The Syndicate

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 6:10 pm I think LC is Mafia based on that result. I say we just lynch him again.

Yes Taco me.

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 4:57 pm Did I miss Glor claiming town again or something?

Glorfindel wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 4:46 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 4:44 pm Glorf: "dont rezz me"
Also Glorf: *votes Long Con because he doesn't want to be lynched

I’m Town and you damn well know it.

As Town, it’s my job to try to stay alive - God knows why, I’d be quite happy to be out of this mess

Glorfindel wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 4:46 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 4:44 pm Glorf: "dont rezz me"
Also Glorf: *votes Long Con because he doesn't want to be lynched

I’m Town and you damn well know it.

As Town, it’s my job to try to stay alive - God knows why, I’d be quite happy to be out of this mess

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 4:45 pm [VOTE: Long Con] aubergine

JJJ is probably scum. Glorf is not. JJJ knows glorf better than me. He's defending Glorf for townie points or from genuineness, not to decieve. Either way, Glorf has to be town.

JJJ and glorf are NOOOOT W/W. Impossible. I promise.

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 4:38 pm Speed braintwinning me all over the place. Cfd Jay w me?

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 12:44 am

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 12:28 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 12:17 am

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 12:14 am

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 12:03 am

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 12:00 am (okay, that was a fun exercise, and in doing it I guess there wasn't quite as much suspicious content as it felt like there was. I think my point about LC is the one most worth considering.)

Ok, you do it. Discuss reasons why Colin might do that.

Well he could be town wanting to get confirmed, but as Quin pointed out, why? He's barely even been suspected at all until now -- and what's more, he had just pointed out his fear that rezzes were either gone or in the wrong hands. If he's town he can't count on a rez, by his own admission. He can only rely on a rez if he's bad and knows his team has one. Whether he has some way to appear civ upon flip, or whether his team will rez him as a confirmed baddie, I can't say, but there doesn't really seem to be a town explanation.

Ok, thank you. That seems remarkably similar to my own post that is your top suspected post on the Page of Sin.

No, don't think so. You didn't point out the thing I did that if he's town he can't count on a rez. Your post painted much more of a bleak picture of a baddie fooling us all with a fake flip, and so I came out of your post interpreting more of an overall thesis of "don't lynch Colin he's tricking us" whereas I am saying we should just lynch him because he's bad and if he has a fake flip we'll just have to deal.

The "baddies have the rez" thing wasn't on my mind, that's true. Since we're analyzing Colin's intentions here, I'd say it wasn't on Civ!his (did I do that right?) mind either. So it's debatable whether that's useful.

Both our posts discussed Civ reasons for his play, and found them coming up short, and then we both looked at benefits of doing it as a baddie, with a nod to a possible Seemer aspect in his lynch. How does my post "paint a bleak picture of a baddie fooling us with a fake slip" when yours says "Whether he has some way to appear civ upon flip..." yet presumably avoids those connotations?

Anyway, be that as it may, I can't help you reading my post that way, but I don't recall having a huge "don't lynch Colin" push in that post. My post was geared more to discussing a couple of things and leaving it for Colin to take up before going further.

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 12:31 am

Quin wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 12:19 am

nutella wrote: ↑Sun Nov 04, 2018 11:59 pm big post with long con in it

I didn't get that subtle defence or whatever from LC at all. Dunno how you interpreted it that way.

So anyway why isn't your vote on Colin? same goes for @Long Con

I have found Colin's play pretty strong so far, and I have no intention of voting him because I can create a theory about his strange request that shows him as bad. Like I said, that wasn't the purpose of my post - to vilify Colin. I want him to respond to it before I decide anything.

I don't really have any suspicion of Colin apart from it.

Glorfindel wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 4:27 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 4:21 pm @Sloonei

Vote elsewhere.

No, I will

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 4:13 pm Yeah sure [VOTE: Glorf] aubergine

The only reason not to do it is because I suspect Jack some, and there's no way this is a bus.

ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 2:00 pm Town: DH, timmer, Jay, Epi, Glorf, Sloonei

Luna and LC are baddies

Later nerds

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 2:00 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 1:58 pm Claiming argument aside, what has Glorf done to convince you he's town?

Nothing really.

I don't care if you make a Glorf case. He doesn't look great. Just leave out the claiming bit.

speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 1:57 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 1:55 pm He ignored the suggestion for everyone to post "I am town" for a truth checker to have more to work with.
He replied with this sad, emotional plea to Colin's suggestion that we ask Glorf if he's bad:

Glorfindel wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 2:26 am

ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 9:08 pm So who’s going to ask Glorfindel if he’s bad?

To be honest, this whole mess had completely slipped my mind. It’s hard for me to know what to do here - do I refuse to answer and get lynched by a rabid Town or answer it and put a target on my back Night 1? Either way, I guess it suggests a short stay for me this game...

Reason I'm okay with pushing a Glorf lynch is because if he is town, he won't let us lynch him without saying so.

Ew no.

It kinda ruins the game for Glorf to town-claim or not town-claim. It's a dick move by all accounts, and it's been encountered in several games.

We aren't pushing Glorf into claiming. Leave that out of any cases you make.

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 1:38 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Mon Nov 05, 2018 1:34 pm Here's my GTH list. Throwing this out so I can start to organize my thoughts:
Owner/Sloonei - good
Epignosis - good
JaggedJimmyJay - good
JackOfHearts - good
Quin - good
Bullzeye/Speedchuck - good
Kara - good
Timmer - good
Poutanko - good
ColinIsCool - bad
Sprityo - bad
nutella - bad
MacDougal - bad
Glorf - bad
DharmaHelper - bad

And long con??

Glorfindel wrote: ↑Mon Oct 29, 2018 2:26 am

ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Sun Oct 28, 2018 9:08 pm So who’s going to ask Glorfindel if he’s bad?

To be honest, this whole mess had completely slipped my mind. It’s hard for me to know what to do here - do I refuse to answer and get lynched by a rabid Town or answer it and put a target on my back Night 1? Either way, I guess it suggests a short stay for me this game...

Quin wrote: ↑Sun Nov 04, 2018 3:09 am

nutella wrote: ↑Sun Nov 04, 2018 2:54 am

Quin wrote: ↑Sun Nov 04, 2018 1:04 am i don't deserve to be townread so i am suspicious of anyone who is doing so

I periodically remember that you are playing this game. You've been thoroughly forgettable and I'm not sure I could name more than one opinion you have had in this game, the one being suspicion of Mac (which I share). I wonder if I should be worried about that. I don't have much of a handle on your meta at all really. Luna's take resonated with me a bit, about expecting you to be more... abrasive. I know you can be abrasive as scum too (*cough*FE) and perhaps conversely you can be more chill as town. Also I agree with Sloonei that this very post is a good look.

i've felt as though you've been in my corner for most of this game though i have absolutely no idea why. you haven't explicitly said this, but joining me on the mac train even though my own reason was so lacklustre and then gth reading me as good makes me feel this way and this feeling is not great.

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sun Nov 04, 2018 1:47 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:58 pm

Spoiler: show

timmer wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:55 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:51 pm

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:47 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:46 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:44 pm the difference between this game and the last game as far as number of opinions from me goes is that in the previous game the few opinions I had were confident and also correct with little basis required up until maybe like day six.

I defended players I knew were civs and voted for my own teammates because I could, and because it was easy, and it made me seem trustworthy to basically everyone except long con. In this game I have few opinions because I've only read like 1/3 of the pages

Did Kylemii just scum-slip?

whaddya mean

He gives a comparison:
Last game (scum): confident opinions, defended players who were civ, voted for his teammates, acted trustworthy
This game (unknown): I have few opinions because I haven't been around.
Not: I have few opinions because I'm town.

So... Ugh... Luna, is that a serious case? Like, you legit think his word choice here is a scumslip? Or is this a desperate attempt at a case to take pressure off of you...

Honestly, no. My use of the term "scum slip" was a little heavy. I just wanted to point out that Kylemii's excuse for not "being on top of things" was because he's "busy."

JUST when I thought I could clear Luna :/

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Nov 04, 2018 3:32 am

Spoiler: show

Lisa and Isaiah

Things INH said to/about Lunalee:

LIKE!

INH used Luna's vague gripe against me as a springboard to promote his own previously-stated suspicion of me. K.

Spoiler: show

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:49 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:36 pm

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:21 pm

juliets wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 3:38 pm I just read through INH and I don't see any reason to call him a civ. There wasn't a lot there and he seems to be missing after saying he would try to be here more on day 2. Low performing INH in my experience = bad INH. I could see a vote there unless I'm missing some good reason not to.

alrighty now catching up, but literally popped into the most recent page to post about how I'm townreading Kara the most and wishing that JJJ was in one of his moody self-loathing moods instead of his SUUUUUUUUUPATOWN (PAY ATTENTION TO THE WORDS I SPEAK) moods. Not sure if/how that impacts his alignment, but he's certainly TALKING VERY LOUD, and making GRAND SWEEPING DECLARATIVE STATEMENTS ABOUT THE PROPER WAY TO PLAY MAFIA. It's like he tried posting differently on D1, got a negative response, then reverted back to his standard shtick.

Then, I see this stupid post by Juliets. Juliets, you're a lovely person, and a wonderful fixture in this community, but this is like the second game that you've pushed this weird forced "low-posting INH = bad INH" thing. It's dumb. I'm at a point in my life where my mafia time is limited. I have just finished another game, and started the sign up process for a game that I'm hosting. Yesterday was a holiday. This thread is, in standard Full Job fashion, too damn long. There's no way that I could be whatever the fuck you'd call a "high performing INH" right now. My level of activity is dependent on the length/density of the thread, the amount of games I'm concurrently playing/hosting, and the things happening in my life. Not what alignment I am. So, please kindly stop pushing this idea. It irks me.

Still have like 6 pages to get through. Will continually update with more commentary.

PS: Day 1's are, have been, and always will be random garbage-y crapshoots barring major fuckery.

nutella wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:25 pm Okay, inh is town

Nutella is too quick to buy INH's response. I get that he's busy and has limited time for mafia. But when he does have time to post, his content still pings me as not fully genuine. Maybe I'm just a skeptic, but giving commentary on what's happening in the game, giving out fluffy/non reads, defending your own meta, and using the "busy" excuse, however true it may be, just makes me more inclined to suspect that you are scum.
So far INH's reads are Kara is town, JJJ looks a "tad suspicious," and Owner should be lynched.
I currently think Kara looks suspicious, and see no reason to town read him. Sort of agree with the JJJ thing, and disagree that Owner should be lynched.

well gee wilikers, I'm sorry that my opinions aren't enough for you Luna. Not sure where the hell you got the "fluffy non-reads" from. Scumreading JJJ, Owner, and Juliets currently. Townreading Kara, because her responses to folks attacking her sound hella genuine to me. Apologies that my ""busy" excuse" just makes you more inclined to scumread me. You're certainly entitled to your own opinion.

If you want to unduly dismiss everything I've said in this game and view it in the most negative possible light for no other substantive reason other than "I'm a skeptic," then, well, you can certainly choose to do that.

There's something awkward about this exchange which I am finding difficult to describe. INH was snarky in his response to Luna's beefs as he often is, but it feels a bit different in this case. In his sarcasm he is accepting of Luna's suspicion ("You're certainly entitled to your own opinion" / "you can certainly choose to do that"). Note the first sentence that I have highlighted: this is a characteristic response by INH to an accuser, but does it fit the accusation? Luna suggested INH's pings are not fully genuine, but not that they're "lacking" or "unsubstantial" or the like. The latter terms apply more to INH's response re: "aren't enough for you". The disconnect makes this read more manufactured than INH's similar snark as he handled Long Con and myself, for example.

This is a crucial exchange to assess if you are going to label Lunalee a mafia teammate of INH. It covers three posts for each of them, and mutual suspicion is being exchanged throughout. I think the language they use here is compatible for mafia teammates, but it doesn't scream at me. Indeed, moments of doubt are preventing me from harshing too much on Luna's vibe:

INH's "based on my dastardly practice of providing commentary on the thread" -- appeal to emotion junk which belittle's Luna's suspicion

Luna's "But lol, you don't feel great about nutella for her quick flop on you, but "I started it" by expressing my suspicions?"



I hope others will chime in on this exchange. The read can probably be reduced to this point, and it's a tough call.

Spoiler: show

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 2:39 pm

timmer wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 2:15 pm

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 2:11 pm I looked over Luna's posts in U-Pick and Mega Man (mafia in both). It's difficult to identify any tonal differences with this game. In terms of content, I do observe that in her mafia performances she was inclined toward individualized player analysis, in the forms of large quote compilations, ISOs, or thorough reads lists, in a way that isn't quite as visible here. Her hunting activity is more reactive and less self-constructed.

Luna is definitely reactionary right now. It reminds me of my earlier mafia career where I would freak out once I realized that I was being eyed. But she seems to be flailing with no idea of an overarching goal. Vote bullz. Don't vote bullz. But vote bullz. But maybe Kara. But no bullz... it's dizzying.

This. Her 3 targets that she's focused on, Bullz, Kara, and me, have all been easy suspicions to come by, and mostly feel like her hopping onto easy suspects already mentioned by others. She criticized me for having too few/weak reads, and only providing "commentary" to the thread, while she herself has been guilty of all of that.

I always read willful hypocrisy as a scumtell. Other folks I'd be down to lynching: Glorf, Owner, and maaaaaybe JJJ. Need to read up on all of three of them before I decisively side against them.

[VOTE: lunalee] aubergine

INH continued to dump on Luna for taking the easy way out and hypocrisy (the latter accusation being an absolutely false representation of their content comparatively). Lunalee was pretty lynchable on Day 2, so this vote is important. It's difficult to assess relative to the Soneji wagon which sprung up late. Bullzeye might be a more accurate counterwagon at this moment.

Things Lunalee said to/about INH:

Luna LIKEs my case on INH

Lunalee was one of the first to acknowledge my suspicion of INH, and it actually took a while for anyone else to give a shit (the only other response I saw in a quick skim was DH making fun of it). I think that's decent for her. The thing was basically forgotten within ten minutes of my having posted it, and she brought it back.

Spoiler: show

Lunalee wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 1:15 pm Changing my vote to kara, because timmer's on board with it. And because no one shares my INH suspicions.

This one's not ideal. At least one person definitely shared the INH suspicion (the one who made the case she agreed with). There was enough time left in the day at this point to promote the lynch of any player on the roster.

Spoiler: show

Lunalee wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 4:01 pm

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:57 pm Who buys INH as a civilian?

I'm not really sure how to read INH, but he sure didn't appreciate my suspicions of him yesterday. Feel free to go back and look.

Lunalee wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 4:16 pm Once my life is no longer endangered, I will happily join the INH lynch

I don't know what point Luna is making in the first post there. She has stated her suspicions, but this one seems to be a reversion to neutrality (at least in the specific language employed if not necessarily in spirit). The second one bugs me a bit, as at that point there were about 80 minutes remaining in the day. Self-preservation isn't so crucial with that much time remaining and numerous players present playing the game. Push the lynch you want as long as you can. This might be more of a strategic gripe than one which is indicative of alignment.

~~~

Conclusion

This is a very mixed bag. I think INH's posts are barely good for her, and Luna's own posts are barely bad for her. If they're teammates then their distancing effort was thorough. It strikes me as relatively plausible.
Luna at least needs to answer for her handling of INH late in Day 2, per the last two points in this analysis.

nutella wrote: ↑Sat Nov 03, 2018 9:31 pm [VOTE: jigglyjameeljafar] aubergine

he's most likely inh teammate fight me

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Nov 03, 2018 8:55 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 4:30 pm Soneji has done little but try to get me lynched. GTH, they could be scum, and I am very okay with this train.

Name one person besides yourself who could not be bad.

nutella wrote: ↑Sat Nov 03, 2018 4:51 pm Oh wow I was wrong about all three of those people. RIP juliets and kyle, bye baddie inh!

Lunalee wrote: ↑Sat Nov 03, 2018 4:40 pm

juliets wrote: ↑Sat Nov 03, 2018 1:32 pm I just re-read timmer and found a couple of things about Luna like her Kyle slip opinion (though she kinda backed off that) and timmer's questions about her Bullz vote/not vote that I don't see an answer to. I need to re-evaluate my statement above that she is good by re-reading her which may not happen today.

let me know if you have any questions!

juliets wrote: ↑Sat Nov 03, 2018 1:32 pm I just re-read timmer and found a couple of things about Luna like her Kyle slip opinion (though she kinda backed off that) and timmer's questions about her Bullz vote/not vote that I don't see an answer to. I need to re-evaluate my statement above that she is good by re-reading her which may not happen today.

juliets wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 8:34 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 8:21 pm So who was last to vote Soneji? @juliets ? Did ya get a hallow?

I didn't but was I the last one to vote?

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 4:47 pm Soneji vote looks fine to me, but I'll stick on Luna.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:57 pm Who buys INH as a civilian?

timmer wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:55 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:51 pm

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:47 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:46 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:44 pm the difference between this game and the last game as far as number of opinions from me goes is that in the previous game the few opinions I had were confident and also correct with little basis required up until maybe like day six.

I defended players I knew were civs and voted for my own teammates because I could, and because it was easy, and it made me seem trustworthy to basically everyone except long con. In this game I have few opinions because I've only read like 1/3 of the pages

Did Kylemii just scum-slip?

whaddya mean

He gives a comparison:
Last game (scum): confident opinions, defended players who were civ, voted for his teammates, acted trustworthy
This game (unknown): I have few opinions because I haven't been around.
Not: I have few opinions because I'm town.

So... Ugh... Luna, is that a serious case? Like, you legit think his word choice here is a scumslip? Or is this a desperate attempt at a case to take pressure off of you...

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:47 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:46 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:44 pm the difference between this game and the last game as far as number of opinions from me goes is that in the previous game the few opinions I had were confident and also correct with little basis required up until maybe like day six.

I defended players I knew were civs and voted for my own teammates because I could, and because it was easy, and it made me seem trustworthy to basically everyone except long con. In this game I have few opinions because I've only read like 1/3 of the pages

Did Kylemii just scum-slip?

whaddya mean

Kylemii wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:44 pm the difference between this game and the last game as far as number of opinions from me goes is that in the previous game the few opinions I had were confident and also correct with little basis required up until maybe like day six.

I defended players I knew were civs and voted for my own teammates because I could, and because it was easy, and it made me seem trustworthy to basically everyone except long con. In this game I have few opinions because I've only read like 1/3 of the pages

juliets wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:41 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:37 pm

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:08 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 2:49 pm Imma fight Jimmy for lying or being wrong on Luna and Nutella.

what, Jack. WHAT.

Luna is town and Nutella is scum. That’s what.

What do you see about Nutella that makes you think she is scum. Someone brought up earlier that she has been very bold this game which seems more likely civ.

juliets wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:38 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:35 pm

juliets wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:12 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 9:50 am

juliets wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 9:15 pm @Lunalee I missed that you had voted INH so I guess he is one you think has been laying low, much like I thought.

I also suspect Kara, because he hasn't said much.

I'm just catching up...

Lunalee what about Kyle or lapluie?

Kylemii impressed me with his scum game last time we were all scum together. I got lynched early on, but Kylemii survived until the end with hardley any suspicions. He mostly laid low, hopped in and looked good when he needed to, and sat back and won the game. Because of this I do not feel confident in giving Kyle a town read.

As far as I can tell, Lapluie isn't playing. She posted "hello, checking in" and hasn't been back since to post or vote. I'd rather she get a replacement than us resort to lynching an inactive.

So Luna, the reason I asked about Kyle is for me he falls into that category of not saying much - mostly just popping in to get opinions. So I just wondered why he wasn't one of the people you named?

timmer wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:36 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:28 pm

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 1:52 pm Lunalee, I am unclear why you are suspicious of karavalenge. If you've already explained in detail just direct me that way, or please do so now. It strikes me as a very easy selection (as does Bullzeye).

See my response to Timmer. I suspected Kara, but then found a post of theirs that made me want to back off. That's why I moved my vote to Bullzeye instead. As far as Bullzeye being an "easy" selection, that may be true. And if that's the case I don't want to join an opportunistic band wagon. I'll be around for the next hour or so and hope to have a confident vote by then.

But you've said previously that you think there is at least some thread/game evidence to support a bullzeye lunch, so if you believe in it, why be hesitant about your vote just because it may also appear opportunistic? I mean, if you think he's bad... why would you move your votr, potentially?

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:33 pm The real world keeps punching me in the face this week, and it'd be super if I could get me a mafioso corpse tonight to forget it all.

juliets wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 3:12 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 9:50 am

juliets wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 9:15 pm @Lunalee I missed that you had voted INH so I guess he is one you think has been laying low, much like I thought.

I also suspect Kara, because he hasn't said much.

I'm just catching up...

Lunalee what about Kyle or lapluie?

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 1:52 pm Lunalee, I am unclear why you are suspicious of karavalenge. If you've already explained in detail just direct me that way, or please do so now. It strikes me as a very easy selection (as does Bullzeye).

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 1:45 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 1:43 pm

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 1:41 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 1:41 pm I don't want this to look like a "no u" but I am keeping my eye on DH

Who cares what it looks like? What is your current read on DharmaHelper, go.

Okay, give me a minute.

That's not how this works. Take a stance immediately.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 1:41 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 1:41 pm I don't want this to look like a "no u" but I am keeping my eye on DH

Who cares what it looks like? What is your current read on DharmaHelper, go.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 1:40 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 12:08 pm @karavalenge @DharmaHelper @ColinIsCool seeing as how Owner requested to be replaced, does that change your stance on wanting her lynched? There are better trains to jump on today. Just saying.

Which are the better trains?

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 1:38 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 1:34 pm

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 1:32 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 1:26 pm

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 1:18 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 1:15 pm Changing my vote to kara, because timmer's on board with it. And because no one shares my INH suspicions.

Mkayyyyy gonna vote Luna here in a bit I'm sure.

wow DH, sorry I don't agree with all your opinions and such, but it's no reason to lynch me.

Snarky passive aggressive defense very town.

You know, last time you tunneled me until I got lynched, you were scum.

Do you read DH as scum then?

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 1:32 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 1:26 pm

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 1:18 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 1:15 pm Changing my vote to kara, because timmer's on board with it. And because no one shares my INH suspicions.

Mkayyyyy gonna vote Luna here in a bit I'm sure.

wow DH, sorry I don't agree with all your opinions and such, but it's no reason to lynch me.

Snarky passive aggressive defense very town.

timmer wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 1:20 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 1:15 pm Changing my vote to kara, because timmer's on board with it. And because no one shares my INH suspicions.

Do you have specific thoughts on Kara that mirror mine? Or you think strongly that I'm civ so will follow my vote? I'm hoping it's the former, as I am civ but it doesn't mean my reads are correct.

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 1:18 pm

Lunalee wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 1:15 pm Changing my vote to kara, because timmer's on board with it. And because no one shares my INH suspicions.

Mkayyyyy gonna vote Luna here in a bit I'm sure.