Weren’t we on the same team that game?
Either way it’s a sock that may have voting power, might be able to get killed, but generally would be a waste to shoot imo.
Weren’t we on the same team that game?
leetic wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 10:45 pm Anyway, I wonder if we're split randomly or if there's a balance in some way. In Severance, it was pretty clear that there'd likely be an even amount of wolves on both sides for the most part (although PRs were pretty skewed) but I'm not sure that holds up here.
Aww I'm part of the superior half
Should I tunnel you again?
I'm here to be towny and still drive you crazysig wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 12:20 pm I’ll add to the scrappy doo stuff some more.
As already said they were a sock third party. The owner lucy had some goal that I can’t remember now, but it did have voting power and could be killed.
Also falcon was on my team that game not TSP.
I like LC train of thought on the secret Santa thing, that seems very much within his town meta.
Epi is a gut town read.
I’m liking Abigail posts even though she’s creating a town core
I’m eyeing Daisy right now, her play style right now reminds me of muppets, where she was present but a bit flatflooted being mafia.
Based on his suspicion of you, for saying you would have to read and try?
No. I remembered that I found him sus D0. He doesn't have any of the sharpness that town!Falcon has. Town!Falcon will make plenty of fluffy posts, but will also interject with some pointed, mildly aggressive questions and observations. Scum!Falcon doesn't do that second part, and I didn't see any of that D0. Today, him voting me without pushing or real reason just corroborates this view.
Seanzie wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 2:48 pmNo. I remembered that I found him sus D0. He doesn't have any of the sharpness that town!Falcon has. Town!Falcon will make plenty of fluffy posts, but will also interject with some pointed, mildly aggressive questions and observations. Scum!Falcon doesn't do that second part, and I didn't see any of that D0. Today, him voting me without pushing or real reason just corroborates this view.
When I first read this, I thought you were writing some short fiction or something. I was hooked by the end of the second sentence, gets you right into the tension.TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 9:00 pm There’s a button here to call someone to unlock the case. The button doesn’t do anything. I found someone and she told me to go to customer service and they’d have to page someone. So I go to the customer service guy on the other side of the store and he says “well let me check who’s over there” and walks like a video game character you have to follow to complete a quest across the store to the automotive section, where he looks around and says “there’s no one here, I’ll have to go page someone”. Then he walks back to the customer service case at a pace that would make a snail blush and 10 minutes later I hear the announcement over the intercom, someone to I25. That was 10 minutes ago. I’m still here.
leetic wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 11:27 pmHate to use this term, but LAMIST
Have you seen our interactions in Philosophy 2? That was nothing.I suspect leetic and nutella have that advantage. Their Day 0 interaction was goofy and over the top. It was acting. Check it out.
You said I never suspected anyone, then I bring up someone I had openly suspected, and now you wanna play dumb?Unprompted, leetic brings up nutella in this thread by way of accusing me as though I can do jack shit about it. Acting.
Did you ask that pointed, mildly aggressive question just because of what Seanzie said?falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 3:34 pmleetic wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 11:27 pmHate to use this term, but LAMIST
Have you seen our interactions in Philosophy 2? That was nothing.I suspect leetic and nutella have that advantage. Their Day 0 interaction was goofy and over the top. It was acting. Check it out.
You said I never suspected anyone, then I bring up someone I had openly suspected, and now you wanna play dumb?Unprompted, leetic brings up nutella in this thread by way of accusing me as though I can do jack shit about it. Acting.
Why use the term LAMIST if you dislike it, especially to describe a post that is borderline LAMIST?
Now you're being lamest.
Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 3:36 pmDid you ask that pointed, mildly aggressive question just because of what Seanzie said?falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 3:34 pmleetic wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 11:27 pmHate to use this term, but LAMIST
Have you seen our interactions in Philosophy 2? That was nothing.I suspect leetic and nutella have that advantage. Their Day 0 interaction was goofy and over the top. It was acting. Check it out.
You said I never suspected anyone, then I bring up someone I had openly suspected, and now you wanna play dumb?Unprompted, leetic brings up nutella in this thread by way of accusing me as though I can do jack shit about it. Acting.
Why use the term LAMIST if you dislike it, especially to describe a post that is borderline LAMIST?
Character-defining.
Yeah, pretty bang-on.falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 3:37 pmLong Con wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 3:36 pmDid you ask that pointed, mildly aggressive question just because of what Seanzie said?falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 3:34 pmleetic wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 11:27 pmHate to use this term, but LAMIST
Have you seen our interactions in Philosophy 2? That was nothing.I suspect leetic and nutella have that advantage. Their Day 0 interaction was goofy and over the top. It was acting. Check it out.
You said I never suspected anyone, then I bring up someone I had openly suspected, and now you wanna play dumb?Unprompted, leetic brings up nutella in this thread by way of accusing me as though I can do jack shit about it. Acting.
Why use the term LAMIST if you dislike it, especially to describe a post that is borderline LAMIST?
Haha, no but the Beetlejuice irony is not lost on me
It was totes lame to sit in the motel seat.
LAMIST
This one also arguably satisfies the criteria, "pointed, mildly aggressive questions or observations".falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 9:24 pm
So, if you had been placed w/ players you do have feelings about, you wouldn't need to read & pay attention?
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 2:34 am ok seriously I didn't really count at first but what's scrappy doo
It sure is.falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 3:45 pm
Hmmmmm...do post count, or post quality matter more?
This feels like posting for the sake of posting
Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 3:49 pmIt sure is.falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 3:45 pm
Hmmmmm...do post count, or post quality matter more?
This feels like posting for the sake of posting
I had a thought, and then I converted that thought into finger movements over my keyboard. Then, I pressed "Submit." The whole process resulted in very mild amusement.falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 3:54 pmSloonei wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 3:49 pmIt sure is.falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 3:45 pm
Hmmmmm...do post count, or post quality matter more?
This feels like posting for the sake of posting
What's your motivation behind that speculation?
I didn't lie, persay, when I made the first post, my initial sus of you had slipped my mind. That's the whole "I remembered" thing. I also realized Caitlin is in our group (I think?) so I was wrong on multiple accounts.falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 3:32 pmSeanzie wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 2:48 pmNo. I remembered that I found him sus D0. He doesn't have any of the sharpness that town!Falcon has. Town!Falcon will make plenty of fluffy posts, but will also interject with some pointed, mildly aggressive questions and observations. Scum!Falcon doesn't do that second part, and I didn't see any of that D0. Today, him voting me without pushing or real reason just corroborates this view.
You said there weren't any players you had feelings about in this...side game? I don't know what to call where we are now
I also recall you stating N0 you found me wolfy
Why did you lie?
I'm just watching for now.Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 3:38 pmYeah, pretty bang-on.falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 3:37 pmLong Con wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 3:36 pmDid you ask that pointed, mildly aggressive question just because of what Seanzie said?falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 3:34 pmleetic wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 11:27 pmHate to use this term, but LAMIST
Have you seen our interactions in Philosophy 2? That was nothing.I suspect leetic and nutella have that advantage. Their Day 0 interaction was goofy and over the top. It was acting. Check it out.
You said I never suspected anyone, then I bring up someone I had openly suspected, and now you wanna play dumb?Unprompted, leetic brings up nutella in this thread by way of accusing me as though I can do jack shit about it. Acting.
Why use the term LAMIST if you dislike it, especially to describe a post that is borderline LAMIST?
Haha, no but the Beetlejuice irony is not lost on me
@Seanzie do you believe this shit?
I'd call this the right kind of reason to give someone a Secret Santa.Caitlin wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 7:41 am My friends are coming over today cuz it was my bday two days ago so I wont rlly be here today sorry
So do we all think the Secret Santa thing is positive? If so, any thoughts on me giving mine to Cape? I townread Cape & WWA the most on the other side and afaik WWA is a pretty controversial one making me lead towards giving it to Cape
I disagree. It's a useless made to create a reason to post a vote no matter what I say. My post clearly implied the answer to the question he asked.Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 3:45 pmThis one also arguably satisfies the criteria, "pointed, mildly aggressive questions or observations".falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 9:24 pm
So, if you had been placed w/ players you do have feelings about, you wouldn't need to read & pay attention?
Does it corroborate the first view though? "Voting without pushing or real reason" isn't the same as "doesn't interject with pointed, mildly aggressive etc." Right? But you are saying it does, and I just detect some level of fakeness going on here, both from the fact that falcon HAD asked such a question prior to this, and for the dodgy corroboration and general vibe.Seanzie wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 2:48 pmNo. I remembered that I found him sus D0. He doesn't have any of the sharpness that town!Falcon has. Town!Falcon will make plenty of fluffy posts, but will also interject with some pointed, mildly aggressive questions and observations. Scum!Falcon doesn't do that second part, and I didn't see any of that D0. Today, him voting me without pushing or real reason just corroborates this view.
Seanzie wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 3:58 pmI didn't lie, persay, when I made the first post, my initial sus of you had slipped my mind. That's the whole "I remembered" thing. I also realized Caitlin is in our group (I think?) so I was wrong on multiple accounts.falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 3:32 pmSeanzie wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 2:48 pmNo. I remembered that I found him sus D0. He doesn't have any of the sharpness that town!Falcon has. Town!Falcon will make plenty of fluffy posts, but will also interject with some pointed, mildly aggressive questions and observations. Scum!Falcon doesn't do that second part, and I didn't see any of that D0. Today, him voting me without pushing or real reason just corroborates this view.
You said there weren't any players you had feelings about in this...side game? I don't know what to call where we are now
I also recall you stating N0 you found me wolfy
Why did you lie?
Let me know when you want to read the words I wrote without filling in things I didn't say. I found Falcon's D0 questionable. I found Falcon's vote on my questionable. I never said that Falcon's vote was exactly the same thing as Falcon's vote on me, but that the lackluster approach to the vote corroborated my earlier view.Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 4:06 pmDoes it corroborate the first view though? "Voting without pushing or real reason" isn't the same as "doesn't interject with pointed, mildly aggressive etc." Right? But you are saying it does, and I just detect some level of fakeness going on here, both from the fact that falcon HAD asked such a question prior to this, and for the dodgy corroboration and general vibe.Seanzie wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 2:48 pmNo. I remembered that I found him sus D0. He doesn't have any of the sharpness that town!Falcon has. Town!Falcon will make plenty of fluffy posts, but will also interject with some pointed, mildly aggressive questions and observations. Scum!Falcon doesn't do that second part, and I didn't see any of that D0. Today, him voting me without pushing or real reason just corroborates this view.
[VOTE: seanzie] aubergine
You're probably not realizing that I only reluctantly joined this game because... idk because mafia is hard to stay away from, and I'd rather not get too sucked into it since my IRL life and career seem to have an inverse relationship with how hard I play mafia.falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 4:14 pmSeanzie wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 3:58 pmI didn't lie, persay, when I made the first post, my initial sus of you had slipped my mind. That's the whole "I remembered" thing. I also realized Caitlin is in our group (I think?) so I was wrong on multiple accounts.falcon45ca wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 3:32 pmSeanzie wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 2:48 pmNo. I remembered that I found him sus D0. He doesn't have any of the sharpness that town!Falcon has. Town!Falcon will make plenty of fluffy posts, but will also interject with some pointed, mildly aggressive questions and observations. Scum!Falcon doesn't do that second part, and I didn't see any of that D0. Today, him voting me without pushing or real reason just corroborates this view.
You said there weren't any players you had feelings about in this...side game? I don't know what to call where we are now
I also recall you stating N0 you found me wolfy
Why did you lie?
I find it odd that you would be that absent minded
Town tend to have a lot more of a laser-like focus on their suspicions without any new info
What are your reads outside of my slot?