The Syndicate

Boomslang wrote:Tranq's slip of calling Finn McMissile mafia (the role was part of a second civ team) is too easily fact-checkable to be intentional, imo.

It wasn't a slip. It was Tranq being a nub. Hence my opening post.

Checking in to this scandalous game before I let the pages get out of control

Oh, who am I kidding? They'll get out of control despite my efforts. But damn, I'm glad this started around the end of the asinine semester schedule of our public schools here - less lesson planning due to exams, more mafia playing! For like a week or so. Yes.

Voting Finn McMissile because a) the name amuses me most and b) my life (and freaking cool role that I never got to use) was cut tragically short on Day 1 of that game, and I want to sulk.

Epignosis wrote:

Boomslang wrote:Tranq's slip of calling Finn McMissile mafia (the role was part of a second civ team) is too easily fact-checkable to be intentional, imo.

It wasn't a slip. It was Tranq being a nub. Hence my opening post.

What I'm seeing here is, on the surface, a possible Boomslang-Tranq baddie teamup. That's just surface though, and I don't really think that's what's going on here.

However, my ideal civ-mindset would hold back and wait to see if anyone jumps on Tranq opportunistically, rather than defuse the situation with some textbook "let's not get too finger-pointy" sanity. Short-term "obvious Civ" statements can be long-term "don't worry about me, I'm cooler than being cool" baddie groundwork.

sig wrote:I find this game scandalous so far. I'm not sure which option to vote on. I don't recall the role in Dune and I doubt it is Xander Crews as they are the people who had their heads blown up in Llama's game. (I think)

I was Duncan Idaho and I had a role where I was one shot bulletproof and also had one vig shot that was activated when an attempt was made to kill me. Nobody ever tried to kill me so I didn't get to use it.

Long Con wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Boomslang wrote:Tranq's slip of calling Finn McMissile mafia (the role was part of a second civ team) is too easily fact-checkable to be intentional, imo.

It wasn't a slip. It was Tranq being a nub. Hence my opening post.

What I'm seeing here is, on the surface, a possible Boomslang-Tranq baddie teamup. That's just surface though, and I don't really think that's what's going on here.

However, my ideal civ-mindset would hold back and wait to see if anyone jumps on Tranq opportunistically, rather than defuse the situation with some textbook "let's not get too finger-pointy" sanity. Short-term "obvious Civ" statements can be long-term "don't worry about me, I'm cooler than being cool" baddie groundwork.

Weird post. Do not like.

MacDougall wrote:

Long Con wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Boomslang wrote:Tranq's slip of calling Finn McMissile mafia (the role was part of a second civ team) is too easily fact-checkable to be intentional, imo.

It wasn't a slip. It was Tranq being a nub. Hence my opening post.

What I'm seeing here is, on the surface, a possible Boomslang-Tranq baddie teamup. That's just surface though, and I don't really think that's what's going on here.

However, my ideal civ-mindset would hold back and wait to see if anyone jumps on Tranq opportunistically, rather than defuse the situation with some textbook "let's not get too finger-pointy" sanity. Short-term "obvious Civ" statements can be long-term "don't worry about me, I'm cooler than being cool" baddie groundwork.

Weird post. Do not like.

What, were there "too many quotes" for your taste?

Matt wrote:Duncan Idaho cuz I like the name.

Also, yay game!

Matt confirmed to have a role that requires him to rhyme.

Long Con wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

Long Con wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Boomslang wrote:Tranq's slip of calling Finn McMissile mafia (the role was part of a second civ team) is too easily fact-checkable to be intentional, imo.

It wasn't a slip. It was Tranq being a nub. Hence my opening post.

What I'm seeing here is, on the surface, a possible Boomslang-Tranq baddie teamup. That's just surface though, and I don't really think that's what's going on here.

However, my ideal civ-mindset would hold back and wait to see if anyone jumps on Tranq opportunistically, rather than defuse the situation with some textbook "let's not get too finger-pointy" sanity. Short-term "obvious Civ" statements can be long-term "don't worry about me, I'm cooler than being cool" baddie groundwork.

Weird post. Do not like.

What, were there "too many quotes" for your taste?

No, sorry I was agreeing with you. I was referring to Boomslang's post.

MacDougall wrote:

Long Con wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

Long Con wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Boomslang wrote:Tranq's slip of calling Finn McMissile mafia (the role was part of a second civ team) is too easily fact-checkable to be intentional, imo.

It wasn't a slip. It was Tranq being a nub. Hence my opening post.

What I'm seeing here is, on the surface, a possible Boomslang-Tranq baddie teamup. That's just surface though, and I don't really think that's what's going on here.

However, my ideal civ-mindset would hold back and wait to see if anyone jumps on Tranq opportunistically, rather than defuse the situation with some textbook "let's not get too finger-pointy" sanity. Short-term "obvious Civ" statements can be long-term "don't worry about me, I'm cooler than being cool" baddie groundwork.

Weird post. Do not like.

What, were there "too many quotes" for your taste?

No, sorry I was agreeing with you. I was referring to Boomslang's post.

Phew! I thought I dun got meself lynched Day 1 already!

Lol I just read the last rule. I hadn't NOT read them, just scanned them for keywords and obviously didn't look at that scandalous detail. Sorry SVS.

Long Con wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

Long Con wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

Long Con wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Boomslang wrote:Tranq's slip of calling Finn McMissile mafia (the role was part of a second civ team) is too easily fact-checkable to be intentional, imo.

It wasn't a slip. It was Tranq being a nub. Hence my opening post.

What I'm seeing here is, on the surface, a possible Boomslang-Tranq baddie teamup. That's just surface though, and I don't really think that's what's going on here.

However, my ideal civ-mindset would hold back and wait to see if anyone jumps on Tranq opportunistically, rather than defuse the situation with some textbook "let's not get too finger-pointy" sanity. Short-term "obvious Civ" statements can be long-term "don't worry about me, I'm cooler than being cool" baddie groundwork.

Weird post. Do not like.

What, were there "too many quotes" for your taste?

No, sorry I was agreeing with you. I was referring to Boomslang's post.

Phew! I thought I dun got meself lynched Day 1 already!

Ha no I read those sorts of posts the same way. Making obvious defensive statements, especially very early, is a pretty decent scum tell imo.

Haha. I did read (*ahem* skim *ahem*) the rules but must've missed that part. How belatedly scandalous of me

DharmaHelper wrote:Tranq posted but didn't vote. Mac voted but did not post. Discuss.

Scandalous.

Golden wrote:It's kind of scandalous that none of those 5 roles are mine.

My thoughts exactly.


I will vote for Ezekiel as it is the middle name of my first born.

"I broke the tie, I broke the tie."

DharmaHelper wrote:Tranq posted but didn't vote. Mac voted but did not post. Discuss.

Scandalous.

Elo and Metalmarsh made their first posts at very near to the same time. Discuss.

MacDougall wrote:Elo and Metalmarsh made their first posts at very near to the same time. Discuss.

Are they having an affair?

Coincidence, MacDingus.

I've read Death Note so I'm going to vote for Watari

Epignosis wrote:

MacDougall wrote:Elo and Metalmarsh made their first posts at very near to the same time. Discuss.

Are they having an affair?

Coincidence, MacDingus.

I was being sarcastic Epi. Did you see the posts they quoted.

MacDougall wrote:Elo and Metalmarsh made their first posts at very near to the same time. Discuss.

Epignosis spends too much time at band practice.

MacDougall wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

MacDougall wrote:Elo and Metalmarsh made their first posts at very near to the same time. Discuss.

Are they having an affair?

Coincidence, MacDingus.

I was being sarcastic Epi. Did you see the posts they quoted.

I didn't even notice that.

To clarify, I'm intentionally going to play differently than my previous game on this site. If that rouses suspicion then that's perfectly fine, but I'm vetoing any future "he's been acting strange" paths here and now.

RadicalFuzz wrote:To clarify, I'm intentionally going to play differently than my previous game on this site. If that rouses suspicion then that's perfectly fine, but I'm vetoing any future "he's been acting strange" paths here and now.

You are acting strange.

RadicalFuzz wrote:To clarify, I'm intentionally going to play differently than my previous game on this site. If that rouses suspicion then that's perfectly fine, but I'm vetoing any future "he's been acting strange" paths here and now.

Me too. I am going to play like a scum but you aren't allowed to say I am playing like a scum because I told you here and now that I am going to play like a scum.

RadicalFuzz do you understand the problem with your post?

I will exhibit a behavior this game that has not been previously imagined by any mafia player ever (including myself).

Hold on to your butts!

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

MacDougall wrote:Elo and Metalmarsh made their first posts at very near to the same time. Discuss.

Are they having an affair?

Coincidence, MacDingus.

I was being sarcastic Epi. Did you see the posts they quoted.

I didn't even notice that.

Theory: baddies don't have to read the thread as thoroughly as Civvies. Converse.

Long Con wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

MacDougall wrote:Elo and Metalmarsh made their first posts at very near to the same time. Discuss.

Are they having an affair?

Coincidence, MacDingus.

I was being sarcastic Epi. Did you see the posts they quoted.

I didn't even notice that.

Theory: baddies don't have to read the thread as thoroughly as Civvies. Converse.

Harumph!

This is sure to be a scandalous game.


Anyway, I'm voting for the character from the only game of these I played.

Long Con wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

MacDougall wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

MacDougall wrote:Elo and Metalmarsh made their first posts at very near to the same time. Discuss.

Are they having an affair?

Coincidence, MacDingus.

I was being sarcastic Epi. Did you see the posts they quoted.

I didn't even notice that.

Theory: baddies don't have to read the thread as thoroughly as Civvies. Converse.

I'm waiting for Epignosis's apology for calling me MacDingus.

MacDougall wrote:I'm waiting for Epignosis's apology for calling me MacDingus.

Never.

Deciding not to overthink and just vote. Especially because votes are changable.

Voted Ezekiel because rabbi--I mean, he's in the bible, and even in the half of it I believe in as sacred text.

I wonder if 48 hours is enough time or not enough time.

LoRab wrote:Deciding not to overthink and just vote. Especially because votes are changable.

Voted Ezekiel because rabbi--I mean, he's in the bible, and even in the half of it I believe in as sacred text.

You are very bad. Enrique in Star Wars bad.

Epignosis wrote:

MacDougall wrote:I'm waiting for Epignosis's apology for calling me MacDingus.

Never.

Fine. Epiknowsnothing.

Supercalifragilistiexpialiscandalous!

Switching my vote to Watari, so it can go ahead in the polls to my benefit.

Although I wouldn't mind all of you voting Duncan, that would benefit me as well.

*buddies Ricochet*

I'll tune in more later.

Oh, and I picked Xander Crews. I hope if that role is in the game that whoever has it finds more luck than I did with it. I never found a single xticle or whatever the hell they were.

Epignosis wrote:

Tranq wrote:Finn McMissile - Disney Cars - Mafia

Finn McMissile was Mafia?

A game of nubs indeed.

Voted Finn McMissile.

I'm going to exhibit behavior that players expect... And that's the unexpected thing...

Hmm...

Lynch Fuzz.

I wish there was a rule not to end up creating any ties between the Night 0 options, so I can create them.

Also, how soon are the others willing to test the idea that Black Rock and Long Con were given baddie roles?

timmer wrote:Oh, and I picked Xander Crews. I hope if that role is in the game that whoever has it finds more luck than I did with it. I never found a single xticle or whatever the hell they were.

The only Xander voter so far. Either there's a reward for the top choice(s) and Timmer's trying to stay away from it, perhaps distance himself from teammates, or there's something to gain from every option and he's trying to get his share. Confirmed baddie.

My rainbow list so far

Ricochet
DharmaHelper
MacDougall
thellama73

DharmaHelper

a2thezebra
bcornett24
Bass_the_Clever
Black Rock
Boomslang
dfaraday
DharmaHelper
Dom
Dr. Wilgy
Draconus
Elohcin
Epignosis
Golden
Hamburger Boy
JaggedJimmyJay
Juliets
Long Con
LoRab
Matt
Metalmarsh
nijuukyugou
RadicalFuzz
sig
Sorsha
Spacedaisy
Timmer
Tranq

MacDougall wrote:

LoRab wrote:Deciding not to overthink and just vote. Especially because votes are changable.

Voted Ezekiel because rabbi--I mean, he's in the bible, and even in the half of it I believe in as sacred text.

You are very bad. Enrique in Star Wars bad.

No, I'm not.

Ricochet wrote:I wish there was a rule not to end up creating any ties between the Night 0 options, so I can create them.

Also, how soon are the others willing to test the idea that Black Rock and Long Con were given baddie roles?

Ok Mr Smart Guy, let's test this. If you die Night 1, then it was me. Then everyone will know I was given a baddie role.

Good morning, Gentlemen!

Very glad to be here in this game of champs. I'm voting for Xander Crews because I hosted that game and I like the character. I see there's already been some pot stirring, and Ricochet's rainbow list is hilarious. Very good.

Long Con wrote:

Ricochet wrote:I wish there was a rule not to end up creating any ties between the Night 0 options, so I can create them.

Also, how soon are the others willing to test the idea that Black Rock and Long Con were given baddie roles?

Ok Mr Smart Guy, let's test this. If you die Night 1, then it was me. Then everyone will know I was given a baddie role.

Night 1 might be to late... for you.

timmer wrote:Oh, and I picked Xander Crews. I hope if that role is in the game that whoever has it finds more luck than I did with it. I never found a single xticle or whatever the hell they were.

It didn't help that I was lynched Day 1 with 3 flippin' votes.