So, why I think sig is bad.
1) He immediately read the shift to Fuzz as 'some kind of big save', and he settles on it specifically being a save of ika or epi. Gleam is notably absent. Quotes like this:
sig wrote:The fact that the Gleam wagon exploded at the beginning of the phase with almost no explanation to being gone and another wagon popping up ijust as fast is insane. I bet Fuzz will flip civ, you'll attempt to lead a Gleam lynch tomorrow and they will flip civ. I know firmly believe one of the other two front runners is a cop.
Make it seem to me like sig was protecting both fuzz AND gleam in that eod. Sig seems to ignore that the ika and epi bandwagons also seem to have popped up with not really any more explanation that the gleam or fuzz ones.
2) Quotes like this:
sig wrote:I also find it very odd Golden doesn't want to lynch Ike a new player but suggested a CFD onto Serge another new player?
Seem to me on their face very manipulative. Trying to discredit one of the loudest voices by misrepresenting the motivation for saving ika.
Also this:
sig wrote:This is the scummiest CFD since the one I lead to stop me from getting lynched when I was almost confirmed mafia
trying to paint the CFD as 'scummy'. Like, his language was very strong in its opposition and I felt it was designed to save Fuzz. The whole time he was talking about how all that would happen is mafia would drop out of the other chains to vote in the new one... it seemed false to me.
3)
sig wrote:He voted for ike after saying he wasn't going to discuss ike/Silver correct? I believe Baddie Fuzz wouldn't slip like that. I think this is the mafia finding a weak reason and freaking everyone out.
Here is another quote that specifically bothered me. "I believe baddie fuzz wouldn't slip like that". It felt and sounded to me like a specific effort to protect Fuzz.
4) He expressly advocated people vote on the counter chain
sig wrote:Yo zebra, what do you think of this sudden Fuzz wagon? You should vote for Ike.
5) It doesn't help that sigs view of the world post-lynch is essentially the exact reverse of what I think seems sensible and still seems like it is being defensive of the people I see as most likely to be his teammates.
sig wrote:I'm in no way mafia was I wrong about Fuzz yes. However, nobody had convinced me enough to prove he was guilty and I had already mentioned how I'd rather Ika be lynched then another player. At that time this player was gleam but all the gleam people switched to Fuzz.
Quin (5), Nerolunar (6), agleaminranks (11), Soneji (12), Serge (14),RadicalFuzz (16), Enrique (23), Long Con (28), sig (29)
The most suspicious here is LC. I think the people more likely to be cops are Zebra/Epi, and Sloonie. I don't doubt there are a few on here however, I don't think there would have been a huge movement to save Fuzz if anything I think mafia members would jump in his wagon to gain civ credit espacilly when you have Golden saying nobody on the Fuzz wagon was mafia.
LC, zebra, epi and sloonei most suspicious? That I found very hard to understand. What about gleam, quin, enrique?
6) And he was the deciding vote that appeared to save Fuzz.
There is lots that looks bad to me in sig's iso. He looks good on day 3, I won't deny. He's tried very hard to clear his name.