as for llama - jjj asked and I tend to associate civ llama as death note llama as it was the most recently impactful time he was a civ for me. I agree with your read of the thing between him and golden as feeling genuine on both ends.
Of course, read svs as genuine when she was after golden in recruitment as well and I was wrong about that making svs civ. Still they both read like they are not manufacturing their argument and legitly believe that they are correct in what, to me, has mostly become a pedantic argument.
jjj - you asked about JC's game play earlier. I tend to assocciate her with someone who tries very hard to look at every side of an argument and give every player every chance to defend as possible. I agree with epi that it's not usually JC's style to ISO a player and play that sort of game. If she is doing it to prove something to mac, well, I don't know. I could see it. What I think of as typical JC can often be seen as waffly. I can relate to that as I try to see all sides as well.
I thought your iso on boom was good, but I'm troubled by the ease in which people are ok with it. His curse also puts a wrench into my following along this train of thought atm.
Quiet tranq always makes me edgy, but I think that's more because tranq than quiet. Like LC, he is one I like to keep one eye on all the time and never really 100 percent trust. Even if we are civs. Even in civ bts.
Speaking of LC, he makes some interesting points and I've agreed with some of them. His inter actions with Golden felt particularly good to me. That said, LC.
Oh - lorab. I can confirm that she does buddy to people she percieves as civs when she's bad. She managed to fool LC through most of that game. Then he figured it out and our baddie victory was tossed squarely into his baddie teams hand.
I don't have a lot to go on in developing a read on lorab atm. I have not done any back reading so my impressions are pretty much based on this last phase alone. I would need a lot more time with her.