[END] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts

#1601

Golden wrote:I'm willing to do a Fuzz vote.

i can do that

#1602

RadicalFuzz is the crooked kind of player.

#1603

I voted for Scotty on the basis of the points I made in this post. It's not as strong of a point now that the Gleam wagon slowed down and two others popped up, but I still get a word feeling from how he used his vote today.

#1604

Golden wrote:
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:I don't like the idea of starting another wagon, when we already have 3, with less than an hour for the phase to end.

This is the PERFECT opportunity for scum to save each other if they need to.

If you don't like the current wagons then tough luck. Try to push another one earlier next day.
Every post you make is making you look more scummy, imo. Why shouldn't we try to push one now, when so many people think all of the current wagons don't have a lot of merit?

If people don't like any of the 3 wagons then sure, go ahead.

But inviting people to look for a fourth one reeks of an attempt to deflect this lynch into something else.

I don't like the timing of this at all. Because all the scum who are seeing their possible teammates get lynched will take the chance to jump out.

#1605

Well that was a lot of fucking linki

#1606

RadicalFuzz

#1607

I'm willing to lynch Radical Fuzz right now if there's enough support for it.

#1608

sig wrote:
Golden wrote:Serge and Fuzz votes both opportunistic, I'd be open to either of them too.

Serge another new player?

linki: Good point from Sloonie, however I can also see what he means CFD usually are lead by mafia imo. It has saved me more then once getting worked up then someone else suggesting it

I feel good about this Chinese Fire Drill not being lead by mafia. I am on board, and everyone else who's expressed interest so far is at least a moderate town read of mine.
You seem to be sitting on the fence here. What's your take on the current state of things?

#1609

Point is: I'm more worried about the people currently on the wagons wanting a way out, than the ones outside of them who are not satisfied wanting to create a new one.

#1610

Sloonei wrote:
Quin wrote:Oh, so do we have another hour until day ends? I thought it ended now.
Pick a name that's not Epignosis, ika, or Gleam and tell us why we should all vote for that person.

Luffy. I did not agree with the original suspicion of him in the 'maf will struggle to win this game' argument, but now hearing him explicitly try to control a lynch by essentially threatening us with scumreads has changed my mind. There was a point made about him trying to control all discussion in the thread, and I'm not opposed to that way of thinking either.

#1611

Sloonei wrote:
Quin wrote:Oh, so do we have another hour until day ends? I thought it ended now.
Pick a name that's not Epignosis, ika, or Gleam and tell us why we should all vote for that person.

Luffy. I did not agree with the original suspicion of him in the 'maf will struggle to win this game' argument, but now hearing him explicitly try to control a lynch by essentially threatening us with scumreads has changed my mind. There was a point made about him trying to control all discussion in the thread, and I'm not opposed to that way of thinking either.

#1612

I'm gonna go inhale some supper and come right back here.

#1613

Dragon D. Luffy wrote:
Golden wrote:
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:I don't like the idea of starting another wagon, when we already have 3, with less than an hour for the phase to end.

This is the PERFECT opportunity for scum to save each other if they need to.

If you don't like the current wagons then tough luck. Try to push another one earlier next day.
Every post you make is making you look more scummy, imo. Why shouldn't we try to push one now, when so many people think all of the current wagons don't have a lot of merit?
If people don't like any of the 3 wagons then sure, go ahead.

But inviting people to look for a fourth one reeks of an attempt to deflect this lynch into something else.

I don't like the timing of this at all. Because all the scum who are seeing their possible teammates get lynched will take the chance to jump out.

What if no scum are seeing their possible teammates get lynched right now?

What about if someone (like SVS, for example) makes a pretty damn good case in a single post....

#1614

Dragon D. Luffy wrote:
Golden wrote:
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:I don't like the idea of starting another wagon, when we already have 3, with less than an hour for the phase to end.

This is the PERFECT opportunity for scum to save each other if they need to.

If you don't like the current wagons then tough luck. Try to push another one earlier next day.
Every post you make is making you look more scummy, imo. Why shouldn't we try to push one now, when so many people think all of the current wagons don't have a lot of merit?
If people don't like any of the 3 wagons then sure, go ahead.

But inviting people to look for a fourth one reeks of an attempt to deflect this lynch into something else.

I don't like the timing of this at all. Because all the scum who are seeing their possible teammates get lynched will take the chance to jump out.

Well if that's the case it would certainly give us a lot of info to use going forward. ..

#1615

Sloonei wrote:I am starting to feel more inclined to vote for Epi, and if I reach a point where I'm confident enough to do that, I will do it.

Is that gonna happen on its own? Are you looking for encouragement?

also why is everyone voting fuzz now wtf i wasnt serious

#1616

Why Fuzz? I've got linki up the wazoo

#1617

Changed my vote

pedit: well we are @riki

#1618

Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Point is: I'm more worried about the people currently on the wagons wanting a way out, than the ones outside of them who are not satisfied wanting to create a new one.

Good. I want them to get out. I think the wagons are bad. That's exactly what I'm trying to do. Even better if they get out to bus their own teammate.

#1619

Dragon D. Luffy wrote:
Golden wrote:
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:I don't like the idea of starting another wagon, when we already have 3, with less than an hour for the phase to end.

This is the PERFECT opportunity for scum to save each other if they need to.

If you don't like the current wagons then tough luck. Try to push another one earlier next day.
Every post you make is making you look more scummy, imo. Why shouldn't we try to push one now, when so many people think all of the current wagons don't have a lot of merit?
If people don't like any of the 3 wagons then sure, go ahead.

But inviting people to look for a fourth one reeks of an attempt to deflect this lynch into something else.

I don't like the timing of this at all. Because all the scum who are seeing their possible teammates get lynched will take the chance to jump out.

Good post.

#1620

Quin wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
Quin wrote:Oh, so do we have another hour until day ends? I thought it ended now.
Pick a name that's not Epignosis, ika, or Gleam and tell us why we should all vote for that person.
Luffy. I did not agree with the original suspicion of him in the 'maf will struggle to win this game' argument, but now hearing him explicitly try to control a lynch by essentially threatening us with scumreads has changed my mind. There was a point made about him trying to control all discussion in the thread, and I'm not opposed to that way of thinking either.

I'm not threatening anyone. Don't put words in my mouth.

#1621

Turnip Head wrote:Why Fuzz? I've got linki up the wazoo

Iso SVS and read her last few posts.

#1622

Why does Epi have votes?

#1623

S~V~S wrote:Why does Epi have votes?

No clue.

#1624

Golden I really don't like this.

#1625

All I did was search his posts for "ika", lol. Not that hard.

Linki, thanks.

#1626

Enrique wrote:Golden I really don't like this.

Why? Who do you think is being saved?

#1627

Radical Fuzz

If this doesn't happen today, I'm voting it tomorrow.

#1628

If Fuzz is lynched and comes back bad, Enrique, you will look to me like someone who tried to cast a distance vote and it went bad.

#1629

I went to Fuzz

Tied it backup.

#1630

Fine.

RadicalFuzz

I hate this plan but if we are not lynching gleam, the Fuzz is the next in line.

I'm not lynching ika today.

#1631

Switching to Fuzz for the time being.

I would definitely like to hear from him / her before EoD if possible.

I did recently get mislynched in a CFD in Rocky & Bullwinkle, and it sucked. I prefer people to be able to defend against votes, but I also prefer not to be forced to vote for someone I don't want to vote for in order for my vote to mean something.

Linki up the wazoo here too! Weeeeee!

#1632

That makes sense then, Luffy. You're looking for a solution, not for all the facts. And I appreciate the atypical comment, I like being a special snowflake.

English isn't native for you Nero & Luffy? Could've fooled me.

Question for everyone that says I'm being opportunistic. Would breaking the tie by voting for Gleam look the same way?

#1633

EBWOP (probably with a side of linki)~

Sorry Fuzz, for doing this when you are not here.

Nothing personal at all.

#1634

I am not seeing a lot of reasoning behind the fuzz vote. I don't like it at all. I can't recall a single thing in the thread even being said that would paint fuzz as scum.

linki: even more 'okay fizz it is' without anything tangible to work with.

#1635

RadicalFuzz wrote:That makes sense then, Luffy. You're looking for a solution, not for all the facts. And I appreciate the atypical comment, I like being a special snowflake.

English isn't native for you Nero & Luffy? Could've fooled me.

Question for everyone that says I'm being opportunistic. Would breaking the tie by voting for Gleam look the same way?

Personally, I think every vote for ika looks opportunistic. Why did you go from 'won't touch that with a bargepole' to voting for him?

#1636

Golden wrote:
Enrique wrote:Golden I really don't like this.
Why? Who do you think is being saved?

I have no clue, but someone. If the bandwagon fails, you weren't complicit in the others, if it succeeds, you still arbitrarily got somebody else lynched.

That felt dirty, having the first of 5 random votes for Fuzz. (I know there's a case– opportunistic voting. Oh well I'm seeing more of that stuff everywhere I look).

linki- what the fuck did i miss something important

#1637

Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Point is: I'm more worried about the people currently on the wagons wanting a way out, than the ones outside of them who are not satisfied wanting to create a new one.

are any of them suggesting a Chinese Fire Drill? I'd certainly love to hear their thoughts on the issue.

#1638

Wow, this is happening

Is a good point about Fuzz not wanting to touch the ika thing, but he did say he'd break the tie and didn't care which way he broke it. That may say something in and of itself though.

#1639

Yeah sorry Fuzz. My suspicion on you is not strong, but I'm not wasting my vote. You are still the guy who only posted reads when people asked you to.

#1640

Yes Enrique - you missed the fact that Fuzz said he wasn't going to touch the ika thing with a bargepole and then voted for him to put him in the lead with zero explanation.

#1641

RadicalFuzz wrote:That makes sense then, Luffy. You're looking for a solution, not for all the facts. And I appreciate the atypical comment, I like being a special snowflake.

English isn't native for you Nero & Luffy? Could've fooled me.

Question for everyone that says I'm being opportunistic. Would breaking the tie by voting for Gleam look the same way?

Well, you did express a suspicion of Gleam.

Linki @TH, well, he said he suspected one of the other tied people though.

#1642

Sloonei wrote:
Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Point is: I'm more worried about the people currently on the wagons wanting a way out, than the ones outside of them who are not satisfied wanting to create a new one.
are any of them suggesting a Chinese Fire Drill? I'd certainly love to hear their thoughts on the issue.

You're late. Look at the poll.

#1643

Wow why Fuzz this makes no sense I think this is a baddie driven CFD to save a teammate, notice almost the same people are up for lynches today as yesterday? I stand by my theory that one was mafia and that we had some minor save last phase, I think we are seeing a much bigger save attempt this phase. With a mafia team thhis big a CFD is easy to pull off I think this is scum driven to save one of the three leading people. Most likely Ike or Epi.

Can someone give me any reason for the Fuzz lynch?

I also really dislike DDL switch and his reasons. I actually am agreeing with Llama about him what about a Dragon lycnh?

linki: DDL and Golden are my top two scum reads, either Ike or Epi are there partners. Possibly Wilgy as well.

#1644

To me, it's not so much "opportunistic" as it is a fast flip w/absolutely NO explanation.

Fuzz, what is your motivation for suddenly flipping from not touching it with a 39 1/2 foot pole to voting exactly for that person?

#1645

Lemme go find that

#1646

What happened to all the people that thought gleam was bad?

This looks very very wrong.

#1647

Enrique wrote:
Sloonei wrote:I am starting to feel more inclined to vote for Epi, and if I reach a point where I'm confident enough to do that, I will do it.
Is that gonna happen on its own? Are you looking for encouragement?

also why is everyone voting fuzz now wtf i wasnt serious

It did happen, briefly. I suppose you could say I was looking for encouragement, aye. I wanted my decision to be the one that most people agreed with, because I am member of the town team, and I am mindful of everyone else's opinions. But now I'm on Fuzz. See the poll.
I'd still like to keep the discussion open for everyone.
Why aren't we voting for Matt?

linki to infinity and beyond

#1648

The fact that the Gleam wagon exploded at the beginning of the phase with almost no explanation to being gone and another wagon popping up ijust as fast is insane. I bet Fuzz will flip civ, you'll attempt to lead a Gleam lynch tomorrow and they will flip civ. I know firmly believe one of the other two front runners is a cop.

#1649

I still support a gleam lynch if you guys wanna go back to that though.

#1650

Enrique wrote:What happened to all the people that thought gleam was bad?

This looks very very wrong.

Did anyone say he still inst bad?

It's over! Would you play a sequel?