The Syndicate

All the other wagons = me and Falcon basically

Creature wrote: ↑Sun May 01, 2022 12:13 pm
Alison wrote: ↑Sun May 01, 2022 12:06 pm
Alison wrote: ↑Sun May 01, 2022 12:06 pm
Creature wrote: ↑Sun May 01, 2022 11:59 am I'm unsatisfied with today. It feels like most players just voteparked somewhere.
Yeah, which is why I said to hold people accountable if they're around at EOD and sit on a vanity wagon
You are on a vanity wagon yourself funnily enough
I could be voting Porscha but not sure they're wolf

I think Porscha has significantly higher wolf equity than all the other wagons that I think have a decent chance of making it through.

Alison wrote: ↑Sun May 01, 2022 12:06 pm
Creature wrote: ↑Sun May 01, 2022 11:59 am I'm unsatisfied with today. It feels like most players just voteparked somewhere.
Yeah, which is why I said to hold people accountable if they're around at EOD and sit on a vanity wagon

You are on a vanity wagon yourself funnily enough

Creature wrote: ↑Sun May 01, 2022 11:59 am I'm unsatisfied with today. It feels like most players just voteparked somewhere.

Yeah, which is why I said to hold people accountable if they're around at EOD and sit on a vanity wagon

Marmot wrote: ↑Sun May 01, 2022 9:53 am Oh, one portion I do disagree with. I don't think Creature TMI'd Nanook, and I'm uncertain where you see that Alison.

Creature TRed Nanook for making super NAI jokes. He has since explained the reason for TRing Nanook (the "sup" comment) and while I think it's a silly reason it's not wholly inappropriate for a page 1 read and I have accepted it as a defense against my charge of TMI.

srceenplay wrote: ↑Sun May 01, 2022 11:04 am
Marmot wrote: ↑Sun May 01, 2022 10:41 am I do have a qualm with srceenplay, he stated Creature and falcon as his wolfreads in his first post, and has been committed to those reads ever since. I do like his early take on falcon.

srceenplay wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 2:41 pm
Alison wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 2:00 pm
srceenplay wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 1:44 pm I’ve read page 1
Creature and Falcon are scum so far.
Why Falcon?
Fake questions and fake fluff.
It’s early RVS but still feels fake.
Page 3 or 4 they where also talking just to talk. Trying to fake a purpose.

Sean looks belligerently stubborn town.

Allison looks town that wanted to progress past Sean but is not feed up.

But I don't like the inflexibility, and don't know why he suspects Creature, because he hasn't talked about him at all. Can you explain that one srceenplay?
Probably not well enough.
Just a gut read.

Haven’t talked about anyone else because no one else feels that off to me.

End of day I could probably vote Allison just because if enough people are doubting them it might be worth sorting now and not be worrying about what ifs later. Still have them more of a town lean though.

To be clear, only Seanzie is holding an active scumread on me. Both Creature and Marmot have walked back their townreads and now townread me, Nanook has said he doesn't know my alignment and is just sheeping Seanzie, and Porscha has said they don't buy Seanzie's case on me.

You should still choose a vote between the top wagons since falcon isn't (and imo shouldn't) going over today, so voteparking him achieves nothing. I am informing you of this so you can't say "I just wanted to resolve a consensus scumread" on D2 if I die today.

Just got back from the airport and am unpacking.

[VOTE: Porscha] aubergine for self pres since it seems like there isn't much time remaining and I doubt I can fully catch up in that time.

Legacy is to get more out of Wilgy/Mizery/DOO D2, policy Seanzie and do not relent on it if I end up flipping, and to hold people accountable if they sit on vanity wagons at EOD since I wasn't a fan of the 1/1/1/1 stale thread state.

Toodles.

One, to see who you'd vote, if given the choice. Two, because I'm afraid you're refraining from making commitments, even temporary ones. Three, because if you're town it's mathematically optimal - it decreases the % of total votes that come from wolves.

I think you should make a vote.

Porscha wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 11:41 pm
Alison wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 11:38 pm Creature has had some posts I like. I townread Nanook's vote hopping. Fair point about Mizery.

[VOTE: Mizery] aubergine

What made you reluctant to hop on board, actually? You said yourself that you can change it any time and you thought there was a wolf between us.
b/c I'm not confident in sean's mega heavy push. he keeps saying you're outed but I don't get how.

What's your read on Seanzie, then?

Creature has had some posts I like. I townread Nanook's vote hopping. Fair point about Mizery.

[VOTE: Mizery] aubergine

What made you reluctant to hop on board, actually? You said yourself that you can change it any time and you thought there was a wolf between us.

Who do you suspect Porscha? Are you still on one between me and Sean?

Porscha wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 11:29 pm alison there's no way you see so many worthless day 1 posts from others and think that mine are worth voting me over. doesn't make sense

Which other users have an ISO comprised entirely of worthless posts?

Porscha wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 11:11 pm
Alison wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 10:55 pm [VOTE: Porscha] aubergine
*misremembers*

*gets voted*

That's not why I voted you. I voted you because all your posts have done nothing while attempting to sound like they are doing something.

[VOTE: Porscha] aubergine

Porscha wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 10:30 pm
Creature wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 7:51 pm
Alison wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 7:22 pm What do you make of my suspicion towards you, Creature?
I thought your case seemed logical more like the one you made against me on GoC instead of the case you made on that mountainous you and Mac were wolves.
as if alison wasn't also wolf in GoC lol

I was town in GoC.

What do you make of my suspicion towards you, Creature?

Creature wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 7:07 pm
Alison wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 7:00 pmI am also suspicious that nobody at all has shown interest in the point that he might have TMI on Nanook.
It's not necessarily TMI. I kind of expected NANOOK to post a certain different way as wolf, hence why I townread him. However, it's a very weak read and I had it as my third out of three in terms of strength (DrWilgy > falcon > NANOOK). I was looking to get something started so I townread those three and felt you and/or Seanzie were more likely to be wolves based on entrance.

What's your opinions on the reactions you garnered with your reaction test?

And how did you expect Nanook to post as wolf?

[VOTE: Creature] aubergine

Brief thoughts, as wifi is laggy.

- I am not impressed by Creature basically trying to shoehorn in a claim that he is unable to confidently claim town as wolf. I am also suspicious that nobody at all has shown interest in the point that he might have TMI on Nanook.

- I think people are giving Seanzie way too much credit for his aggression, when it has mostly taken the form of a one-note attack against me. This is the easiest kind of aggression to fake, and you are severely underestimating Seanzie's wolf game if you think he is incapable of faking it.

- Nanook's blatant sheeping of people is NAI, but his showing interest in shopping around rather than lazily parking a vote on me and peaceing out is kinda villagery.

- Not convinced by the falcon wagon; the man's done nothing wrong.

Creature wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 6:38 pm
Porscha wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 6:36 pm
Creature wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 6:32 pm
DaughterOfOmega wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 6:30 pm
Creature wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 6:30 pm I ain't even a wolf so this is a plus.
What a wolf says
but can a wolf ever say they're town with confidence?
I would think so lol
Perhaps. It's just that I tend to overestimate the players being able to read whether I sound genuine or not as wolf.

This is a really weird exchange.

If I were to receive mod confirmation that Seanzie was town, I'd plant my vote firmly on Marmot. #195 seems like a crude attempt to egg on V/V violence in that world. Obviously I am not convinced Seanzie is town, but you seem to think we are V/V, so I am surprised you haven't given a thought to Marmot at all. When I townread both sides of a loud conflict, I often look for people egging them on.

srceenplay wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 2:41 pm
Alison wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 2:00 pm
srceenplay wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 1:44 pm I’ve read page 1
Creature and Falcon are scum so far.
Why Falcon?
Fake questions and fake fluff.
It’s early RVS but still feels fake.
Page 3 or 4 they where also talking just to talk. Trying to fake a purpose.

Sean looks belligerently stubborn town.

Allison looks town that wanted to progress past Sean but is not feed up.

Talking just to talk just seems like falcon in general to me, rather than a hallmark of him as wolf specifically.

What do you think of Marmot?

srceenplay wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 1:44 pm I’ve read page 1
Creature and Falcon are scum so far.

Why Falcon?

Marmot wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 11:14 am I have seen seanzie distance from his teammates before on Day 1 as wolf. That said, his interactions with Alison go far beyond that, and I think it is both not w/w, and also sean looks town from them and Alison looks mildly scummy from them.

Alison did add a disclaimer about activity in her first post, but didn't seem to commit to playing fluffy until sean accused her of it.

My playstyle decision was made prerand.

Why do you read Seanzie as V and me as W off it?

Porscha wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 6:03 amThey never do

Not even on FoL? They love derpclears there, iirc.

I don't accept that derpclear, though.

Porscha wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 5:59 am wouldn't it be f unny if sean got like the 3p role and it's just executioner, target: alison

I have a hunch that's not what's happening.

Seanzie wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 5:47 am
Alison wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 5:43 am
Seanzie wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 5:39 am
Alison wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 5:36 am
Seanzie wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 5:35 am
Alison wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 5:07 am In Lost in Space, you engaged in argument with two players you felt were outed wolves (me and Mac) for dozens of pages. Your argument was critical to burying us and showing that our thought processes were artificial.

Why do you now have a policy of not engaging with people you think are outed wolves?
Again, good try. You're outed though.

We need to flip Alison. They are outed.
On the contrary. I think you'll find that I am very much "inned".
Then explain your thoughts on me. In detail. This time tell me gun-to-head what you think my alingment is and explain my behavior.
Right now I believe you are mafia who has committed too deep to your narrative. I think my wallpost was your last chance to really back off; after doubling down there, I don't think you can. I certainly expected a town Sean to back off there, or at least re-evaluate. Since then you have been mostly repeating the phrase "Alison is outed" on repeat; you're just reiterating your narrative. There is a chance you are simply extremely tunnelled town, but after your behavior the past few pages, I can't say I particularly care.
Town-you would have no problem sensing my intensity (I'm sure you can feel it)

Everyone else: vote Alison. They're outed.

I can feel your intensity. I just don't think it's a townie intensity.

Seanzie wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 5:39 am
Alison wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 5:36 am
Seanzie wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 5:35 am
Alison wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 5:07 am In Lost in Space, you engaged in argument with two players you felt were outed wolves (me and Mac) for dozens of pages. Your argument was critical to burying us and showing that our thought processes were artificial.

Why do you now have a policy of not engaging with people you think are outed wolves?
Again, good try. You're outed though.

We need to flip Alison. They are outed.
On the contrary. I think you'll find that I am very much "inned".
Then explain your thoughts on me. In detail. This time tell me gun-to-head what you think my alingment is and explain my behavior.

Right now I believe you are mafia who has committed too deep to your narrative. I think my wallpost was your last chance to really back off; after doubling down there, I don't think you can. I certainly expected a town Sean to back off there, or at least re-evaluate. Since then you have been mostly repeating the phrase "Alison is outed" on repeat; you're just reiterating your narrative. There is a chance you are simply extremely tunnelled town, but after your behavior the past few pages, I can't say I particularly care.

Seanzie wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 5:35 am
Alison wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 5:07 am In Lost in Space, you engaged in argument with two players you felt were outed wolves (me and Mac) for dozens of pages. Your argument was critical to burying us and showing that our thought processes were artificial.

Why do you now have a policy of not engaging with people you think are outed wolves?
Again, good try. You're outed though.

We need to flip Alison. They are outed.

On the contrary. I think you'll find that I am very much "inned".

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 5:21 am
Alison wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 5:17 am
falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 5:17 am
Alison wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 5:13 am
falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 5:13 am
Alison wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 5:11 am
Porscha wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 5:10 am

sure since I can just change my vote whenever. lol
This is an odd definition of the word "commit".
How would you answer that question?

Assuming you're town of course
Sorry, what question?
The first one, tho it wasn't to you

Are you willing to commit to voting Seanzie over...well, let's say someone and another other than yourself?
Nah.
Don't blame you

I don't blame me, neither.

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 5:17 am
Alison wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 5:13 am
falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 5:13 am
Alison wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 5:11 am
Porscha wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 5:10 am
Seanzie wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 4:51 am @Porscha I'm curious if you're willing to commit to voting one of me or Alison.
sure since I can just change my vote whenever. lol
This is an odd definition of the word "commit".
How would you answer that question?

Assuming you're town of course
Sorry, what question?
The first one, tho it wasn't to you

Are you willing to commit to voting Seanzie over...well, let's say someone and another other than yourself?

Nah.

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 5:13 am
Alison wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 5:11 am
Porscha wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 5:10 am
Seanzie wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 4:51 am @Porscha I'm curious if you're willing to commit to voting one of me or Alison.
sure since I can just change my vote whenever. lol
This is an odd definition of the word "commit".
How would you answer that question?

Assuming you're town of course

Sorry, what question?

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 5:11 am
Alison wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 5:09 am
falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 5:08 am
DaughterOfOmega wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 1:15 am I'd kill one of sean or ali

idrc, but I'd bet a lot on one being mafia
And if they're both Wolves, with a bit of back n forth, "I vote for fluff!"..."Nay, I shan't be around later!"...some Thee-A-Tahr, perhaps?

Cuz thus game is off to a quiet start, and it strikes me as a possible plan to seed a Deep WULF

I have had Ny-Quil, melatonin, alcohol & THC recently, but I'm positive that has no bearing on this tin foil
A quiet start, eh?
How would you qualify this game's beginning?

Nothing, I was just amused because the game's aggression rapidly escalates over the next few pages.

Porscha wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 5:10 am
Seanzie wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 4:51 am @Porscha I'm curious if you're willing to commit to voting one of me or Alison.
sure since I can just change my vote whenever. lol

This is an odd definition of the word "commit".

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 5:08 am
DaughterOfOmega wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 1:15 am I'd kill one of sean or ali

idrc, but I'd bet a lot on one being mafia
And if they're both Wolves, with a bit of back n forth, "I vote for fluff!"..."Nay, I shan't be around later!"...some Thee-A-Tahr, perhaps?

Cuz thus game is off to a quiet start, and it strikes me as a possible plan to seed a Deep WULF

I have had Ny-Quil, melatonin, alcohol & THC recently, but I'm positive that has no bearing on this tin foil

A quiet start, eh?

In Lost in Space, you engaged in argument with two players you felt were outed wolves (me and Mac) for dozens of pages. Your argument was critical to burying us and showing that our thought processes were artificial.

Why do you now have a policy of not engaging with people you think are outed wolves?

Alison wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 4:34 am Here are my full thoughts on you.

I have three tells that I am confident are good at determining your alignment before flips happen. The first is that you are appease-y and try to avoid causing offense as wolf. The second tell is that you are a "grumpy Boomer" (not my words) as town, making hostile and somtimes contrarian remarks to fish reactions out of people or apply pressure. The third tell is a specific line that I have seen you use repeatedly as town and only town, which is when you turn up the pressure on someone to try to get them to attempt to pocket you by reading you town, only to challenge them on why they are reading you town, invoking the line "I have done nothing townie" or similar.

You are not appease-y this game, but neither are you as prickly as I expect you to be. For instance, when you briefly voted and questioned Porscha, you let them off with fairly softball questions asking them to clarify their meaning and provide some wolf games before backing off. The only person you have really turned up the aggression against is me... but I am not someone who is easily ruffled or pressured into cracking, and furthermore, I have applied the "prickly grumpy Boomer" tell enough times in the past that if you were faking it, I would be the one you would be performing for the most intensely.

I have been waiting for you to use the "I have done nothing townie" line; Porscha gave you an opportunity, and you didn't take it. I stonewalled you with posts like the "morale" joke, and "I agree", to frustrate you and see if you would push elsewhere and demonstrate that town tell. You haven't, except for a brief foray onto Porscha; you've mostly stayed tunnelled on me.

I was waiting for you to do something I can confidently read before saying anything, hence: "I have no read on you". If you put a gun to my head and asked me to name you either town or mafia, I would say I am leaning towards mafia, because the way you have targeted specifically me with your aggression, persisting despite a stonewall, feels targeted to pocket me through the meta that you know I read you on. But I am uncertain of this.

That's how I feel about you.

I have helpfully colored the areas that are analysis pink. In green is a paragraph that is information but necessary for understanding yhe context of my analysis.

I invite you to explain your view of these sections, and why they do not constitute analysis.

Do you disagree?

Alison wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 4:34 am
Seanzie wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 4:20 am
Alison wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 4:16 am
Seanzie wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 4:13 am
Alison wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 4:09 am
Seanzie wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 4:08 am Alison is a wolf and we need to kill her today.
Why?
I know you well enough to know that you know me well enough that you'd have a read on me if you were town. You can claim you're busy, and I believe that you're busy, but regardless of your business, you're just a wolf. Sorry about your rand.
Why would me knowing you well mean that I would definitely have a read on you as town?
Why indeed. You tell me.

In particular, what is your read one me right now? please don't say "I don't have one", but please tell me exactly what you think of me and my alignment
Here are my full thoughts on you.

I have three tells that I am confident are good at determining your alignment before flips happen. The first is that you are appease-y and try to avoid causing offense as wolf. The second tell is that you are a "grumpy Boomer" (not my words) as town, making hostile and somtimes contrarian remarks to fish reactions out of people or apply pressure. The third tell is a specific line that I have seen you use repeatedly as town and only town, which is when you turn up the pressure on someone to try to get them to attempt to pocket you by reading you town, only to challenge them on why they are reading you town, invoking the line "I have done nothing townie" or similar.

You are not appease-y this game, but neither are you as prickly as I expect you to be. For instance, when you briefly voted and questioned Porscha, you let them off with fairly softball questions asking them to clarify their meaning and provide some wolf games before backing off. The only person you have really turned up the aggression against is me... but I am not someone who is easily ruffled or pressured into cracking, and furthermore, I have applied the "prickly grumpy Boomer" tell enough times in the past that if you were faking it, I would be the one you would be performing for the most intensely.

I have been waiting for you to use the "I have done nothing townie" line; Porscha gave you an opportunity, and you didn't take it. I stonewalled you with posts like the "morale" joke, and "I agree", to frustrate you and see if you would push elsewhere and demonstrate that town tell. You haven't, except for a brief foray onto Porscha; you've mostly stayed tunnelled on me.

I was waiting for you to do something I can confidently read before saying anything, hence: "I have no read on you". If you put a gun to my head and asked me to name you either town or mafia, I would say I am leaning towards mafia, because the way you have targeted specifically me with your aggression, persisting despite a stonewall, feels targeted to pocket me through the meta that you know I read you on. But I am uncertain of this.

That's how I feel about you.

This one.

Seanzie wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 4:49 am
Alison wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 4:44 am [VOTE: Seanzie] aubergine
OoO, fun!

explain.

Your earlier post did not contain anything which sorted my alignment one way or the other, so why are you voting me here? Be specific please.w

I wrote a townie post and you doubled down on your wolfread.

[VOTE: Seanzie] aubergine

Seanzie wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 4:20 am
Alison wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 4:16 am
Seanzie wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 4:13 am
Alison wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 4:09 am
Seanzie wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 4:08 am Alison is a wolf and we need to kill her today.
Why?
I know you well enough to know that you know me well enough that you'd have a read on me if you were town. You can claim you're busy, and I believe that you're busy, but regardless of your business, you're just a wolf. Sorry about your rand.
Why would me knowing you well mean that I would definitely have a read on you as town?
Why indeed. You tell me.

In particular, what is your read one me right now? please don't say "I don't have one", but please tell me exactly what you think of me and my alignment

Here are my full thoughts on you.

I have three tells that I am confident are good at determining your alignment before flips happen. The first is that you are appease-y and try to avoid causing offense as wolf. The second tell is that you are a "grumpy Boomer" (not my words) as town, making hostile and somtimes contrarian remarks to fish reactions out of people or apply pressure. The third tell is a specific line that I have seen you use repeatedly as town and only town, which is when you turn up the pressure on someone to try to get them to attempt to pocket you by reading you town, only to challenge them on why they are reading you town, invoking the line "I have done nothing townie" or similar.

You are not appease-y this game, but neither are you as prickly as I expect you to be. For instance, when you briefly voted and questioned Porscha, you let them off with fairly softball questions asking them to clarify their meaning and provide some wolf games before backing off. The only person you have really turned up the aggression against is me... but I am not someone who is easily ruffled or pressured into cracking, and furthermore, I have applied the "prickly grumpy Boomer" tell enough times in the past that if you were faking it, I would be the one you would be performing for the most intensely.

I have been waiting for you to use the "I have done nothing townie" line; Porscha gave you an opportunity, and you didn't take it. I stonewalled you with posts like the "morale" joke, and "I agree", to frustrate you and see if you would push elsewhere and demonstrate that town tell. You haven't, except for a brief foray onto Porscha; you've mostly stayed tunnelled on me.

I was waiting for you to do something I can confidently read before saying anything, hence: "I have no read on you". If you put a gun to my head and asked me to name you either town or mafia, I would say I am leaning towards mafia, because the way you have targeted specifically me with your aggression, persisting despite a stonewall, feels targeted to pocket me through the meta that you know I read you on. But I am uncertain of this.

That's how I feel about you.

Seanzie wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 4:13 am
Alison wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 4:09 am
Seanzie wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 4:08 am Alison is a wolf and we need to kill her today.
Why?
I know you well enough to know that you know me well enough that you'd have a read on me if you were town. You can claim you're busy, and I believe that you're busy, but regardless of your business, you're just a wolf. Sorry about your rand.

Why would me knowing you well mean that I would definitely have a read on you as town?

DaughterOfOmega wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 4:10 am
Alison wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 4:08 am Do you think the posts I quoted are low quality?
I don't think either post brings anything of value to the game

I think they bring more value to the game than most other posts on that page because they state reads and the other posts are just chilling. That's not why I dislike them.

I dislike them because Nanook's posts are extremely obviously NAI and I find it odd that Creature disagrees. I could buy that he was just stretching to try to make a read on everyone, but when I questioned him about you being left out, he just shrugged and said you had no AI content.

Seanzie wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 4:09 am are you talking to me

No, the low quality remark was directed at DOO, who implied that Creature's posts were low quality.

Seanzie wrote: ↑Sat Apr 30, 2022 4:08 am Alison is a wolf and we need to kill her today.

Why?

Do you think the posts I quoted are low quality?

You might wish to dismantle capitalism and replace it with a socialist system of universal healthcare.

Also comment on the Creature posts, please.

Search found 74 matches