Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
I mean it is halloween, blood tho.MovingPictures07 wrote:
I also find Made's suggestion first to lynch me, SVS, and splints, and now zeek, most bloodthirsty of anyone. Not sure what it means yet though.
I ordered pizza. Wings were a terrible idea.juliets wrote:actually i'm not making dinner yet - will probably be next hour
Ah, good points.Made wrote:I mean it is halloween, blood tho.MovingPictures07 wrote:
I also find Made's suggestion first to lynch me, SVS, and splints, and now zeek, most bloodthirsty of anyone. Not sure what it means yet though.
Also, I did that before i got my role. Maybe i'm psychic tho. iunno
To be fair, she hasn't committed to anything. She said probably.MovingPictures07 wrote:45 minutes to go and already committing to a random vote?
I'm trying to look at it fairly because I understand other people are more OK with randomizing than I typically am. There is a time and a place, I guess. But I don't know why you would say it so far in advance.thellama73 wrote:To be fair, she hasn't committed to anything. She said probably.MovingPictures07 wrote:45 minutes to go and already committing to a random vote?
It rubs me the wrong way too though.
she randoms a lot day 1 though. If someone who doesn't usually random day 1 said it it would bother me morethellama73 wrote:To be fair, she hasn't committed to anything. She said probably.MovingPictures07 wrote:45 minutes to go and already committing to a random vote?
It rubs me the wrong way too though.
Tell me about it. I want to make a cup of tea, but I am afraid to leave the thread for the three minutes it takes to boil water.Made wrote:Oh god, I have to use the restroom..... this could be bad....
thellama73 wrote:To be fair, she hasn't committed to anything. She said probably.MovingPictures07 wrote:45 minutes to go and already committing to a random vote?
It rubs me the wrong way too though.
Not necessarily, it just could be an easy way for a mafioso to set up a vote lacking responsibility well in advance of poll's end.juliets wrote:MP you are still saying randoming is bad even in a game like this?
I just don't like randomizing and I don't understand why people do it. It feels like you're handing the lynch to the baddies to me. But I don't want to get into it again because we've had this debate many times and no one is going to change anyone's mind.Roxy wrote:thellama73 wrote:To be fair, she hasn't committed to anything. She said probably.MovingPictures07 wrote:45 minutes to go and already committing to a random vote?
It rubs me the wrong way too though.
The way I play rubs you wrong? That is not even fair tbqh!
Why?fingersplints wrote:she randoms a lot day 1 though. If someone who doesn't usually random day 1 said it it would bother me morethellama73 wrote:To be fair, she hasn't committed to anything. She said probably.MovingPictures07 wrote:45 minutes to go and already committing to a random vote?
It rubs me the wrong way too though.
Dunno. He posted 30 minutes before gametime, but hasn't received his role PM yet.S~V~S wrote:Where is Boogs?
I know I wouldMovingPictures07 wrote:Why?fingersplints wrote:she randoms a lot day 1 though. If someone who doesn't usually random day 1 said it it would bother me morethellama73 wrote:To be fair, she hasn't committed to anything. She said probably.MovingPictures07 wrote:45 minutes to go and already committing to a random vote?
It rubs me the wrong way too though.
This seems to me you're equating "weird" or "different" v. "suspicious".
What if I decided I wanted to randomize this game? You think that's more suspicious than someone who usually hides behind that saying so?
I'm having deja vu.MovingPictures07 wrote:Why?fingersplints wrote:she randoms a lot day 1 though. If someone who doesn't usually random day 1 said it it would bother me morethellama73 wrote:To be fair, she hasn't committed to anything. She said probably.MovingPictures07 wrote:45 minutes to go and already committing to a random vote?
It rubs me the wrong way too though.
This seems to me you're equating "weird" or "different" v. "suspicious".
What if I decided I wanted to randomize this game? You think that's more suspicious than someone who usually hides behind that saying so?
Consequently, I will look for players trying to seem too hard to appear like their normal playstyle without genuinely contributing.MovingPictures07 wrote:So let's think about this.
Given people's responses, apparently it is more suspicious for one to change up one's own playstyle from game to game than it is to not, regardless of whether the circumstances were different (in this case, this type of game is very different from a full mafia game).
Therefore, it would be more logical for a baddie to try to confine oneself to one's usual playing style.
Thanks Jujuliets wrote:boogs maybe
You're assuming that everything a player does is coldly rational. People slip up and psyche themselves out when trying not to get "caught" as a baddie. Inconsistent behavior can be a symptom of this.MovingPictures07 wrote:So let's think about this.
Given people's responses, apparently it is more suspicious for one to change up one's own playstyle from game to game than it is to not, regardless of whether the circumstances were different (in this case, this type of game is very different from a full mafia game).
Therefore, it would be more logical for a baddie to try to confine oneself to one's usual playing style.
If boogs doesn't show up soon I will also be voting for him.juliets wrote:boogs maybe
Can we please keep the racial slurs to a minimum? :PRoxy wrote:Thanks Jujuliets wrote:boogs maybe
Also, Epignosis cannot be lynched today and cannot be targeted by any Night actions the following Night.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Effective immediately, Epignosis is replacing Boogs.
Sorry Boogs. I don't know when you are returning.
Sure, this is a good point, but how many players have been lynched for being different than usual or misunderstood and turned out to be civvie?thellama73 wrote:You're assuming that everything a player does is coldly rational. People slip up and psyche themselves out when trying not to get "caught" as a baddie. Inconsistent behavior can be a symptom of this.MovingPictures07 wrote:So let's think about this.
Given people's responses, apparently it is more suspicious for one to change up one's own playstyle from game to game than it is to not, regardless of whether the circumstances were different (in this case, this type of game is very different from a full mafia game).
Therefore, it would be more logical for a baddie to try to confine oneself to one's usual playing style.
Okay.thellama73 wrote:Okay, that makes it easy. We can all just lynch Rob now. :P
Definitely. It's happened to me.MovingPictures07 wrote:Sure, this is a good point, but how many players have been lynched for being different than usual or misunderstood and turned out to be civvie?thellama73 wrote:You're assuming that everything a player does is coldly rational. People slip up and psyche themselves out when trying not to get "caught" as a baddie. Inconsistent behavior can be a symptom of this.MovingPictures07 wrote:So let's think about this.
Given people's responses, apparently it is more suspicious for one to change up one's own playstyle from game to game than it is to not, regardless of whether the circumstances were different (in this case, this type of game is very different from a full mafia game).
Therefore, it would be more logical for a baddie to try to confine oneself to one's usual playing style.
I would argue instead that the shorter timing of this game allows people less opportunity to slip up. I think that's a fair assumption.
thellama73 wrote:Okay, that makes it easy. We can all just lynch Rob now. :P
Therefore, I think my logic for this game stands.thellama73 wrote:Definitely. It's happened to me.MovingPictures07 wrote:Sure, this is a good point, but how many players have been lynched for being different than usual or misunderstood and turned out to be civvie?thellama73 wrote:You're assuming that everything a player does is coldly rational. People slip up and psyche themselves out when trying not to get "caught" as a baddie. Inconsistent behavior can be a symptom of this.MovingPictures07 wrote:So let's think about this.
Given people's responses, apparently it is more suspicious for one to change up one's own playstyle from game to game than it is to not, regardless of whether the circumstances were different (in this case, this type of game is very different from a full mafia game).
Therefore, it would be more logical for a baddie to try to confine oneself to one's usual playing style.
I would argue instead that the shorter timing of this game allows people less opportunity to slip up. I think that's a fair assumption.
