The Syndicate

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Sun Aug 27, 2017 4:27 pm I'll spell it out for you fine folks.

#72 is a member of three teams.

#44 is only a member of one team.

I am #44, not #72.

Yep for some reason only the passive limitation part stuck in my brain, not the role claim part. I'll vote you now.

(Although I'm still fine voting Ricochet as he continues his gimmick and also apparently doesn't get why being on 3 teams is a good thing?)

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Sun Aug 27, 2017 11:44 am

colonialbob wrote: ↑Sun Aug 27, 2017 10:48 am Which speaking of, I'm not voting for inh. Your role has a limitation because you're on 3 different teams. *That's* your real power - get creative and use it.

Not factual. I'm honestly not at all sure why you came to this conclusion. Do you think everyone's on 3 different teams?

Here's why.

# 72
Alias: Achilles
Source: The number 72 is considered an Achilles Number.
Member Of: Sinister 6’s, Crazy 8’s, Nasty 9's
Power Type: Passive Limitation
Role Description: You may be on three teams at once but you have a weakness. You can only cast the second or seventh vote for any player. Trying to vote any other way will result in punishment.

That's why.

Ricochet wrote: ↑Sun Aug 27, 2017 10:38 am wolves are Marmot and colonialbob and Sloonei and insertnamehere

And I was so close to moving my vote.

I'ma be honest here, I don't really see a need to dig too deep into solving this yet. I think N1 will hopefully get us kick-started as stuff starts happening. Right now it's between "vote the one with annoying posts" and "vote the one who doesn't like their role."

Which speaking of, I'm not voting for inh. Your role has a limitation because you're on 3 different teams. *That's* your real power - get creative and use it.

Finally, because I'm an insufferable hipster (but only in certain very specific niches), I'm going to vote speedchuck's rendition.

Over this gimmick, you guys.

Also not sure why Rico's history of being a civilian doing this shtick (even if it was later proved false) is relevant? No civilians in here. This is the Thunderdome. Or, the children's book version of the Thunderdome.

The fact that I'm in his list is pretty much a non-factor in my vote.

Long Con wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2017 10:17 am Your words are those of one who speaks in prose, the style you use is not quite known to me. Is it the Good Book from which you compose, or is it Chicka-Chicka-1-2-3?

Chicka Chicka boom boom
Chicka Chicka boom boom
An angel came, to Joseph and Mary
Said soon you'll have a holy baby
They had to go to Bethlehem
But so many people, so all full inns
Chicka Chicka boom boom
will there be enough room?

Re: strategy - on the Realms we recently had a game in which each player had two lives, and there were multiple factions (7, I think?), with only a few of them being 'bad' and having a kill. People who hadn't died certainly stood out, but it also made the scum factions harder to coordinate since they didn't want to be open with each other in case one of their teammates died and switched allegiances.

This game is obviously not quite the same thing, since it looks like basically everybody is potentially scum, if they have enough teammates. But it seems that whatever teams don't have kills will be 'town' and trying to root out the ones that do. Of course I haven't actually sat down and figured out how likely the teams are to be active, but I'm guessing evens and primes are the best bet to be 'town' right now.

Hello again, Syndicate! Looking forward to playing with y'all for more than a single cycle.