Sabiplz wrote: ↑Tue Nov 29, 2022 1:11 am
Wild Dennis has no take on me
You are still in the Pool of Mystery for me, so I guess I don't have one either. You are one of the high posters, but most of them are one line posts, except when Marmot showed, you had some more in depth interaction with him.
For me, you're a bit enigmatic. We've had very little direct interaction (I don't recall questioning you about Marmot as you said in one post, but I didn't go back to look, this is more of an impressions post than a fact checker post), although I do recall asking you about Seanzie after you said his tunnelling post felt off, it seemed so out of character to you that you asked if he was all right. Yet that is exactly what he went on to do, to randomly tunnel someone. Personally, having been in many civ/civ Battle Royales myself, that is how this feels to me. As a random ship in the night, I'm not easy to sink, though.
You are the only one of the people I don't know (you, Lucy, Seanzie & falcon) who is being openly engaging with people, answering question, providing reads on people others may not be familiar with. Seanzie is also doing this a bit, when he's not actively trying to kill me. This makes me feel positive about you in general.
But your reads list is a short list, which makes it a safe list. You don't have reads on many people yourself, but you seem to think it's wild that Dennis has none on you.
I have no reason to think you're bad, and that's how I play, I look for baddies rather than clear civvies, although I'm trying to get better at that, since apparently it's the thing to do now. But I'm a hunter, not a politician.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
@Kate you could also ask me. When I read back over last night, I realized we've not really interacted at all. You've asked everyone else about the Seanzie thing but not me. Unless someone tells me the tunnelling thing is unlike him, I have no reason to think he's bad, if the dog with a bone thing is his norm. I talk alot and it's easy to find something to twist out of shape when a person won't shut up, lol, and I'm aware of that and I expect it. And as a Grade A tunneller myself, I know civs can twist words and meanings as well as baddies. I don't plan on engaging with him any further because two brick walls slamming into each other over and over is no fun for the rest of the thread, not to mention the walls.
But I also have no plans to vote for him, he doesn't look particularly bad to me.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I am keeping my vote on Lucy for now, I see no town reason for actively trying to limit the suspicion pool to three people for reasons unrelated to the thread. That would be like saying, "We should try to be suspicious of SVS, Scotty and Seanzie becasue their names all start with S". It's possible one is bad, but not for those reasons. Again, can't see a town rationale for that.
I'll be following, but will have to try to stay TF out of here today at work lol.
