Re: A Game About Chinese Food [Day 0]
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2017 5:53 pm
When is it?
Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
explain?Ricochet wrote:conditionally to individual for you are a is badly, that is distancingsprityo wrote:see now youre tunneling a single fact on poor premise. poor show.thellama73 wrote:Does no one else see the post where Sprityo totally outed himself?
You'll find nothing but regret and cold soggy chinese foodthellama73 wrote:I'll tunnel you right to baddie hell, my friend.sprityo wrote:see now youre tunneling a single fact on poor premise. poor show.thellama73 wrote:Does no one else see the post where Sprityo totally outed himself?
Why is the premise poor?sprityo wrote:see now youre tunneling a single fact on poor premise. poor show.thellama73 wrote:Does no one else see the post where Sprityo totally outed himself?
I haveno clue what makes you think that. You do not know me anywhere near as well as you think you do.Ricochet wrote:"misguided" meta readings originate s~v~s = usually that baddie sign
I don't know what you mean.S~V~S wrote:In this game, OK it moves fast enough that a no show won't affect game play.Epignosis wrote:I refuse to vote anyone just because he hasn't Made it yet. If Made is a civilian, pretend he doesn't exist and interact with people who ARE here. Otherwise you give the mafia an easy path to win.
Thank you, you are quite handsome too.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I think llama looks great.
To jump straight to the conclusion that I believed there to be a chatzy for the game = im scumJaggedJimmyJay wrote:Why is the premise poor?sprityo wrote:see now youre tunneling a single fact on poor premise. poor show.thellama73 wrote:Does no one else see the post where Sprityo totally outed himself?
Wait, what? Can you reword/elaborate upon this?Ricochet wrote:"misguided" meta readings originate s~v~s = usually that baddie sign
Has he ever even visited the Friday chatzy?juliets wrote:What do you mean I'm sticking to the sidelines?
I think sprityo may have slipped after all - I thought he was talking about the Friday chatzy but evidently not so I'm voting for him
Vote sprityo
It means OK, I will do as you ask, since in such a quick game, the quality of game play will not be affected by low posters or no shows.Epignosis wrote:I don't know what you mean.S~V~S wrote:In this game, OK it moves fast enough that a no show won't affect game play.Epignosis wrote:I refuse to vote anyone just because he hasn't Made it yet. If Made is a civilian, pretend he doesn't exist and interact with people who ARE here. Otherwise you give the mafia an easy path to win.
thellama73 for obvious budding up.
why are evidently don'tjuliets wrote:What do you mean I'm sticking to the sidelines?
I think sprityo may have slipped after all - I thought he was talking about the Friday chatzy but evidently not so I'm voting for him
Vote sprityo
You haven't given any reads of me, S~V~S, Jay, Llama, Rico, etc., despite the fact that there has been discussion among us.juliets wrote:What do you mean I'm sticking to the sidelines?
I think sprityo may have slipped after all - I thought he was talking about the Friday chatzy but evidently not so I'm voting for him
Vote sprityo
you are a don't watching bttf very wrong!Quin wrote:If these aren't up to date it might be because linki is off, but I'll catch up. Yell at me if something is really wrong though.
okaysprityo wrote:GUH you guys are really boiling my buns and now im getting flustered.
*grumble grumble*
Lynch me day one again, see if i care about your loss
You all look civvie to me at the moment. Not much has happened.MovingPictures07 wrote:You haven't given any reads of me, S~V~S, Jay, Llama, Rico, etc., despite the fact that there has been discussion among us.juliets wrote:What do you mean I'm sticking to the sidelines?
I think sprityo may have slipped after all - I thought he was talking about the Friday chatzy but evidently not so I'm voting for him
Vote sprityo
I thought people got mixed up about what day it was so I counted them.juliets wrote:Quin - I voted made day 0 - I didn't know that counted
I am trying to unvote made, vote sprityo
S~V~S wrote:Vote: MovingPictures
I get overwhelmed easily. but whatever.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:okaysprityo wrote:GUH you guys are really boiling my buns and now im getting flustered.
*grumble grumble*
Lynch me day one again, see if i care about your loss
sprityo
You look quite inauthentic in this appeal. You barely even tried to argue for yourself and jumped straight to that.
What looks inauthentic about it?JaggedJimmyJay wrote:okaysprityo wrote:GUH you guys are really boiling my buns and now im getting flustered.
*grumble grumble*
Lynch me day one again, see if i care about your loss
sprityo
You look quite inauthentic in this appeal. You barely even tried to argue for yourself and jumped straight to that.
he made a good pointthellama73 wrote:Although SVS doing what Epi wants is unusual enough to be noteworthy.
It coveys less than what I intend, because "quite" adds more.MovingPictures07 wrote:What looks inauthentic about it?JaggedJimmyJay wrote:okaysprityo wrote:GUH you guys are really boiling my buns and now im getting flustered.
*grumble grumble*
Lynch me day one again, see if i care about your loss
sprityo
You look quite inauthentic in this appeal. You barely even tried to argue for yourself and jumped straight to that.
And why did you say "quite inauthentic"? Doesn't inauthentic alone convey what you intend?
"Quite" is sometimes used to convey emphasis when the adjective alone is not strong enough for the intended meaning. A milder version of "very".MovingPictures07 wrote:What looks inauthentic about it?JaggedJimmyJay wrote:okaysprityo wrote:GUH you guys are really boiling my buns and now im getting flustered.
*grumble grumble*
Lynch me day one again, see if i care about your loss
sprityo
You look quite inauthentic in this appeal. You barely even tried to argue for yourself and jumped straight to that.
And why did you say "quite inauthentic"? Doesn't inauthentic alone convey what you intend?
Yeah, I feel the same way.Ricochet wrote:that sprityo wagon becoming very icky. juliets particularly wagony
Your read on llama, go.sprityo wrote:I get overwhelmed easily. but whatever.
Yeah, if I'm wrong about Sprityo then juliets is deffo bad.Ricochet wrote:that sprityo wagon becoming very icky. juliets particularly wagony
Why?thellama73 wrote:Yeah, if I'm wrong about Sprityo then juliets is deffo bad.Ricochet wrote:that sprityo wagon becoming very icky. juliets particularly wagony
lmao conditionally to you are're wrong in that "scumslip", then you are're right in that "wagon"? have outwardthellama73 wrote:Yeah, if I'm wrong about Sprityo then juliets is deffo bad.Ricochet wrote:that sprityo wagon becoming very icky. juliets particularly wagony
I told you I wasn't going to be able to say much. And I voted llama and said why.MovingPictures07 wrote:unvote: JaggedJimmyJay
vote: Epignosis
Say more things, Epi. Give me at least one read.
Because if I'm right about Sprityo then I don't think you would buss a teammate like that.juliets wrote:Why?thellama73 wrote:Yeah, if I'm wrong about Sprityo then juliets is deffo bad.Ricochet wrote:that sprityo wagon becoming very icky. juliets particularly wagony
Aggressively pushing a lynch on a believable cause with little backing outside of a theory.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Your read on llama, go.sprityo wrote:I get overwhelmed easily. but whatever.