The Syndicate

S~V~S wrote:Now see, i would have put that in sarcastic orange :nod:

FZ says:A sense of humor, and popular. You must be one hell of a catch

Fixed

S~V~S wrote:

Do too have one, I laugh a lot and so do those who know me well~ but I have been lynched SO MANY TIMES for blowing off a question i thought was a joke, lol. For me suspicions are srs bsns, and if someone asks me a question i do them the courtesy of assuming they are serious.

Mister Rearranger wrote:Can I haz suspicionz?

FZ. wrote:

Mister Rearranger wrote:Can I haz suspicionz?

Sure

insertnamehere wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

Do too have one, I laugh a lot and so do those who know me well~ but I have been lynched SO MANY TIMES for blowing off a question i thought was a joke, lol. For me suspicions are srs bsns, and if someone asks me a question i do them the courtesy of assuming they are serious.

The fact that you take suspicions so seriously makes me very suspicious of you.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

insertnamehere wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

Do too have one, I laugh a lot and so do those who know me well~ but I have been lynched SO MANY TIMES for blowing off a question i thought was a joke, lol. For me suspicions are srs bsns, and if someone asks me a question i do them the courtesy of assuming they are serious.

The fact that you take suspicions so seriously makes me very suspicious of you.

Should I take your suspicion of him seriously? Not much else to do so far. Or I could just keep the playful banter going for pages and pages. So yes Mister Rearranger, you can haz some too.

S~V~S wrote:*Falls Over Dead*

S~V~S wrote:After you said i had no sense of humor

insertnamehere wrote: I am always serious 100% of the time.

thellama73 wrote:

Hedgeowl wrote:

Epignosis wrote:I'm still on chapter 17 of the instructions.

I just realized the downside of this format is that we can't all sit around a table having boo read the instructions to us, while some pay attention, some zone out when they get it, others just figure it out as the games starts, and the rest never quite figure it all out, but still manage to win somehow.

Well, since I'm not reading any of the host posts, this should be interesting.

birdwithteeth11 wrote: Boo games are ridiculously complicated, so I wish you luck with that!

Dom wrote:I usually die in Boo games, so I guess I'm pretty ignorant.

thellama73 wrote:

birdwithteeth11 wrote: Boo games are ridiculously complicated, so I wish you luck with that!

Thank you, BWT. I bet you're a good catch.

<Pointed glare at SVS>

FZ. wrote:

S~V~S wrote:Actually it is just playful banter, we do ALOT of that around here, we have not, and never will discourage fluff.

I know. I'm just teasing you. Don't take me seriously...or do. I'm in a weird mood. Ignore me

@linki: no, Kitty. It was a joke. But it doesn't mean they can't be.

Does SVS always regard everything at face value?

Mister Rearranger wrote:

FZ. wrote:

Mister Rearranger wrote:Can I haz suspicionz?

Sure

*glomps*

Hedgeowl wrote:So anybody here actually good at catching baddies?

Dom wrote:

FZ. wrote:

S~V~S wrote:Actually it is just playful banter, we do ALOT of that around here, we have not, and never will discourage fluff.

I know. I'm just teasing you. Don't take me seriously...or do. I'm in a weird mood. Ignore me

@linki: no, Kitty. It was a joke. But it doesn't mean they can't be.

Does SVS always regard everything at face value?

No.

FZ. wrote:

Dom wrote:

FZ. wrote:

S~V~S wrote:Actually it is just playful banter, we do ALOT of that around here, we have not, and never will discourage fluff.

I know. I'm just teasing you. Don't take me seriously...or do. I'm in a weird mood. Ignore me

@linki: no, Kitty. It was a joke. But it doesn't mean they can't be.

Does SVS always regard everything at face value?

No.

Is your way of trying to make me suspicious of SVS in a not so subtle way? Or did you think her reactions were genuinely too serious?

Dom wrote:

FZ. wrote:

Dom wrote:

FZ. wrote:

S~V~S wrote:Actually it is just playful banter, we do ALOT of that around here, we have not, and never will discourage fluff.

I know. I'm just teasing you. Don't take me seriously...or do. I'm in a weird mood. Ignore me

@linki: no, Kitty. It was a joke. But it doesn't mean they can't be.

Does SVS always regard everything at face value?

No.

Is your way of trying to make me suspicious of SVS in a not so subtle way? Or did you think her reactions were genuinely too serious?

I found her to be neither civvie or baddie here. I found her being herself.
I don't think it means much to her alignment.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

insertnamehere wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

Do too have one, I laugh a lot and so do those who know me well~ but I have been lynched SO MANY TIMES for blowing off a question i thought was a joke, lol. For me suspicions are srs bsns, and if someone asks me a question i do them the courtesy of assuming they are serious.

The fact that you take suspicions so seriously makes me very suspicious of you.

Should I take your suspicion of him seriously? Not much else to do so far. Or I could just keep the playful banter going for pages and pages. So yes Mister Rearranger, you can haz some too.

S~V~S wrote:Dom had that Avi for quite a while, as I recall.

And Day Zero is a day to get the feel of things, and the feel of people. Since you can't vote to lynch anyhow, alot of people use the time to settle into the thread before we go into the cat/mouse phase.

S~V~S wrote:Dom had that Avi for quite a while, as I recall.

And Day Zero is a day to get the feel of things, and the feel of people. Since you can't vote to lynch anyhow, alot of people use the time to settle into the thread before we go into the cat/mouse phase.

Hedgeowl wrote:Anybody else see Dom's avatar as BWTs old one? Dom have you been drinking and avatar switching with your new mod powers or is it my device making things go cray cray?

I would never abuse my powers like that?

But, really, Dean Winchester.... that's my avvie <3

reywaS wrote:nub DharmaHelper.

Are you going to a temple or something to meditate on your thoughts before sharing them with us?

Mister Rearranger wrote:

reywaS wrote:nub DharmaHelper.

Are you going to a temple or something to meditate on your thoughts before sharing them with us?

He went and posted in the Game of Champions thread, as a matter of fact.

Lying already, are we DH?

thellama73 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:Dom had that Avi for quite a while, as I recall.

And Day Zero is a day to get the feel of things, and the feel of people. Since you can't vote to lynch anyhow, alot of people use the time to settle into the thread before we go into the cat/mouse phase.

And some people use the time to cast aspersions on other people's desirability as mate.

FZ. wrote:

thellama73 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:Dom had that Avi for quite a while, as I recall.

And Day Zero is a day to get the feel of things, and the feel of people. Since you can't vote to lynch anyhow, alot of people use the time to settle into the thread before we go into the cat/mouse phase.

And some people use the time to cast aspersions on other people's desirability as mate.

While I feel your pain, last game you were pushing people more by this point already, and even though you were an indi, you said you chose to work with the civvies. So should I take it that this is how you play when a baddie?

thellama73 wrote:

FZ. wrote:

thellama73 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:Dom had that Avi for quite a while, as I recall.

And Day Zero is a day to get the feel of things, and the feel of people. Since you can't vote to lynch anyhow, alot of people use the time to settle into the thread before we go into the cat/mouse phase.

And some people use the time to cast aspersions on other people's desirability as mate.

While I feel your pain, last game you were pushing people more by this point already, and even though you were an indi, you said you chose to work with the civvies. So should I take it that this is how you play when a baddie?

I don't think I understand what you mean.

FZ. wrote: I mean that you're dwelling too much on something that is off topic. I'm just wondering if it's convenient playing that card.I kind of liked the way you played in the Shawshank game, so I say: Less moping more hunting

FZ. wrote:

Hedgeowl wrote:So anybody here actually good at catching baddies?

After only 2 games on this site, I've given up trying on day0. People just reply with sarcastic come backs. So I say, if you can't beat then, join them.
Though I have to say, it makes it so much easier for the baddies to blend in. Right now, I'm not sure who is more suspicious: those trying to scum hunt, or those that are just talking about everything but the game.

thellama73 wrote:

FZ. wrote: I mean that you're dwelling too much on something that is off topic. I'm just wondering if it's convenient playing that card.I kind of liked the way you played in the Shawshank game, so I say: Less moping more hunting

Okay, I see. Thanks for clarifying. I guess I would respond in two ways. First, I went after people in Shawshank because I saw things to go after. I haven't seen anything of note to go after here yet. That doesn't mean I am not looking.

Second, I am making somewhat of a conscious effort to improve on my generally terrible record of finding baddies. I think that too often, early in the game, I manufacture cases on people because I am desperate to find something on which to base my vote, and this biases my thinking later in the game. Just look at all the times I relentlessly pursued Hedgeowl only to have her flip civ. I am trying not to do that this game. I am playing it laid back, waiting to see if anything catches my eye. It's still early yet, and we have plenty of time before the first lynch.

thellama73 wrote:

FZ. wrote: I mean that you're dwelling too much on something that is off topic. I'm just wondering if it's convenient playing that card.I kind of liked the way you played in the Shawshank game, so I say: Less moping more hunting

Okay, I see. Thanks for clarifying. I guess I would respond in two ways. First, I went after people in Shawshank because I saw things to go after. I haven't seen anything of note to go after here yet. That doesn't mean I am not looking.

Second, I am making somewhat of a conscious effort to improve on my generally terrible record of finding baddies. I think that too often, early in the game, I manufacture cases on people because I am desperate to find something on which to base my vote, and this biases my thinking later in the game. Just look at all the times I relentlessly pursued Hedgeowl only to have her flip civ. I am trying not to do that this game. I am playing it laid back, waiting to see if anything catches my eye. It's still early yet, and we have plenty of time before the first lynch.[/quot
Thanks for answering. The second paragraph is a little contradictory to the first one, since you didn't make that conscious decision last game, did you?
Anyway, I know there's plenty of time before the lynch, I just like to push things forward because how are we going to be anywhere better next day if all we do is joke around?

kneel4justice wrote:

FZ. wrote:

Hedgeowl wrote:So anybody here actually good at catching baddies?

After only 2 games on this site, I've given up trying on day0. People just reply with sarcastic come backs. So I say, if you can't beat then, join them.
Though I have to say, it makes it so much easier for the baddies to blend in. Right now, I'm not sure who is more suspicious: those trying to scum hunt, or those that are just talking about everything but the game.

I really like your posts so far this game, they feel like the FZ I know from KSITE. That being said, I do wonder what is up with that comment about having given up trying on Day 0, clearly that is not that case? Which I am glad it is not, but I am having trouble following why you've said that but you have went on to "try". It's just a contradiction and I wonder if there is a reason behind it such as you feel you need to make yourself look as good as possible right off the bat?

FZ. wrote: I was wondering were you were. It seems you are affected by the syndicate curse too because after only one game, you're not your usual aggressive self as I'm used to even this early in the game.
I think I meant that I've given up hope people will actually do something. It doesn't mean I won't try, even if I tone it down a bit until the rest decide to actually join the game...

Did anything catch your eye so far?

@linki: I know, I was trying to remember who was the baddie that said it not so long ago. But I've said that in the past as well, and I was a civ, so I can't fault him for that