me, you are either Batman or bad. The reason I didn't vote for you yesterday, and the reason I'm not today, is that I landed on Batman. If I'm wrong, then the real Batman should vote for you.
These are really straightforward statements.

Then I don't understand what you are saying or why you keep talking about it, about why TH & I ignored your theory. If you did not want me to confirm it, what did you want me to do? I already denied it once

Golden wrote:I am saying that, if you are not the Batman, you have been perfectly happy to let my theory that you are lie for days. To me, you are either Batman or bad. The reason I didn't vote for you yesterday, and the reason I'm not today, is that I landed on Batman. If I'm wrong, then the real Batman should vote for you.

So I am Batman or I am bad? Those are the options?

I don't know what to say here. I am fairly flabbergasted that you have a theory that someone is a civ role, and you want them to confirm it in the thread.

*Forgotten, not forgetten, holy crap. I am on my work computer with a normal key board

I had forgetten that I read somewhere where Golden posted that he does not think drawing targets is an issue any more, iirc?

In any case, no matter what my role is, I am not going to hint at it or confirm it to you.

MovingPictures07 wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:
DFaraday wrote:Linki: I'm kind of unclear about TH too. Everybody seems to be taking it for granted that he's civ and I feel like I missed why.
Maybe it's not being taken for granted. Maybe other players are critically thinking about my contributions and have concluded that I'm playing a strong game for the town. Have you read my posts DF? Have you looked into my contributions? Or are you just sort of skating by and not thinking deeply about what's happening?
This. I have a stronger town read on TH than anyone else remaining solely for these reasons.

This. Initially I was getting not the best vibes from TH, but that cleared up. I think he is very much playing for the civs here. He has been working hard to try to keep us on track and avoid all the tangential stuff he & I saw fragment the civs in GoC.

Golden wrote:
Dom wrote:
Matt wrote:I'm tryin' to get things done, Dom. I'm tryin'.

You still like Turnips? I've never seen such a bad and/or indy player shove in my face how bad and/or indy they are, yet nobody wants to get behind a Turnips lynch. Does everyone still think he's Alfred or something?

Going back to another "confirmed civ", why isn't Mac dead? Sorry, but that doesn't make any sense for him to still be breathing. Derp.
Why do you think TH is bad and who thinks he is Alfred? The case was that he wasn't Alfred.
Despite dropping many hints in that direction over the last few days, there have been a distinct lack of TH or SVS (or anyone else) rejecting my assertion that SVS could be Batman.

I am not, but why would you want me or anyone else to out my role if I was??

I think I have finally achieved clarity

I am fairly sure I have not been to City Hall.

Glorfindel wrote:
Dom wrote:
Glorfindel wrote: Show you that I'm Town, Dom? TH? I'm told that I'm suspicious because of unsubstantiated claims that my playstyle is similar to when I was Mafia in Star Wars. I'm told that I'm not suspicious because I'm not 'hunting' Mafia? Can you not see the blatant hypocrisy of what you're saying? I presented a strong case against MM and apart from two players who at least considered my case, it was completely ignored. I'm being condemned for voting for Sprityo when any number of players voted for him but they're not suspicious. Take for example, Typhoony. The guy has numerous posts and nearly every single one of them devoid of substance. His votes are unsubstantiated. Where is there any questioning of him? Where is the interrogation of the type to which I've been subjected? And you still want me to buy that you two are impartial? I think not.
Your case was not ignored. It was irrelevant because the guy is dead. I don't condemn you for voting sprit. The core of my suspicion has nothing to do with Star Wars-- please read my posts.

Show me that you're town. Stop claiming I'm not impartial and refuting claims that I didn't make and go lynch a baddie-- something you've been hesitant to do all game.
I brought forward my case on MM a day and a bit before he was NK'd and it was ignored. There were probably more players campaigning for my lynching than there was for his. I'm trying very hard to lynch 'baddies' but it's a little difficult when I'm constantly having to defend myself from the false and mischievous allegations that have been constantly directed at me.

In any case, should Typhoony remain with us after the end of this Night phase, I think based on his performance so far this game, he is someone we need to look at very closely.

Typhoony does not write long elaborate posts, true. But he says what has to be said. I have no intention od voting for Typhoony anytime soon. You do what I used to do when I was bad, write long paragraphs of text that don't actually say anything. While I can never hope to be as succinct as he, I have learned alot about getting to the point from him.

Turnip Head wrote:What are you trying to say Golden? That I didn't do enough? After I basically gave myself an ulcer defending SVS the other day, and you replied with "I can't understand why TH is defending her so strongly?"

I made the points in sprityo's defense that he wasn't making himself. I tried to get people off of him and onto other suspects. It's weird that you're acting like I should have done more when YOU'RE the one who wouldn't consider the points I was making.

And I appreciate it when I would not even defend myself that day. I really had just thrown my hands up and said, "Fine, I'll show them" that day, and I appreciate you putting in the effort for me. Yesterday was different. Yesterday the self vote was more of a pressure vote. I wanted to see who would put their money where their mouth was. Golden keeps saying, "I don't know why SVS thinks I am gonna vote for her". Well, I was his main topic of discussion, every post where he mentioned me he mentioned some form of "bad", for starters. And Glorfindel (writing "Glor or Glorf" seems disrespectful to the High Elven, lol) clearly stated he was going to vote for me. I asked 3 tumes for his reasons, finally he said, search my posts. And I did and I could not find it, and asked him to link me to it two or three times,and he ignored me,even though he replied to posts both before & after mine.

So basically I dared the people who suspected me to vote for me. And DH did it becasue DH actually in his heart thinks I am bad. And I can respect that. He is wrong, but he has the courage of his convictions. He made his case, he thought I did not answer him adequately, I said alot of "C'mon lynch me you'll be sorry", and he said fuck that. And he voted for me. Good for him.

Golden & Glorfindel didn't becasue they don't really believe it, imo. They are bad.

Glorfindel wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
Glorfindel wrote:
S~V~S wrote:

This is my point; I am being used as a distraction to draw attention away from the real baddies. And I can think of nothing more tedious that having to defend myself against the same tepid *meh* accusations.

I would like to lynch Spityo or Glorfindel or even Golden. But every time people start diuscussion about others, I come back up. So if you want to lynch a real baddie,do it. But if you choose to lynch me, you will be able to move past it and get the game back on track. Either way, yay civs.
And maybe that is my point too my friend - you see me as bad when I simply am not. I have no idea how I can convince you otherwise - convince you of the truth. The fact that you have self-voted concerns me greatly too.. As I've made reference previously, I think self-voting as Town is irresponsible unless there is some 'greater good' that that may be achieved as a result and I take your point about feeling like a distraction. I may be making a heinous mistake here but I'm not voting for you today. I'd like to look again at your performance this game from more of a holistic perspective - I just want to be certain about that decision (well, more certain).
Lots of empty words backed with no town-minded effort to find mafia.
Thank you MP for that utterly irrelevant assessment of my post. I'd respectfully suggest to you that your limited time and energy would have been better spent addressing the questions that I put to you last night. I think that would be a far more constructive use of your time in assisting our cause.

Why is it irrelevant?

This is my point; I am being used as a distraction to draw attention away from the real baddies. And I can think of nothing more tedious that having to defend myself against the same tepid *meh* accusations.

I would like to lynch Spityo or Glorfindel or even Golden. But every time people start diuscussion about others, I come back up. So if you want to lynch a real baddie,do it. But if you choose to lynch me, you will be able to move past it and get the game back on track. Either way, yay civs.

juliets wrote:S~V~S, I can see you being frustrated one day and voting for yourself but now you've done it twice. Are you encouraging us to vote you because you want out? You haven't sounded like that but then I don't think I've ever seen you vote yourself twice - have you?

I feel that I am a distraction. Every time it looks like we are going to move on, one of the same few people brings me backup again. If I am gone it will force them to move past that. Why else do you think that every time I make a fuss, they back off?

And I am annoyed that people I think are civ, who should know better, can't get over their predisposition to think I am bad.

Oh stop. You can't quit every time I say "Arkham". Besides, you just said this:

DharmaHelper wrote:I won't bring up Recruitment if you don't bring up Gotham :P

This does not imply forever

Let's talk after this game

I have not been bad in either Arkham game, and you can expect nose rubbing for the rest of time about it

Stop trying to compare this to Recruitment. You had info there. You don't have info here,or you wouldnot be saying this.

And you were wrong wrong wrong about me in that game soooooooooooooo....

Go for it

Golden it has to end in jpg or a similar thing.

And it is not just me sayingit, I am just the only onetalking to you.

But I already voted, if you and Glorfindel jump on it, you can lynch me

ha ha ha

Search found 421 matches