All right guys, I'm back! Don't worry, I'm not bogged down by the posting limit, just a tad busy today. Gonna try to respond to people.
nutella wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 5:10 pm[snipping this out because it's super long with it in but leaving the quote box in for context]
cool, nice to meet you!! your style sounds kinda similar to mine except it seems you write longer posts lol[/quote]
Haha, yeah, I'm a wallposter
Alison wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 5:24 pm
PSI seems too eager to please. I don't get why they're doubting the cayvie read because like two other people townread cayvie. I don't read them as being that easily swayed in general. I'd be happy with a push there.
[snip]
This is literally just because my conviction was never strong at all in the first place. It's still too early in the game for me to be making proper scumreads, but I feel really uncomfortable when I don't have a scumread yet, so I just grabbed at the first thing I could think of. If other people make a read that seems better because either multiple people agree with it, or the one or two people who make the read's logic makes sense to me, I'll just sort of sheep it and may flip-flop around a bit until I land on something that feels better. When multiple people thought of Cavyie as town, I was just like "well I'm probably wrong so I'll see how Cavyie looks through the lens of town".
While I was writing this, I also realized that this is something I did in my last game where I was town: I had this perception of U-G that he and I have the same playstyle but he's better than me, so for much of the first Day I basically sheeped his reads when we disagreed on something because I felt like if we had differing views on something, then he was automatically right since he has more experience. I realized later in the game that it somewhat hindered me and there were a few reads that were left over that had no business being there and I had to clear them out. I realized that we both had probably equally good reads after the game ended. The point of all this is that I just realized I'm sort of doing the same thing here, because I have a perception that you all are better than me just because you're more experienced, so if we have differing reads than I should just abandon mine and go for yours since you're probably right. Obviously this is a fallacy, so I'll try to be wary of doing this in the future.
cayvie wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 6:08 pm
nutella wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 5:12 pm
cayvie wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 1:00 pm
PSINightmareEmpower wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 12:57 pm
As an outside eye, I can confirm that Alison was not being condescending,
mild w/w ping for PSI/Alison here
hmmm
sounded like distancing to me ("as an outside eye").
i'm kinda eh on my post now tho tbh.
Actually what I'd meant by this was that I was trying to be an impartial and objective third-party in reading the sequence of events, and that was the conclusion I came to. I figured my conclusion would differ from yours because you, being on the defensive in the situation, would potentially read the tone differently from how others would. (I know I sometimes read tone differently from how others would when I'm the one being pressured.)
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 8:11 pm
Actually now that you mention it.
PSINightmareEmpower wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 4:17 pm
I'll be honest, I'm not entirely sure what you mean by 'I don't know why you think this so you must be wrong'? You lost me there. I mean, I understand you take issue with the read, and it's about my weird intuition thing, but I don't really understand what specifically you mean?
To be fair though, I don't really read the post the same way I did when I first wrote that. Sometimes I think I should wait a bit before giving thoughts on a post because I'll read it differently at different times. I'm also really reaching for a scumread here because I always feel weird when I don't have a single scumread at a given time; but it's also probably still too early to have a proper scumread so maybe I should just be patient.
Definitely waffling on the Cavyie read though, for no other reason than that almost everyone else is townreading her so it's making me doubt myself. Might have to move her back up to null until further notice.
3/33
I'll be honest
if you need to point that out maybe you aren't being honest
I'm not entirely sure - the entirely feels like
I mean, I understand... but...
Holy waffling, Batman
but I don't really understand what specifically you mean?
There is an adverb tell in this forum. I'm burrowing it. ADVERBS!
To be fair, though
"To be fair" is another sentence that tries to ease the reader into what they are going to say and "though" reinforces that.
it's also probably still too early to have a proper scumread so maybe I should just be patient.
Full of flowery language, declaration of not scumreading, but isn't sure of that either.
Might have to move her back up to null
null is noncommital
until further notice.
Until someone makes a better case so I can jump back, ofc.
Yeah I totes see it.
I was kind of feeling bad about cass before (and yes, I just made that nickname and I didn't know her before) and now she's a high town read imo.
Yeah like Neutron said this is legitimately just how I type all the time. I actually say some variation of "honestly" irl too like all the time so those points are NAI. Obviously (as in, scum would say this too) "until further notice" means until I see a reason to drop her back to scum. I'm not sure what your point on "null" is, do *you* have all of the active players sorted into town or scum yet? It's kinda too early for me to sort everyone.
DJ Neutron Star wrote: ↑Tue Sep 01, 2020 8:14 pm
[snipping the quote pyramid to save space]
you think Alison's posts aren't condescending — cayvie does, so that makes cayvie the one who's incorrect and over defensive
literally anyone can say that about any take esp. if they feel required to post a scumread for some reason
and again, the thing about assuming cayvie is angry about being voted in order to make that post still sticks out, bc i'm pretty sure cayvie addressed in the post is specifically not the reason she was annoyed at Alison here, and it was bc she has Feelings about the way Alison was playing
also, who specifically is 'everyone else' in this situation?
I have this perception that the person on the defensive would read things in a different manner than everyone else would. I guess I thought the person on the defensive's read would be objectively wrong compared to everyone else's. That's how it seems to work out in my experience at least. It's probably not correct though.
You're right, I read the post entirely as though she meant she was annoyed about the vote. Now that I'm rereading it though, I think it does make more sense as your interpretation which is probably correct.
Everyone else is everyone else who weighed in on Cavyie's alignment. I'm pretty sure after Alison changed her read I was the only person to list Cavyie as scumlean.