The Syndicate

And i do get your point.

Also, ebwop~ teammates actions can implicate people ALL THE TIME. So not sure why you are trying to say that the whole potential BTS tells line of suspicion is without merit because it involves the actions of other people.

I felt that he potentially did not vote for you as you were baddie teammates. I thought that was abundantly clear.

No logical fallacy whatsoever.

I considered a vote for you due to behavior of what i considered to be a potential teammate. Yes.

My main reason for suspecting him is his voting reason paired with the fact that he did NOT vote for the earliest voter (you). Should he come up bad, we can talk. Until then, it is academic.

I did not actually vote for you, MP. My point was that his vote for an early voter that was the SECOND voter, not the first, made me question why not vote for the FIRST early voter. I thought that perhaps he was protecting you, the FIRST early voter. Since early voting seems so suspish to him and all. Which seemed fairly baddie for him, and not a good reflection on you, either.

Like i said, I voted for him, not you, and likely will vote for him tomorrow unless a srs smoking gun type thing happens. If he comes up bad, we'll talk. But surely you can see why I voted this way?

But....that isn't what you said when you voted, you said:

Nevinera wrote:Bah. I forgot it's a speed game again.

I have plans for the afternoon and evening, so I'm going to toss my vote out now after all.
I agree that voting early smells a bit, and I think that baddies are more likely to have read the bad roles thoroughly
(though that's hardly a solid logical leap), so I'm going to vote for gleam now.

No mention of MP having a good reason for his vote, just stating that early voting smells a bit. You don't say it smells unless you give a reason for it, or that drive by votes smell a bit.

Don't you think that someone who has read the bad roles thoroughly could potentially make up a reason for a vote? So not sure how having a reason for early voting excludes someone from smelling due to making an early vote.

Well, this is a crappy result. Don't feel bad, Gleam. Plot your revenge, it's more fun

I am looking forward to hearing Nevins reasoning for voting for the SECOND voter for his early vote. Very much so.

Ebwop, also voted pipe again~ old habits die hard

I agree about Nevin. So there's my vote.

Nevinera wrote:Bah. I forgot it's a speed game again.

I have plans for the afternoon and evening, so I'm going to toss my vote out now after all.
I agree that voting early smells a bit, and I think that baddies are more likely to have read the bad roles thoroughly
(though that's hardly a solid logical leap), so I'm going to vote for gleam now.

So why gleam and not MP who voted first?

This post raises my brow a bit. It makes me want to vote for you, or maybe even MP.

I will be voting from phone at work. Not totally sure where I am looking yet~ initially the Water voter thing was interesting, but when the flaws with it were pointed out, I decided that on its own it did not merit a vote. So I am not feeling MPs vote for Hedgeowl. I will be reading but not saying much (damned work, getting in the way of internet games). Also not really feeling the Vomp/Lizzy thing, I am not sure they would tip their hand so openly if bad~ I think Mongooses comment about their rapport feels right to me.

Linki, well, I know that when I am bad, I have at times avoided voting for the option that benefited me and then pointed out and framed those that DID vote for it. I am not saying YOU did this, but that could be why someone may find you suspicious.

Oh thanks, i missed that, last I heard, I though he wasn't and i have not reread all of today yet, Thanks

OK, so then not so sure I am looking all that hard at Water voters at this early stage. That said, I know someone was wondering about voting orders, does anyone have one? I was at work when the poll ended. I think knowing who voted what could come in handy.

LittleTiger wrote:

Roxy wrote:

LittleTiger wrote:

Roxy wrote:I am wondering why LT, Eloh and Lizzy's voted water tbs!

Is there something wrong with Water? I didn't really know what to choose, so I went with my astrological sign - plus, I like water....

i didnt know what to choose either so inread the roles and noticed sev eral baddies votes will count as 4 if we are in a water area/land. so hence my wondering about water voters.

Oh!!!!!!!!! I hadn't even noticed that LOL! I need to go read through all the roles again and get a spreadsheet going....

Yeah, good catch. i am not immensely familiar with this game, and was not sure what "roles" listed were actual "roles" or what have you. At first I thought there were like 30 someodd roles. But agreed, a deeper read of them would be a good thing at this point.

Also, I think the Kings are civs, right? So Even if baddies might benefit from that choice, mightn't the Water King also vote for it? I am thinking I would not want to vote for a water voter JUST because they voted "Water", but it is something to take into account if there are other factors.

If the Kings are NOT civs, then just ignore me, lol. But they are, aren't they?

Vompatti wrote:I think all plants should be legal to grow and smoke and consume and it's outright insane that they're not k

Once again I remember why you're my hero

I feel squashed

Hopefully someone catches a screenshot, and then posts it to the thread. Or you can make a running tally in a Word doc or a notepad, and fill in the blanks from the thread. Someone will likely post an order.

Mongoose wrote:Thanks for the clarification, Epi!

Quasi OT: And everyone voting pipes: What's up with that; have you all just come from a Seth Rogen film or something?

My computer is on my desk, which has a drawer that contains a box that is full of....well, I've never hidden my stoner tendencies

I have a soft spot for stoners and their paraphernalia~ so voting Pipe