The Syndicate

Spacedaisy wrote:
nutella wrote:RIP Quin.

G-Man wrote:Feeling pretty confident that there is a baddie in the Llama voters. So ladies, talk me out of voting for you, starting... now!
Can you explain why you think that? If there is, it's not me. Can't speak for the S-ladies.
Just numerically speaking it's not a bad shot, I mean a third of the players were in that list of voters. That said, I don't believe you are bad and I know I'm not bad. That leaves me with Sorsha and SVS.

Well, it is not me and I agree that it is probably not Nutella.

G Man, it would be helpful if you have more than "reasons". I went over your chart and aren't sure how it implicates individuals unless we are looking for a serial killer (or you think the entire bad team is comprised of members of your red group).

Like Sawyer, I took one linguistics class in college and it was more than 8 years ago. So

Re open ended terminology, I do what Nutella is suspected for ALL THE TIME. Open ended terminology is not necessarily baddie. Especially early in game. "He did x, y, and z, which is not a good look for him, BUT I can never read him and he also did a,b, and c, so not sure".

Not being iron clad sure of something doesn't make you bad.

Just like being defensive apparently doesn't make you bad. Sorry Sawyer.

Thanks for no Tie Pool of Death. Lulz for GMan who isn't on the poll and doesn't seem to be eligible for the Tie Pool, maybe not for the rest of us.

Quin wrote:I think one of either DF and sawyer are bad. Just a feeling.

Probably.

I absolutely do not want another tie with the random List of Death, my baybee might be left alone if something happens to me, and I don't want him raised by another

I am going to vote Sawyer, I thought he overreacted with that no u reaction, and Faraday is blendy regardless of affiliation.

I had plans tonight, but I cancelled them this damn cold won't go away. SO for the 4th day in a row, I am gonna grab the nyqil and the remote. Hasta, Honeys.

Dom wrote:
S~V~S wrote:
G-Man wrote:Further more, why wouldn't Nikki/Paulo be just as likely to be a cover as anyone else? If Golden randomized the cover roles again this game, then there's no need to dismiss the notion that Nikki/Paulo could be baddie covers. It would just be a cruel twist of fate that one or two of the most despised characters on Lost got used as cover roles. In fact, it adds a level of meta-WIFOM to it all, now doesn't it?

Hey, being bossy is fun. Maybe we should let Jack and Locke hog all the fun from now on.
Exactly.

You seem to be the one who thinks people are suspect based on their roleplay claims. It seems that you are trying to suspectpeople BASED on their covers, when you say yourself:

If Golden randomized the cover roles again this game
You seem to be the one pushing the thought that this matters. And if Golden randomized it, it doesn't.
Why are you going after G?

I'm not. I was asking him a question. Question =/= "Going After". His line of suspicion was starting to feel wild tangentish to me.

Although in any case, I also did not realize that that part of the OP was about him, I thought it was flavor until I realized he was not on the poll and Golden explained.

You saw this post but missed that one?

I will prolly vote early since I don't expect to be around tonight.

I just noticed G Man is not on the poll.

G-Man wrote:Further more, why wouldn't Nikki/Paulo be just as likely to be a cover as anyone else? If Golden randomized the cover roles again this game, then there's no need to dismiss the notion that Nikki/Paulo could be baddie covers. It would just be a cruel twist of fate that one or two of the most despised characters on Lost got used as cover roles. In fact, it adds a level of meta-WIFOM to it all, now doesn't it?

Hey, being bossy is fun. Maybe we should let Jack and Locke hog all the fun from now on.

Exactly.

You seem to be the one who thinks people are suspect based on their roleplay claims. It seems that you are trying to suspectpeople BASED on their covers, when you say yourself:

If Golden randomized the cover roles again this game

You seem to be the one pushing the thought that this matters. And if Golden randomized it, it doesn't.

Because of that quote, they had them in season 2.

It feels to me like you are trying to manufacture reasons to suspect people. Daisy clearly said the baddies had alibis.

Spacedaisy wrote:... I find G-Man's vote for Quin because he claimed Nikki to be questionable. I was a baddie in season 2 and Golden provided good cover as far as fake role claims. Why on earth would he give them shitty role claims like that this time around? Also, just because a lot of fans hated Nikki and Paulo (I enjoyed their story, it just was not very well written into already established characters. Plus Paulo was some excellent eye candy, if you ask me, lol), that doesn't mean they are baddies.

Quin wrote:
G-Man wrote:Fearing for my life tonight, guys. Without Desmond, who's going to keep death at bay?
Never fear, Paulo's here!

G-Man wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
G-Man wrote:From my notes:

DFaraday = JOHN LOCKE
Dom = ???
Epignosis = ???
G-Man = CHARLIE PACE
notsawyer540 = KATE AUSTEN
nutella = JIN-SOO KWON
Quin = NIKKI FERNANDEZ
S~V~S = CLAIRE LITTLETON
Sorsha = HUGO "HURLEY" REYES
Spacedaisy = ???
Speedchuck = SUN-HWA KWON

thellama73 = DESMOND HUME
insertnamehere = SAYID JARRAH CHARLES WIDMORE
Sure would be nice if we could replace those bloody question marks with names.
I don't understand how I'm ??? at all.
Funny that you didn't bother correcting my false assumption that INH was Juliet. I would have hoped you'd be more forthcoming than that. Perhaps you're not one of us, but rather one of them, hoping for me to discredit myself on a false assumption. Curiouser and curiouser.

Why is this so important to you?

No I think you were pretty obvious.

Knee Jerk no u over defensive reaction from sawyer.

notsawyer540 wrote:About what? I didn't have any suspicions, so I said I was considering voting for INH just because we have differing opinions on aspects of the show. I was mostly dicking around. As far as Quin, that bit's covered in the part you quoted. I misread what Quin wrote and thought that he had said that his role PM didn't specify an alignment because I have a terrible habit of skim reading sometimes.

I do find you suspicious now, however, because of the way your post is addressed toward everyone except me. Seems to me you're trying to convince people to vote for me. If you really had any interest in my response, you would've directed your inquiry about me to me.

Vote DFaraday

I do this all the time. When something about someones post catches my eye, I often talk about it because I am in fact soliciting other peoples opinions. If I am asking for clarification, I will ask directly. If I want to discuss it,I will talk about it.

So I am missing what is so incendiary about this post that Sawyer reacted like this to it.

Wow quiet in here. I have the cold from hell and pretty much sacked after work again.

Bye INH.

I think Dom has had some RL going on this weekend, he hasn't been around our Politics discussion group on FB much either iirc.

I still feel like crap but will have time to reread that weird Lynch. G Man why was maintaining the tie so important to you that you sabotaged Llama effort to save himself?

And Speed, before G man said that Llama switched the vote to you I thought that maybe the two of you had BTSC since you paralleled him pretty closely. Why did you do that?

Boo for the random pool of death.

Bye Llama.

thellama73 wrote:
S~V~S wrote:Llama~

"What is LOST?"

Google results: https://www.google.com/search?q=what+is ... 8&oe=utf-8

Took me 4 seconds

And I will take you seriously if you give real answers and stop goofing around. If you suspect Faraday, then vote for him! You don't feel even remotely sincere to me, and you put someone you don't actually seem to suspect in danger. That concerns me. Even goofing around, when you are sincere this comes through. I am not seeing it.
I don't google things I can ask my friends about. And if I vote for Faraday now, I put my own life in peril, which I am not in the mood to do.

I don't like to bother my friends with trivia, so I Google things. It takes all types to make the world go around.

So you would rather leave your vote on the person who you don't actually suspect, instead of the person you DO suspect, and who you already named as your suspect? Becasue voting for the person you actually do suspect will get you killed, whereas just naming him won't?

I know you like to be quirky and quixotic and cultivate this image, but you make no sense right now. I am Okey Dokey with my vote.

Iam taking another hit of Nyquil and going to bed.

Llama~

"What is LOST?"

Google results: https://www.google.com/search?q=what+is ... 8&oe=utf-8

Took me 4 seconds

And I will take you seriously if you give real answers and stop goofing around. If you suspect Faraday, then vote for him! You don't feel even remotely sincere to me, and you put someone you don't actually seem to suspect in danger. That concerns me. Even goofing around, when you are sincere this comes through. I am not seeing it.

speedchuck wrote:Those who have their vote placed on me:

Is it because you don't like what my actions have been? Or because you think they come from a scummy place. Do explain.

Personally, I think Llama looks scummier than you. He was the first to put a second vote on someone for a silly reason. I can't imagine someone being bad and piling a third silly vote on someone. That is why I voted for him, not you. But I have seen very bold baddies do very bold things to fall back on the wifom.

Are you a bold baddie?

Do you honestly think Sorsha is bad? If not do you plan to move your vote?

thellama73 wrote:Who would you prefer I vote for, SVS?

At this point, I don't particularly know, the votes for Sorsha are the only thing to stand out to me so far. Who do you think I should vote for?

I just really dislike it when people put others in a lynchable position for lulz. Probably an artifact of when we did not have changeable votes.

thellama73 wrote:
S~V~S wrote:I wonder if Sorsha noticed she had three votes when she was in here.

One vote on a person for a silly reason, ha ha lulz. Dropping a second vote on someone for a silly reason, not cool. Dropping a third vote, what baddie would do that?

I hope to see votes moving there or better reasons put forth.

So dropping a temp vote on Llama for lulz. If he takes his vote more seriously, I will too.
I never claimed to be cool.

You know what I mean.

People like you with your wild shenanigans, stay away from my baybee

I wonder if Sorsha noticed she had three votes when she was in here.

One vote on a person for a silly reason, ha ha lulz. Dropping a second vote on someone for a silly reason, not cool. Dropping a third vote, what baddie would do that?

I hope to see votes moving there or better reasons put forth.

So dropping a temp vote on Llama for lulz. If he takes his vote more seriously, I will too.

thellama73 wrote:Quin is the only one in this game talking any sense, so I am following his vote on Sorsha.

You put a second vote on someone becasue the first persons reason ("none whatsoever") was talking sense to you?

notsawyer540 wrote:
Quin wrote:Let me get that classic Quin tinfoil out into the thread now rather than later.

G-Man's role card (as posted in the OP) doesn't specify alignment.

Quin wrote:
notsawyer540 wrote:Thinking about voting Quin because his PM didn't specify an alignment. Also thinking about voting INH because he's wrong as fuck about literally everything except for Sayid. Leaning INH because how the fuck can you be that wrong and not be evil?

huh
Sorry, misread that. Definitely considering voting INH right now.

Really?

And Expose was a good episode, and the best part about was Nikki's death (I felt bad for Paolo).

speedchuck wrote:*suddenly bashful*

I uh... I forgot to vote in the poll, till you responded, but... anyway...

Why did you have to be a smoke monster, SVS?

I'm not a smoke monster, I'm a single mother.

speedchuck wrote:Vote: SVS

You smoke monster wearing human skin. You shall feel the wrath of my mighty characterization!
I'll roleplay something.

I look forward to it.

No don't just tell us. Either read the character synopsis (like for instance, see if they are greedy or are looking for specific things for instance, lol) for character clues. We are all being hella overt, so

Or don't worry about it, it is something we LOST psychos (our original Mafia forum was Lostpedia for MP, Daisy and I,nd many more of us although not all) expect from the unanointed and are really just doing for lulz since LOST brought alot of us together.

One episode of season 3? Or one episode in total?

I hope you are not a friend of that horrible Ethan Rom

He tried to kill Chahleeee and take my baybeeee.

I am curious what all of the non LOST-psychos think of all of this role playing.

G-Man wrote:Funny, I always recall Jin calling them udders.

You all every Butties...

No, in between gazing adoringly at my baybeeee, I seem to recall an occasional "uzzers" especially in the earlier seasons when his english was worse. Udders came after his English improved.

This is fun. Too bad there's a mafia game attached to it. We should just have a LOST rpg thread for when we're bored. I am sure we are gonna annoy the crap out of the non LOST players, lol.

G-Man wrote:
S~V~S wrote:No I was just curious, being able to go 42 minutes at a time without searching for my baybee has given me free time to speculate.
Fancy a picnic? Desmond is telling me not to but that git's been acting odder than usual lately.

You all... You all everybody...

I think he said something about a lightning rod.

No I was just curious, being able to go 42 minutes at a time without searching for my baybee has given me free time to speculate.

Was that random? Or becasue she did not check in yet?

I don't know that Moths have a sense of destiny or mortality. Maybe Chahlee should ask the Doctor?

Chahlee! Where are you?

The Syndicate

Search found 82 matches

Re: Lost Again Mafia (Season 3) - Day 3

Re: Lost Again Mafia (Season 3) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (Season 3) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (Season 3) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (Season 3) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (Season 3) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (Season 3) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (Season 3) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (Season 3) - Day 1

Re: Lost Again Mafia (Season 3) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (Season 3) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (Season 3) - Day 2

Re: Lost Again Mafia (Season 3) - Day 1

Re: Lost Again Mafia (Season 3) - Day 1

Re: Lost Again Mafia (Season 3) - Day 1

Re: Lost Again Mafia (Season 3) - Day 1

Re: Lost Again Mafia (Season 3) - Day 1

Re: Lost Again Mafia (Season 3) - Day 1

Re: Lost Again Mafia (Season 3) - Day 1

Re: Lost Again Mafia (Season 3) - Day 1

Re: Lost Again Mafia (Season 3) - Day 1

Re: Lost Again Mafia (Season 3) - Day 1

Re: Lost Again Mafia (Season 3) - Day 1

Re: Lost Again Mafia (Season 3) - Day 1

Re: Lost Again Mafia (Season 3) - Day 1

Re: Lost Again Mafia (Season 3) - Day 1

Re: Lost Again Mafia (Season 3) - Day 1

Re: Lost Again Mafia (Season 3) - Day 1

Re: Lost Again Mafia (Season 3) - Day 1

Re: Lost Again Mafia (Season 3) - Day 1

Re: Lost Again Mafia (Season 3) - Day 1

Re: Lost Again Mafia (Season 3) - Day 1