The Syndicate

S~V~S wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

Long Con wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

Long Con wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:Yeah, yesterday and yesterday only.

You are not going to win this "who is lying?" debate, friend. Especially when someone comes forward and tells us that Natasha forced their vote in the last lynch.

Well if that happens and I'm lynched we will know even more of the baddies. So they can come and this'll be fun!

Unless I was right and I'm going to die tonight. Where you really trying to send the moose after me to prevent any anti NK shenanigans?
Even if that's the case, peabody just needs to check me :P

I don't think the other players are that unaware of the roles, to believe that there is one that becomes more vulnerable when roleblocked. What anti NK shenanigans are you referring to? And I ask this knowing I'm feeding the troll at this point - no offense to you personally, of course... but we both know that this is a line of bullsuit.

@bea: Yes, yesterday was the last lynch, and it is the one I'm talking about. The lynch that Wilgy and I are both claiming to have been seduced by Natasha is the lynch before that. I'm interested in finding out who was seduced into voting someone during the last lynch.

LC, you aren't thinkin big enough. What if I'm Nell and you wanna take down the force fields? What if I'm narrator and you don't want me to attempt to re-direct?

Are you saying you could be Nell?

Yes. I could be anyone. Who do you think I am?

I take it we have two votes in the poll today? And are votes changeable?

Sloonei wrote:I take it we have two votes in the poll today? And are votes changeable?

Yes, and yes.

thellama73 wrote:

Sloonei wrote:I take it we have two votes in the poll today? And are votes changeable?

Yes, and yes.

Also, in case it isn't clear, vote for ONE person to lynch and ONE location. Don't try to vote for two people. It won't work.

So I can't vote for DrWilgy in Long Con?

Put my votes on SVS and folklore. SVS because because of my Scotty analysis yesterday and her uninspiring response to it, and folklore because folklore is neat.

I'm not sure I believe either Wilgy or Long Con is lying. It's possible they're both telling the truth. I certainly don't know what motive there'd be for Long Con to make his claim up, and Wilgy's claim also seems to have some truth to it.

Sloonei wrote:Put my votes on SVS and folklore. SVS because because of my Scotty analysis yesterday and her uninspiring response to it, and folklore because folklore is neat.

How did you expect me to reply to it? If Scotty was kissing up to me, that makes me bad how?

Do you have an opinion on Sorsha?

DrWilgy wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

Long Con wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

Long Con wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:Yeah, yesterday and yesterday only.

You are not going to win this "who is lying?" debate, friend. Especially when someone comes forward and tells us that Natasha forced their vote in the last lynch.

Well if that happens and I'm lynched we will know even more of the baddies. So they can come and this'll be fun!

Unless I was right and I'm going to die tonight. Where you really trying to send the moose after me to prevent any anti NK shenanigans?
Even if that's the case, peabody just needs to check me :P

I don't think the other players are that unaware of the roles, to believe that there is one that becomes more vulnerable when roleblocked. What anti NK shenanigans are you referring to? And I ask this knowing I'm feeding the troll at this point - no offense to you personally, of course... but we both know that this is a line of bullsuit.

@bea: Yes, yesterday was the last lynch, and it is the one I'm talking about. The lynch that Wilgy and I are both claiming to have been seduced by Natasha is the lynch before that. I'm interested in finding out who was seduced into voting someone during the last lynch.

LC, you aren't thinkin big enough. What if I'm Nell and you wanna take down the force fields? What if I'm narrator and you don't want me to attempt to re-direct?

Are you saying you could be Nell?

Yes. I could be anyone. Who do you think I am?

I know who i think you are not, lol. Otherwise, not sure.

S~V~S wrote:

Sloonei wrote:Put my votes on SVS and folklore. SVS because because of my Scotty analysis yesterday and her uninspiring response to it, and folklore because folklore is neat.

How did you expect me to reply to it? If Scotty was kissing up to me, that makes me bad how?

Do you have an opinion on Sorsha?

I've only played with her briefly in a couple of heists, but sue's been less visible here than in either of those games. I'm not sure I view that as an indicator of her alignment in anyway, but I also haven't had as much time to review everything in this game as I normally do.

What did you mean when you said you're "susceptible to buddying"? That seemed like a very passive way to shrug off my case.

S~V~S wrote:I know who i think you are not, lol. Otherwise, not sure.

What do you think of Long Con then?

Bye

I'm about to surpass my post count from this game in Battle of the Hosts already and I don't know how to feel about that.

Voting Wilgy. Final answer. He is bad.

Oh, and I'll go for Mr Knowledge as well.

Ha ha I'm lame. Mr Know-It-All.

You sound more sure than Wilgy, and dropped that vote down hard. He has been here since the poll ended and had he really thought you were lying, I think he would have voted for you immediately. That would be in line with how he acted in Recruitment when he had info that I was bad, and he did not dick around, he voted.

So Wilgy will get my vote as well.

And poetry <3

S~V~S wrote:You sound more sure than Wilgy, and dropped that vote down hard. He has been here since the poll ended and had he really thought you were lying, I think he would have voted for you immediately. That would be in line with how he acted in Recruitment when he had info that I was bad, and he did not dick around, he voted.

So Wilgy will get my vote as well.

So I'm bad for taking time to think about all the angles? I actually had info on you for almost a full day cycle before I stated anything in recruitment SVS. If I condemn anyone I need to be sure about my actions and do them confidently.

Long con problems I see.
1. The only role that can send a message would be fearless leader, meaning if you got a message from themyou would be bad.
2. Natasha can't pm.
3. I didn't receive a pm other than host instruction.

Adding to the conundrum is that LC, stated it was mock russian type lingo. Which matches Scotty's parting words.

The confusion... Would mafia set up a situation where counter claims are possible? Would they say "hey I received a message" when only baddies receive messages. The elaborate ploy I see here is LC being Natasha, not submitting an action and then claiming they were Natasha'd. This would make sense in the case where LC has never seen what the recipient of his target receives. The spookiest part, is that if anyone were to do something like that, I think it would be LC to do it.

If you are voting me, do you think I was on Scotty's team, wanting to bus him? Also, where's the natasha counter claim? Not even bothering to wait on that one LC?

thellama73 wrote:You know, all this talk about host PMs is dangerously close to breaking Rule #4.

Forgive me Llama, I will strafe away and just say that comparing what LC stated to my own experience. I think there's a Marmot in these woods.

In my own defense, "no reproduction" doesn't mean the same thing to me as "no discussion". When I brought up the nature of the PM that I supposedly received (nod to Wilgy) and gave an example, it was just some top-of-my-head text that matched the stylistic quality of the PM, I didn't reproduce anything directly, except a word that matched here or there. Or maybe Llama is talking to Wilgy, and I'm the liar who's tagging along with my own fake part of the conversation! Only you can decide!

But I did have a dual-title for the day's event, so I think that alone deserves some merit.

I'm not voting for DrWilgy or S~V~S today.

Elohcin and Folklore.

boop, on to the next thread:

i guess all i have to ask right now is, what was up with your earlier posts, DrWilgy? They seemed overly confident, or something, if i remember right

bea wrote:I'm confused? Isn't yesterday the last lynch?

bea could you explain the question being asked here?

Long Con wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

Long Con wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:Yeah, yesterday and yesterday only.

You are not going to win this "who is lying?" debate, friend. Especially when someone comes forward and tells us that Natasha forced their vote in the last lynch.

Well if that happens and I'm lynched we will know even more of the baddies. So they can come and this'll be fun!

Unless I was right and I'm going to die tonight. Where you really trying to send the moose after me to prevent any anti NK shenanigans?
Even if that's the case, peabody just needs to check me :P

I don't think the other players are that unaware of the roles, to believe that there is one that becomes more vulnerable when roleblocked. What anti NK shenanigans are you referring to? And I ask this knowing I'm feeding the troll at this point - no offense to you personally, of course... but we both know that this is a line of bullsuit.

@bea: Yes, yesterday was the last lynch, and it is the one I'm talking about. The lynch that Wilgy and I are both claiming to have been seduced by Natasha is the lynch before that. I'm interested in finding out who was seduced into voting someone during the last lynch.

nevermind, LC's response is fine

@Zebra, is the reason youre voting elo simply because youre suspicious and dont want to vote SVS or wilgy?

I don't even know what to say about Zebra anymore.

LC supposedly lies. I'm surprised he isn't getting more flak about that.

I'm going t reread a few people in light of Scotty and then vote.

sprityo wrote:i guess all i have to ask right now is, what was up with your earlier posts, DrWilgy? They seemed overly confident, or something, if i remember right

Which ones?

Yesterday when I voted for SVS I said look at her iso for her Scotty content, I know it was lazy of me to say that but I usually play on my phone and its really hard to multi-quote and highlight things that way. I don't think any of you took the time to actually look though

So here they are... these are all from the last voting phase:

S~V~S wrote:Of the people with votes, I think Scotty DOES have a baddie game. I am not sure I am seeing it here. I don't think Eloh is bad either. A reread of her knowing what we know now did me a world of good there. I recommend it, Zebra & Wilgy.

Wilgy on the other hand is giving me heeebies, maybe even jeebies. I should be finished catching up and able to vote over my AM coffee at work.

S~V~S wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

S~V~S wrote:Of the people with votes, I think Scotty DOES have a baddie game. I am not sure I am seeing it here.

Can you elaborate?

It is hard to explain; he just *feels* jabbier to me when he's bad, not unlike how I view LC when he's bad; he makes little one liner pokes at people for reasons I don't fathom. Which isn't to say *I* have to fathom everyone elses thoughts. But in LOST Again I read Scottys posts with my forehead scrinched up and one eyebrow almost in my hairline. In LOST Again, I could pretty much pull him out of a hat after a few posts. I am not seeing it as much here. He danced around it a bit more, IMO. Here he is pretty much sticking to his guns. He looks totally different to me than he looked in that game, and more like he does in the games I have seen him mislynched.

BUT God knows I could be wrong, though; see the last 2 lynches. My civ game always goes off the rails when I have to defend before I get a chance to settle in to the thread.

@Bea, yeah I kinda agree. But even if Llama were to allow votes for Matt (and in the past he has not cut replacements slack iirc) I would feel better letting him settle in. Replacing into a role taking suspish is not easy.

Which reminds me, I don't know about anyone else, but I thought Suspish-Gate in GOC was hilarious.

The above quote is I why I think Epi got killed. I think Epi was on to the Scotty/SVS connection as well. So the pink is her once again softly defending him based on past meta reasons. Then the blue is leaving herself a way out when she is wrong.

S~V~S wrote:Scotty is not in the house. I hope you guys are right. He looks very different to me than he did in LOST Again, but that is my only basis for comparison.

Again with the soft defense followed by the "but" she could point at later... not sure how many no-shows we had that lynch (i know bea missed it) but I think this last post was for the sake of them to get any last minute straggler voters to push over to WIlgy instead of Scotty.

Voting for SVS

I think both SVS and Long Con could be bad. As I said, I've had squirrely feelings about SVS ever since her reaction to me defending her on day 1. She is one of the people I have chosen to reread in light of Scotty flipping bad and I think its pretty clear they were probably teammates.

Then I see linki from Sorsha. Yeah, voting SVS. And I'll vote for the everything lesson.

Go for it!

And guys when it is over,remember who voted for me.

Sorsha is bad. I am sure of it. And Wilgy more likely than LC.

Sloonei, Sorsha & Elohcin so far.

I feel OK about Elohcin. She should have stuck to her original thoughts & trusted me though. Sorsha is bad. Sloonei... he also was against lynching FL. But one of Wilgy/LC have to be lying. So less sure about that.

Gonna post this awesome dance for everyone while they are voting

sprityo wrote:

bea wrote:I'm confused? Isn't yesterday the last lynch?

bea could you explain the question being asked here?

I was confused by the time line being laid out so I asked for clarification. Wilgy said he'd been natasha targeted yesterday and lc said he wanted to hear who had been targeted the last lynch. I thought they were the same thing. I've also been more drunk than sober since roughly 7 pm my time saturday. Yay hubby's birthday!

Imma vote svs. And imma pout about it.

Also I have better feels about lc than Wilgy for reasons that should be obvious.

Oh also poetry.

bea wrote:Imma vote svs. And imma pout about it.

Really??

Can you tell me why? YOu ate the person Imost expected to be able to see me for what I am.

you ARE, not ate,lol.

I am hoping you come back to tell me why. Becasue I think you know I am not bad.

Blargh, I've been battling the first true stomach bug I've had in ages (aches, nausea, the works) all day, so I apologize that I'm not up to optimal playing tonight. One of my kids must've prayed a liiiiiiittle too hard to not have to present their Odyssey project today. Or tomorrow.

Many of the people up for votes and being discussed are tricky tricky. My brain hurts along with my head sorting that out. Gonna vote SVS because she's one of those and I like Sorsha's point, and even though I'll be around the house tomorrow morning, I'm hoping I sleep through the morning :P Sorry for the cloudy, piss-poor explanation. Back to bed with me.

Wow.

Oh, and voting poetry. I thought about Know-All lessons, but I just like poetry too damned much

Iam so looking forward to the lynch post. And to hearing beas explanation.

OH! Maybe she was forced. I forgot about that.I feel better now.

I have stuff to do. After I flip civ (and I will ) lynch Sorsha.

S~V~S wrote:I am hoping you come back to tell me why. Becasue I think you know I am not bad.

I don't think you are bad. I voted you anyway. Nuff said? Was hoping you'd pick up on it because I'm pouty about it and also I took a stance re:lc and wilgy.