You did. But I was key in the follow up. Ticker tape parade pleasethellama73 wrote:Zomba? Hey! Who started the anti-Snowman sentiment?juliets wrote:Nice work Zomba and yay we got one! Snowman, you are an enjoyable person, please continue to play.

Moderator: Community Team
You did. But I was key in the follow up. Ticker tape parade pleasethellama73 wrote:Zomba? Hey! Who started the anti-Snowman sentiment?juliets wrote:Nice work Zomba and yay we got one! Snowman, you are an enjoyable person, please continue to play.
Turnip Head wrote:I for one welcome our new zombie and llama overlords. May their reign be long, and may their cases always be on point.
Drama is my spesheealitee!juliets wrote:Well Zomba was the most dramatic. But yes, nice work to you for starting the suspicion.thellama73 wrote:Zomba? Hey! Who started the anti-Snowman sentiment?juliets wrote:Nice work Zomba and yay we got one! Snowman, you are an enjoyable person, please continue to play.
Turnip Head wrote:I for one welcome our new zombie and llama overlords. May their reign be long, and may their cases always be on point.
MP's post says they don't share BTSC by default, but some of the revealed role secrets show ways they can get BTSC. Snowman's role secrets have no been revealed yet, so we don't know whether he had BTSC or not. It's possible.juliets wrote:Well Zomba was the most dramatic. But yes, nice work to you for starting the suspicion.thellama73 wrote:Zomba? Hey! Who started the anti-Snowman sentiment?juliets wrote:Nice work Zomba and yay we got one! Snowman, you are an enjoyable person, please continue to play.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Oh?boo wrote:Which isn't relevant to what you're saying, because he wasn't a non-participant.Epignosis wrote:Yeah, and you defended him, didn't you?boo wrote:Again, for the millionth fucking time, non-participants. Did Snowman post? Yes. Did Snowman vote? Yes.Epignosis wrote:boo defended Snowman despite his view that active players should not be lynched over inactives.
Snowman was, for me, inactive.
You discouraged people from voting Snowman. You encouraged the birdwithteeth lynch.boo wrote:So... would I like to see more from Snowman? Yes. But even if he wasn't a new player I would find the arguments for lynching him to be some serious grasping at straws. As it is... I have to question the motivation of people who want to lynch him, because I think many of them are the ones looking to bandwagon.
Why are you asking me this? Is it because you get points for leading a lynch? I've mentioned this before....thellama73 wrote:Zomba? Hey! Who started the anti-Snowman sentiment?juliets wrote:Nice work Zomba and yay we got one! Snowman, you are an enjoyable person, please continue to play.
Turnip Head wrote:I for one welcome our new zombie and llama overlords. May their reign be long, and may their cases always be on point.
I didn't ask you. I asked juliets. I just wanted to bask in your reflected glory.Zomberella12 wrote:Why are you asking me this? Is it because you get points for leading a lynch? I've mentioned this before....thellama73 wrote:Zomba? Hey! Who started the anti-Snowman sentiment?juliets wrote:Nice work Zomba and yay we got one! Snowman, you are an enjoyable person, please continue to play.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Turnip Head wrote:I for one welcome our new zombie and llama overlords. May their reign be long, and may their cases always be on point.
I didn't say I didn't defend Snowman, I was correcting you, because you have an obsession with twisting my words in an attempt to make me look like a hypocrite. I was very clear I was talking about non-participants, and discussed the difference between that and a low poster. Every time you bring it up, you ignore that difference and ignore what I actually said.Epignosis wrote:Oh?boo wrote:Which isn't relevant to what you're saying, because he wasn't a non-participant.Epignosis wrote:Yeah, and you defended him, didn't you?boo wrote:Again, for the millionth fucking time, non-participants. Did Snowman post? Yes. Did Snowman vote? Yes.Epignosis wrote:boo defended Snowman despite his view that active players should not be lynched over inactives.
Snowman was, for me, inactive.
You discouraged people from voting Snowman. You encouraged the birdwithteeth lynch.boo wrote:So... would I like to see more from Snowman? Yes. But even if he wasn't a new player I would find the arguments for lynching him to be some serious grasping at straws. As it is... I have to question the motivation of people who want to lynch him, because I think many of them are the ones looking to bandwagon.
Uh-uh. You, sir, are the twister. I will show this tomorrow.boo wrote:I didn't say I didn't defend Snowman, I was correcting you, because you have an obsession with twisting my words in an attempt to make me look like a hypocrite. I was very clear I was talking about non-participants, and discussed the difference between that and a low poster. Every time you bring it up, you ignore that difference and ignore what I actually said.Epignosis wrote:Oh?boo wrote:Which isn't relevant to what you're saying, because he wasn't a non-participant.Epignosis wrote:Yeah, and you defended him, didn't you?boo wrote:Again, for the millionth fucking time, non-participants. Did Snowman post? Yes. Did Snowman vote? Yes.Epignosis wrote:boo defended Snowman despite his view that active players should not be lynched over inactives.
Snowman was, for me, inactive.
You discouraged people from voting Snowman. You encouraged the birdwithteeth lynch.boo wrote:So... would I like to see more from Snowman? Yes. But even if he wasn't a new player I would find the arguments for lynching him to be some serious grasping at straws. As it is... I have to question the motivation of people who want to lynch him, because I think many of them are the ones looking to bandwagon.
And now you're trying to use it to gain cred.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
*Gives llama a cookie from S~V~S's corpse.*thellama73 wrote:Guys, can I just take a victory lap for finally managing to be right in one of my relentless, single-minded campaigns? I really needed this win after the fiasco of Film Directors.
Epignosis wrote:Bitch, my identity is my identity theft protection!
Turnip Head wrote:I for one welcome our new zombie and llama overlords. May their reign be long, and may their cases always be on point.
Zomberella12 wrote:
But I might still kill you.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
I think I will probably dust off my Day 1 TH suspicion for tomorrow. His apologism for Snowman pings me something fierce, and I had other reasons to suspect him before that never fully went away.Epignosis wrote:Kira kills whenever, so don't be shy about voicing your thoughts. Get them out there before you have a heart attack.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
That sounds a little like a threat. But, I agree with you. I am a HUGE target. These names are suspected baddies for me: Zeek, DP, and Llama. No case this time, not even a weak one.Epignosis wrote:Kira kills whenever, so don't be shy about voicing your thoughts. Get them out there before you have a heart attack.
Turnip Head wrote:I for one welcome our new zombie and llama overlords. May their reign be long, and may their cases always be on point.
Epignosis wrote:Bitch, my identity is my identity theft protection!
A Turnip Head lynch would not bother me at all.thellama73 wrote:I think I will probably dust off my Day 1 TH suspicion for tomorrow. His apologism for Snowman pings me something fierce, and I had other reasons to suspect him before that never fully went away.Epignosis wrote:Kira kills whenever, so don't be shy about voicing your thoughts. Get them out there before you have a heart attack.
Those are my thoughts.
How are facts threats? Speak now. You may die tomorrow. That's a fact.Zomberella12 wrote:That sounds a little like a threat. But, I agree with you. I am a HUGE target. These names are suspected baddies for me: Zeek, DP, and Llama. No case this time, not even a weak one.Epignosis wrote:Kira kills whenever, so don't be shy about voicing your thoughts. Get them out there before you have a heart attack.
Not sure what that means, but it's a weird coincidence, isn't it?Zomberella12 wrote:This character fits the way Llama is acting. Didn't someone suggest that people might be getting points for being the first to vote? That would also fit.
Hitoshi Demegawa – A very greedy man who feeds off of publicity, Demegawa is director of Sakura TV. If L dies, Demegawa asserts himself as Kira’s spokesman and constantly rallies for Kira supporters to participate in various violent acts of protest. (Secrets)
Remember that. She voted for me because I went after Snowman. This will come back later, so try to keep it in mind.Zomberella12 wrote: I had to skip so many pages that I can't really comment on others' reasons. I did read all of Snowman's posts and many of Llamas. I think Llama's case was made too early and not based on strong evidence. However, Llama's actions against Snowman are what made me vote for Llama.
As soon as Snowman is lynched, she flips back to suspecting me, even though her vote for me previously was based on my suspicion of Snowman. (I told you that would come back later.)Zomberella12 wrote:Oh yeah. I do want to talk to you! Maybe not first. But I'm sorry that I doubted you. You were right. Hail Llama's deductive powers.thellama73 wrote:I thought you said you wanted to talk to me about it first.Zomberella12 wrote:Epi probably won't like me saying it, but there is a civ role that cannot be lynched or NK'd (as far as we know right now). It is possible that he is good. Weird, but good. I am still going to vote Snowman.
She gives no reason for her new suspicion of me.Zomberella12 wrote:That sounds a little like a threat. But, I agree with you. I am a HUGE target. These names are suspected baddies for me: Zeek, DP, and Llama. No case this time, not even a weak one.Epignosis wrote:Kira kills whenever, so don't be shy about voicing your thoughts. Get them out there before you have a heart attack.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Because.Turnip Head wrote:Good points about Zomberella, Llama. I'm don't know what she would really gain from suspecting you again so quickly, so I'm thinking her feelings are genuine, but I'm interested to hear her reasons.
Why wouldn't a TH lynch bother you, Epi?
I will say three things:thellama73 wrote:Story time! Let's read some of Zombrella's posts together, shall we?
First, I find this one extremely interesting. Zomba accuses me of being the role thta Snowman ended up being.Not sure what that means, but it's a weird coincidence, isn't it?Zomberella12 wrote:This character fits the way Llama is acting. Didn't someone suggest that people might be getting points for being the first to vote? That would also fit.
Hitoshi Demegawa – A very greedy man who feeds off of publicity, Demegawa is director of Sakura TV. If L dies, Demegawa asserts himself as Kira’s spokesman and constantly rallies for Kira supporters to participate in various violent acts of protest. (Secrets)
Next, Zomba made several posts accusing me of being bad (not quoted here) and justified her vote on the following grounds.Remember that. She voted for me because I went after Snowman. This will come back later, so try to keep it in mind.Zomberella12 wrote: I had to skip so many pages that I can't really comment on others' reasons. I did read all of Snowman's posts and many of Llamas. I think Llama's case was made too early and not based on strong evidence. However, Llama's actions against Snowman are what made me vote for Llama.
Zomba then suddenly flips and decides SNowman is bad, chasing after him relentlessly and soliciting my help. She then "hails my deductive powers."As soon as Snowman is lynched, she flips back to suspecting me, even though her vote for me previously was based on my suspicion of Snowman. (I told you that would come back later.)Zomberella12 wrote:Oh yeah. I do want to talk to you! Maybe not first. But I'm sorry that I doubted you. You were right. Hail Llama's deductive powers.thellama73 wrote:I thought you said you wanted to talk to me about it first.Zomberella12 wrote:Epi probably won't like me saying it, but there is a civ role that cannot be lynched or NK'd (as far as we know right now). It is possible that he is good. Weird, but good. I am still going to vote Snowman.She gives no reason for her new suspicion of me.Zomberella12 wrote:That sounds a little like a threat. But, I agree with you. I am a HUGE target. These names are suspected baddies for me: Zeek, DP, and Llama. No case this time, not even a weak one.Epignosis wrote:Kira kills whenever, so don't be shy about voicing your thoughts. Get them out there before you have a heart attack.
Also, why are you a HUGE target? Why more so than anyone else?
Turnip Head wrote:I for one welcome our new zombie and llama overlords. May their reign be long, and may their cases always be on point.
What "investigation thing" are you talking about?Zomberella12 wrote: I will say three things:
1) I am a mess - what some of you interpret as newbieness - is really just messiness - also I am forgetful.
2) I said that I am not going to give any reasons for my suspicions of MP, Zeek, and Llama. As a Detective I've been detecting. (I think this is going to bug Mata - sorry).
3) I think I'm a target because I led an attack against a Kira Supporter. If Kira finds out I'm civvie through that investigation thing, I might die. That's all.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
The when I voted for Llama it wasn't because he suspected Snowman, it was the REASONS that he suspected Snowman. Those still stand.Turnip Head wrote:Good points about Zomberella, Llama. I'm don't know what she would really gain from suspecting you again so quickly, so I'm thinking her feelings are genuine, but I'm interested to hear her reasons.
Why wouldn't a TH lynch bother you, Epi?
Turnip Head wrote:I for one welcome our new zombie and llama overlords. May their reign be long, and may their cases always be on point.
Sugarmama Eye Deal - that's all.thellama73 wrote:What "investigation thing" are you talking about?Zomberella12 wrote: I will say three things:
1) I am a mess - what some of you interpret as newbieness - is really just messiness - also I am forgetful.
2) I said that I am not going to give any reasons for my suspicions of MP, Zeek, and Llama. As a Detective I've been detecting. (I think this is going to bug Mata - sorry).
3) I think I'm a target because I led an attack against a Kira Supporter. If Kira finds out I'm civvie through that investigation thing, I might die. That's all.
Turnip Head wrote:I for one welcome our new zombie and llama overlords. May their reign be long, and may their cases always be on point.
So to be clear, you think I am a Kira sympathizer who led a vocal lynch train against Snowman, thinking he was a detective, and I just got unlucky that he turned out to be bad? Is that a fair assessment of your opinion of me?Zomberella12 wrote:The when I voted for Llama it wasn't because he suspected Snowman, it was the REASONS that he suspected Snowman. Those still stand.Turnip Head wrote:Good points about Zomberella, Llama. I'm don't know what she would really gain from suspecting you again so quickly, so I'm thinking her feelings are genuine, but I'm interested to hear her reasons.
Why wouldn't a TH lynch bother you, Epi?
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Zomberella12 wrote:I will say three things:thellama73 wrote:Story time! Let's read some of Zombrella's posts together, shall we?
First, I find this one extremely interesting. Zomba accuses me of being the role thta Snowman ended up being.Not sure what that means, but it's a weird coincidence, isn't it?Zomberella12 wrote:This character fits the way Llama is acting. Didn't someone suggest that people might be getting points for being the first to vote? That would also fit.
Hitoshi Demegawa – A very greedy man who feeds off of publicity, Demegawa is director of Sakura TV. If L dies, Demegawa asserts himself as Kira’s spokesman and constantly rallies for Kira supporters to participate in various violent acts of protest. (Secrets)
Next, Zomba made several posts accusing me of being bad (not quoted here) and justified her vote on the following grounds.Remember that. She voted for me because I went after Snowman. This will come back later, so try to keep it in mind.Zomberella12 wrote: I had to skip so many pages that I can't really comment on others' reasons. I did read all of Snowman's posts and many of Llamas. I think Llama's case was made too early and not based on strong evidence. However, Llama's actions against Snowman are what made me vote for Llama.
Zomba then suddenly flips and decides SNowman is bad, chasing after him relentlessly and soliciting my help. She then "hails my deductive powers."As soon as Snowman is lynched, she flips back to suspecting me, even though her vote for me previously was based on my suspicion of Snowman. (I told you that would come back later.)Zomberella12 wrote:Oh yeah. I do want to talk to you! Maybe not first. But I'm sorry that I doubted you. You were right. Hail Llama's deductive powers.thellama73 wrote:I thought you said you wanted to talk to me about it first.Zomberella12 wrote:Epi probably won't like me saying it, but there is a civ role that cannot be lynched or NK'd (as far as we know right now). It is possible that he is good. Weird, but good. I am still going to vote Snowman.She gives no reason for her new suspicion of me.Zomberella12 wrote:That sounds a little like a threat. But, I agree with you. I am a HUGE target. These names are suspected baddies for me: Zeek, DP, and Llama. No case this time, not even a weak one.Epignosis wrote:Kira kills whenever, so don't be shy about voicing your thoughts. Get them out there before you have a heart attack.
Also, why are you a HUGE target? Why more so than anyone else?
1) I am a mess - what some of you interpret as newbieness - is really just messiness - also I am forgetful.
2) I said that I am not going to give any reasons for my suspicions of MP, Zeek, and Llama. As a Detective I've been detecting. (I think this is going to bug Mata - sorry).
3) I think I'm a target because I led an attack against a Kira Supporter. If Kira finds out I'm civvie through that investigation thing, I might die. That's all.
I think knowing is more likely than hoping. Otherwise, fairly correct.Turnip Head wrote:What's your assessment of me, Llama? That I defended Snowman hoping he was bad, and I just got unlucky that he turned out to be bad?
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Well...when you put it that way it sounds stupid. WIll it make you happy if I take you off my suspect list?thellama73 wrote:So to be clear, you think I am a Kira sympathizer who led a vocal lynch train against Snowman, thinking he was a detective, and I just got unlucky that he turned out to be bad? Is that a fair assessment of your opinion of me?Zomberella12 wrote:The when I voted for Llama it wasn't because he suspected Snowman, it was the REASONS that he suspected Snowman. Those still stand.Turnip Head wrote:Good points about Zomberella, Llama. I'm don't know what she would really gain from suspecting you again so quickly, so I'm thinking her feelings are genuine, but I'm interested to hear her reasons.
Why wouldn't a TH lynch bother you, Epi?
Turnip Head wrote:I for one welcome our new zombie and llama overlords. May their reign be long, and may their cases always be on point.
@Llama - so now you are going to start building your super strong, not made up, convincing argument against TH? No? Well, then o wise one, who is your next target since you are so good at using your llama nose to sniff out baddies?thellama73 wrote:I think knowing is more likely than hoping. Otherwise, fairly correct.Turnip Head wrote:What's your assessment of me, Llama? That I defended Snowman hoping he was bad, and I just got unlucky that he turned out to be bad?
Turnip Head wrote:I for one welcome our new zombie and llama overlords. May their reign be long, and may their cases always be on point.
Turnip Head wrote:I for one welcome our new zombie and llama overlords. May their reign be long, and may their cases always be on point.
Turnip Head wrote:I for one welcome our new zombie and llama overlords. May their reign be long, and may their cases always be on point.
I disagree. I think it would be foolish to blindly follow two players after one correct lynch, especially in a game where the baddies don't know each other.Turnip Head wrote:I for one welcome our new zombie and llama overlords. May their reign be long, and may their cases always be on point.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
Yes, please.Zomberella12 wrote:Well...when you put it that way it sounds stupid. WIll it make you happy if I take you off my suspect list?thellama73 wrote:So to be clear, you think I am a Kira sympathizer who led a vocal lynch train against Snowman, thinking he was a detective, and I just got unlucky that he turned out to be bad? Is that a fair assessment of your opinion of me?Zomberella12 wrote:The when I voted for Llama it wasn't because he suspected Snowman, it was the REASONS that he suspected Snowman. Those still stand.Turnip Head wrote:Good points about Zomberella, Llama. I'm don't know what she would really gain from suspecting you again so quickly, so I'm thinking her feelings are genuine, but I'm interested to hear her reasons.
Why wouldn't a TH lynch bother you, Epi?
Maybe tomorrow. Tonight I am tired.Zomberella12 wrote:@Llama - so now you are going to start building your super strong, not made up, convincing argument against TH? No? Well, then o wise one, who is your next target since you are so good at using your llama nose to sniff out baddies?thellama73 wrote:I think knowing is more likely than hoping. Otherwise, fairly correct.Turnip Head wrote:What's your assessment of me, Llama? That I defended Snowman hoping he was bad, and I just got unlucky that he turned out to be bad?
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Yes. I needed a good sig.MovingPictures07 wrote:Turnip Head wrote:I for one welcome our new zombie and llama overlords. May their reign be long, and may their cases always be on point.
This needs to be sig'd.
Turnip Head wrote:I for one welcome our new zombie and llama overlords. May their reign be long, and may their cases always be on point.
I prefer the TH one I have.Zomberella12 wrote:Yes. I needed a good sig.MovingPictures07 wrote:Turnip Head wrote:I for one welcome our new zombie and llama overlords. May their reign be long, and may their cases always be on point.
This needs to be sig'd.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
Quite the conspiracy you've uncovered there Epi. I saw Death Note in its entirety years ago. I don't feel like googling every little detailI got a bit of flak for even mentioning the Shinigami eyes. However, consider this: Does DharmaHelper know the show? If he does, then his "If I remember rightly from the show" comment is just to make it seem like this knowledge isn't a Google away. He is bullshitting you, folks. He is feigning ignorance of things he knows. And that's a fact.
You could not be more wrong in my opinion. Act batshit crazy and it will make people think you are one if those bad Shinigami that no one can kill or an inactive Kira. No one wants to waste a kill on someone they don't need to or can't kill and why would a Kira waste a kill that he may need on someone he can't kill? The outrageous players are the ones who have a handle on this game right now. It's the rest of who are still trying to figure it out. Commence the crazy I guess...zeek wrote:Forgot to reply to this due to EPIc posts.
I don't know, I feel the Kira would be playing a very simple game not really drawing attention to themselves, so they could be hiding in half the players in the game. Based on aggressive and odd behaviour, I'd tentatively cross off a handful of players from the Kira list.bea wrote:If not them, who?zeek wrote:My problem with Epi right now is that MM's case was good. It showed how inconsistent he has been and his responses have done little to convince me he's good. His tone, deflated and dejected, has however. So I'm back and forth on him.
Then we have Snowman. His responses don't seem genuine to me and he doesn't actually seem frustrated by all this, half-heartedly NO U'ing his detractors.
Still a fair amount of time before the lynch ends but, honestly, these guys may be aligned with Kira but I really doubt either is one.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
thellama73 wrote:I've got a lot of cogitating to do today, but right now it's off to work. And maybe get some biscuits and gravy on the way there! Be back later, y'all.