The Syndicate

thellama73 wrote:

This post has been heartily approved by your friendly neighborhood Sockface.

MovingPictures07 wrote: This post has been heartily approved by your friendly neighborhood Sockface.

I still can't get over how great that album is. Never ceases to amaze.

thellama73 wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote: This post has been heartily approved by your friendly neighborhood Sockface.

I still can't get over how great that album is. Never ceases to amaze.

Agreed completely.

Mongoose wrote:No one likes rules, but we've got to have a few, seeing as this isn't some libertarian think tank!

Libertarians are not opposed to rules. The philosophy itself is axiomatic.

Mongoose wrote:"Wait, I have all kinds of ferret jokes!" shouted Epignosis.

Ferret it's worth, I have no such jokes. Only puns.

Mongoose wrote:If you have a question on interpreting any of the other rules, please ask S~V~S or myself.

Please refrain from using a reflexive pronoun when the subject does not warrant it.

That is all. It feels grand to be back home.

Epignosis wrote:

Mongoose wrote:No one likes rules, but we've got to have a few, seeing as this isn't some libertarian think tank!

Libertarians are not opposed to rules. The philosophy itself is axiomatic.

I've explained this to her many times. She is just trolling me (and now you, it seems.)

Ghost Ferret wrote:someone did indeed poison me

but who, what, where, when, why, and how is not the question

the only thing i do know for sure is that time is short and you must find my killer as quickly as possible

or else there will be dire consequences

in other news i am having a contest

whoever can correctly mention the word i am thinking of will win a prize from the lovely, beautiful, intelligent hostess

whoever posts the word first wins the prize so get to it

There. No more silly interruptions.

Hi everyone still learning how to use this website so bear with me if I do anything wrong. Nice to "meet" all of you!

sabie12 wrote:Hi everyone still learning how to use this website so bear with me if I do anything wrong. Nice to "meet" all of you!

Hello Sabie!

How are you doing? Tell us a bit about yourself.

Not sure what kind of information everyone usually shares but a friend got me into this site. I've always loved murder mysteries hence my interest in playing. Sherlock is one of my favorite mystery related shows and I also enjoyed the movies.

Mister Rearranger wrote:*makes note to self that Llama self-voted on Day 0*

I have to vote tongiht because we will be too busy tomorrow morning to check -in. I am voting llama for self-voting and being our current top poster.

votes lalalallama

Hedgeowl wrote:

Mister Rearranger wrote:*makes note to self that Llama self-voted on Day 0*

I have to vote tongiht because we will be too busy tomorrow morning to check -in. I am voting llama for self-voting and being our current top poster.

votes lalalallama

I didn't self-vote! Alpacas are not llamas!

thellama73 wrote:

Hedgeowl wrote:

Mister Rearranger wrote:*makes note to self that Llama self-voted on Day 0*

I have to vote tongiht because we will be too busy tomorrow morning to check -in. I am voting llama for self-voting and being our current top poster.

votes lalalallama

I didn't self-vote! Alpacas are not llamas!

You're not helping your top poster status any though.

Epignosis wrote:

Mongoose wrote:No one likes rules, but we've got to have a few, seeing as this isn't some libertarian think tank!

Libertarians are not opposed to rules. The philosophy itself is axiomatic.

I only wrote that part to get Logan's goat.

It worked.

Yikes, catching up.

sabie12 wrote:Hi everyone still learning how to use this website so bear with me if I do anything wrong. Nice to "meet" all of you!

nice to meet you too sabie - don't be afraid of our weird antics - just jump in and play. We will ask clarifying questions if you do anything that seems odd. In the mean time have fun! oh - also - if you have questions about how to use anything in the site - feel free to ask the thread. - there's a mod or so playing and most of us are pretty familiar with things.



@ llama - yay! kraftwerk!!!!

ok - booze made me lost after kraftwerk

bea wrote:

sabie12 wrote:Hi everyone still learning how to use this website so bear with me if I do anything wrong. Nice to "meet" all of you!

nice to meet you too sabie - don't be afraid of our weird antics - just jump in and play. We will ask clarifying questions if you do anything that seems odd. In the mean time have fun! oh - also - if you have questions about how to use anything in the site - feel free to ask the thread. - there's a mod or so playing and most of us are pretty familiar with things.

Glad you are here, Sabie. If you like mysteries, there will be lots of fun game themes for you to enjoy over the upcoming months.

Hi Sabie! I won't lynch you... yet!

Elohcin wrote:I was eating Brazil nuts while writing that post I'd like to see Keterman pop up too. From my experience with him, he is not a very quiet player.

You mean that game where I was scum, missed two votes, and frequently went for periods longer than my absence until just now without posting? I'm not quiet, but I'm not exactly prolific either. Aggressive scumhunting and number of posts are two non-sequiters.

Ilama is rubbing me the wrong way. He's trying to look supatown on Day 1, having a lot of suspicions, none of which are well-founded at all. He seemed fully prepared to vote for inactive players, then tried to pass it off as pressure. He had his eye on A Person for posting early (seriously?) and Roxy for a pretty absurd misinterpretation of one of her posts. There's not much to go off of, sure, so it makes sense to go off of little. But llama seems way too confident, to the degree that it seems like he knows everyone's alignment.

sabie12 wrote:Not sure what kind of information everyone usually shares but a friend got me into this site. I've always loved murder mysteries hence my interest in playing. Sherlock is one of my favorite mystery related shows and I also enjoyed the movies.

Hi If you have any questions, as Bea says, you can ask the thread. Or you can PM me, I am the game mod~ the person in charge of no fuss no muss happy game experiences (hush Llama)

Hope you have fun

Keterman wrote:

Elohcin wrote:I was eating Brazil nuts while writing that post I'd like to see Keterman pop up too. From my experience with him, he is not a very quiet player.

You mean that game where I was scum, missed two votes, and frequently went for periods longer than my absence until just now without posting? I'm not quiet, but I'm not exactly prolific either. Aggressive scumhunting and number of posts are two non-sequiters.

Ilama is rubbing me the wrong way. He's trying to look supatown on Day 1, having a lot of suspicions, none of which are well-founded at all. He seemed fully prepared to vote for inactive players, then tried to pass it off as pressure. He had his eye on A Person for posting early (seriously?) and Roxy for a pretty absurd misinterpretation of one of her posts. There's not much to go off of, sure, so it makes sense to go off of little. But llama seems way too confident, to the degree that it seems like he knows everyone's alignment.

Supatown, baby, that's me. And I am always confident because that's how you get chicks.

I'm glad you said that, Keterman.

Hedgeowl wrote:

thellama73 wrote:

Hedgeowl wrote:

Mister Rearranger wrote:*makes note to self that Llama self-voted on Day 0*

I have to vote tongiht because we will be too busy tomorrow morning to check -in. I am voting llama for self-voting and being our current top poster.

votes lalalallama

I didn't self-vote! Alpacas are not llamas!

You're not helping your top poster status any though.

Initially, yes, but they might leave you if you end up with a lot of civilian blood on your hands.

Keterman wrote:Initially, yes, but they might leave you if you end up with a lot of civilian blood on your hands.

Oh, I don't think I am in any danger of lynching civilians this game. Supatown!

No danger, none at all? You must know our alignments then.

Keterman wrote:No danger, none at all? You must know our alignments then.

No, I am just supatown good at deduction.

sabie12 wrote:Hi everyone still learning how to use this website so bear with me if I do anything wrong. Nice to "meet" all of you!

Hi sabie, nice to meet you too

Mister Rearranger wrote:

I'm not a rapper.

thellama73 wrote:

Keterman wrote:

Elohcin wrote:I was eating Brazil nuts while writing that post I'd like to see Keterman pop up too. From my experience with him, he is not a very quiet player.

You mean that game where I was scum, missed two votes, and frequently went for periods longer than my absence until just now without posting? I'm not quiet, but I'm not exactly prolific either. Aggressive scumhunting and number of posts are two non-sequiters.

Ilama is rubbing me the wrong way. He's trying to look supatown on Day 1, having a lot of suspicions, none of which are well-founded at all. He seemed fully prepared to vote for inactive players, then tried to pass it off as pressure. He had his eye on A Person for posting early (seriously?) and Roxy for a pretty absurd misinterpretation of one of her posts. There's not much to go off of, sure, so it makes sense to go off of little. But llama seems way too confident, to the degree that it seems like he knows everyone's alignment.

Supatown, baby, that's me. And I am always confident because that's how you get chicks.

Are you sure? I mean, are you really sure? like you see the baby chickens and/or ducks lining outside your house?

Or was chicks slang for something else?

I hope supatown stays a thing, I like it.

Also, I'm feeling like Llama is probably a proactive civ, so I need to look over the rest to see where I stand on the board. Most players haven't made much impression so far.

DFaraday wrote:I hope supatown stays a thing, I like it.

Also, I'm feeling like Llama is probably a proactive civ, so I need to look over the rest to see where I stand on the board. Most players haven't made much impression so far.

you would

DFaraday wrote:I hope supatown stays a thing, I like it.

Also, I'm feeling like Llama is probably a proactive civ, so I need to look over the rest to see where I stand on the board. Most players haven't made much impression so far.

A proactive Civ? All I have seen is him act unusual and try to "stir the pot" to get certain people to cause conflict. Doesn't seem Civ like behavior in the least to me. Voting for a non participant always is a bad idea if you are Civ, and considering the game started a few hours on a holiday weekend before I can check in that he says he wanted to "get us to react" etc. doesn't feel any good to me. I'm most likely giving him my vote tomorrow. I don't what proactive Civ you see in him by most of the talk here about apples and off topic being helpful. Which makes me worried about you as well to say that about Llama.

EBWOP *Dont understand what proactive Civ

so boogsy - you are cranky at the llama because he didn't give enough time for low poster to check in before he started to suspect them?

Is that right? Or am I misunderstanding your point?

bea wrote:so boogsy - you are cranky at the llama because he didn't give enough time for low poster to check in before he started to suspect them?

Is that right? Or am I misunderstanding your point?

I'm not cranky, I'm saying it's very suspicious to me to make such a bold statement and assumption THAT early and be acting so cocky that he is sure he is awesome etc. He's really rubbing me the wrong way and Dfaraday trying to vouch for him that he's Civ isn't setting right with me either. I think he's acting very off compared to the games I have played with him recently. Either he's being weird on purpose, or he's confident you his teammates can assure he isn't going anywhere for a while for the behavior he has been showing in the thread, but in no way has he been contributing as a proactive civ as DFar stated.

its freaking 1 AMShouldn't be a you before teammates*

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I miss Vompernoodles

He is in a better place now.

Also, since no one has been killed, how do even know there is a baddie? Perhaps we should just wait and see what happens.

Vompatti wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I miss Vompernoodles

He is in a better place now.

Also, since no one has been killed, how do even know there is a baddie? Perhaps we should just wait and see what happens.

This is an interesting theory and would be quite the innovative twist, but there are baddies listed among the roles. That is the only hole I can find in your suggestion.

Boogs wrote:

DFaraday wrote:I hope supatown stays a thing, I like it.

Also, I'm feeling like Llama is probably a proactive civ, so I need to look over the rest to see where I stand on the board. Most players haven't made much impression so far.

A proactive Civ? All I have seen is him act unusual and try to "stir the pot" to get certain people to cause conflict. Doesn't seem Civ like behavior in the least to me. Voting for a non participant always is a bad idea if you are Civ, and considering the game started a few hours on a holiday weekend before I can check in that he says he wanted to "get us to react" etc. doesn't feel any good to me. I'm most likely giving him my vote tomorrow. I don't what proactive Civ you see in him by most of the talk here about apples and off topic being helpful. Which makes me worried about you as well to say that about Llama.

"Lynching non-participants is always a bad idea if you are civ" is not remotely true. There have been lots of baddie non-participants and lynching them is good.

Furthermore, my objective in stirring the pot was to get people talking on topic. We had no real discussion, and nothing to go on, so throwing out a few accusations to see how people reacted is a good way to get the ball rolling. When people are accused, they react, and sometimes a lot can be gleaned from their reactions. I would say it's working.

I am always this cocky, btw.

I have to vote now and I'm voting llama.

I have to clock in for work, so voting now for Llama.

I'm honestly not seeing Llama as bad. He's being cocky and over-confident sure, but I don't think an evil Llama would behave like that so quickly knowing he'd probably draw negative attention to himself.

Llama seems like a civ llama to me.

I'm not liking where this is going. Having said that, Boogs reads as genuine to me. Keterman, on the other hand, just kind of jumped in after Boogs made his case and dropped a vote on Llama. I found that a bit off, so I'll vote Keterman.

I'm voting for Keterman too. Last one to check in and an opportunistic vote for me piggybacking on Boogs. Especially when I am obviously civ.

I dunno, Keterman's vote seems about as argumented as Boogs', and Hedge's was pretty much random. It's possible that they're all civs. But if it's between Keterman and Llama, I'd rather vote Keterman.

And now Sabie votes for me without posting? That's some weak sauce, guys.

voted for Keterman.

I'm gonna join the pro-Llama crowd and vote Keterman.