Re: Twin Peaks Mafia {NIGHT 0}
Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2013 10:29 am
I am fairly bad at chess, as a matter of fact.
I also happen to know that Nevinera is very good at chess, so I hope he doesn't get that role.

Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
Bye Alex. By the way, my son, Simon, cracks up every time he reads "Eat Socks?! Socks eat Alex."MovingPictures07 wrote:Welcome Rox, bye Elohcin!
Sad to see you go, hope to play another game with you soon!Elohcin wrote:Bye Alex. By the way, my son, Simon, cracks up every time he reads "Eat Socks?! Socks eat Alex."MovingPictures07 wrote:Welcome Rox, bye Elohcin!
This made me happy. Totally listening to that album now.insertnamehere wrote:Shiny, shiny, shiny boots of leather, whiplash girlchild in the dark. Severin, your servant comes in bells, please don't forsake him. Strike, dear mistress, and cure his heart.
I don't know. Did it turn out the chemistry book in MacGyver had anything worthwhile it was saying or did it all turn out to be crap? I am going to take it with a grain of salt like I usually do.thellama73 wrote:Wow, this is going to be a tough game. What do we think of Lucy's column?
I wouldn't give it much heed. Just a player's thoughts as far as I can tell from the roles.thellama73 wrote:Wow, this is going to be a tough game. What do we think of Lucy's column?
Some of the chemistry book was true I think. Don't know what to think of this for certain though. If Vompatti turns out to be Bob though I will scream. :-)MovingPictures07 wrote:I don't know. Did it turn out the chemistry book in MacGyver had anything worthwhile it was saying or did it all turn out to be crap? I am going to take it with a grain of salt like I usually do.thellama73 wrote:Wow, this is going to be a tough game. What do we think of Lucy's column?
It is, but there's an inherent danger as well - if we put out a spread of votes, whoever votes later has a lot of control over who is lynched. Worse even - if we put out a spread early, then a baddie block vote at the end can decide exactly who dies.Snow Dog wrote:Ok. So that confirms Bob is in the game. And it seems a spread of votes would be useful to us.
This is true, but if Bob and his minion are the only baddies, wouldn't they out themselves as baddies when they don't spread the vote? Why not just plan to spread it completely from the beginning?Nevinera wrote:It is, but there's an inherent danger as well - if we put out a spread of votes, whoever votes later has a lot of control over who is lynched. Worse even - if we put out a spread early, then a baddie block vote at the end can decide exactly who dies.Snow Dog wrote:Ok. So that confirms Bob is in the game. And it seems a spread of votes would be useful to us.
I think it makes more sense for early voters to *not* spread, and then later voters to spend their votes protecting everyone, if they otherwise would agree on the target. In fact, I think we should consider it a strong sign of BOB-ness if a bunch of people vote the same way after half the players have already voted.
It wouldn't be a bunch of players, though, since there is only bob and his one recruit so far. I think the vote spreading out idea is a good one, provided we have a few people hang back to override Bob and his friend.Nevinera wrote:It is, but there's an inherent danger as well - if we put out a spread of votes, whoever votes later has a lot of control over who is lynched. Worse even - if we put out a spread early, then a baddie block vote at the end can decide exactly who dies.Snow Dog wrote:Ok. So that confirms Bob is in the game. And it seems a spread of votes would be useful to us.
I think it makes more sense for early voters to *not* spread, and then later voters to spend their votes protecting everyone, if they otherwise would agree on the target. In fact, I think we should consider it a strong sign of BOB-ness if a bunch of people vote the same way after half the players have already voted.
We'd have to hang back four though, to be sure to be able to cancel out the bob-block. Three might be enough, chosen randomly, since the chances of picking two specific people in a random group of three out of 11 is about 11 in 11C3, or 7% (then we'd have to trust someone to pick random numbers, and it might have been bob).thellama73 wrote: It wouldn't be a bunch of players, though, since there is only bob and his one recruit so far. I think the vote spreading out idea is a good one, provided we have a few people hang back to override Bob and his friend.
Yea I agree. I think the best thing to do is spread the vote evenly. Why don't we all just vote ourselves, why do the shift one?MovingPictures07 wrote:Why not just have everyone plan to vote the person beneath or above them alphabetically and why vote early? I see no reason why Bob would risk outing himself and/or his minion by breaking the pattern because the best that could happen is 1 person gets lynched and the NK still fails, and then we know who to lynch tomorrow.
You think Bob is going to fail to go along with out plan? I highly doubt that. That would be suicide.Nevinera wrote:We'd have to hang back four though, to be sure to be able to cancel out the bob-block. Three might be enough, chosen randomly, since the chances of picking two specific people in a random group of three out of 11 is about 11 in 11C3, or 7% (then we'd have to trust someone to pick random numbers, and it might have been bob).thellama73 wrote: It wouldn't be a bunch of players, though, since there is only bob and his one recruit so far. I think the vote spreading out idea is a good one, provided we have a few people hang back to override Bob and his friend.
I agree.Snow Dog wrote:I will go along with voting the person above. If everyone agrees.
I'm okay with that toothellama73 wrote:I agree.Snow Dog wrote:I will go along with voting the person above. If everyone agrees.
I will do so also, but I'm going to wait for the end of the day.Snow Dog wrote:I will go along with voting the person above. If everyone agrees.
I was just thinking this myself. Sure, this works for now, but if we continue this strategy all throughout, every lynch will be randomly determined death, there will be no NK, then more randomly determined death, ever chasing after catching Bob by chance.Vompatti wrote:I'm fine with the above since it's day 1, but we'll have to think of something better soon.
I agree we need to change tactics tomorrow. Bob will not have another recruit until day three, so we can try to ferret them out during discussion tomorrow. When you say "above" do you mean in the poll or alphabetically?MovingPictures07 wrote:I was just thinking this myself. Sure, this works for now, but if we continue this strategy all throughout, every lynch will be randomly determined death, there will be no NK, then more randomly determined death, ever chasing after catching Bob by chance.Vompatti wrote:I'm fine with the above since it's day 1, but we'll have to think of something better soon.
That said, I still think this is currently our best option, unless someone can come up with something better.
And I like the idea of voting the person above. There's something weird about voting for myself, lol.
That's true, he does recruit every other period, so that will give us some time to examine more closely. I did mean alphabetically because usually that's how polls are listed, but now that you brought this to my attention, I realized the poll is not alphabetical. Uh... let's just go with above on the poll then. Makes it easier, right?thellama73 wrote:I agree we need to change tactics tomorrow. Bob will not have another recruit until day three, so we can try to ferret them out during discussion tomorrow. When you say "above" do you mean in the poll or alphabetically?MovingPictures07 wrote:I was just thinking this myself. Sure, this works for now, but if we continue this strategy all throughout, every lynch will be randomly determined death, there will be no NK, then more randomly determined death, ever chasing after catching Bob by chance.Vompatti wrote:I'm fine with the above since it's day 1, but we'll have to think of something better soon.
That said, I still think this is currently our best option, unless someone can come up with something better.
And I like the idea of voting the person above. There's something weird about voting for myself, lol.
Also, I am going to be gone for most of the weekend so I will go ahead and vote soon.
Is that something that I'm missing/forgetting that indicates this is going to happen every day? Is there a possibility that this is a one time occurrence?It is now Day 1. You have 24 hours to vote out who you think is BOB, and whoever he is possessing. Remember, if whoever BOB's possessing get's a single vote, everybody lives through the night.
From the roles:Kate wrote:Is that something that I'm missing/forgetting that indicates this is going to happen every day? Is there a possibility that this is a one time occurrence?It is now Day 1. You have 24 hours to vote out who you think is BOB, and whoever he is possessing. Remember, if whoever BOB's possessing get's a single vote, everybody lives through the night.
OH, should read the roles.thellama73 wrote:From the roles:Kate wrote:Is that something that I'm missing/forgetting that indicates this is going to happen every day? Is there a possibility that this is a one time occurrence?It is now Day 1. You have 24 hours to vote out who you think is BOB, and whoever he is possessing. Remember, if whoever BOB's possessing get's a single vote, everybody lives through the night.
BOB
Wow, Bob, Wow. On even days, can possess someone. That person will join his team. Bob himself cannot kill, but his minions can, unless they are under suspicion. Bob's minions can NK someone every night, unless they have at least one vote. If they get even a single vote, their NK doesn't go through. To win, Bob and his minions need to outnumber everyone else. Minions can still use their NP, and even have BTSC. If Bob is killed, only his minions remain.
Well hopefully he is not with Bob.insertnamehere wrote:Remember, Ben Horne can change one vote. He could change the vote for himself to whoever he chooses.
Just food for thought.
So I guess that means Ben Horne is in play, another white role. Does anyone have any reason to believe any black roles are in play?insertnamehere wrote:Remember, Ben Horne can change one vote. He could change the vote for himself to whoever he chooses.
Just food for thought.
No I have not noticed, hmmmm. My vote goes to him anyway but that is goo food for thoughtthellama73 wrote:Has anyone else noticed that BWT keeps saying he's voting without actually voting? He did it on Night 0 too. Might be something to look at.
Sorry, but it has to be in the thread.S~V~S wrote:INH, am I allowed to nudge BWT to vote on FB? I mean. If I don't get a vote and something goes wrong with this plan (although we all know that plans like these always turn out so well) I will get the blame.
Also I have. Not read back yet (phone/car) but are we able to self vote? If so I may hold my vote in case BWT fails to vote for me.