The Syndicate

Epignosis wrote:I don't believe sprityo is so inexperienced that he farked up like that. That shit was planned. Because of course it's the guy who can't be lynched until the other one is gone that we get Day 1 rather than the vulnerable one. So what do you do? He makes a silly slip, his teammate calls him on it, they have a cute little back and forth, everybody believes llama and he lynches everybody one by one to victory.

this makes sense to me. Especially since we know Llama is a fearless Greyhound Pilot when he needs to be.

ha ha ha ha, I like you.

Well, I think this proves that Iam not bad~ If I had BTS with this guy I would have told him to cool his jets, cause mocking, outed baddies just piss people off

lol so glad it isn't just me.

juliets wrote:SVS are you around? Any reads?

S~V~S wrote:The combo of nyquil, fast thread and Ricos syntax (which I have to believe is intentional since his English is flawless) is making my head swim.

I am beginning to think Rico is intentionally trying to be confusing. Not sure why though. It is really throwing me off.

sprityo wrote:
Ricochet wrote:S~v~s, I d1 suss, awwwwwwfullly quiet right currently
That's because with all the pressure you want to put on Jay, SVS gets to relax back in the cool kids club

Silly baddie troll, lol. You are pretty good at it, too.

The combo of nyquil, fast thread and Ricos syntax (which I have to believe is intentional since his English is flawless) is making my head swim.

thellama73 wrote:Vote Glorfindel

Why?

I thought you did not go after low posters anymore?

I think I ate too much poo poo platter, blurgh.

MP? How unexpected.

thellama73 wrote:
juliets wrote:llama how did I end up on your bad list?
I view you as bad by default unless I have good reason to believe otherwise because you are sneaky and rarely lynched.

Sneaky? What?

MovingPictures07 wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:Jay, what do you like about juliets?
I think she looked authentic in that lynch.
Can you point me to something specific?

I thought so, too. And it's a feel, not a specific thing she said.

thellama73 wrote:
sprityo wrote:
Quin wrote:sprityo survived the lynch.

Night 1 has begun. Send in your night actions!

Night ends in 10 minutes.
I feel i should explain this before i get any more accusations since i seem to attract votes like flies to a pile of shit

I am the Snooty Waitress

If it wasnt obvious, my *secret* is a one shot invincibility to the first action upon my life
You're not, because role claiming is not allowed and Quin would have to kill you if this were true. Checkmate.

Good point, plus how likely is it that two roles would have similar powers in a game with only 3 power roles?

Two roles with the same power?

sprityo wrote:Im gonna feel stupid if i got upset over a day that didnt even count

What does this mean?

thellama73 wrote:
S~V~S wrote:Epignosis, is there a name for Llamas logical fallacy?
Yeah, it's the "my game ethics prevent me from saying more, but vote for Sprityo" fallacy. :P

No I meant about what you said about Juliets being bad if Sprit wasn't. That made no sense.

Epignosis wrote:
S~V~S wrote:Epignosis, is there a name for Llamas logical fallacy?
False dilemma.

Thank You! I knew it had a name.

Ricochet wrote:
juliets wrote:I don't understand any of what rico is saying. Rico do you have any reads?
opera

also svs badly

Rico wrongly

Epignosis, is there a name for Llamas logical fallacy?

thellama73 wrote:
juliets wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
Ricochet wrote:that sprityo wagon becoming very icky. juliets particularly wagony
Yeah, if I'm wrong about Sprityo then juliets is deffo bad.
Why?
Because if I'm right about Sprityo then I don't think you would buss a teammate like that.

What does that have to do with if you're wrong? Your logic eludes me here, this seems like some sort of logical fallacy with a name that you would accuse others of had they done it rather than you doing it.

No linki and no poll and head full of Nyquil, I have no idea what's going on.

thellama73 wrote:Although SVS doing what Epi wants is unusual enough to be noteworthy.

he made a good point

Unvote: Made

S~V~S wrote:Vote: MovingPictures

Vote: MovingPictures

Epignosis wrote:
S~V~S wrote:
Epignosis wrote:I refuse to vote anyone just because he hasn't Made it yet. If Made is a civilian, pretend he doesn't exist and interact with people who ARE here. Otherwise you give the mafia an easy path to win.
In this game, OK it moves fast enough that a no show won't affect game play.
I don't know what you mean.

thellama73 for obvious budding up.

It means OK, I will do as you ask, since in such a quick game, the quality of game play will not be affected by low posters or no shows.

What cycle is it?

Ricochet wrote:"misguided" meta readings originate s~v~s = usually that baddie sign

I haveno clue what makes you think that. You do not know me anywhere near as well as you think you do.

When is it?

Epignosis wrote:I refuse to vote anyone just because he hasn't Made it yet. If Made is a civilian, pretend he doesn't exist and interact with people who ARE here. Otherwise you give the mafia an easy path to win.

In this game, OK it moves fast enough that a no show won't affect game play.

Ricochet wrote:
S~V~S wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
juliets wrote:You're doing fine sprityo. The chatzy is the spectator thread. Once we die we can go in there.

Ok MP, let's do it.
Alright, I think Jay is bad.

JaggedJimmyJay
Overeager and forced. Probably scum.
Lol, you think me being overeager is a scum tell? Do elaborate.
After years of playing with you, in your case, yeah, I think it is.
no agreed

Vote S~V~S

Disagreement = baddie?

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I like S~V~S.

I like you too

MovingPictures07 wrote:How did my reaction to your vote seemed forced, S~V~S? It's not.

Overeager more so than forced.

MovingPictures07 wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
juliets wrote:You're doing fine sprityo. The chatzy is the spectator thread. Once we die we can go in there.

Ok MP, let's do it.
Alright, I think Jay is bad.

JaggedJimmyJay
Overeager and forced. Probably scum.
Lol, you think me being overeager is a scum tell? Do elaborate.

After years of playing with you, in your case, yeah, I think it is.

sprityo wrote:
juliets wrote:Did I miss the beginning of Day 1 somewhere?

In case I did, I agree Made isn't here so

vote Made

S~V~S wrote:Voting MADE, he isn't here.

He's not here. Death to low posters. You NKed one for us in GOC, recall?

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
juliets wrote:You're doing fine sprityo. The chatzy is the spectator thread. Once we die we can go in there.

Ok MP, let's do it.
Alright, I think Jay is bad.

JaggedJimmyJay
Overeager and forced. Probably scum.

Yeah, his reaction to my vote was also forced. Didn't like it.

Quin wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
Quin wrote:Voting will have to be done in the thread, because I don't see a way to have shorter deadlines. Votes are changeable, day 0 will end at 7:45am AEST (10 minutes)
It is limited to days (for now), yes.

You could still have a poll, just no end time in it, and then end it once the time has expired. Up to you.
I think I'll just go with in thread votes. Make sure that you all signal your votes by posting in dead red or else I might not see it and it might not be counted. Thanks.

OK, I thought this meant we vote today.

But MPs reaction to this vote caught my eye, so eye on him.

MovingPictures07 wrote:
S~V~S wrote:Voting MADE, he isn't here.
This is an awfully easy vote.

Lynch ends inlike 3 minutes right?

He has not been onsite in a week and at least I voted.

Voting MADE, he isn't here.

I just love Szechuan Veggies!

Search found 39 matches