Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
in that post you also said u post more as town than mafianovaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:11 pmHence the rest of my answer to Tedexter that I usually post a lot no matter my alignment.
latternovaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:14 pm Therealet, do you catch up on everything then start posting? Or do you quote people and respond while catching up?
Whaaaaaat? There ain't nothing more townie than good old shade. I mean how do you usually play?therealet wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:13 pmits not towny? at all? lmfaonovaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:11 pmWhat's wrong with shades?therealet wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:07 pmshade already. yikes
+1Tedexter wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:34 pm You just said that asking for activity is not suspicious, but then you keep saying that "complaining about it" is suspicious. Your whole post didn't answer my question. You are pacing my "reality". In other words, you are feigning agreeing with me to make me think we're on the same page, but you are logically claiming to be on opposite sides from me. You agree with me, but you still paint me scum for a perfectly reasonable thing.
I'll pass judgement until later when I see you engage with other players. I read people better off of how they engage with others and what questions they ask.
But for now, you're on my radar. I don't mind you jumping the gun fast, I like that. I just don't think your reasoning was townie. It feels like you've locked yourself into scum reading me early on. You agreed with me but you still paint me scum, like you have a reputation to hold, or ... an image to protect. Or to create. If you know what I mean.
Which is also true and a partial response to his question.therealet wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:14 pmin that post you also said u post more as town than mafianovaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:11 pmHence the rest of my answer to Tedexter that I usually post a lot no matter my alignment.
youre arguing over an emotenovaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:56 pmYou seem to have pinpointed "why" just fine. Not really, it's the obvious truth. I mean that's just how I roll here by shooting the shit to get stuff going. I mean what do you think that emoji included in the initial post was trying to convey?Tedexter wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:41 pmI don't like this post either, can't really pinpoint why though. It's probably because I see you saying this preemptively to defend yourself for that ridiculous push.novaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:16 pm An aspect of try-harding D0 is shooting shit to get people going, my 'not a good look' was some shit shooting and I thought the emoji accompanying it would give a hint at the seriousness of it. There's still a lot of truth to a shot shit though
To further explain, it felt like you went guns blazing and from your post, your main idea was that you were susing me. But then you say "shooting shit to get people going" as to make it seem like you were testing me and not having an actual scum read on me, which reads as really fake.
which you also cant realistically have as a town indicatornovaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:16 pmWhich is also true and a partial response to his question.therealet wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:14 pmin that post you also said u post more as town than mafianovaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:11 pmHence the rest of my answer to Tedexter that I usually post a lot no matter my alignment.
GTH stance on both of us.therealet wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:18 pmyoure arguing over an emotenovaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:56 pmYou seem to have pinpointed "why" just fine. Not really, it's the obvious truth. I mean that's just how I roll here by shooting the shit to get stuff going. I mean what do you think that emoji included in the initial post was trying to convey?Tedexter wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:41 pmI don't like this post either, can't really pinpoint why though. It's probably because I see you saying this preemptively to defend yourself for that ridiculous push.novaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:16 pm An aspect of try-harding D0 is shooting shit to get people going, my 'not a good look' was some shit shooting and I thought the emoji accompanying it would give a hint at the seriousness of it. There's still a lot of truth to a shot shit though
To further explain, it felt like you went guns blazing and from your post, your main idea was that you were susing me. But then you say "shooting shit to get people going" as to make it seem like you were testing me and not having an actual scum read on me, which reads as really fake.
youre both being very stubborn and are easy to provoke
How so?therealet wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:09 pmbit overreactive my dudeTedexter wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 4:36 pmI mean, yeah, for me it's still a phase. Game's started. I never played with D0 phases in my entire life, I just expect everyone to be active regardless.
You're saying that second line like I'm supposed to know people's activity, especially during New Year's. Given that it's free time I'd expect people to post more than post less, because they don't have to work. Wouldn't that be true? I don't see why it's not a good look to be honest. I don't like that shade mister nova, I might hop on the train sig is in charge of.
Could you elaborate on why it's suspicious to ask for activity, nova? Why would that be alignment indicative in any way?
fairly wolfy the both of younovaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:19 pmGTH stance on both of us.therealet wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:18 pmyoure arguing over an emotenovaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:56 pmYou seem to have pinpointed "why" just fine. Not really, it's the obvious truth. I mean that's just how I roll here by shooting the shit to get stuff going. I mean what do you think that emoji included in the initial post was trying to convey?Tedexter wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:41 pmI don't like this post either, can't really pinpoint why though. It's probably because I see you saying this preemptively to defend yourself for that ridiculous push.novaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:16 pm An aspect of try-harding D0 is shooting shit to get people going, my 'not a good look' was some shit shooting and I thought the emoji accompanying it would give a hint at the seriousness of it. There's still a lot of truth to a shot shit though
To further explain, it felt like you went guns blazing and from your post, your main idea was that you were susing me. But then you say "shooting shit to get people going" as to make it seem like you were testing me and not having an actual scum read on me, which reads as really fake.
youre both being very stubborn and are easy to provoke
nova made an obvious joke kingTedexter wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:21 pmHow so?therealet wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:09 pmbit overreactive my dudeTedexter wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 4:36 pmI mean, yeah, for me it's still a phase. Game's started. I never played with D0 phases in my entire life, I just expect everyone to be active regardless.
You're saying that second line like I'm supposed to know people's activity, especially during New Year's. Given that it's free time I'd expect people to post more than post less, because they don't have to work. Wouldn't that be true? I don't see why it's not a good look to be honest. I don't like that shade mister nova, I might hop on the train sig is in charge of.
Could you elaborate on why it's suspicious to ask for activity, nova? Why would that be alignment indicative in any way?
+1 lmao, my thoughts when I read the poststherealet wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:18 pmyoure arguing over an emotenovaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:56 pmYou seem to have pinpointed "why" just fine. Not really, it's the obvious truth. I mean that's just how I roll here by shooting the shit to get stuff going. I mean what do you think that emoji included in the initial post was trying to convey?Tedexter wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:41 pmI don't like this post either, can't really pinpoint why though. It's probably because I see you saying this preemptively to defend yourself for that ridiculous push.novaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:16 pm An aspect of try-harding D0 is shooting shit to get people going, my 'not a good look' was some shit shooting and I thought the emoji accompanying it would give a hint at the seriousness of it. There's still a lot of truth to a shot shit though
To further explain, it felt like you went guns blazing and from your post, your main idea was that you were susing me. But then you say "shooting shit to get people going" as to make it seem like you were testing me and not having an actual scum read on me, which reads as really fake.
youre both being very stubborn and are easy to provoke
Indeed. So what's the point of this?therealet wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:18 pmwhich you also cant realistically have as a town indicatornovaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:16 pmWhich is also true and a partial response to his question.therealet wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:14 pmin that post you also said u post more as town than mafianovaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:11 pmHence the rest of my answer to Tedexter that I usually post a lot no matter my alignment.
novaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:24 pmIndeed. So what's the point of this?therealet wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:18 pmwhich you also cant realistically have as a town indicatornovaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:16 pmWhich is also true and a partial response to his question.therealet wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:14 pmin that post you also said u post more as town than mafianovaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:11 pmHence the rest of my answer to Tedexter that I usually post a lot no matter my alignment.
the first post of novas directed at you was a joke, your reaction set off a way in to a discussion
But I'm not though, that's why I followed with "but I post a lot no matter my alignment". The "I guess I post more as Town" is a true remark, I'm not sure how it can be viewed as an attempt to use it as a town indicator when I clearly said it wasn't.therealet wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:26 pmnovaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:24 pmIndeed. So what's the point of this?therealet wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:18 pmwhich you also cant realistically have as a town indicatornovaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:16 pmWhich is also true and a partial response to his question.therealet wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:14 pmin that post you also said u post more as town than mafianovaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:11 pmHence the rest of my answer to Tedexter that I usually post a lot no matter my alignment.
mate, im just not letting u use that as a town indicator
Eh, I actually like long drawn interactions. Gets me inside the head of the person I'm trying to read by engaging them for a while to see if they're full of shit or not lol.Tedexter wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:18 pm Alright, plenty of information for the people to chew on and express their opinions. Successful day 0.
I’m not gonna comment anything because it’s a conversation that leads more towards who’s right and who’s wrong rather than figuring alignments.
If it’s not for you, then for me it definitely is. That’s not how I read people.
which you cant donovaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:32 pmBut I'm not though, that's why I followed with "but I post a lot no matter my alignment". The "I guess I post more as Town" is a true remark, I'm not sure how it can be viewed as an attempt to use it as a town indicator when I clearly said it wasn't.therealet wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:26 pmnovaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:24 pmIndeed. So what's the point of this?therealet wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:18 pmwhich you also cant realistically have as a town indicatornovaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:16 pmWhich is also true and a partial response to his question.therealet wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:14 pmin that post you also said u post more as town than mafianovaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:11 pm
Hence the rest of my answer to Tedexter that I usually post a lot no matter my alignment.
mate, im just not letting u use that as a town indicator
I mean In your attempt to "not letting u use that as a town indicator", you're using my own words to the dude lol. This shit is no dumb and pointless.
Thoughts on that "lil bit substance"?Rej wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:23 pm+1 lmao, my thoughts when I read the poststherealet wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:18 pmyoure arguing over an emotenovaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:56 pmYou seem to have pinpointed "why" just fine. Not really, it's the obvious truth. I mean that's just how I roll here by shooting the shit to get stuff going. I mean what do you think that emoji included in the initial post was trying to convey?Tedexter wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:41 pmI don't like this post either, can't really pinpoint why though. It's probably because I see you saying this preemptively to defend yourself for that ridiculous push.novaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:16 pm An aspect of try-harding D0 is shooting shit to get people going, my 'not a good look' was some shit shooting and I thought the emoji accompanying it would give a hint at the seriousness of it. There's still a lot of truth to a shot shit though
To further explain, it felt like you went guns blazing and from your post, your main idea was that you were susing me. But then you say "shooting shit to get people going" as to make it seem like you were testing me and not having an actual scum read on me, which reads as really fake.
youre both being very stubborn and are easy to provoke
atleast there is a lil bit substance between their emote debates
You have foiled my plan. Curse you!therealet wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:36 pmwhich you cant donovaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:32 pmBut I'm not though, that's why I followed with "but I post a lot no matter my alignment". The "I guess I post more as Town" is a true remark, I'm not sure how it can be viewed as an attempt to use it as a town indicator when I clearly said it wasn't.therealet wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:26 pmnovaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:24 pmIndeed. So what's the point of this?therealet wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:18 pmwhich you also cant realistically have as a town indicatornovaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:16 pmWhich is also true and a partial response to his question.
mate, im just not letting u use that as a town indicator
I mean In your attempt to "not letting u use that as a town indicator", you're using my own words to the dude lol. This shit is no dumb and pointless.
what's substanceful is your stances on D0 and how each one defends their stancenovaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:36 pmThoughts on that "lil bit substance"?Rej wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:23 pm+1 lmao, my thoughts when I read the poststherealet wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:18 pmyoure arguing over an emotenovaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:56 pmYou seem to have pinpointed "why" just fine. Not really, it's the obvious truth. I mean that's just how I roll here by shooting the shit to get stuff going. I mean what do you think that emoji included in the initial post was trying to convey?Tedexter wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:41 pmI don't like this post either, can't really pinpoint why though. It's probably because I see you saying this preemptively to defend yourself for that ridiculous push.novaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:16 pm An aspect of try-harding D0 is shooting shit to get people going, my 'not a good look' was some shit shooting and I thought the emoji accompanying it would give a hint at the seriousness of it. There's still a lot of truth to a shot shit though
To further explain, it felt like you went guns blazing and from your post, your main idea was that you were susing me. But then you say "shooting shit to get people going" as to make it seem like you were testing me and not having an actual scum read on me, which reads as really fake.
youre both being very stubborn and are easy to provoke
atleast there is a lil bit substance between their emote debates
What is all this supposed to mean lol? I want your concrete thoughts and feelings, not a philosophical take on the gameRej wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 7:13 pmwhat's substanceful is your stances on D0 and how each one defends their stancenovaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:36 pmThoughts on that "lil bit substance"?Rej wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:23 pm+1 lmao, my thoughts when I read the poststherealet wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:18 pmyoure arguing over an emotenovaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:56 pmYou seem to have pinpointed "why" just fine. Not really, it's the obvious truth. I mean that's just how I roll here by shooting the shit to get stuff going. I mean what do you think that emoji included in the initial post was trying to convey?Tedexter wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:41 pmI don't like this post either, can't really pinpoint why though. It's probably because I see you saying this preemptively to defend yourself for that ridiculous push.novaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:16 pm An aspect of try-harding D0 is shooting shit to get people going, my 'not a good look' was some shit shooting and I thought the emoji accompanying it would give a hint at the seriousness of it. There's still a lot of truth to a shot shit though
To further explain, it felt like you went guns blazing and from your post, your main idea was that you were susing me. But then you say "shooting shit to get people going" as to make it seem like you were testing me and not having an actual scum read on me, which reads as really fake.
youre both being very stubborn and are easy to provoke
atleast there is a lil bit substance between their emote debates
but I am too tired to read anything into it, I was swamped today
what for me counts is the motivation D0, even if reads can be shit, if the enthusiasm is right and the whole picture fits, then the towncard can be handed out, I think catching a slipping scum D0 is a rare event. Atleast I haven't seen this yet on TS or it just happened once and I forgot it.
Alot of people try to find someone slipping tho and force it with heaty discussions and imho it is NAI but mostly towns due to ratios.
And finding a lone agendaful wolf who tries to make a towny slip in whatever means to throw shades on them is rarely happening, but it happens.
Calling it D0 powerwolfing, that's basically based on infowolfing.
That's why the interaction from my PoV was NAI and you guys could be V/V W/W or V/W or anything.
You get a proper scum read on someone.novaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 7:31 pm What happens if you don't get a proper scum read on someone?
then I make sure that you will only receive well deserved town readsnovaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 7:31 pm What happens if you don't get a proper scum read on someone?
