Search found 257 matches
Return to “Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]”
- Fri Feb 11, 2022 2:56 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 2]
tbh only NAA strikes me as a mechanically minded player here.
- Fri Feb 11, 2022 2:52 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 2]
I feel like I'm being pushed mostly by everyone rn. Probably because I'm failing to get any concrete read.Marmot wrote: ↑Fri Feb 11, 2022 2:50 pm
Imo, every now and then DrWilgy does blatantly towntell in games, otherwise he's hard to read. I don't see that here, but he could still be either alignment.
It just occurred to me that the three lowest posters in the game: sig, Spacedaisy, and DrWilgy, are pushing Creature, and for slightly different reasons.
- Fri Feb 11, 2022 2:46 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 2]
Urist seems confident on this?Urist wrote: ↑Fri Feb 11, 2022 12:32 pmnanook knows my meta well enough to townread me here so posting more than the bare minimum just makes the thread more difficult to read.Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Fri Feb 11, 2022 11:51 amAnd you think he knows that because... ?NotAnAxehole wrote: ↑Fri Feb 11, 2022 11:49 amMy point isn't that your opinion doesn't matter, it's that... Assume Urist knows he's not getting shot, his posting so that people can read him better is really meaningless.Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Fri Feb 11, 2022 11:44 amAnd he has no way of making informed decisions unless people post and participate.NotAnAxehole wrote: ↑Fri Feb 11, 2022 11:42 am Sorry, but this is objectively false, Nanook has the gun. LOL
Also if you are gonna just spend the game quoting people and telling them "lol all you said don't matter since you don't have the gun", I'll just ignore you because that isn't useful and isn't funny.
- Fri Feb 11, 2022 2:44 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 2]
Okay. I think I'll give sig the medal of participation.Marmot wrote: ↑Fri Feb 11, 2022 2:43 pm I don't think that sig is necessarily town, but he has made more attempts at finding scum today than a few other players, namely Urist and DrWilgy
Spacedaisy falls in the same boat.
I agree that sig's attempts are not impressive, though I will acknowledge he has little to work with. On the whole, this game is very low-volume right now, and generating content seems to be difficult for a lot of people in this game.
I'd be ok shooting sig, I also think there are marginally better options today.
- Fri Feb 11, 2022 2:44 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 2]
Someone should be able to read DrWilgy here I guess. Just skimmed their ISO and it looks pretty lackluster.
- Fri Feb 11, 2022 2:41 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 2]
Yep. Just checked Michelle's ISO and it was mostly minimal talking about mech and one pocket attempt towards NANOOK.Marmot wrote: ↑Fri Feb 11, 2022 2:40 pm
Michelle had 6 posts and 4 of them were void of any interactive content. There wasn't much to analyze.
- Fri Feb 11, 2022 2:40 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 2]
What's up with Urist?
- Fri Feb 11, 2022 2:38 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 2]
DDL I kinda trust Dyslexicon's townread on him and also the fingersplints kill looks way straight to the face if it was done because she was wolfreading DDL.
I think sig's spew dive left me unimpressed tbh.
- Fri Feb 11, 2022 1:26 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 2]
At least we got lucky with Michelle
- Fri Feb 11, 2022 1:25 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 2]
I know. Whenever I try to do something it feels like a waste.Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Fri Feb 11, 2022 12:47 pm Yeah this game isn't gonna be fun to play if half the plauers are gonna go "nothing matters just let nanook do everything"
I guess I gonna stop posting for today then and let nanook do everything.
See you next phase.
- Fri Feb 11, 2022 9:58 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 2]
One can pretty much talk about mechanics yet recognize wolves' easiest thing to do is talk about mechanics.
- Fri Feb 11, 2022 9:57 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 2]
[VOTE:
hollowkatt] aubergine
tbh
tbh
- Thu Feb 10, 2022 10:35 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 2]
[VOTE:
Spacedaisy] aubergine
- Thu Feb 10, 2022 10:33 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 2]
sig and Spacedaisy makes sense thenNotAnAxehole wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 9:54 pm I don't know how valuable night kill analysis is going to be - other than it's not a mechanically minded mafia team.
- Thu Feb 10, 2022 10:32 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 2]
Perhaps this might just be an easy game.
I'm okay with sig and Spacedaisy shots.
I'm okay with sig and Spacedaisy shots.
- Thu Feb 10, 2022 9:51 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 1]
I think it calls attention a lot to DDL because fingersplints' only perceptive stance was her wolf read on him.falcon45ca wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 9:49 pmHow do you read the MK?Creature wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 9:11 pmLooks very blatant if they killed her for suspecting DDL.hollowkatt wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 8:53 pmok, so fingersplints was a dodge kill?Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 7:30 pmDDL is 100 % town. I'd bet this and my three next games on it.Creature wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 7:22 pmfingersplints was mostly on DDL. If wolves bothered to ISO her then this might be a WIFOM kill.fingersplints wrote: ↑Wed Feb 09, 2022 1:14 pm I think DDL is most suspicious so far today, for his comments in regards to falcon. It very much reads like maf throwing out some early confirmed town reads.
[VOTE: DDL] aubergine
- Thu Feb 10, 2022 9:11 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 1]
Looks very blatant if they killed her for suspecting DDL.hollowkatt wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 8:53 pmok, so fingersplints was a dodge kill?Dyslexicon wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 7:30 pmDDL is 100 % town. I'd bet this and my three next games on it.Creature wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 7:22 pmfingersplints was mostly on DDL. If wolves bothered to ISO her then this might be a WIFOM kill.fingersplints wrote: ↑Wed Feb 09, 2022 1:14 pm I think DDL is most suspicious so far today, for his comments in regards to falcon. It very much reads like maf throwing out some early confirmed town reads.
[VOTE: DDL] aubergine
- Thu Feb 10, 2022 7:38 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 2]
What do you all think about falcon btw?
- Thu Feb 10, 2022 7:38 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 2]
I thought him being stubborn with plans and complaining about NANOOK being the dictator felt town tbhDyslexicon wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 7:36 pmWhat about Guillo's derp galore, any feels from that?Creature wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 7:35 pmIt's probably for a stupid reason. I need to recheck.
Guillo felt fine but he says he's pretty tricky as wolf.
- Thu Feb 10, 2022 7:35 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 2]
It's probably for a stupid reason. I need to recheck.
Guillo felt fine but he says he's pretty tricky as wolf.
- Thu Feb 10, 2022 7:33 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 1]
Tempted to sheep you on thisDyslexicon wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 7:30 pmDDL is 100 % town. I'd bet this and my three next games on it.Creature wrote: ↑Thu Feb 10, 2022 7:22 pmfingersplints was mostly on DDL. If wolves bothered to ISO her then this might be a WIFOM kill.fingersplints wrote: ↑Wed Feb 09, 2022 1:14 pm I think DDL is most suspicious so far today, for his comments in regards to falcon. It very much reads like maf throwing out some early confirmed town reads.
[VOTE: DDL] aubergine
- Thu Feb 10, 2022 7:25 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 2]
falcon might be another townread I'm wrong
- Thu Feb 10, 2022 7:25 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 2]
I remember reading DrWilgy, Marmot and Urist town from last EOD.
- Thu Feb 10, 2022 7:22 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 1]
fingersplints was mostly on DDL. If wolves bothered to ISO her then this might be a WIFOM kill.fingersplints wrote: ↑Wed Feb 09, 2022 1:14 pm I think DDL is most suspicious so far today, for his comments in regards to falcon. It very much reads like maf throwing out some early confirmed town reads.
[VOTE: DDL] aubergine
- Wed Feb 09, 2022 7:44 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
- Wed Feb 09, 2022 7:44 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 1]
I townread these two posts for some reason.Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Feb 09, 2022 10:10 amNanook is a good wolf hunterCreature wrote: ↑Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:36 amI hope NANOOK is a good wolf hunter then.Urist wrote: ↑Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:31 am Rethinking this. It might not be worth trying to save anyone other than Nanook. In terms of actual value gained by saving other people, we would need 3 successful saves in order to increase our number of miselims from two to three.
Given this, I'm tempted to say we should just do the d3 method because it's prob the only one everyone will be able to understand.
11 v 4 --> Mislynch --> 10 v 4 --> Odd-night nightkill --> 9 v 4 --> Mislynch --> 8 v 4 --> Even-night nightkills --> 6 v 4 --> Mislynch --> 5 v 4 --> Odd-night nightkill --> 4 v 4
I think it's gonna be extremely hard for town to win if all nightkills succeed.
This is the worst case scenario and I doubt it will be like this, so we should do this every day depending on the flips to check the gamestate.
I think defending Nanook and scumhunting in the classic way should bring us the win
- Wed Feb 09, 2022 7:41 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 1]
Top priorities:
1. Be towny
2. Find town
3. Find wolf
1. Be towny
2. Find town
3. Find wolf
- Wed Feb 09, 2022 7:07 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 1]
Bit stressed out. But I think I can play for now. I hope our wolf hunting is going well.
- Wed Feb 09, 2022 12:59 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 1]
I'm probably looking at Dragon + Dyslexicon + one of the mech talkers (NAA/HK/Guillo/maybe Urist).
- Wed Feb 09, 2022 12:58 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 1]
The easiest thing for wolves to do is to talk about mech. It's a little sad we focused so much on mech talking and couldn't even have a proper game start to have an idea of where to go.
- Wed Feb 09, 2022 12:51 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 1]
How are we doing non-NANOOK saves by the way?
- Wed Feb 09, 2022 12:46 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 1]
Lying/bluffing shouldn't be a problem. We should just treat this game as a vanilla game and wolf hunt normally instead of trying to read save targets.
- Wed Feb 09, 2022 12:45 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 1]
I think we shouldn't so wolves can't count how many saves we used.falcon45ca wrote: ↑Wed Feb 09, 2022 12:41 pmDo we claim what we roll so we know who's on Nook? I'm not a big mech play guyUrist wrote: ↑Wed Feb 09, 2022 11:03 am Alright so what we're doing is rolling 1d100, and if you get AT LEAST this high a number, you save Nanook:
Odd NightsEven NightsCode: Select all
# of Living Pandas Save if you roll at least this number 10 66 9 63 8 60 7 55 6 50 5 45 4 33 3 25 2 15
Code: Select all
# of Living Pandas Save if you roll at least this number 9 60 8 55 7 50 6 45 5 35 4 25 3 10 2 1
- Wed Feb 09, 2022 12:37 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 1]
I think if there are only 2 living giant pandas you always save NANOOK if you have any save left.
- Wed Feb 09, 2022 10:43 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 1]
I think Marmot and sig can be town too
So I have for town:
falcon45ca
Marmot
sig
Urist
That leaves:
Dragon D. Luffy
DrWilgy
Dyslexicon
fingersplints
Guillotine
hollowkatt
Michelle
NotAnAxehole
Spacedaisy
So I have for town:
falcon45ca
Marmot
sig
Urist
That leaves:
Dragon D. Luffy
DrWilgy
Dyslexicon
fingersplints
Guillotine
hollowkatt
Michelle
NotAnAxehole
Spacedaisy
- Wed Feb 09, 2022 10:01 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 1]
Trash pandas don't have a block assuming the setup is open.
Worst risk is we nominate a trash panda to protect NANOOK, in which case we'll rely on our randing.
- Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:36 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 1]
I hope NANOOK is a good wolf hunter then.Urist wrote: ↑Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:31 am Rethinking this. It might not be worth trying to save anyone other than Nanook. In terms of actual value gained by saving other people, we would need 3 successful saves in order to increase our number of miselims from two to three.
Given this, I'm tempted to say we should just do the d3 method because it's prob the only one everyone will be able to understand.
11 v 4 --> Mislynch --> 10 v 4 --> Odd-night nightkill --> 9 v 4 --> Mislynch --> 8 v 4 --> Even-night nightkills --> 6 v 4 --> Mislynch --> 5 v 4 --> Odd-night nightkill --> 4 v 4
I think it's gonna be extremely hard for town to win if all nightkills succeed.
- Tue Feb 08, 2022 11:45 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 1]
A vanilla nightless town EV is calculated through [NUMBER OF TOWN PLAYERS - NUMBER OF MAFIA PLAYERS]/[NUMBER OF TOTAL PLAYERS] so an 11:4 nightless town EV would be: [11 - 4]/[15] = 46.67% or wolves EV = 53.33%.
Of course, the wolves EV should be slightly lower than that considering one of the town players is confirmed.
- Tue Feb 08, 2022 10:33 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 1]
I think I'm only liking falcon45ca and Urist right now.
- Tue Feb 08, 2022 10:24 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 1]
Alternatively we can nominate one player (on odd nights) or two players (on even nights) to protect NANOOK and everybody else rands their shots incase the nominated players happen to be wolves.
- Tue Feb 08, 2022 10:22 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 1]
What about 70% chance of not saving NANOOK and 30% chance of saving NANOOK? That's like 3% chance of wolves winning if they shoot NANOOK in one night and 20% chance if they shoot NANOOK in eight nights.
Though, to be honest I'm not counting the double kills on even nights.
Though, to be honest I'm not counting the double kills on even nights.
- Tue Feb 08, 2022 10:13 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 1]
I confess NAA's plan looks a lot less complicated. Would have to calculate how many doc shots are going to be used per night though and also add the % for saving non-NANOOKs.
- Tue Feb 08, 2022 10:12 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 1]
Mountainous hype
- Tue Feb 08, 2022 10:09 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 1]
Not opposed to this. Waiting 48 hours for a flip feels unbearable.NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Feb 08, 2022 10:05 pm I'm gonna shoot at 24 hour mark every day, first person to complain about it or call it anti-town gets shot today
- Tue Feb 08, 2022 10:08 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 1]
I am tired of talking about mechanics, to be honest. Can we settle on a strategy that protects NANOOK and towny non-NANOOKs but saves enough shots for lategame?
- Tue Feb 08, 2022 9:53 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 1]
We should still do some non-NANOOK saving because we're likely losing if we only protect NANOOK. It's 11 v 4 and wolves will get 3 kills every two nights.
- Tue Feb 08, 2022 9:50 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 1]
I think players who expect to die early should be doing the saving, while players who expect to survive longer should try to save some of their shots.
- Tue Feb 08, 2022 9:50 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 1]
Wolves can kill somewhere else and that can accelerate their win condition, especially because they're getting two kills in even nights. So we'll need some non-NANOOK saves.NotAnAxehole wrote: ↑Tue Feb 08, 2022 9:45 pm Ok, so basic risk calculation indicates that if we all roll 3, and we only save on a 3 (1/3 of the time)... There's a 1.7% probability of mafia winning instantly with a shot on Nanook -> This isn't a viable shot for them.
If we maintain a ~1.5-2% chance each day (just need to calculate the numbers for each amount of pandas), every scenario, should be trivial...
That gives mafia about a 7% chance of winning in by day 4 (exclusive targeting Nanook), 13% chance with 8 days of targeting...
This is a very good number for town, and I think Nanook can kill mafia faster than this.. I have not calculated the probability of us running out of saves, but I would probably do that privately...
Nobody ever saves anyone but Nanook, and nobody ever claims saves.
- Tue Feb 08, 2022 9:47 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 1]
We run the risk of running out of saves though. It's better we coordinate so we can save some for lategame.Guillotine wrote: ↑Tue Feb 08, 2022 9:46 pmYou know what i think about plans? They help wolves, what if we just do whatever the fuck we want and be unpredictable, that way the wolves cant predict our moves, yah? Cool!Creature wrote: ↑Tue Feb 08, 2022 9:29 pmI thought about something like this:
Odd-nights: wolves have one kill. Therefore, we nominate three trusty players to protect NANOOK and everybody else rolls a dice (1/3 or 1/4) to protect someone else they expect wolves would try to kill.
Even-nights: wolves have two kills. Therefore, we nominate four or five trusty players to protect NANOOK and everybody else rolls a dice.
I think one strategy is to make players who expect to die earlier to save first. I think the trusty players should be those most likely to be nightkilled early and the everybody else, instead of a dice, decides if they're likely to die (either to nightkill or lynch) and if they are they protect someone they expect wolves to nightkill.
- Tue Feb 08, 2022 9:42 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 7]
- Replies: 1269
- Views: 56196
Re: Pandas vs Trash Pandas [Day 1]
Also I hope this day doesn't become just mech talk. Other than the doc things, this game is pretty much somewhere between mountainous to nightless vanilla. We'll need oldschool wolf hunting.