The Syndicate

And my day 0 green peek was lovedelic.

Sorsha wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:On the next... Arrested DrWilgy reveals that he is most certainly a doctor and can indeed post his thoughts in non-emoticon format.

But I haven't read the script!

Regardless, for some reason I think Sloonei is a vanilla civilian.

Everyone but Daisy and Zebra have checked in so far... JJJ can we get a player list?

Funny you would think that, Sloonei has been giving me the creeps.

It's natural to feel some resentment toward in-laws. When I was a therapist I saw this sort of thing all the time. I think what you need is some heart to heart mother-son-in-law bonding. Am I touching something?

are votes changeable?

Sloonei wrote:are votes changeable?

Yes.

a2thezebra wrote:

Sloonei wrote:are votes changeable?

Yes.

Cool, let's get the ball rolling. thellama has two posts expressing excitement about the game. I want to see that excitement translate into for real posts.

The sun is up and that's not the only thing that's up. RICK OCHÉ! \o/

Spacedaisy wrote:And my day 0 green peek was lovedelic.

Wow. Okay, so we've had a couple of people claim to have had a Day 0 free check but only one of them can be right, right. I mean, I guess they could all be lying if the checker is keeping the information to his or herself.

Why do grownups have to lie so much? It's very confusing for a kid like me.

Well, I recommend that some peeps try to be more subtle with their "checks". I was just lazy and wanted to be conspicuous to get the ball rolling. A healthy mix of obvious claims and more subtle ones should make it difficult for the mafia to find the real cop.

Even if I am the cop, my G-Man check might have been fake. If so, I will leave clues as to who I really checked.

Sloonei wrote:are votes changeable?

Did you not bother to read the rules?

lovedelic wrote:

Elohcin wrote:Lovedelic, did I miss your reason behind voting no lynch? Seems maybe you could bebas and not happy lynching anyone without conspiring with your team first.

can't conspire during the day phase anyway so simmer down

You noticeably avoided her question. Why did you vote No Lynch?

Turnip Head wrote:Well, I recommend that some peeps try to be more subtle with their "checks". I was just lazy and wanted to be conspicuous to get the ball rolling. A healthy mix of obvious claims and more subtle ones should make it difficult for the mafia to find the real cop.

Don't worry too much TH, if we don't believe in our cop and our cop doesn't believe in us, then we'll have a problem.

DrWilgy wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:Well, I recommend that some peeps try to be more subtle with their "checks". I was just lazy and wanted to be conspicuous to get the ball rolling. A healthy mix of obvious claims and more subtle ones should make it difficult for the mafia to find the real cop.

Don't worry too much TH, if we don't believe in our cop and our cop doesn't believe in us, then we'll have a problem.

Ah yes, believing in our cop will keep him safe. I forgot I'm supposed to be playing a naïve character.

lovedelic wrote:wait, zebra's in this game?

Her?

Sloonei wrote:

a2thezebra wrote:

Sloonei wrote:are votes changeable?

Yes.

Cool, let's get the ball rolling. thellama has two posts expressing excitement about the game. I want to see that excitement translate into for real posts.

And people in Hell want ice water.

Wait... wrong show.

RICK OCHÉ! \o/

Maybe subtlety isn't the point, maybe the more people who state a peek the harder it is for the baddies to know who the real cop is.

Anyway, I'll be quiet for a while, I've got school to go to. I'd play hookie but I already did that all of December and no one cared. Well technically the principal called my parents, butt my mom started the phone and thought he was hitting on her so she just ended up with a date and now I can get much do what I want at school, which is annoying because it totally ruins the whole point of rebelling in the first place. This sucks.

Sorsha wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:On the next... Arrested DrWilgy reveals that he is most certainly a doctor and can indeed post his thoughts in non-emoticon format.

But I haven't read the script!

Regardless, for some reason I think Sloonei is a vanilla civilian.

Everyone but Daisy and Zebra have checked in so far... JJJ can we get a player list?

Funny you would think that, Sloonei has been giving me the creeps.

As it turns out, Sorsha had gotten up early and had taken pain medication because of a hangover-related headache. However, she mistook the drowsy-eye alcohol warning for a winking-eye alcohol suggestion.

If not for that, her dislike of her son-in-law remained unexplained.

Spacedaisy wrote:Maybe subtlety isn't the point, maybe the more people who state a peek the harder it is for the baddies to know who the real cop is.

Anyway, I'll be quiet for a while, I've got school to go to. I'd play hookie but I already did that all of December and no one cared. Well technically the principal called my parents, butt my mom started the phone and thought he was hitting on her so she just ended up with a date and now I can get much do what I want at school, which is annoying because it totally ruins the whole point of rebelling in the first place. This sucks.

Do you wanna make out? \o/

DrWilgy wrote:

Sorsha wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:On the next... Arrested DrWilgy reveals that he is most certainly a doctor and can indeed post his thoughts in non-emoticon format.

But I haven't read the script!

Regardless, for some reason I think Sloonei is a vanilla civilian.

Everyone but Daisy and Zebra have checked in so far... JJJ can we get a player list?

Funny you would think that, Sloonei has been giving me the creeps.

Really? Llama's giving me the creeps...

I normally tone read him as bad, but this time I can only read it as civ. Talk about creepy!

Llama had not yet gone after low posters, but in an act of defiance, had tunneled no player accompanying his excitement into the thread... This proved a more dramatic gesture than he'd anticipated.

Turnip Head wrote:Well, I recommend that some peeps try to be more subtle with their "checks". I was just lazy and wanted to be conspicuous to get the ball rolling. A healthy mix of obvious claims and more subtle ones should make it difficult for the mafia to find the real cop.

Even if I am the cop, my G-Man check might have been fake. If so, I will leave clues as to who I really checked.

Sloonei wrote:are votes changeable?

Did you not bother to read the rules?

On the next... Arrested Development:

Buster starts a gambit to catch the traitor... but as to be expected, it is contrived in execution, warranting suspicion from the authorities. Turnip Head

Ricochet wrote:

Spacedaisy wrote:Maybe subtlety isn't the point, maybe the more people who state a peek the harder it is for the baddies to know who the real cop is.

Anyway, I'll be quiet for a while, I've got school to go to. I'd play hookie but I already did that all of December and no one cared. Well technically the principal called my parents, butt my mom started the phone and thought he was hitting on her so she just ended up with a date and now I can get much do what I want at school, which is annoying because it totally ruins the whole point of rebelling in the first place. This sucks.

Do you wanna make out? \o/

A boy after my own heart.

Turnip Head wrote:

lovedelic wrote:

Elohcin wrote:Lovedelic, did I miss your reason behind voting no lynch? Seems maybe you could bebas and not happy lynching anyone without conspiring with your team first.

can't conspire during the day phase anyway so simmer down

You noticeably avoided her question. Why did you vote No Lynch?

i threw out a vote but changed my mind, okay? it was for llama

I'm voting lovedelic because "no lynch" is the one option guaranteed not to catch a baddie. Come on!

I don't want to be rude but Ricochet sounds like he might be a moron jock. He might get my vote today. I don't want to vote for any of my family members just yet. I'm not that rebellious.

i've made a huge mistake

G-Man wrote:I don't want to be rude but Ricochet sounds like he might be a moron jock. He might get my vote today. I don't want to vote for any of my family members just yet. I'm not that rebellious.

Hey, don't talk that way about my son!

thellama73 wrote:I'm voting lovedelic because "no lynch" is the one option guaranteed not to catch a baddie. Come on!

hey, i'm gonna change it! thellama73

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:Well, I recommend that some peeps try to be more subtle with their "checks". I was just lazy and wanted to be conspicuous to get the ball rolling. A healthy mix of obvious claims and more subtle ones should make it difficult for the mafia to find the real cop.

Even if I am the cop, my G-Man check might have been fake. If so, I will leave clues as to who I really checked.

Sloonei wrote:are votes changeable?

Did you not bother to read the rules?

On the next... Arrested Development:

Buster starts a gambit to catch the traitor... but as to be expected, it is contrived in execution, warranting suspicion from the authorities. Turnip Head

What's contrived about it? "Contrived" is the word I'd use to describe Sloonei's post. If he wanted to know if votes were changeable, why didn't he read the rules to see? It's literally the first one.

The question seems to have been asked for the sake of asking it, or to telegraph his next move, as if to say "I'm going to vote right now, but I want everyone to be aware that it can be changed and that I am aware it can be changed". I've asked meaningless questions early in games when I've been bad before, to appear like I care about the game, which is why it caught me eye.

lovedelic wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:

lovedelic wrote:

Elohcin wrote:Lovedelic, did I miss your reason behind voting no lynch? Seems maybe you could bebas and not happy lynching anyone without conspiring with your team first.

can't conspire during the day phase anyway so simmer down

You noticeably avoided her question. Why did you vote No Lynch?

i threw out a vote but changed my mind, okay? it was for llama

What made you change your mind between casting your vote for Llama and changing it to No Lynch? You made no post about either vote, so you can understand my confusion.

also OMG llama is gob

my god i'm on the right track THE READ

lovedelic wrote:also OMG llama is gob

my god i'm on the right track THE READ

I think Llama is George Sr. and Rico is GOB

Turnip Head wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:Well, I recommend that some peeps try to be more subtle with their "checks". I was just lazy and wanted to be conspicuous to get the ball rolling. A healthy mix of obvious claims and more subtle ones should make it difficult for the mafia to find the real cop.

Even if I am the cop, my G-Man check might have been fake. If so, I will leave clues as to who I really checked.

Sloonei wrote:are votes changeable?

Did you not bother to read the rules?

On the next... Arrested Development:

Buster starts a gambit to catch the traitor... but as to be expected, it is contrived in execution, warranting suspicion from the authorities. Turnip Head

What's contrived about it? "Contrived" is the word I'd use to describe Sloonei's post. If he wanted to know if votes were changeable, why didn't he read the rules to see? It's literally the first one.

The question seems to have been asked for the sake of asking it, or to telegraph his next move, as if to say "I'm going to vote right now, but I want everyone to be aware that it can be changed and that I am aware it can be changed". I've asked meaningless questions early in games when I've been bad before, to appear like I care about the game, which is why it caught me eye.

The answer to Buster's inquiry could be boiled down to a matter of disbelief due to the election to disclose the green peek, only to withdraw it after others followed suit, with a denouncement of the method. Even this narrator doesn't believe that acting.

Nonetheless, Buster impressed with his articulations regarding his brother-in-law, giving the rest of the family something to ponder over as they consider their next move.

Turnip Head wrote:

lovedelic wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:

lovedelic wrote:

Elohcin wrote:Lovedelic, did I miss your reason behind voting no lynch? Seems maybe you could bebas and not happy lynching anyone without conspiring with your team first.

can't conspire during the day phase anyway so simmer down

You noticeably avoided her question. Why did you vote No Lynch?

i threw out a vote but changed my mind, okay? it was for llama

What made you change your mind between casting your vote for Llama and changing it to No Lynch? You made no post about either vote, so you can understand my confusion.

idk it was a guess. i was afraid it might be wrong but now i think i'm on the right track. i regret the no lynch vote

G-Man wrote:I don't want to be rude but Ricochet sounds like he might be a moron jock. He might get my vote today. I don't want to vote for any of my family members just yet. I'm not that rebellious.

RICK OCHÉ! \o/

lovedelic wrote:i've made a huge mistake

Do I know you?

Turnip Head wrote:

lovedelic wrote:also OMG llama is gob

my god i'm on the right track THE READ

I think Llama is George Sr. and Rico is GOB

RICK OCHÉ! \o/

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:Well, I recommend that some peeps try to be more subtle with their "checks". I was just lazy and wanted to be conspicuous to get the ball rolling. A healthy mix of obvious claims and more subtle ones should make it difficult for the mafia to find the real cop.

Even if I am the cop, my G-Man check might have been fake. If so, I will leave clues as to who I really checked.

Sloonei wrote:are votes changeable?

Did you not bother to read the rules?

On the next... Arrested Development:

Buster starts a gambit to catch the traitor... but as to be expected, it is contrived in execution, warranting suspicion from the authorities. Turnip Head

What's contrived about it? "Contrived" is the word I'd use to describe Sloonei's post. If he wanted to know if votes were changeable, why didn't he read the rules to see? It's literally the first one.

The question seems to have been asked for the sake of asking it, or to telegraph his next move, as if to say "I'm going to vote right now, but I want everyone to be aware that it can be changed and that I am aware it can be changed". I've asked meaningless questions early in games when I've been bad before, to appear like I care about the game, which is why it caught me eye.

The answer to Buster's inquiry could be boiled down to a matter of disbelief due to the election to disclose the green peek, only to withdraw it after others followed suit, with a denouncement of the method. Even this narrator doesn't believe that acting.

Nonetheless, Buster impressed with his articulations regarding his brother-in-law, giving the rest of the family something to ponder over as they consider their next move.

I denounced nothing. I merely offered up other avenues for people to reveal their peaks. I'm not sure what you think I could gain from that as a baddie ploy.

Suddenly, a manuscript fell out of thin air, containing the following notes:

Ron Howard's voice wrote:List of actors and characters:
a2thezebra - Ann
DrWilgy - ?????
Elohcin - ?????
G-Man - George-Michael Bluth
lovedelic - George Bluth Sr.
Metalmarsh89 - Michael Bluth
MovingPictures07 - The Narrator
Ricochet - Steve Holt
Sloonei - Tobias Funke
Spacedaisy - Maeby Funke
Sorsha - Lucille Bluth
thellama73 - G.O.B Bluth
Turnip Head - Buster Bluth

A red pen could serve as a handy way for the family to track any changes.

lovedelic wrote:

thellama73 wrote:I'm voting lovedelic because "no lynch" is the one option guaranteed not to catch a baddie. Come on!

hey, i'm gonna change it! thellama73

Sure, vote for the guy in $6,000 suit.

Turnip Head wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:
The answer to Buster's inquiry could be boiled down to a matter of disbelief due to the election to disclose the green peek, only to withdraw it after others followed suit, with a denouncement of the method. Even this narrator doesn't believe that acting.

Nonetheless, Buster impressed with his articulations regarding his brother-in-law, giving the rest of the family something to ponder over as they consider their next move.

I denounced nothing. I merely offered up other avenues for people to reveal their peaks. I'm not sure what you think I could gain from that as a baddie ploy.

Buster's contributions to the traitor hunt appeared increasingly persuasive, although his actions still warrant healthy suspicion from the authorities, and this narrator is still confused as to his motivation.

The family was anxious to hear from the resident doctor, DrWilgy. Will this man be as literal as one the family had encountered a few times prior? Tune in next week to find out!

Turnip Head wrote:

lovedelic wrote:also OMG llama is gob

my god i'm on the right track THE READ

I think Llama is George Sr. and Rico is GOB

i dont know if youre being serious

rico is

Give me that manuscript!
*marks out the question marks and writes down Lindsey*

Lovedelic, what is your mafia history?

lovedelic wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:

lovedelic wrote:also OMG llama is gob

my god i'm on the right track THE READ

I think Llama is George Sr. and Rico is GOB

i dont know if youre being serious

rico is

Spoiler: show

GOB'S BASTARD CHILD \o/

Yeah I know, I figured that out afterwards

MovingPictures07 wrote:Suddenly, a manuscript fell out of thin air, containing the following notes:

Ron Howard's voice wrote:List of actors and characters:
a2thezebra - Ann
DrWilgy - ?????
Elohcin - ?????
G-Man - George-Michael Bluth
lovedelic - George Bluth Sr.
Metalmarsh89 - Michael Bluth
MovingPictures07 - The Narrator
Ricochet - Steve Holt
Sloonei - Tobias Funke
Spacedaisy - Maeby Funke
Sorsha - Lucille Bluth
thellama73 - G.O.B Bluth
Turnip Head - Buster Bluth

A red pen could serve as a handy way for the family to track any changes.

Here are some familiar names that I don't see on this list:

Lindsay Bluth-Funke
Annyong
Ann Veal
Barry Zuckerhorn
Kitty Sanchez
Lucille 2
Lupe
Oscar Bluth

With only two slots open, who do you think makes sense to be hanging around? Someone already claimed they were Annyong, I think. I may indeed have to vote for Ricochet if everyone else here is related to me. I can't imagine turning on my family like that. Maybe I should ask my dad what he thinks I should do.

Unfortunately for the show's audience, the show's reboot budget allotted a particularly low portion of the salary to its outstanding narrator. This measly salary would be more fitting for the narrator of Scandalmakers, a show known for the narrator's inattention to detail. Real shoddy narrating. Just pure crap.

As a result, subsequent scenes will be aired without the narrator's flawless commentary.

G-Man wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Suddenly, a manuscript fell out of thin air, containing the following notes:

Ron Howard's voice wrote:List of actors and characters:
a2thezebra - Ann
DrWilgy - ?????
Elohcin - ?????
G-Man - George-Michael Bluth
lovedelic - George Bluth Sr.
Metalmarsh89 - Michael Bluth
MovingPictures07 - The Narrator
Ricochet - Steve Holt
Sloonei - Tobias Funke
Spacedaisy - Maeby Funke
Sorsha - Lucille Bluth
thellama73 - G.O.B Bluth
Turnip Head - Buster Bluth

A red pen could serve as a handy way for the family to track any changes.

Here are some familiar names that I don't see on this list:

Lindsay Bluth-Funke
Annyong
Ann Veal
Barry Zuckerhorn
Kitty Sanchez
Lucille 2
Lupe
Oscar Bluth

With only two slots open, who do you think makes sense to be hanging around? Someone already claimed they were Annyong, I think. I may indeed have to vote for Ricochet if everyone else here is related to me. I can't imagine turning on my family like that. Maybe I should ask my dad what he thinks I should do.

Lucky you, having a family to put your trust in. I've no dad. I only have myself. \o/

The Narrator missed out, apparently, on lovedelic trying out several voices throughtout the game so far. Slip of a remark or intentionally forgetful?