The Syndicate

I have no clue but you should have seen my reaction when he did. Something along the lines of, "you fucking cheater, who told you?!?" No one did though. It was the craziest thing I've ever seen.

Forthe record Timmer, my timing of my votes were what screwed me but it was due to my work schedule. And my posts on the day I died were all made before I even knew I was dead. So while correct about golden and I being on a team, I intended to cast my vote hoping to live and if I had I would have continued after golden. But I unknowingly missed the vote and was doomed anyway.

I missed the vote by one minute. Not that it would have mattered it seems. I'm a dead woman with a mustache walking. That's a shame...

Oh and golden. I'm not defending MM, I'm calling you out on twisting things. If I do live, I well show you exactly what I mean. In the meantime, I'm tired from work and need to make dinner. Please don't make the mistake of lynching me.

Black Rock wrote:I voted for Daisy because I want to live.

Back at you cowgirl. I don't really want to die frankly.

This is a lot of silliness imo. Yep, I voted turnip day 1. Llama and Epi, did I not just express the same thoughts to the mods about non participants and how it makes the most sense to vote them out rather than let them hang around handicapping the civs? And given all the hub bub around someone as invested in the site as turnip head getting his p score dinged, I don't see why this is such a surprising vote. Given how DDL flipped, yes I can see why that is working against me. But my vote yesterday was not intended to lead a charge on anyone and save DDL, obviously. I was the last voter with minutes to spare. I was making a statement. I don't trust Golden and I think you all would be well advised to not trust him either. More on this later should I live. Because unfortunately to save my life I have to vote BR... I hope you are bad, but I know I'm not.

Splints, you said it would look bad for me if I had voted DDL. This is horse manure. I have many times voted along with a train, regardless of my alignment and regardless of if I suspected them. If I don't see a better reason to vote somewhere else then I certainly will. I voted where I did for exactly the reason I said.

Now, I apologize for not being in here more. Between work and wedding planning it gets the better of me, especially with 24 hour days.

Voting BR.

No Golden, I don't think that particular comment was intended to cast suspicion like you are trying to make it seem. And I don't find your arguments about suspicions thus far to feel very genuine. I don't normally feel that way about you either, thus my vote.

I see DDL is our lynch candidate today.im behind and don't know all the ins and outs of it, but I trust you all if that is the way you want to go. That said, I'm voting for Golden. I said he was my number two suspect and that has not changed. His cases feel very manufactured to me, and very much like reaching,this is not the norm for Golden IMO. Here is the biggest example in my mind:

Golden wrote:RIP TH. "Turnip Head has been put down" sounds way more intense than it actually is.

I have conflicted feelings about that. Would have been better if we caught a mafia, but I do agree with the sentiment that inactive civilians make the game harder for the civs.

The other interesting thing is that, in a game with no roles, it almost sounds like there was a tie between DDL and TH. I wonder if there could have been an extra vote going on somewhere in there?

He cut it after "would have been better if we caught mafia"

But here is my problem, MM was not suggesting suspicion of you, but you made it out like he was. His posts were a commentary on our method for choosing our Day one lynch, nothing about you. You seem like you are looking for something that can be painted bad rather than actually suspecting someone naturally. Sorry man, I'm just not buying it.

I'm casting a statement vote on Golden. I think after the DDL lynch we should take a serious look at him.

fingersplints wrote:Sorry I should have reread that. SD said she didn't understand the case on DDL not TH
That's where my suspicion comes from. I think she misrepresented the points on him. My reason for suspecting him had nothing to do with what she said

Well then that proves my point that I don't understand the case on him, because that was the impression I got from the thread yesterday.

I'm having ipad issues. Irritating.

Here are my thoughts thus far...

Roxy and Splints: I don't find anything weird about their statements regarding MP and I don't find it weird how they have stated them or been in agreement. It pretty much lines up with what I have seen of them in the past. They are always thick as theives so I don't find any reason to suspect them here.

Golden: I kind of agree with others about you. You seem to be reaching with your suspicions. That said, civ Golden can be a great guy to keep around, so I want to be sure before I cast a vote for him. But I will be keeping an eyeball there. You are probably my number two option today.

DDL: I don't understand this case. Because he assumed a host would modkill someone who did not put up an avatar he must be bad? Have we asked the host for confirmation about what would happen? If she is going to modkill MP, then I can totally see DDL being suspicious. but if she is not I don't really get what the basis of this case is.

Missing Person: I see why there are those that would want to lynch him. His lack of avatar cripples any advantage we have to suss out the baddies through the use of the questions. We can neither incriminate him nor clear him. However, he is here, or at least trying to be. So I would like to give him at least this first cycle to see if he gets an avatar up.

Turnip Head: My vote is likely going here. The reason being that he is simply not here at all. If we wait until tomorrow's lynch to eliminate him then we risk him getting his P Score dinged, because I believe I read in the beginning that you can only miss two lynches this game. He has clearly been AWOL from everything here, so I have to assume he can't be here for whatever reason, so I think he is the best lynch today. Additionally, I take the stance that a non participator only hurts the civs. If he is a Civ, he is not using his vote so it is essentially lowering our numbers by one by default. The baddies are not going to kill him, because he helps them. My vote is going here.

Timmer, I ain't even mad.

votes TH

thellama73 wrote:

G-Man wrote:

thellama73 wrote: The probability of any player being bad is therefore 4 / 12 = 0.33, so the odds of lynching a civilian from a random vote are 2/3.

Just curious- shouldn't that be 4/16 with a 75% chance of lynching a civilian?

Yes. You passed my clever test.

G-Man wrote:

thellama73 wrote:Guys, an awful lot of people haven't even checked in yet. Settle down.

Um, no. The only player who hasn't posted yet since this thread went live is TurnipHead.

My bad. I forgot the Hedgeowl and Spacedaisy were here since they vanished after the first page.

Missing Person still has no avatar.

Dude, I have to work you know... I am currently catching up on my lunch break and will post properly when I get home tonight.

Roxy wrote:I cannot stop giggling every time I see Daisy's avatar

Lol, mission accomplished! I like how I see George in the background of yours.

So many more left to be resolved...

There is no such thing as right click on the iPad. I'll get Alex to copy the picture and upload it to photobucket. I'll link it here for everyone once he does. If that's ok...

Is this picture uploaded somewhere else? Itis too big to view on my iPad. Mobile devices often cut some ofthe pictures off in viewing, so it might be helpful to more than me.